Comments by "UzuMaki NaRuto" (@UzumakiNaruto_) on "Russia Vuhledar Advance, Denies Losses in Pavlovka, Takes Donetsk Airport; Rumours of US Diplomacy" video.

The Russian military doesn't lie HAHAHAHHAHHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHHAHAHHAHAHA 🤣😂😅😆😅😂🤣😅🤣
3
Well its certainly not helping that the Russians are giving back Kherson without even putting up a fight. Annex the territory and give back a major portion of it just a few weeks later. How nice of them.
2
He'll likely spin it as Kherson no longer being militarily important or something just like he did when the Russians gave up Izyum without a fight.
2
Too bad men on both sides are being killed...it is not a competition as to how many are killed on either side. Even one death is too many. All this wouldn't have had to happen if Putin didn't invade Ukraine period. He made the decision to launch this invasion and now everyone has to pay for it. The Russians cannot accept less as it is existential. So the war will go on and the Russians will have to be prepared to pound Ukraine and take the war unfortunately to the limit. Considering how well the Ukrainians are doing against the Russians right now, it would be stupid for them to stop and negotiate a ceasefire that will reward Putin and his aggression instead of punishing. The only good solution is to kick the Russians completely out of Ukraine and maybe even Crimea and then join NATO. That's the only way that the Ukrainians will ever find long term peace and be protected from any future possible Russian attacks. The Baltic states were smart to join NATO as soon as they could and look at them now. Instead of facing the same fate as Ukraine and getting invaded and taken over by the Russians, those small nations are forever protected against Russian aggression and can live peacefully and free from the Russian threat.
1
@fazilm1 he would not have invaded if the Ukrainiae was not killing Russian speaking eastern Ukrainians since 2014 and NATO was not heavily arming Ukraine for only one purpose. And the Ukrainians wouldn't be fighting the Donbas militia if the Russians didn't support them when they were about to lose and then bring in troops to fight and push back Ukrainian forces. So the Russians already invaded Ukrainian territory back in 2014 and they did it again in 2022 only on a much large scale. This time the Ukrainians were able to stand up and fight back and the Russians are paying for their miscalculation. Unfortunately the Ukrainians also have to pay for Putin's idiot decisions. Also you do realize that most of the people in the Donbas region might've wanted more autonomy and independence, but NOT to breakaway from Ukraine entirely right? And even fewer wanted the Donbas region to be apart of Russia. So even the people living in the Donbas didn't want to completely breakaway from Ukraine let alone have an intense desire to join Russia. Only a few very people did and Putin decided to back them and turn it into a wider and more destructive conflict and now 8 years later Putin again decided to turn this relative low intensity conflict into an all out war. So trying to say this wasn't Putin's fault is pure bullshit.
1
@fazilm1 He said the separatists were armed by Russian speaking defectors from the Ukrainian armed forces, and it was the alarming defection rate that drove the Minsk agreements. Please link me to a legitimate source that shows this to be true. I'd really like to see it. I do not know where you get the notion that the Russian speaking people, who having endured years of atrocities did not want to join Russia. My own recollection is that they wanted greater autonomy and only turned to Russia after their demands resulted in the Ukrainian govt unleashing the ultranationalists on them. There were polls done that showed that most people in the Donbas wanted autonomy while REMAINING WITHIN Ukraine and not breaking away from them and very few wanted to actually join Russia. Find me a poll from 2014 to even more recently before the war that disproves this and post it here so I can read it if you're able to. And 100% almost no one but a few militants supported by the Russians wanted to breakaway by violent means. These relative few people who took up arms and rose up were quickly being put down by Ukrainian forces until the Russians intervened with their own troops and pushed Ukrainians forces back. If Russia didn't invade back then, the Donbas militia would've been dealt with and peace would've mostly been restored and there wouldn't have been 8 years of low intensity conflict leading up to the present day war.
1
@fazilm1 Russian forces did not invade the Donbass until Feb 2022. Those breakaway republics wanted to join Russia since 2014 and Russia said no. Russia took back Crimea in 2014. Again all the info I looked up showed that NONE of those regions wanted to leave Ukraine let alone join Russia. The majority of people in the Donbas wanted more autonomy and independence for their areas and that's it and certainly the vast majority of people in the Donbas didn't want to leave by force. If you can show me proof that the majority of people in Donbas wanted to leave Ukraine even if it was by force then please post it here. I gave you the name of the NATO advisor who was in charge of training the Ukrainian army in 2014. Do your own research . Sounds like you made up your own poll in your response? Again if what you say is true then you should be able to find me more than one random source that supports what this supposed NATO advisor said.
