Comments by "UzuMaki NaRuto" (@UzumakiNaruto_) on "Task & Purpose" channel.

@Freeukraine45 I'd rather have the Stugna than the Kornet. Not having to be near the launcher and also being able to aim with a display is so much better.
36
Javelins are much better and the Ukrainians themselves have also been using their own built Stugna anti-tank missiles with great effect so far and it seems to be more modern and much lighter than the TOW.
11
@joseantonioliguori4976 Cappy didn't say that he was in support of sacrificing freedom of speech to come together against a common enemy, he said that he was afraid that that was what's already starting to happen and if that wasn't signaling that things were getting worse.
10
@joseantonioliguori4976 "And that scares me". He's saying this personally. He uses "we" in reference to the NEED to sacrifice freedom of speech, to band together, and defeat a common enemy. To me he's saying he's scared that that's happening rather than actually advocating for sacrificing freedom of speech to fight a common enemy.
9
@Stormie Wutzke Russian army isn't completely incompetent, but they certainly aren't the big Russian bear that we've been told that we should all be super scared over. They're still a formidable force and it seems like after underestimating the Ukrainians and their will to fight and resist that they're now learning from their mistakes and will be smarter on how they attack in the future. Hopefully the Ukrainians are also learning and will be continued to be supplied to keep the fight going even if their conventional forces eventually fall.
8
@sl9wdive The west has been weak politically and on the home front for decades, but have been strong militarily for many decades. Countries like Russia have been strong politically and weak militarily. The US and NATO can crush any enemy that opposes them. The problem is that they have often been hesitant to use all that military power even when its necessary to do so like with Ukraine. Who knows how much better the Ukrainian forces would be doing right now and how much land they could've retaken if NATO had been strong from Day 1 of the invasion in helping Ukraine push Russia out of their country.
8
F-15 is still one of the most beautiful fighter jets ever after all these years. Good to see that it will still be in service for years to come. 😘😍🥰😍😍😘
4
@Ted-Stryker What western propaganda was Cappy parroting?
3
@bobbeel3255 Zelensky is brave for staying, but really does he have a choice? If he left when he was offered or he leaves now, how would his fellow Ukrainians ever forgive him or take him back as their leader if he left his people to fight while he flew away to safety? He'd likely be done in Ukraine and also it may affect the morale of his troops and people.
2
Probably because if Ukraine gathered any large armored force together it would quickly get smashed by Russian airpower. If you don't have air superiority you're severely restricted in what you can do without getting bombed from the skies.
2
If you're only thinking about defending your country then tanks are probably less needed, but if you're thinking about any kind of serious offensive operations then tanks will still be needed. Tank armor might still be able to be improved and probably more likely in the future they may just make tanks be remotely controlled like drones are so that you can send a tank and its firepower into dangerous situations and not have to worry about a crew being killed.
2
@Elthenar Sometimes in the US, we forget that other peoples don't always have the same values as us and we can't force them. We should've learned LONG AGO that most muslim and black nations are hopeless causes when it comes to trying to build a stable and peaceful country where their people can start to improve their lives. In most of those nations the people there seem to care more about their tribe or gangs than they do for their country and trying to teach them to run a nation is largely a waste of time.
2
@Joseph-eh4rs If those generals are right then why are the Russians still making progress instead of being stopped in their tracks? Have the Russians perhaps under estimated the ability of the Ukrainian army's abilities and the Ukrainians' will to fight? Perhaps. Are they not advancing as quickly as hoped and taking more casualties than expected? Probably. But are they still pushing on and making slow but steady progress towards their objectives while the Ukrainian army is still only able to hang on without being able to counter attack? Yes. So no matter how 'embarrassing' the invasion has gone for the Russians in the first couple of weeks, their numbers and firepower are still making the difference and who knows how much longer the Ukrainian forces can hold out before they breakup and have to continue fighting as a guerilla force.
2
@FarmerDrew Thank you for talking about this, Cappy! I bring it up in church regularly. Their religious freedom is our religious freedom, with the way the world is headed towards an intersection. There's a difference between religious freedom and allowing a segment of your population to run wild because you're too afraid of being called 'racist' and not doing anything to fix the problem before it gets out of control. Just look at the Paris riots and all the other attacks that never stop by certain minorities in western countries? That's what China is tackling head on and getting under control while western leaders are trying to find ways to not blame Muslims and Africans for all the violence and crime they cause because they don't want to be seen as 'racist' and 'intolerant' at the expense of putting innocent people in constant danger with their lack of action.
2
@jamielonsdale3018 *The difference with the US is much of the indigenous population was wiped out during colonialism and the 'manifestation of destiny' * Well that's what happens when you're not strong enough to protect your land and people from attackers whether they be foreigners or your next door neighboring tribes. Its what's been happening since the beginning of human history where the strong survive.
2
@rumo893 If I were in charge of Ukrainian forces, I'd be using this small number of Bradleys as command vehicles where it would stay farther back and use its superior optics and thermals to spot the enemy and direct a platoon of BMP to focus their fire on and if need be use TOW missiles to take out armor or other enemy targets. Give each platoon of say 4 BMPs a Bradley to coordinate their efforts and you can probably make better use of them until more Bradleys and other western IFVs enter service in larger numbers.
2
@peterpike We can stick our head in the sand and insist that we have the power to impose a No Fly Zone all we want, but the reality is the only way for NATO to put in a No Fly Zone is to defeat the current No Fly Zone imposed on NATO first. NATO definitely has the airforces necessary to take out the Russian airforce. The US airforce could likely do it on its own. If there's one thing that NATO excels at its air power and between their aircraft, training and weaponry, I don't think the Russians have a chance if NATO really wanted to impose a no fly zone over Ukraine. Any ground to air defenses that the Russians have will get taken out in short order whether it be from airstrikes and/or from missile attacks.
