Comments by "UzuMaki NaRuto" (@UzumakiNaruto_) on "Ukraine. Military Summary And Analysis 29.07.2022" video.

  1. @Learn ing People have already identified several of these soldiers and where they came from and its confirmed they're apart of the Russian army. I know it sucks to see soldiers from your side doing such horrible things, but at least acknowledge it rather than trying to cover up their crimes just because they happen to be on 'your team'.
    4
  2.  @GeraldM_inNC  They're only able to make small gains because they've lost so much of their combat power and armored vehicles. Short of throwing much more men and resources into the fight, I doubt that the Russians will be able to launch any large armored offensive like they did at the beginning of the invasion anytime soon.
    2
  3.  @cruiser6260  When it comes to 'demilitarizing' the Russians are doing it to themselves far better than they're doing it to the Ukrainians. And lets not lie and say the Russians didn't want to take the entire Ukraine at the beginning. If they wanted to take only the east they would've launched all their forces there instead of wasting thousands of lives trying to take Kiev and removing Zelensky.
    2
  4.  @jacobjorgenson9285  Russians are reduced to advancing WWI style. Use massive artillery and missile strikes and then advance little by little forward because they've lost much of their ability to launch anymore armored attacks due do so many losses during the initial phase of the invasion. So yeah they're advancing still, but nothing like what it use to be and they're not likely to get significant territory anytime soon unless they throw a ton more troops and equipment into the fight.
    2
  5.  @oknevals  You are obviously very clueless. First, Ukrainian losses are massive approaching 1000 man on heavy fighting days. Their armor is decimated and they are only surviving due to Western supply and RU moving slowly to avoid losses but also by operating with small force. If you believe that Ukrainian troop losses are huge, then you have to believe that Russian losses are as bad or even worse because attackers usually lose more going on the offense. Also Ukrainians didn't have a large armored force for Russia to decimate to begin with which is why their ability to launch a major attack like they're trying in Kherson is more like what the Russians are now doing. Namely gradual and over a period of time. On the otherhand the Russians have lost ALOT of vehicles and weapons systems including almost 1,000 tanks and these only losses that have been visually confirmed which means their actual losses are even higher. Think about that for a moment. Almost 1,000 tanks and over 5,000 other vehicle losses in about 5 months of fighting. Is it any wonder why they're now reduced to such a slow advance these days? This is war of artillery which is exactly what I expected from the start. I've been in something similar just on much smaller scale in every aspect. This was suppose to be a relative short campaign fought with a mobile army for the Russians until they screwed things up and lost so many of their vehicles that have no choice but to use more artillery and advance at a slow pace along a small portion of the front. Unless the Russians commit far more forces to the fight, their days of having large advances are pretty much over and if the Ukrainians and the west can build up UA forces properly then they can take back at least some of what they lost.
    1
  6.  @oknevals  You parroting some bullshit propaganda narrative only shows that you have no clue what you are talking about. I don't know about you, but I care more about the truth and accuracy than simply believing everything that supports the side that you cheer for. While I do support Ukraine and hope they can kick the Russians out, I'm more interested in seeing different perspectives and reading all the data and facts than simply cheering every Ukrainian victory and ignoring every setback and loss to them. I don't know maybe that's what you do when you're rooting for the Russians, but that's not what I do because what's the point? Its not like if you believe all the propaganda that it will change what's actually happening on the battlefield. Better to know the truth than to blindly support your side and later find out not everything was accurate. Just to add that that theory of attackers having higher losses is outdated just like the theory that attackers required at least three times more troops. Its not theory its fact that when you're fighting someone who is at about the same level as you, then you're probably going to suffer more than if you fight someone vastly inferior to you. The Ukrainians might be inferior in amount of equipment, but so far their troops have shown to be just as good if not better than Russian troops they're fighting. Modern warfare is all about survellance, manouver and firepower combined with air and anti-air support. Bunch of those armchair experts never had rifle in their hands. I agree and so far especially in the early phases of this invasion the Russians have shown that they were completely incompetent in combined arms fighting when they failed so hard to coordinating their armored advances with enough artillery and air support to clear out the UA forces in front of them who so effectively used anti-tank weapons to devastate their armored forces. The Russians seemed to have learned their lesson by now, but its far too late when they've lost so many armored vehicles that they no longer can carry out large scale mobile offensives anymore and are now only able to pound enemy forces in front of them with overwhelming firepower before advancing a short distance at best. Also I'm surprised that for someone who's supposedly been in the military that you don't mention logistics much because that's the life blood of every army in history and that's where the Russians are weakest and it was a major reason why their early invasion was so costly.
    1
  7.  @oknevals  Dude have fun staying in your pro-Russian bubble and believing the Russians are doing awesome.
    1