1
@rosszografov614 Of course it could be a trap, but more likely it isn't. Many pro-Russian hacks thought that the Kharkiv offensive that took so much ground so quickly was a Russian trap as well and that there would be an eventual Russian counter attack that would destroy the Ukrainian forces the same way that the Germans were destroyed at the Battle of the Bulge. Anyways we'll find out soon enough when the Ukrainians arrive at Kherson and see if they meet any resistance or find any traps or they simply find a city empty of Russian forces who have indeed left in a hurry and had given the city back without a fight.
1
@rosszografov614 It isn't Kherson. That's the province name. It's Kherson city they talk about so misleadingly in western media. Furthermore, it isn't even the city proper, just the left bank, which would be of no military help to Zelensky..as his troops will be stuck exposed there in the open, with all bridges destroyed and in a heavily mined area I guess we'll find out in the coming days just how much the Russians have given back to the Ukrainians in their retreat and what they'll be doing afterwards. Liman was taken back 5-6 weeks ago..but as it's usual to expect, western media hasn't reported on the Russian gaining back the Northern East.. except a small captions on some western news services, saying: Liman under Russian control. Please show me a legitimate news source says that Lyman was retaken by the Russians? If you have a link please post it here. Western media is full of propaganda and misinformation, and the Russian side doesn't comment much, as a traditional rule by the military.. all that, leaves knowledge in a state of confusion. Are you saying Russian media is 100% accurate and honest in what it reports? 😂🤣😅😂😂🤣 Look even if you don't trust either side's media, you can still do your own research on the internet and also see what's actually happening on the battlefield to get at least a half decent accurate picture. Like for example many pro-Russian hacks like Alexander still push the lie that the Russians haven't taken high casualties and yet if you look at the actions of the Russian government where they've called for mobilization as well as finding as many troops as they can from everywhere that they can, it certainly doesn't seem like the Russians have taken only light casualties going by the measures they've taken. This isn't very different than the Russian invasion of Chechnya where they launched a poorly planned and poorly executed assault into that country and took significant casualties and tried to cover it up. Then mostly by being a vastly larger army with much more equipment did the Russians finally win through brute force. The same is happening now in this war except that Ukrainian being a much larger country with a much bigger population is able to fight back effectively with western help. This time around Putin had bitten off more than he could chew and he's paying for it bigtime now. It's clearer to us, that with each day Zelensky's troops have run out of steam, weapons and energy. We can't see any advances..it all looks grey, cold and gloomy on the Zelensky's side Again if what you say is true then we'll soon see it on the battlefield where the Ukrainians will have taken so many casualties that they will be unable to launch further major offensives against the Russians. So far that hasn't proven to be true when people like Alexander kept insisting that the Russians were winning with their small advances in the Donbas. Then when the Ukrainian offensives began he said they were minor gains and that the Russians would hold and probably take back what they lost with counterattacks. Then when that didn't happen and the Ukrainians kept moving forward, he claimed that they were taking heavy casualties for their advances and said that the Kherson offensive was still a failure. Then when the Ukrainians started making advances in the Kherson front he said they were minor gains at heavy cost and that the Russians would hold. And now we see that was false too and that the Russians chose to retreat now rather have another Kharkiv happen where the Russians ran and retreated in disarray. So we'll see in the next few weeks and longer as to what will happen and then see if Alexander, you and all the other pro-Russian hacks will be right or will you all be wrong once again like almost every other time.
1
@rosszografov614 You actually ask me to go back weeks ago to look for information and then serve it you, on a plate..?? In a discussion when someone asks you for your sources for the statements you make its usually up to the person making the statements to provide those sources. Unless you're just pulling shit out of your ass or you don't have any confidence that your sources are reliable then you should have no trouble providing proof and facts to backup your statements instead of trying to make someone else do it for you to disprove you. I mean how hard is it for you to post a link to the source you used so that other people can read it themselves? Not hard at all unless you were bullshitting or you used a source that wasn't really reliable.
1
@halilzelenka5813 Alexander has filmed alot of videos where he's been proven wrong. Its mind boggling that anyone would still take him or anyone at the Duran seriously when they've been constantly wrong with almost every military prediction they've made.
