Comments by "UzuMaki NaRuto" (@UzumakiNaruto_) on "Ukraine. Military Summary And Analysis 11.10.2022" video.

@BohemianMarauder Honestly, if I were Russia I would keep the missile strikes going. Not doing so would just be naive. Ukraine won't be negotiating anytime soon, might as well go all out. Seriously if I were the Ukrainians I'd HOPE the missile strikes would keep going to civilian infrastructure because that means less missiles hitting military targets and frontline troops. And going by history bombing the hell out of the British civilians in WWII worked out really well for the Germans didn't it?
6
@Vypnox When Ukraine has all of their troops on the offensive, places like Kiev are not well defended Not nearly as many troops are needed to defend Kiev against Russian/Belarussian human waves of cannon fodder.
6
The war could end tomorrow if Russia decided to pull its troops out of Ukraine. How would Ukraine and the west continue the war then?
5
@cruiser6260 Normandy landing was only made possible by preventing German resupply by rail. Normandy landings was also made possible by having overwhelming air superiority as well as great numbers of troops, equipment and huge amounts of supplies. Bombing civilian infrastructure will hurt, but it won't break Ukrainian resolve to win and UA forces will find other ways to get their supplies to the front. Look at the Russians who have had their logistics severely damaged by Ukrainians. It hasn't completely stopped the Russians from completely getting supplies through to their troops, but it has gotten more difficult.
2
@zachariasobenauf1895 sure - after Ukraine revived all the killed and crippled LPR-DPR-civilians ... and paid the held-back pensions and the "small" reperations for their shelling "avtivities" You do realize that more Ukrainian civilians have been killed since Feb 24 when the invasion started than all 8 years since 2014 when the Donbas conflict started right? Yet somehow you don't mention that fact or care too much about them and call for justice for those innocent murdered people by the Russians. how the West could continue war ? with ease ... they did what they wanted for 70 years You mean the west FORCED the Russians to invade Ukraine and continue the invasion even when they're slowly but surely being pushed back and are forced to scramble and push for mobilization to prevent a potential complete disaster on the battlefield? The west pushed Putin and the Russians to do that? OK. 🙄🙄🙄🙄🙄🙄🙄
2
What battle for Kiev? I doubt there's going to be a second try anytime soon from Belarus area attacking into Ukraine again.
2
@anceldesingano8687 while destruction civilian infrastructure won’t hurt the resolve of Ukrainians but it will hurt for there logistics especially if Russia now going to hit there railway lane logistics that Ukraine desperate using this days Again you're assuming the Russian missiles can accurately hit what they're aiming for on a consistent basis which we've seen the Russians are having hugeD trouble with. If the Russians had their own version of HIMARS the Ukrainians would be in deep shit, but thankfully Russian guided weapons are much less accurate so we'll have to see if their attacks will have nearly the same effect as HIMARS has had on the battlefield since it started being used. I remember when it first arrived on the battlefield, the Duran, Gonzalo and most other pro-Russian hacks were laughing at the idea that a little more than a dozen HIMARS systems could significantly make a difference on the war and that's exactly what its done. HIMARS along with other western MLRS systems firing very accurate missiles have vastly helped turn the tide of the war into Ukraine's favor and thank goodness the Russians don't have anything nearly as good in their arsenal. Also Dima was probably one of the few pro-Russian folks who saw the danger of HIMARS to the Russians and I still remember him going on the Duran as a guest speaker and when asked about them, he stated that the Russians needed to target and eliminate them ASAP because they were that dangerous. Gonzalo who was on the show at the time completely didn't understand the threat that HIMARS presented and blew it off as being something that the Russians didn't have to really worry about. The bottom line is shooting alot of missiles is only good if you're hitting what you're targeting. Western MLRS systems are hitting what they're targeting which is why they've become such a big game changer for the Ukrainians and such a nightmare for the Russians. The same isn't the case going the other way where Russian missiles hitting and destroying their targets are a crapshoot.
1
Russia needs to destroy railroad brides, locomotives, tunnels and train roundhouses. Lets see if they can hit what they're aiming at with some regularity first. Or if they're going have to throw a ton of missiles at each target.
1
@fs0c1ety_bs92 but since the resistance is high they're left with no option but to destroy the infrastructure Or the Russians could you know just stop invading Ukraine and then the killing and destruction will stop. I know its a radical idea, but it just might work.
1
@robm1392 Shame for Russia that they never developed a modern army. Good for the rest of the world.
1
@nicholas8363 Why should Ukrainians accept a pro-Russian stooge that was a puppet for Putin to manipulate much like Lukashenko as their leader? Ukrainians have suffered for decades under USSR rule so why would they want to go back to that instead of moving away from them and closer to the west where they have a chance at improving their nation and the lives of their people? Can you name me one former USSR nation that has done worse since deciding to have closer ties to the west?
1
Because that's EXACTLY what happened to the British when they were bombed to hell and back during WWII. They grew angry and rose up against their government to demand they sue for peace. Yep that's how things turned out. 😅🤣😂🤣😅😆😅
1
@johnjennings9043 Look - if Russia wanted to target civillians it would have done so - with real strategic bombing. They didnt - for the reason above. Do you think that Russia couldnt do a Dresden or Tokyo firestorm? Are you serious? What aircraft do the Russians possess that would allow them to carry out a Dresden or Tokyo bombing on the Ukrainians right now? Their bomber force is garbage and they would get shot out of the sky easy if they came anywhere close to Kiev. If the Russians wanted to they certainly could continue what they're doing now and do some damage to Kiev or other cities with missiles, but outside of using nuke missiles or getting their artillery in range, there's no way they can level a city by simply using their airforce. The US is the ONLY airforce in the world that's even remotely capable of leveling parts of a city because it still operates B-52s that can drop a large payload on a city and also have enough fighter aircraft to largely suppress enemy air defenses. Forget strategic bombing when the Russians can't even gain air superiority over Ukrainian airspace.
1