Youtube comments of Carey Titan (@careytitan9097).

  1. 1500
  2. 1400
  3. 1100
  4. 1100
  5. 648
  6. 577
  7. 571
  8. 538
  9. 532
  10. 522
  11. 505
  12. 505
  13. 504
  14. 498
  15. 492
  16. 479
  17. 467
  18. 466
  19. 444
  20. 439
  21. 412
  22. 374
  23. 371
  24. 359
  25. 348
  26. 330
  27. 316
  28. 313
  29. 311
  30. 308
  31. 307
  32. 286
  33. 265
  34. The UK is accelerating its Islamization at an ever-increasing speed. The desire of the British establishment to submit to Islam appears to be overwhelming. ''A network of Islamist extremists operating in the UK will continue to use charities and taxpayer money to fund the spread of divisive, illiberal and intolerant views within our communities". Among the charities detailed in the report, are several Islamic charities involved in dawa [outreach, proselytization], such as the Islamic Education and Research Academy (iERA), as well as several charities connected to Hamas and the Muslim Brotherhood, such as the Muslim Charities Forum (MCF) and Islamic Relief. Deploying taxpayer money to support Islamic charities is not the only way in which the UK embraces Islamization. The British establishment has even let itself and its police be lectured by radical Islamist organizations such as Mend on what Islam is -- and has doggedly refused to listen to any dissident voices. Large parts of the British population, therefore, have nowhere to turn with their frustrations at the rapid Islamization of British society. Britain has suffered many Muslim terrorist attacks already, plus the grooming gang scandals with the rapes of thousands of children. Ninety per cent' of 43,000 extremists on MI5 watchlist are Islamist terror suspects, none are deported, yet every day and each week, hundreds of mainly lone Muslim men are allowed to illegally invade our country and still the government import even more in legally. Our traitorous government have no intention of deporting any. No other organizations appear willing to have an open discussion about the ongoing Islamization of Britain. A situation that seems bound to continue, unless or until the British establishment -- political, security, educational, clerical and cultural -- begins to address, openly and honestly, the rapidly increasing speed of Islamization into British society.
    256
  35. 255
  36. 254
  37. 247
  38. 237
  39. 236
  40. 236
  41. 235
  42. 233
  43. 229
  44. 223
  45. 220
  46. 217
  47. 208
  48. 205
  49. 204
  50. 200
  51. 190
  52. 189
  53. 185
  54. 185
  55. 184
  56. 179
  57. 173
  58. 173
  59. 172
  60. 171
  61. 171
  62. 171
  63. 167
  64. 162
  65. 161
  66. 153
  67. 153
  68. 152
  69. 151
  70. 148
  71. 148
  72. 145
  73. 143
  74. 142
  75. 142
  76. 139
  77. 137
  78. 134
  79. 134
  80. 132
  81. 131
  82. 130
  83. 122
  84. 120
  85. 118
  86. 114
  87. 111
  88. 108
  89. 108
  90. 107
  91. 107
  92. 106
  93. 105
  94. 104
  95. 104
  96. 101
  97. 99
  98. 98
  99. 98
  100. 97
  101. 96
  102. 96
  103. 96
  104. 96
  105. 95
  106. 95
  107. 95
  108. 94
  109. 91
  110. 90
  111. 88
  112. 88
  113. 88
  114. 87
  115. 86
  116. 85
  117. 84
  118. 81
  119. 81
  120. 80
  121. 80
  122. 78
  123. 78
  124. 78
  125. 76
  126. 76
  127. 74
  128. 74
  129. 73
  130. 71
  131. 71
  132. 71
  133. 71
  134. 70
  135. 69
  136. 69
  137. 69
  138. 69
  139. 69
  140. 69
  141. 68
  142. 68
  143. 67
  144. 67
  145. 67
  146. 65
  147. 64
  148. 63
  149. 62
  150. 62
  151. 62
  152. 62
  153. 62
  154. 61
  155. 61
  156. 61
  157. 61
  158. 60
  159. 60
  160. 60
  161. 59
  162. 59
  163. 59
  164. 59
  165. 59
  166. 59
  167. 57
  168. 57
  169. 55
  170. 55
  171. 54
  172. 54
  173. 52
  174. 51
  175. 51
  176. 51
  177. 50
  178. 49
  179. 49
  180. 'In the wake of a speech by then prime minister David Cameron, in which he told a security conference in Germany that the UK needed a stronger national identity to prevent extremism. In his speech, which provoked a political storm, Mr Cameron defines "the doctrine of state multiculturalism" as a strategy which has "encouraged different cultures to live separate lives, apart from each other and apart from the mainstream". 'In 2004 Trevor Phillips, chairman of the the Commission for Racial Equality - now the Equality and Human Rights Commission - told the Times that multiculturalism was out of date, because it "suggests separateness" and should be replaced with policies which promote integration and "assert a core of Britishness". 'Lord Sacks, Chief Rabbi of the United Hebrew Congregations of the Commonwealth says in the Times, that multiculturalism was intended to create a more tolerant society, one in which everyone, regardless of colour, creed or culture, felt at home. But, he says, multiculturalism's message is "there is no need to integrate". He distinguishes between tolerance and multiculturalism - using the Netherlands as an example of a tolerant, rather than multicultural, society. Additionally, he says the current meaning of multiculturalism is part of the wider European phenomenon of moral relativism and talks of multiculturalism as dissolving national identity, shared values and collective identity which "makes it impossible for groups to integrate because there is nothing to integrate into".