1
@halilzelenka5813 he’s also been right about things. Like the resignation of Truss and her chancellor of the exchequer, including the timeline of resignation as well as the order in which they resigned. Even a broken clock can be right twice a day, but mostly when I talk about how wrong Alexander has been I'm mainly referring to his military opinions on the war in Ukraine where he's been almost completely wrong every step of the way. If you look back at all his videos here or on the Duran channel and look at his opinions and predictions that he made in the early months of the war and then see how things actually turned out, he's been wrong almost every single time. From the very beginning of the war until present day, I can't remember very many predictions that he's made concerning the war and the Russian and Ukrainian military that have ever been correct. The reason for this is because no matter what has actually happened in real life, Alexander still believes that the Russian military is strong, is competent and has capabilities that it clearly doesn't have. The Chechen wars exposed how poorly led and trained the Russian forces were and the Ukrainian war now shows completely that Russian forces is 100% a 2nd rate military that even after all this time still relies more on sheer numbers to overwhelm their enemies rather than improving the quality of their army to be more effective with smaller numbers like most western armies have. The bottom line is Alexander is 100% a Russian shill that refuses to acknowledge reality when it comes to the utter piss poor performance of the Russian army in Ukraine. No matter how big the disaster is, he'll find a way to put a positive spin on it to lessen the blow and criticism towards the Russia military and Putin.
1
@halilzelenka5813 keep in mind that the Russians withdrew from Kherson, preserving their manpower. It wasn’t a complete debacle. The troops were not stranded on the west side of the Dniepr. You're pretty much using the line that Alexander will use when talking about yet another major Russian retreat in his next video. This is the only silver lining out of an otherwise major defeat. For how long did Alexander and many other pro-Russian folks keep saying that the Kherson offensive was going nowhere and that Kherson city wasn't going to fall anytime soon and yet with proper planning and a healthy dose of MLRS systems that destroyed so many supply dumps and continued to disrupt Russian supply lines that finally they made the smart decision to fall back across the river rather than fight a losing battle that would've resulted in high casualties. Who would've thought that back in September that Kherson would return into the hands of the Ukrainians and yet here we are witnessing just that even as Putin had just annexed this region a few short weeks ago. Also this is more confirmation that the Russians have definitely taken high casualties during this war that they would throw in poorly trained and equipped troops into the fight. The Ukrainians on the otherhand are increasingly becoming the opposite where they're able to send their new recruits to western countries to be trained by NATO instructors and be properly equipped by them. With troop quality going in favor of Ukraine more and more over time, its going to be difficult for the Russians to stop them unless they themselves start training and equipping their own troops better.
1
@halilzelenka5813 what happened in Mariupol? Ukraine refused to withdraw and their forces were encircled. That was the decision of the Ukrainian forces there to defend to the end when the better choice would've been to fall back. The only good to come from that was that it tied up and killed alot of Russian forces for a couple of months that could've been used to push further west on the southern front. What happened in Severodonetsk and Lysichansk? Ukraine refused to withdraw troops that were in a hopeless situation. These troops were then encircled and destroyed or captured. This didn't happen at all. Most of the Ukrainian forces in the Lysychansk salient escaped because the Russians didn't have the armored forces to close a 10km gap to complete the encirclement. I was watching that area closely during that time and the Russians had lost so many armored vehicles by then that they didn't even have the forces to close that relatively small gap. Who has more artillery capacity? Russia. How are most people killed in this, and any modern, war? Artillery. Having more artillery pieces isn't as important if 1) your artillery fire is largely inaccurate and requires a ton of shells to complete a mission and 2) having more artillery pieces means you need more logistics to keep them supplied with shells and spare parts to keep them running. That is a HUGE downside when your logistics are already poor to begin with and you're already having major difficulties keeping your army supplied in the field. Compare that to Ukrainian artillery when it started receiving more western artillery pieces and SPGs. Much more accurate fire which means less shells needed to accomplish a mission which also means less logistics required to keep them in service and firing. Especially recently when the Ukrainians have been receiving the Excalibur shell from the US and now they're able to hit targets with amazing accuracy. And this doesn't even include HIMARS/M270 MLRS systems that can hit targets with pinpoint accuracy up to 80kms away. You don't need a huge volume of fire when you have a HIMARS rocket acting like a sniper bullet hitting your target from dozens of kilometers away. But keep telling yourself that the casualty ratio is heavily in Ukraine’s favour. Unlike you, Alexander and all the other pro-Russian hacks who choose to live in fantasyland, I do my own research and follow the facts. If we're excluding civilian Ukrainian casualties and are only talking about military losses then the Russians have absolutely taken more casualties. Imagine at the beginning of the invasion you're able to launch multiple major armored attacks into Ukraine and now barely 9 months later you're barely able to launch even a few moderately large mostly infantry heavy assaults against your enemy and you're using mostly Cold War era vehicles and you're telling me that the Russians haven't taken huge losses? Cmon now. The facts speak for themselves and its reflected on the battlefield. Take off your pro-Russian hat and look at what's actually happening on the ground for a change.
1