Comments by "UzuMaki NaRuto" (@UzumakiNaruto_) on "Ukraine. Military Summary And Analysis 25.09.2022" video.

  1.  @juliensalemkour5708  Despite the fact, that Putins words were totally misrepresented in Western media, I believe Russia could be inclined to use them, simply because they would get away with that, which would make NATO even more look like very weak. Who would look weaker? NATO for hypothetically not responding in kind to Russia using a nuke and using one in return? Or Russia for believing that their armed forces are so inferior and have been beaten so badly that they think there's no other choice but to use a nuke to try and change the direction of the war? I don't know about you, but I'd say it would be the latter. I can't ever imagine a scenario where the US gets beaten on the battlefield so brutally that they would have to resort to using nukes to save themselves from defeat. And we're not even talking about Russia getting beat by the US or NATO which would be understandable that the Russians would get desperate. We're talking about the Russians getting beat by the Ukrainians who don't have a fraction of the equipment that Russia has and they're still holding their own.
    2
  2. @Guus Ellenkamp Just because Russia declares something is theirs doesn't mean its theirs. If that's the case Germany should declare that they're taking Kaliningrad back from the Russians and kicking all the Russians out since it wasn't theirs to begin with. Konigsberg was a nice place until the Russians turned it into a poor place.
    1
  3.  @drumming-and-discipline  Without using nukes, how much more can the Russians use in Ukraine besides more manpower? Are they going to be able to throw in hundreds of more tanks and other armored vehicles? More aircraft? Doesn't seem like they can or want to do that. Even with the extra manpower coming in the next few weeks and months it doesn't seem like they're going to be using them for attacks, but rather to mostly stablize their lines and hold what they've taken.
    1
  4.  @drumming-and-discipline  The SMO has been a very limited operation mostly fought by Donetsk and Lugansk militia and Wagner Group and such. Are you serious? Do you really believe that? Because it makes absolutely no sense from a logic standpoint and from all the information that we have. Do you really believe that the Russians took a couple of hundred thousand DPR/LNR militia OUT OF Ukraine pre-invasion, trained them and then allowed them to crew some of the best tanks and armored vehicles that the Russians had to lead the invasion into Ukraine? Really?? LOL That would make zero sense and if that's what actually happened then that would mean the Russians were even MORE dumb and incompetent that they currently are showing. The facts clearly show that it was Russian troops leading the invasion as it should be. There's no indication at all that DPR/LNR militia played a major role in the initial offensives into Ukraine because they're likely not trained to undertake offensive armored operations, at least not competently although the Russians weren't all that competent either. The time that we first saw the DPR/LNR troops in any significant numbers was after the Kiev retreat and when the Donbas offensive began which would make sense since that's the territory that they were most interested in fighting for. This whole notion of Russian troops not being involved is just excuses to try and not show how they've been stopped by the Ukrainians and now even beaten back in some areas. We hardly saw anything Russian army until now. Did you see a lot of air power e.g.? When the (new) Russian territory is being attacked Russia will defend itself and the (whole) Russian army will be fully involved and take the lead. Ukraine will have no chance whatsoever then. I bet you a million dollars we're not going to see some massive increase in Russian airpower all of a sudden that's going along with this mobilization. I would be shocked to see the Russians suddenly be able to come up with hundreds of more jets and helicopters to support their troops when they didn't during this entire war so far. The Russians hadn't ever had air superiority in Ukrainian skies and they never will.
    1
  5.  @111076tom  They can't arm, move or supply a few houndred thousand men, and Dima fears a 5 million army!? Neither could the Russians which is why they're in this mess to begin with. If they had properly organized their logistics before invasion they would've done much better and gained more ground for much less cost.
    1
  6.  @ruparkyitin  Russia will hit US and Europe as well. On the one hand I wouldn't want this to happen and possibly see WWIII begin. On the other hand I would LOVE to see Russia attack NATO and promptly get their asses completely raped.
    1
  7.  @hamasmillitant1  yeah cause none of the want to mobilize, but if they dont then ukraine knows its on its own, they will send guns and debt but not their sons to fight and without more men they will inevitably lose The only thing stopping the Ukrainians beating the Russians right now isn't a lack of NATO troops. Its a lack of modern western weapons. Give the Ukrainians the proper weapons to fight with and Russia has little chance of winning unless they become pussies and use nukes.
    1