    48
  181. 48
  182. 46
  183. 46
  184. 46
  185. 46
  186. 45
  187. 45
  188. 44
  189. 43
  190. 43
  191. 43
  192. 43
  193. 43
  194. 43
  195. 42
  196. 42
  197. 42
  198. 42
  199. 42
  200. 42
  201. 41
  202. 41
  203. 41
  204. 40
  205. 39
  206. 39
  207. 39
  208. 39
  209. 38
  210. 38
  211. 38
  212. 37
  213. 37
  214. 37
  215. 36
  216. 36
  217. 36
  218. 35
  219. 35
  220. 35
  221. 35
  222. 35
  223. 35
  224. 35
  225. 35
  226. 34
  227. 34
  228. 34
  229. 34
  230. 34
  231. 34
  232. 33
  233. 33
  234. 32
  235. 32
  236. 32
  237. 32
  238. 32
  239. 32
  240. 31
  241. 31
  242. 31
  243. 31
  244. 31
  245. 31
  246. 31
  247. 31
  248. 30
  249. 30
  250. 30
  251. 30
  252. 30
  253. 30
  254. 30
  255. 30
  256. 30
  257. 29
  258. 29
  259. 29
  260. 29
  261. 29
  262. 28
  263. 28
  264. 28
  265. 28
  266. 28
  267. 28
  268. 28
  269. 27
  270. 27
  271. 27
  272. 27
  273. 27
  274. 27
  275. 27
  276. 27
  277. 27
  278. 27
  279. 26
  280. 26
  281. 26
  282. 26
  283. 26
  284. 26
  285. 25
  286. 25
  287. 25
  288. 25
  289. 25
  290. 25
  291. 25
  292. 25
  293. 25
  294. 25
  295. 25
  296. 24
  297. 24
  298. 24
  299. 24
  300. 24
  301. 24
  302. 24
  303. 24
  304. 24
  305. 24
  306. 24
  307. 24
  308. 24
  309. 23
  310. 23
  311. 23
  312. 23
  313. 23
  314. 23
  315. 23
  316. 23
  317. 23
  318. 22
  319. 22
  320. 22
  321. 22
  322. 22
  323. 22
  324. 22
  325. 22
  326. 22
  327. 22
  328. 22
  329. 22
  330. 22
  331. 22
  332. 22
  333. 21
  334. 21
  335. 21
  336. 21
  337. 21
  338. 21
  339. 21
  340. 21
  341. 21
  342. 21
  343. 21
  344. 21
  345. 21
  346. 21
  347. 21
  348. 20
  349. 20
  350. 20
  351. 20
  352. 20
  353. 20
  354. 20
  355. 20
  356. 20
  357. 20
  358. 20
  359. 20
  360. 20
  361. 20
  362. 20
  363. 20
  364. 19
  365. 19
  366. 19
  367. 19
  368. 19
  369. 19
  370. 19
  371. 19
  372. 19
  373. 19
  374. 19
  375. 19
  376. 18
  377. 18
  378. 18
  379. 18
  380. 18
  381. 18
  382. 18
  383. 18
  384. 18
  385. 18
  386. 18
  387. 18
  388. 18
  389. 18
  390. 18
  391. 18
  392. 18
  393. 18
  394. 18
  395. 18
  396. 18
  397. 18
  398. 18
  399. 18
  400. 17
  401. 17
  402. 17
  403. The UK is accelerating its Islamization at an ever-increasing speed. The desire of the British establishment to submit to Islam appears to be overwhelming. ''A network of Islamist extremists operating in the UK will continue to use charities and taxpayer money to fund the spread of divisive, illiberal and intolerant views within our communities". Among the charities detailed in the report, are several Islamic charities involved in dawa [outreach, proselytization], such as the Islamic Education and Research Academy (iERA), as well as several charities connected to Hamas and the Muslim Brotherhood, such as the Muslim Charities Forum (MCF) and Islamic Relief. Deploying taxpayer money to support Islamic charities is not the only way in which the UK embraces Islamization. The British establishment has even let itself and its police be lectured by radical Islamist organizations such as Mend on what Islam is -- and has doggedly refused to listen to any dissident voices. Large parts of the British population, therefore, have nowhere to turn with their frustrations at the rapid Islamization of British society. Britain has suffered many Muslim terrorist attacks already, plus the grooming gang scandals with the rapes of thousands of children. Ninety per cent' of 43,000 extremists on MI5 watchlist are Islamist terror suspects, none are deported, yet every day and each week, hundreds of mainly lone Muslim men are allowed to illegally invade our country and still the government import even more in legally. Our traitorous government have no intention of deporting any. No other organizations appear willing to have an open discussion about the ongoing Islamization of Britain. A situation that seems bound to continue, unless or until the British establishment -- political, security, educational, clerical and cultural -- begins to address, openly and honestly, the rapidly increasing speed of Islamization into British society.
    17
  404. 17
  405. 17
  406. 17
  407. 17
  408. 17
  409. 17
  410. 17
  411. 17
  412. 17
  413. 17
  414. 17
  415. 17
  416. 17
  417. 17
  418. 17
  419. 17
  420. 17
  421. 17
  422. 17
  423. 16
  424. 16
  425. 16
  426. 16
  427. 16
  428. 16
  429. 16
  430. 16
  431. 16
  432. 16
  433. 16
  434. 16
  435. 16
  436. 16
  437. 16
  438. 16
  439. 16
  440. 16
  441. 16
  442. 15
  443. 15
  444. 15
  445. 15
  446. 15
  447. 15
  448. 15
  449. 15
  450. 15
  451. 15
  452. 15
  453. 15
  454. 15
  455. 15
  456. 15
  457. 15
  458. 15
  459. 15
  460. 15
  461. 15
  462. 15
  463. 15
  464. 15
  465. 15
  466. 15
  467. 15
  468. 15
  469. 14
  470. 14
  471. 14
  472. 14
  473. 14
  474. 14
  475. 14
  476. 14
  477. 14
  478. 14
  479. 14
  480. 14
  481. 14
  482. 14
  483. 14
  484. 14
  485. 14
  486. 14
  487. 14
  488. 14
  489. 14
  490. 14
  491. 14
  492. 14
  493. 14
  494. 14
  495. 14
  496. 14
  497. 14
  498. 14
  499. 13
  500. 13
  501. 13
  502. 13
  503. 13
  504. 13
  505. 13
  506. 13
  507. 13
  508. 13
  509. 13
  510. 13
  511. 13
  512. 13
  513. 13
  514. 13
  515. 13
  516. 13
  517. 13
  518. 13
  519. 13
  520. 13
  521. 13
  522. 13
  523. 13
  524. 13
  525. 13
  526. 13
  527. 13
  528. 13
  529. 13
  530. 13
  531. 13
  532. 13
  533. 13
  534. 13
  535. 13
  536. 13
  537. 12
  538. 12
  539. 12
  540. 12
  541. 12
  542. 12
  543. 12
  544. 12
  545. 12
  546. 12
  547. 12
  548. 12
  549. 12
  550. 12
  551. 12
  552. 12
  553. 12
  554. 12
  555. 12
  556. 12
  557. 12
  558. 12
  559. 12
  560. 12
  561. 12
  562. 12
  563. 12
  564. 12
  565. 12
  566. 12
  567. 12
  568. 12
  569. 12
  570. 12
  571. 12
  572. 11
  573. 11
  574. 11
  575. 11
  576. 11
  577. 11
  578. 11
  579. 11
  580. 11
