Comments by "UzuMaki NaRuto" (@UzumakiNaruto_) on "Russia's Bakhmut Ring Tightens, UK MSM Admits Russia Close to Chasov Yar, Russia Advances Vuhledar" video.

  1.  @odinbiflindi  Kherson and Kharkiv were how many months ago? What have the Ukrainians done lately except throw their best brigades into a meat grinder. Why don't you mention that Russia's WWI style of fighting is costing them countless thousands of men for relative little gains? And I always find it funny how Alexander is so happy when the Russians make any kind of progress and says its the beginning of the end for the Ukrainians and then on the flipside when the Russians were losing so much territory and towns/cities during Ukrainian counterattacks he tries to play it down as not being very serious.
    3
  2.  @kingtachalla6181  Source for what? How the Russians are fighting on the battlefield right now? All you need to do is go on subreddits that are covering the war and are posting new videos everyday and see for yourself the tactics the Russians are using these days and how few armored vehicles there are to support their attacks in and around Bakhmut now.
    3
  3. If Russian advances were 'speeding up' then how come they're not using their tanks and other armored vehicles to speed up this advance even more? Large scale Russian armored attacks haven't happened much if any ever since the retreat from Kiev.
    1
  4.  @anncoffey8375  They retreated from Kiev in March to demonstrate good will when the negotiations in Instanbul were underway. You CAN'T BE SERIOUS to believe that lie right? No seriously you can't actually believe that to be true right????!? Just think it through logically and ask yourself why would the Russians launch an attack towards Ukraine's capital, come fairly close to their objective while taking thousands of casualties and losing hundreds of vehicles and then all of a sudden completely abandon that front and all that progress all as a 'good will gesture'? Does that logically make sense to you? Even if you believe it was apart of negotiations towards a ceasefire or stopping the war, why would you abandon all that progress BEFORE you have an agreement in place rather than AFTER you come to an agreement? How does it not make more sense for the Russians to hold their position with their army threatening Kiev and negotiate rather than completely pulling all Russian forces back from Kiev into Belarus and losing everything that you gained? Do you not think that the more logical reason for the Russians to give up so much territory is because they HAD NO CHOICE but to do so? Namely they didn't have enough supplies to continue to support the army heading for Kiev and they were taking heavy losses and the only reasonable choice was to pull back and give up that front rather than face having your army get destroyed. Don't you know that Nato was intent upon using Ukraine as its proxy to attack Russia? Again ask yourself logically how does that make sense?!?!! Russia will always have a large army with decent technology even if they're not the best. In what world can a much smaller Ukrainian army with much less advanced weaponry even with NATO help could they ever hope to attack Russia? Also ask yourself WHY would Ukraine ever want to attack Russian soil? What would have to gain from doing that? Can you answer that? It absolutely makes no sense for Ukraine to do so when all they've ever wanted was to keep their country and defend it.
    1
  5.  @mitchvanderben1000  you are a daydreamer, get back to reality pls, ever since NATO was formed the primary objective was to keep Russia in check and using Ukraine <ex USSR republic> as a springboard for possible war against Russia You said it yourself that Russia needs to be kept in check. Maybe if they weren't always being a threat to the rest of Europe and elsewhere all the time, NATO wouldn't need to have existed in the first place to keep the USSR and now Russia in check. This would be like a violent gang roaming a neighborhood and terrorizing and robbing them all the time and finally the people in that community decide to all join together and stand up to that gang and it works in stopping them and then all of a sudden the gang comes and cries and complains that they can't bully your community anymore. This is what's happening with Russia now. They don't like NATO because everyone who joins no longer has to fear getting attacked by Russia or being threatened militarily by them. They see NATO as being 'expansionist' because of all the nations who want to join and be free of Russian influence and threats and of course Russia doesn't like that.
    1
  6.  @Ceyla99  Just go any number of subreddits that are covering the war and posting new footage daily or go to the many Telegram channels that are out there and see for yourself how the Russians are doing vs the Ukrainians. Why do you think the Russians are clamping down on Russian supporters who are reporting on the war? I'm sure its partly because of security reasons, but mostly its because they don't want Russian bloggers complaining and criticising the Russian army and high command for their incompetence and poor performance during this war and showing all the mistakes they've made and the losses they've taken. Do you think the Russians would be taking these steps if they were doing great during this war? That they wouldn't want to show all the videos of the Russian army destroying the Ukrainians and kicking their asses? Cmon now.
    1
  7.  @patb5266  ok clown, Russia's WW1 fighting style that doesn't exist except in the fake media, throwing waves of troops at the Brave Heroic Ukrainians. The Russians are firing tons of artillery at Ukrainian lines before sending in mostly infantry to attack with relatively little armored vehicle support. If that's not WWI style fighting I don't know what is. What happened to earlier in the war when you saw huge columns of Russian armored vehicles and trucks advances kilometers per day? Now you barely see any large number of Russian tanks and IFVs and they're advancing mostly with troops at such a slow rate and at high cost. Please explain what happened to all those tanks and armored vehicles and why we haven't seen them being used in large scale attacks since the beginning of the war?
    1
  8. @LevanGudadze My prediction is that Bakhmut will come under Russian control in the coming days, before February 20-21, when Russian President Putin will address the federal assembly. I noted this in my today's update, pointing out the deplorable situation of the Bakhmut garrison and the city nearby Chasov Yar. Pretty obvious that any Russian advance was going to be reported by Alexander as some massive success and was the beginning of the end for the Ukrainians. He said it himself during the Kharkiv counteroffensive that there would be back and forths between the two sides in this war and now that the Russians have seen some success at such a high cost, he's happy again without remembering that things could change in the coming months.
    1
  9.  @cliff311976  Whatever back and forth happens in this war, Russia is not going to be pushed back. That's what pro-Russian folks like you said before Kharkiv and Kherson offensives happened and then it went from 'Russia is not going to lose ground' to 'This is only a temporary setback for the Russians'. Lets see in the coming months as more Ukrainian troops get NATO training and equipment and then see what happens on the battlefield.
    1
  10. The Russians know how to wear an average western citizen down. These back and forths seriously lose traction on Ukraine in the west. It gets harder to justify Ukraine situation when nobody cares. Sure the Russians know how to wear a westerner down, by throwing massive amounts of men and equipment at a enemy and trying to overwhelm their opponent with sheer numbers regardless of the losses they take. It worked in Chechnya but it won't work in Ukraine sadly for the Russians.
    1