2
@ljubastojanovic608 Shut down by Russian missiles system created in early 60s combined with old type chinese radar. Seemed that F-117 was not invisible at all? "Sorry, we didnt know it was invisible" was Serbian reaction. After this war F-117 was put out of service, even this was first plain lost. You do realize that alot of luck was involved in shooting down the F117. Namely there were 3 F117s flying a mission that night and only one was detected when it had its weapons bay open to drop its bombs. So the aircraft did its job and was barely detectable until it exposed itself slightly to drop its weapons on target.
2
I seriously doubt videos found on Youtube are going to make much of a difference in how the Russians might deal with a Stryker in the future when its such a lightly armored vehicle.
1
Ukrainians already did stop the Russian onslaught and they're getting slaughtered themselves. If the Russians are so unstoppable then why are they measuring success by how many towns they can take over months of fighting? Its been close to an entire year and the Russians are still stuck and Bakhmut where now they might've finally taken it. Damn what progress! 🤣😅😂🤣😅🤣
1
Well thankfully with the size of the US and its military budget they have the best of both worlds. Nations like Russia and China might have quantity on their side, but they still lag behind the US in quality and technology. Most western countries have the quality, but they lack the quantity that the US has in troops and equipment. The US is so large and powerful that it can pursue both and not face many disadvantages from it other than spending tons of money.
1
@LocalDeepstateAgent I think many of the sanctions implemented will have a significant affect on Russia just that it may take abit of time and of course the average Russian will feel it the most. I know Putin expected sanctions of course, but not sure if he expected the global response would be so great and so quick. The longer the war goes on, the more hurt Russia will be and then lets see what the Russians will do then.
1
Well as stated in the video Javelins are somewhat fragile missiles and perhaps they got damaged before they were used and hence malfunctioned.
1
Until the Ukrainians can receive western tanks and IFVs in large numbers, its probably best just to spread them out and use them as command vehicles to take charge of BMP platoons. Say for example one Bradley per 4 BMPs so that each platoon of BMPs has a Bradley to spot and direct their fire for them while using their cannon and TOWs for support fire.
1
@reubenmorris487 Many of the problems that western nations face such as migrants have been self-inflicted. So many issues could've been avoided or minimized if western countries weren't run by idiot politicians who seem hell bent on ruining their modern, largely peaceful and prosperous societies.
1
They might win the conventional war, but its not likely the Russians will win in the long term as long as Ukrainians are committed to fighting a neverending guerilla war like the Taliban or Viet Cong.
1
Pretty sad that many countries have to spend more money on defense just because a few other nations are hostile and insist on being threats to more peaceful countries.
1
The difference is that Dunkirk to the English coast is about 34km while the Chinese coast to Taiwan is like 160km. It would be surprising to see the Chinese being capable to launch a major seaborn invasion over such a distance under enemy fire and succeed anytime soon.
1
You too can help Ukraine by going there to join the fight!
1
@Skinwalkerxiv Lets be real. If the Palestinians weren't fighting the Israelis, they'd just go back to fighting among themselves for power and resources like so many Muslims do. Muslims are good at uniting to fight a common enemy and then they turn on each other when there's no one left to fight. At least the Jews have done something good with the land they're living on and have created modern society there. Give Israel to the Palestinians and they would turn it into a craphole in a few short years.
1
@josedorsaith5261 Russia is definitely not running with large amounts of tanks and other armored vehicles if they're not capable of launching large scale mobile attacks anymore. If they were capable they wouldn't still be crawling forward after massive bombardments of their enemies. They'd be exploiting any gaps and pushing past Ukrainian front lines to try and encircle and destroy Ukrainian forces on a large scale. So while the Russians are pretty far away from running out of resources and men to fight in this war, they're definitely not anywhere as near effective as they were at the beginning of the war and they won't be for years to come.
1
Why can't 'fog of war' have more than one meaning?
1
7:04 poor bird. Must've been scared to hell with rockets suddenly launching just a few feet away from it. 😥😥😥😥😥
1
Now that's it's an artillery war , a war the Russian Army is equipped and trained to fight, a lot of the tactical ineptitude we saw during the first 6 weeks will stop. Only thing that will stop Russian ineptitude is if their troops get better trained and their leaders become smarter which they seem to have become to a degree right now. Artillery only helps the Russians in reducing their own casualties while inflicting casualties on the enemy. So Putin has to defeat Ukraine and install his own government. That's what he tried to do in the first week of the war and failed. That time has passed and completely defeating Ukraine and removing Zelensky is impossible as long as western support keeps flowing into the country. The best Putin can do now is gain some ground in Ukraine and hope that he's able to hold it and negotiate to keep it.
1
I'd would say its difficult if not impossible for Chinese troops to be worst trained than the Russians and with all the money they're pouring into their military, I'd find it difficult to believe that their equipment isn't as good or better than what the Russians have.
1
@WasabiSniffer i can understand why china/West Taiwan wants to secure the region but the way they want to go about it is absolutely despicable. what's more is that the rest of the world is letting it happen. You've already seen time and again how western countries trying to deal with violent Muslims and Africans has turned out and you want China to do the same and get the same results? China faced many terror attacks from Uyghurs in the past 10-15 years that have killed hundreds which no one likes to talk about and unless you take drastic action there would be no end in sight. All you have to do is look at India and all the unrest, violence and disorder because they're unable to deal with their problems and get them under control.
1
Well its not like Ukrainian men were allowed to leave the country anyways. 😜
1