  581. 11
  582. 11
  583. 11
  584. 11
  585. 11
  586. 11
  587. 11
  588. 11
  589. 11
  590. 11
  591. 11
  592. 11
  593. 11
  594. 11
  595. 11
  596. 11
  597. 11
  598. 11
  599. 11
  600. 11
  601. 11
  602. 11
  603. 11
  604. 11
  605. 11
  606. 11
  607. 11
  608. 11
  609. 11
  610. 11
  611. 11
  612. 11
  613. 11
  614. 10
  615. 10
  616. 10
  617. 10
  618. 10
  619. 10
  620. 10
  621. 10
  622. 10
  623. 10
  624. 10
  625. 10
  626. 10
  627. 10
  628. 10
  629. 10
  630. 10
  631. 10
  632. 10
  633. 10
  634. 10
  635. 10
  636. 10
  637. 10
  638. 10
  639. 10
  640. 10
  641. 10
  642. 10
  643. 10
  644. 10
  645. 10
  646. 10
  647. 10
  648. 10
  649. 10
  650. 10
  651. 10
  652. 10
  653. 10
  654. 10
  655. 10
  656. 10
  657. 9
  658. 9
  659. We did not need immigration for shop opening hours, I think that would have changed regardless of immigration. Now all corner shops are completely owned by foreigners, are there any owned by white British anymore? Just 50yrs ago they were all British owned. There used to be off licences that opened from 6pm-10pm, that sold most things in the 70s. Lets face facts 24hr shops are all about the greed of money. Foreigners had a different religion so it was disrespectful to our Christian practices, for them to open on Sundays. Many British owned shops were put out of business by immigrants opening 7 days a week. Most local cinemas, ice rinks and community halls etc were turned into Mosques or places of worship for immigrants, so shop openings aside, there was still nothing for locals to do, back when most families did not even own a car. For the ones that did, Sunday drives out to the countryside and a picnic was a usual practice. Sundays were about spending time with family, gods day of rest. As far as I can see there are no advantages to immigration, the main thing people say is foreign takeaways, as the one advantage. Other than that, communities have gone, traditions have gone, Housing, just 50yrs ago there were empty houses, hospital places, doctors, dentists, school places, loss of green spaces the list goes on and on. Not forgetting regular stabbings shootings and terrorism on our streets, at least it was safe to walk the streets back then. Communities knew everyone else, now community has gone and all are strangers, no one looks out for anyone else anymore. Give me your 'dull 50s' ( Teddy boys and rock 'n' roll) any day to the nightmare we find ourselves in today! Today Britain is no longer British! It's a crying shame!
    9
  660. 9
  661. 9
  662. 9
  663. 9
  664. 9
  665. 9
  666. 9
  667. 9
  668. 9
  669. 9
  670. 9
  671. 9
  672. 9
  673. 9
  674. 9
  675. 9
  676. 9
  677. 9
  678. 9
  679. 9
  680. 9
  681. 9
  682. 9
  683. 9
  684. 9
  685. 9
  686. 9
  687. 9
  688. 9
  689. 9
  690. 9
  691. 9
  692. 9
  693. 9
  694. 9
  695. 9
  696. 9
  697. 9
  698. 9
  699. 9
  700. 9
  701. 9
  702. 9
  703. 9
  704. 9
  705. 9
  706. 9
  707. 9
  708. 9
  709. 9
  710. 9
  711. 9
  712. 9
  713. 9
  714. 9
  715. 9
  716. 9
  717. 9
  718. 9
  719. 9
  720. 9
  721. 9
  722. 9
  723. 9
  724. 9
  725. 9
  726. 9
  727. 9
  728. 8
  729. 8
  730. 8
  731. 8
  732. 8
  733. 8
  734. 8
  735. 8
  736. 8
  737. 8
  738. 8
  739. 8
  740. 8
  741. 8
  742. 8
  743. 8
  744. 8
  745. 8
  746. 8
  747. 8
  748. 8
  749. 8
  750. 8
  751. 8
  752. 8
  753. 8
  754. 8
  755. 8
  756. 8
  757. 8
  758. 8
  759. 8
  760. 8
  761. 8
  762. 8
  763. 8
  764. 8
  765. 8
  766. 8
  767. 8
  768. 8
  769. 8
  770. 8
  771. 8
  772. 8
  773. 8
  774. 8
  775. 8
  776. 8
  777. 8
  778. 8
  779. 8
  780. 8
  781. 8
  782. 8
  783. 8
  784. 8
  785. 8
  786. 8
  787. 8
  788. 8
  789. 8
  790. 8
  791. 8
  792. 8
  793. 8
  794. 8
  795. 8
  796. 8
  797. 8
  798. 8
  799. 8
  800. 8
  801. 8
  802. 8
  803. 8
  804. 8
  805. 8
  806. 7
  807. 7
  808. 7
  809. 7
  810. 7
  811. 7
  812. 7
  813. 7
  814. 7
  815. 7
  816. 7
  817. 7
  818. 7
  819. 7
  820. 7
  821. 7
  822. The UK is accelerating its Islamization at an ever-increasing speed. The desire of the British establishment to submit to Islam appears to be overwhelming. ''A network of Islamist extremists operating in the UK will continue to use charities and taxpayer money to fund the spread of divisive, illiberal and intolerant views within our communities". Among the charities detailed in the report, are several Islamic charities involved in dawa [outreach, proselytization], such as the Islamic Education and Research Academy (iERA), as well as several charities connected to Hamas and the Muslim Brotherhood, such as the Muslim Charities Forum (MCF) and Islamic Relief. Deploying taxpayer money to support Islamic charities is not the only way in which the UK embraces Islamization. The British establishment has even let itself and its police be lectured by radical Islamist organizations such as Mend on what Islam is -- and has doggedly refused to listen to any dissident voices. Large parts of the British population, therefore, have nowhere to turn with their frustrations at the rapid Islamization of British society. Britain has suffered many Muslim terrorist attacks already, plus the grooming gang scandals with the rapes of thousands of children. Ninety per cent' of 43,000 extremists on MI5 watchlist are Islamist terror suspects, none are deported, yet every day and each week, hundreds of mainly lone Muslim men are allowed to illegally invade our country and still the government import even more in legally. Our traitorous government have no intention of deporting any. No other organizations appear willing to have an open discussion about the ongoing Islamization of Britain. A situation that seems bound to continue, unless or until the British establishment -- political, security, educational, clerical and cultural -- begins to address, openly and honestly, the rapidly increasing speed of Islamization into British society.
    7
  823. 7
  824. 7
  825. 7
  826. 7
  827. 7
  828. 7
  829. 7
  830. 7
  831. 7
  832. 7
  833. 7
  834. 7
  835. 7
  836. 7
  837. 7
  838. 7
  839. 7
  840. 7
  841. 7
  842. 7
  843. 7
  844. 7
  845. 7
  846. 7
  847. 7
  848. 7
  849. 7
  850. 7
  851. 7
  852. 7
  853. 7
  854. 7
  855. 7
  856. 7
  857. 7
  858. 7
  859. 7
  860. 7
  861. 7
  862. 7
  863. 7
  864. 7
  865. 7
  866. 7
  867. 7
  868. 7
  869. 7
  870. 7
  871. 7
  872. 7
  873. 7
  874. 7
  875. 7
  876. 7
  877. 7
  878. 7
  879. 7
  880. 7
  881. 7
  882. 7
  883. 7
  884. 7
  885. 7
  886. 7
  887. 7
  888. 7
  889. 7
  890. 7
  891. 7
  892. 7
  893. 7
  894. 7
  895. 7
  896. 7
  897. 7
  898. 7
  899. 7
  900. 7
  901. 7
  902. 7
  903. 7
  904. 7
  905. 7
  906. 7
  907. 7
  908. 7
  909. 7
  910. 6
  911. 6
  912. 6
  913. 6
  914. 6
  915. 6
  916. 6
  917. 6
  918. 6
  919. 6
  920. 6
  921. 6
  922. 6
  923. 6
  924. 6
  925. 6
  926. 6
  927. 6
  928. 6
  929. 6
  930. 6
  931. 6
  932. 6
  933. 6
  934. 6
  935. 6
  936. 6
  937. 6
  938. 6
  939. 6
  940. 6
  941. 6
  942. 6
  943. 6
  944. 6
  945.  @Skanderbeg-t8z  'The only invaders that left a lasting legacy are the Anglo-Saxons. As well as introducing royalty and giving us the English language, the Anglo-Saxons, whose influx began around 450AD account for 10% - 40% per cent of the DNA in half of modern-day Britons.' We were closely related to them anyway, tribes of our tribe, but that is not the point. As I said Britons are still here in England with at least 60% - 70% or more, Brittonic DNA and an admixture of only 10% - 40% Anglo-Saxon DNA. I am so fed-up of the globalists trying to dismiss the ancient Britons and saying the English are all Anglo-Saxons, because it simply is not true! Cheddar mans descendant is Brittonic (English) and he still lives in the same area in England Cheddar man was found, 10,000 years later and that was thousands of years before the Germanic tribes invaded the British Isles! Stonehenge is pre-Anglo-Saxon and Germanic tribes invasions too. Yes the Angles, Saxons, Jutes and Vikings invaded Britain nearly 2000 years ago, but lets not forget the poor Britons they invaded with the many battles they fought with the Britons to take our lands. The ancient Britons are still here in England and Britain today with majority Brittonic DNA living with the Anlgo-Saxon invaders descendants, who still own the majority of our lands and we still have their royalty, we are all now called the British! But then again anyone of foreign origin born here, or anyone with a British passport, can now call themselves British! Before Labours nationality Act of 1948, only the British of England, Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland were called British!
    6
  946. 6
  947. 6
  948. 6
  949. 6
  950. 6
  951. 6
  952. 6
  953. 6
  954. 6
  955. 6
  956. 6
  957. 6
  958. 6
  959. 6
  960. 6
  961. 6
  962. 6
  963. 6
  964. 6
  965. 6
  966. 6
  967. 6
  968. 6
  969. 6
  970. 6
  971. 6
  972. 6
  973. 6
  974. 6
  975. 6
  976. 6
  977. 6
  978. 6
  979. 6
  980. 6
  981. 6
  982. 6
  983. 6
  984. 6
  985. 6
  986. 6
  987. 6
  988. 6
  989. 6
  990. 6
  991. 6
  992. 6
  993. 6
  994. 6
  995. 6
  996. 6
  997. 6
  998. 6
  999. 6
  1000. 6
  1001. 6
  1002. 6
  1003. 6
  1004. 6
  1005. 6
  1006. 6
  1007. 6
  1008. 6
  1009. 6
  1010. 6
  1011. 6
  1012. 6
  1013. 6
  1014. 6
  1015. 6
  1016. 6
  1017. 6
  1018. 6
  1019. 6
  1020. 6
  1021. 6
  1022. 6
  1023. 6
  1024. 6
  1025. 6
  1026. 6
  1027. 6
  1028. 6
  1029. 6
  1030. 6
  1031. 6
  1032. 6
  1033. 6
  1034. 6
  1035. 6
  1036. 6
  1037. 6
  1038. 6
  1039. 6
  1040. 6
  1041. 5
  1042. 5
  1043. 5
  1044. 5
  1045. 5
  1046. 5
  1047. 5
  1048. 5
  1049. 5
  1050. 5
  1051. 5
  1052. 5
  1053. 5
  1054. 5
  1055. 5
  1056. 5
  1057. 5
  1058. 5
  1059. 5
  1060. 5
  1061. 5
  1062. 5
  1063. 5
  1064. 5
  1065. 5
  1066. 5
  1067. 5
  1068. 5
  1069. 5
  1070. 5
  1071. 5
  1072. 5
  1073. 5
  1074. 5
  1075. I know little of Middle Eastern politics but a quick search I found this- The Arabs were already there in Israel/ Palestine, pre-Balfour, they are still there today, so in that regard that is why Israel is multicultural. The Ethiopian refugees that Israel rescued were all fellow Ethiopian 'Jews'. (known as the "Beta Israel" community or "Falashas") from Sudan during a civil war that caused a famine in 1984. So the Jews were rescuing their own. The Balfour Declaration is widely seen as the precursor to the 1948 Palestinian Nakba when Zionist armed groups, who were trained by the British, forcibly expelled more than 750,000 Palestinians from their homeland. Control over Palestine was a strategic imperial interest to keep Egypt and the Suez Canal within Britain’s sphere of influence. The Balfour Declaration, which resulted in a significant upheaval in the lives of Palestinians, was issued on November 2, 1917. The declaration turned the Zionist aim of establishing a Jewish state in Palestine into a reality when Britain publicly pledged to establish “a national home for the Jewish people” there. The pledge is generally viewed as one of the main catalysts of the Nakba – the ethnic cleansing of Palestine in 1948 – and the conflict that ensued with the Zionist state of Israel. The statement came in the form of a letter from Britain’s then-foreign secretary, Arthur Balfour, addressed to Lionel Walter Rothschild, a Zionist and a figurehead of the British Jewish community. It was made during World War I (1914-1918) and was included in the terms of the British Mandate for Palestine after the dissolution of the Arab Ottoman Empire. The so-called mandate system, set up by the Allied powers, was a thinly veiled form of colonialism and occupation. The system transferred rule from the territories that were previously controlled by the powers defeated in the war – Germany, Austria-Hungary, the Ottoman Empire and Bulgaria – to the victors. When it was released, Britain had already promised the Arabs independence from the Ottoman Empire in the 1915 Hussein-McMahon correspondence. The British also promised the French, in a separate treaty known as 1916 Sykes-Picot agreement, that the majority of Palestine would be under international administration, while the rest of the region would be split between the two colonial powers after the war. The declaration, however, meant that Palestine would come under British occupation and that the Palestinian Arabs who lived there would not gain independence.
    5
  1076. 5
  1077. 5
  1078. 5
  1079. 5
  1080. 5
  1081. 5
  1082. 5
  1083. 5
  1084. 5
  1085. 5
  1086. 5
  1087. 5
  1088. 5
  1089. 5
  1090. 5
  1091. 5
  1092. 5
  1093. 5
  1094. 5
  1095. 5
  1096. 5
  1097. 5
  1098. 5
  1099. 5
  1100. 5
  1101. The British have white European ancestry, not Asian, Middle Eastern or African. Just 50 years ago all British corner shops, takeaways, post offices, barbers, bakeries, greengrocers, butchers, schools, doctors, dentists etc used to be white British, now they are owned mainly by Asians from India/ Indian subcontinent, whether they are Hindu, Sikh or Muslim. This drastic change has happened in many British peoples lifetime. It is not just the Muslims but the Indians also that have been slowly taking over in just 5 decades. Blair opened the floodgates to the rest of the world in 1997. Asian Khan celebrated Ramadan in London this year instead of traditional Christian Easter. Further eroding the English culture, which is anti-English, anti-white, anti British racism. While many think Indians are benign they are doing exactly the same thing. Many English major cities and towns are now minority white as foreigners take over large areas of our towns, cities and country creating Asian diasporas, and vote for their own Asian MPs, outvoting the British for theirs. An uncomfortable truth, many may dislike for pointing out, but the truth is the truth. In just 5 decades we have lost our country our forefathers sacrificed and fought so heroically to save for us, their children, grandchildren and great-grandchildren. While as they say 'the British are a welcoming nation', that has not been strictly true, the British never had a choice, never voted for it, nor agreed, with giving away their country, culture, inheritance, heritage, ancestral birthright and home to 'foreign others.' which is always ignored or the debate shut down with cries of racism.
    5
  1102. 5
  1103. 5
  1104. 5
  1105. 5
  1106. 5
  1107. 5
  1108. 5
  1109. 5
  1110. 5
  1111. 5
  1112. 5
  1113. 5
  1114. 5
  1115. 5
  1116. 5
  1117. 5
  1118. 5
  1119. 5
  1120. 5
  1121. 5
  1122. 5
  1123. 5
  1124. 5
  1125. 5
  1126. 5
  1127. 5
  1128. 5
  1129. 5
  1130. 5
  1131. 5
  1132. 5
  1133. 5
  1134. 5
  1135. 5
  1136. 5
  1137. 5
  1138. 5
  1139. 5
  1140. 5
  1141. 5
  1142. 5
  1143. 5
  1144. 5
  1145. 5
  1146. 5
  1147. 5
  1148. 5
  1149. 5
  1150. 5
  1151. 5
  1152. 5
  1153. 5
  1154. 5
  1155. 5
  1156. 5
  1157. 5
  1158. 5
  1159. 5
  1160. 5
  1161. 5
  1162. 5
  1163. 5
  1164. 5
  1165. 5
  1166. 5
  1167. 5
  1168. 5
  1169. 5
  1170. 5
  1171. 5
  1172. 5
  1173. 5
  1174. 5
  1175. 5
  1176. 5
  1177. 5
  1178. 5
  1179. 5
  1180. 5
  1181. 5
  1182. 5
  1183. 5
  1184. 5
  1185. 5
  1186. 5
  1187. 5
  1188. 5
  1189. 5
  1190. 5
  1191. Fenner Brockway, was a Labour liberal left socialist, who pushed to get the 'race relations act' bill through parliament, eight times from 1956 to 1964. ( To silence the British who were against mass immigration, that many had recently given their lives to preserve, in war.) By the time the 1965 bill was introduced, there was a population of almost a million immigrants living in Britain. Brockway was born in Calcutta, British India and was a lifelong vegetarian. He was imprisoned for handing out anti-conscription leaflets in 1916, he was anti-war, but campaigned for British volunteers to join the Spanish civil war against Franco. He was a member of the 'League against Imperialism' created in Brussels in 1927. In Brockway's science fiction novel, Purple Plague (1935), a sea liner is quarantined for a decade as a result of a plague. An egalitarian society emerges. ( Doesn't that sound familiar? ) He became an active member of the India League, which advocated Indian independence. He became secretary of the ILP in 1923 and later its chairman. Years later, the Government of India honoured him with the third highest civilian award of the Padma Bhushan in 1989. He became a life peer in the house of Lords in 1964. ( A socialist with privilege). He was also the chairman of the Movement for Colonial Freedom. So Brockway was a Labourite Left liberal socialist, who wanted everyone to stop eating meat and become vegetarians, and had ties to liberal left Brussels and tried to impose his views on others. His novel, similar to the (Covid-19) pandemic and the NWO being imposed on us today. How strange, It all sounds so familiar? The Labour Left still march to the beat of his drum today, but with rainbow coloured hair!
    5
  1192. 5
  1193. 5
  1194. 5
  1195. 5
  1196. 5
  1197. 5
  1198. 5
  1199. 5
  1200. 5
  1201. 5
  1202. 5
  1203. 5
  1204. 5
  1205. 5
  1206. 5
  1207. 5
  1208. 5
  1209. 5
  1210. 5
  1211. 5
  1212. 5
  1213. 5
  1214. In chapter 36 of this 1998 ‘Act’ he attempted to repeal the 1795 Act and the death penalty for high treason but Blair had no lawful authority to do so, and he committed treason in his attempt. He would be in prison today if only the people would stand united under their constitution as the law demands. Blair actually committed three acts of Treason in all, and did not possess the authority to do so. An example of such a treasonous act would be a year earlier at the signing of the Amsterdam Treaty in 1997 which increased the European Union’s powers for action at community level, and included further European integration in legislative, police, judicial, customs and security matters and strengthened Europol. This was a clear act of treason, and because of this, Tony Blair was in fact, actually never the Prime Minister at law. Much like any criminal in supposed “public office”, Blair tried to get rid of the penalty of the crime he was guilty of. The former Labour Prime Minister controversially swept aside 1,400 years of history by setting up a new US-style Supreme Court in place of the Law Lords in 2005. According to parliamentary records, on November 10, 2009, Conservative MP Shailesh Vara addressed the House of Commons, saying: "Given that it was widely reported that the decision to set up a Supreme Court was taken by Tony Blair and Lord Falconer over a glass of whisky, and that the annual cost of running the Supreme Court is some £14million whereas the cost of the previous arrangement was £3million a year, does the Minister agree that it has proved to be a very expensive glass of whisky?”
    4
  1215. 4
  1216. 4
  1217. A mother testified she interrupted Letby who was over her babies incubator when the alarm went off, supposedly baby E was killed by an injection of air. He started to bleed from the mouth. Jurors heard how the day after allegedly murdering Child E, Letby allegedly used insulin for the first time to poison a baby by trying to murder child E's twin brother, child F. Police found Letby was also visiting, baby E and F, parents media sites, such as facebook, even on Christmas day. Another parents story- Mike and Victoria Whitfield's daughter Felicity suffered a catastrophic lung collapse three days after being born prematurely at Countess of Chester Hospital. 'Lucy Letby stood over our baby - then alarms went off as her lung collapsed': Parents who say their daughter was one of the killer's first victims recall chilling moment they found the nurse alone with their newborn seconds before she nearly died. A mother has described approaching her baby's cot and seeing Lucy Letby standing over it with a 'blank' expression on her face and then walking away before 'all hell broke loose' when the newborn's lung collapsed. The parents of a little girl who almost died in hospital days after she was born believe their daughter was one of Lucy Letby's first victims. Vicky says she felt 'sick to her stomach' when she saw Lucy Letby's face... Their little girl is now a healthy nine year old. There were 17 babies who died suspiciously, Letby was the only nurse on duty for all of those suspicious deaths.
    4
  1218. 4
  1219. 4
  1220. 4
  1221. 4
  1222. 4
  1223. 4
  1224. 4
  1225. 4
  1226. 4
  1227. 4
  1228. 4
  1229. 4
  1230. 4
  1231. 4
  1232. 4
  1233. 4
  1234. 4
  1235. 4
  1236. 4
  1237. 4
  1238. (Covid-19) - Eleven pandemic exercises were conducted between 2015 and 2019, the UK government has revealed – but it is refusing to release the results on national security grounds.( The Independent) (Covid-19) arrived in September 2019, UK was locked down March 23 2020, 7 weeks after leaving the EU. Dr. Anthony Fauci, the White House's top infectious disease expert, warned of a 'surprise outbreak' in a speech given in 2016 three years before the global COVID-19 pandemic.( The Brexit referendum was in 2016) Gates predicted the COVID-19 outbreak as early as 2015. The Microsoft founder and global philanthropist talks about how the world would need to drastically prepare for biological attacks. on 28 February 2023 the controversial claim that the pandemic might have leaked from a Chinese laboratory - once dismissed by many as a fringe conspiracy theory - resurfaced with FBI Director Christopher Wray's comments that the bureau believes Covid-19 "most likely" originated in a "Chinese government-controlled lab". In 2014, the NIH awarded a grant to the U.S.-based EcoHealth Alliance to study the risk of the future emergence of coronaviruses from bats. In 2019. And distributed nearly $600,000 of that total to China’s Wuhan Institute of Virology, a collaborator on the project, pre-approved by NIH.The Wuhan Institute of Virology has studied bat coronaviruses for years and their potential to ultimately infect humans, under the direction of scientist Shi Zhengli. Dr. Fauci gave American funding to the Wuhan lab. According to the European Commission’s website, between 2015 and 2019 the European Union paid EUR 130 576.80 to the Wuhan Institute, with nearly EUR 90 000 being earmarked for the period until 2023. EU BREXIT negotiator Michel Barnier authorised the creation of the secretive Wuhan lab when he was France's foreign secretary as part of a co-operation deal with China.The EU’s chief Brexit negotiator approved the joint French and Chinese lab, which was initially designed to combat SARS, back in 2004. The move came despite numerous warnings from intelligence agencies, who claimed the lab could lead to technological advancements and the building of biowarfare weapons and “catastrophic leaks”. Mr Barnier was the French foreign minister at the time, and gave the green light for the venture to begin at the Wuhan Institute of Virology. First the Americans, now the French putting money into this laboratory in Wuhan. Interesting. All just a conspiracy theory? Or all just coincidence? You decide.
    4
  1239. 4
  1240. 4
  1241. 4
  1242. 4
  1243. 4
  1244. 4
  1245. 4
  1246. 4
  1247. 4
  1248. 4
  1249. 4
  1250. 4
  1251. 4
  1252. 4
  1253. 4
  1254. 4
  1255. 4
  1256. 4
  1257. 4
  1258. 4
  1259. 4
  1260. 4
  1261. 4
  1262. 4
  1263. 4
  1264. This is all part of the ongoing agenda. It first happened in Swedish Museums, where they were destroying Viking artefacts and replacing them with their immigrant populations artefacts in 2017. '' The struggle to erase Swedish history, break down Swedish culture and force the Swedes to assimilate into the multicultural globalist phenomenon is going according to plan. Coins, arrow heads, ritual amulets, weapons, jewellery and weights that were kept in the past are now directly dumped into metal recycling bins upon discovery instead of being treasured and displayed. The BBC used an incompetent feminist professor’s views to create an “educational cartoon” where, among other things, Roman centurions in Britain are black. This is one episode of a series where some Picts and Norman Barons are also black. There is not much difference between those Liberal iconoclasts and the soldiers of the Islamic state’s goons smashing millennia-old statues and monuments with sledgehammers. In both cases, those who destroy claim that the targets are false idols. The first against a multiculturalist future and the latter against Allah. Such practices are revolting to say the least. A prime example of how Cultural Marxism aims at erasing the past to get rid of the last roots that our children can call theirs. Just like violent communist regimes in the past aimed first at burning libraries, bringing down churches, graveyards and museums before shooting teachers and scholars in the back of the head. By destroying elements attached to the idea of Viking culture, which valued financial success, bravery and putting one’s people first, Sweden’s self-loathing decision makers. try to erase the few traces that show Sweden as something else than a multiculturalism-infected petri dish. ''Destroy a people’s history so they cannot find a common heritage to fight for and 'they' can start anew and create the society 'they' seek.''
    4
  1265. 4
  1266. 4
  1267. 4
  1268. 4
  1269. 4
  1270. 4
  1271. 4
  1272. 4
  1273. 4
  1274. 4
  1275. 4
  1276. 4
  1277. 4
  1278. 4
  1279. 4
  1280. 4
  1281. 4
  1282. 4
  1283. 4
  1284. 4
  1285. 4
  1286. 4
  1287. 4
  1288. 4
  1289. 4
  1290. 4
  1291. 4
  1292. 4
  1293. 4
  1294. 4
  1295. 4
  1296. 4
  1297. 4
  1298. 4
  1299. 4
  1300. 4
  1301. 4
  1302. 4
  1303. 4
  1304. 4
  1305. 4
  1306.  @Skanderbeg-t8z  Today, people think of the Celtic culture as being a part of Irish and Scottish heritage. The instantly recognizable Celtic art style is something people associate with Ireland, and movies such as Braveheart cement the idea that the Celts were present in Scotland. Furthermore, most British school children are taught about Hadrian’s Wall, built by the Roman emperor Hadrian in 122 AD to keep the Picts, a Celtic tribe in modern Scotland, confined to the North. But Celts were not originally from either of these regions. In fact, the earliest evidence of Celtic culture is from the site of Hallstatt, Austria. The site has over 1000 burials with Celtic features, dated to approximately 1200 BC. Continental Celts were the Celtic peoples that inhabited mainland Europe. In the 3rd and 2nd centuries BC, Celts inhabited a large part of mainland Western Europe and large parts of Western Southern Europe (Iberian peninsula), southern Central Europe and some regions of the Balkans and Anatolia. They were most of the population in Gallia, today's France, Switzerland, possibly Belgica – far Northern France, Belgium and far Southern Netherlands, large parts of Hispania, i.e. Iberian Peninsula – Spain and Portugal, in the northern, central and western regions; southern Central Europe. The ancient Romans called the Celtic Germanic tribes “barbarians.” This is because they believed that the Germanic tribes were uncivilized and primitive. The Romans thought that the Germanic tribes were a threat to their way of life and their civilization. They did have some traditions which were barbaric. One of the grimmer aspects of Celtic tradition was the practice of head-hunting. The Celts believed that human souls resided in heads, and so after victory in battle Celtic warriors would decapitate their enemies. Having a large collection of enemy heads was a sign of prestige to the Celts, and they would even go so far as to decorate the doors to their houses with the heads of their enemies to show off how successful they were in battle. At one site in France there is even a pillar with special niches carved out to display severed heads. When the Germanic tribes invaded Britain, many Britons escaped to France, to a place that was later named after them, which is now called Brittany.
    4
  1307. 4
  1308. 4
  1309. 4
  1310. 4
  1311. 4
  1312. 4
  1313. 4
  1314. 4
  1315. 4
  1316. 4
  1317. 4
  1318. 4
  1319. 4
  1320. 4
  1321. 4
  1322. 4
  1323. 4
  1324. 4
  1325. 4
  1326. 4
  1327. 4
  1328. 4
  1329. 4
  1330. 4
  1331. 4
  1332. 4
  1333. 4
  1334. 4
  1335. 4
  1336. 4
  1337. 4
  1338. 4
  1339. 4
  1340. 4
  1341. 4
  1342. 4
  1343. 4
  1344. 4
  1345. 4
  1346. 4
  1347. 4
  1348. 4
  1349. 4
  1350. 4
  1351. 4
  1352. 4
  1353. 4
  1354. 4
  1355. 4
  1356. 4
  1357. 4
  1358. 4
  1359. 4
  1360. 4
  1361. 4
  1362. 4
  1363. 4
  1364. 4
  1365. 4
  1366. 4
  1367. 4
  1368. 4
  1369. 4
  1370. 4
  1371. 4
  1372. 4
  1373. 4
  1374. 4
  1375. 4
  1376. 4
  1377. 4
  1378. 4
  1379. 4
  1380. 4
  1381. 4
  1382. 4
  1383. 4
  1384. 4
  1385. 4
  1386. 4
  1387. 4
  1388. 4
  1389. 4
  1390. 4
  1391. 4
  1392. 4
  1393. 4
  1394. 4
  1395. 4
  1396. 4
  1397. 4
  1398. 4
  1399. 4
  1400. 4
  1401. 4
  1402. 4
  1403. 4
  1404. 4
  1405. 4
  1406. 4
  1407. 4
  1408. 4
  1409. 4
  1410. 4
  1411. 4
  1412. 4
  1413. 4
  1414. 4
  1415. 4
  1416. 4
  1417. 4
  1418. 4
  1419. 4
  1420. 4
  1421. 4
  1422. 4
  1423. 4
  1424. 4
  1425. 4
  1426. 4
  1427. 4
  1428. 4
  1429. 4
  1430. 4
  1431. 4
  1432. 4
  1433. 4
  1434.  @monstabitta  No we were not part of Schengen, but government still allowed anyone given an EU passport into Britain anyway! We were in the EU illegally anyway! Tony Blair committed a treasonous act by the signing of the Amsterdam Treaty in 1997 which increased the European Union’s powers for action at community level, and included further European integration in legislative, police, judicial, customs and security matters and strengthened Europol. This was a clear act of treason, and because of this, Tony Blair was in fact, actually never the Prime Minister at law. Much like any criminal in supposed “public office”, Blair tried to get rid of the penalty of the crime he was guilty of. There is also the common law crime of treason. An offence of attempting to overthrow the government of a state to which the offender owes allegiance; or of betraying the state into the hands of a foreign power. We we’re never in the EU or the so called “common market” to begin with. This is not only because constitutional law dictates that no foreign powers may have jurisdiction over the United Kingdom, but because the Heath administration lied by telling the country that the ECA would not affect the UK’s sovereignty. The Kilmuir Letter, which was written in December, 1960, evidenced that there would indeed be “loss of sovereignty” and was hidden for thirty years leaving the public completely ignorant. This damning letter to Edward Heath by the then-Lord Chancellor attempted to remind the Prime Minister of the treacherous steps that he was about to take upon signing the Treaty of Rome. Another document released from the Foreign and Commonwealth Office after thirty years of secrecy titled case file 30/1048 also meticulously documents the Heath administrations Treason, Sedition and Fraud which were used to admit us to the “common market” which later flourished into the European “Union.” The solution never was Brexit. As it turns out, the so-called referendum on the 23rd of June, 2016 did nothing but confuse the people more. The (not so) Great Repeal Bill converts all existing EU law into British law which is illegal. The EU Military integration and absorption of the UK Armed Forces is still underway, with no debate in either purporting parliaments. Never since 1972 have the people been so betrayed. The solution is very simple. In 2001 the Crown was deposed. It has been law for 16 years for the people of the UK to put an end to the institutionalized tyranny and reassert their laws and customs, however this fact has been covered up by impostors within the treasonous regime.
    4
  1435. 4
  1436. 4
  1437. 4
  1438. 4
  1439. 4
  1440. 4
  1441. 4
  1442. 4
  1443. 4
  1444. 4
  1445. 4
  1446. 4
  1447. 4
  1448. 4
  1449. 4
  1450. 4
  1451. 4
  1452. 4
  1453. 4
  1454. 4
  1455. 4
  1456. 4
  1457. 4
  1458. 4
  1459. 4
  1460. 4
  1461. 4
  1462. 4
  1463. 4
  1464. 4
  1465. 4
  1466. 4
  1467. 4
  1468. 4
  1469. 4
  1470. 4
  1471. 4
  1472. 4
  1473. 4
  1474. 4
  1475. 4
  1476. 4
  1477. 4
  1478. 4
  1479. 4
  1480. 4
  1481. 4
  1482. 4
  1483. 4
  1484. 4
  1485. 4
  1486. 4
  1487. 3
  1488. 3
  1489. 3
  1490. 3
  1491. 3
  1492. 3
  1493. 3
  1494. 3
  1495. 3
  1496. 3
  1497. 3
  1498. 3
  1499. 3
  1500. 3
  1501. 3
  1502. 3
  1503. 3
  1504. 3
  1505. 3
  1506. 3
  1507. 3
  1508. 3
  1509. 3
  1510. 3
  1511. 3
  1512. 3
  1513. 3
  1514. 3
  1515. 3
  1516. 3
  1517. 3
  1518. 3
  1519. 3
  1520. 3
  1521. 3
  1522. 3
  1523. 3
  1524. 3
  1525. 3
  1526. 3
  1527. 3
  1528. 3
  1529. 3
  1530. 3
  1531. 3
  1532. 3
  1533. The Windsor Framework: a backdoor to Brexit betrayal Rishi Sunak’s Northern Ireland deal sells out UK sovereignty.(Spiked) This will have a real, tangible impact on the UK’s ability to govern itself. For example, a bill is currently making its way through parliament that would outlaw importing hunting trophies of endangered species. This is not only the will of the UK government – it is also a popular policy with the public. It will be rendered pointless, however, by the Windsor Framework. The compromise offered by the framework means that trophies can still be brought back to Northern Ireland. EU law will remain dominant in Northern Ireland and the EU does not intend to introduce any similar hunting-trophy ban. Once in Northern Ireland, there are several ways the trophies then pass seamlessly into the UK. Parliament is set to enact a ‘ban’ that is a ban in name only. It will be a nonsense law. The government will have compromised away all its power. This will happen time and again. Successive UK governments – of all parties – will want to pass new laws and follow through on campaign promises. The only way they will be able to do so is if the EU agrees. Earlier this year, the EU made it lawful for partially defatted cricket powder – an insect product – to be put into food. All sorts of things from pasta to flour to beer can now legally contain cricket powder in the EU. Food with this powder will also be allowed into the UK, in the same way that the supposedly illegal hunting trophies would be. And our government will be powerless to stop it. The UK won’t even have a say over how products containing the cricket powder are labelled. All that will lie with the EU. The EU has an expansive approach to allowing insect products into the food chain. Under the Windsor Framework, the UK will be powerless to stop the same from happening here. Hate the idea? You could try to elect a government that promises to stop it. But under the framework, it simply won’t matter. Under EU rule again through the back door. Sunak has given EU back our sovereignty. R.I.P. Brexit. Conspiracy or fact? You decide.
    3
  1534. 3
  1535. 3
  1536. 3
  1537. 3
  1538. 3
  1539. 3
  1540. 3
  1541. 3
  1542. 3
  1543. 3
  1544. 3
  1545. 3
  1546. 3
  1547. 3
  1548. 3
  1549. 3
  1550. 3
  1551. 3
  1552. 3
  1553. 3
  1554. 3
  1555. 3
  1556. 3
  1557. 3
  1558. 3
  1559. 3
  1560. 3
  1561. 3
  1562. 3
  1563. 3
  1564. 3
  1565. 3
  1566. 3
  1567. 3
  1568. 3
  1569. 3
  1570. 3
  1571. 3
  1572. 3
  1573. 3
  1574. 3
  1575. If the elites were really worried about climate change and the burning of fossil fuels, why do they frequently travel to their climate meetings around the world in private jets? Private jets generally produce significantly more emissions per passenger than commercial flights. Then get into heavy fuel guzzling limousines to travel to their meetings. Why not stay at home and have online meetings? Why is it a case of 'rules for thee but not for me'? Their luxury Superyachts guzzle more fuel for one voyage, than the average car driver in a year! Is it a case they are losing control of the worlds oil? So want to substitute it with expensive electric vehicles which have an even bigger carbon footprint than motor vehicles. Why are the elites buying up swathes of farmland such a Bill Gates in America, Europe and the rest of the world, closing down farms because of 'methane gasses' and putting insects in our foods? while they dine on prime steak, the finest wines and finest cigars, yet are banning smoking and meat for everyone else? The answer is simple 'control'. He who controls, the money, weather, food and resources, control the world. Ukraine and Russia are known as the bread basket of Europe. Not only for their farm crops but they are also rich in minerals, ores, oil and gas. Why has Ukrainian refugees, who fled their countries war, been given settled status and citizenship? Putin along with Angela Merkel, who invited millions of immigrants into Europe, were also WEF young leaders, along with Bill Gates, Jeff Bezos, Mark Zuckerberg, Larry Page and Sergey Brin, Boris Johnson are all listed as YGL alumni. Henry Kissinger, Bill Clinton and Anthony Fauci – are named as members. And beyond that, WEF denotes others – often those who speak at Davos and have an influence on WEF policies – as “Agenda Contributors.” Joe Biden, Donald Trump, Xi Jinping, George Soros, Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla, Bank of America CEO Brian Moynihan, transhumanist author Yuval Noah Harari, State Street CEO Ron O’Hanley and BlackRock CEO Larry Fink – who also sits on WEF's board – are Agenda Contributors.
    3
  1576. 3
  1577. 3
  1578. 3
  1579. 3
  1580. 3
  1581. 3
  1582. 3
  1583. 3
  1584. Our globalist WEF run government are now bringing in laws to imprison homeowner's if they do not lag their lofts correctly, its a globalist dictatorship! People will lose their homes, '' You will own nothing, but be happy''! Brexiteers saw what the EU is and voted to leave. A globalist, socialist Ponzi scheme, where the rich West have to share what they have taken thousands of years to acquire, with those less fortunate who have acquired nothing. All levelling-up does is impoverish the richer countries to the level of the poorer ones and makes all impoverished. King Charles III set up the 'green initiative' with Schwab of the WEF, royals are firmly behind this. Prince Phillip and Charles regularly attended Bilderberg meetings. Every day in the media we are bombarded with propaganda news items of the royals of Europe, plugging themselves. While a member of the EU Britain paid billions for poorer member states, who paid nothing, to build and modernise their countries, while ours degraded, buildings crumbling, roads full of pot holes, lack of housing, NHS crumbling, while it was expected to treat Europe and the world for free at taxpayers expense! We never actually left the EU, it is all smoke and mirrors, we are still in it and still paying, they are still stealing our fish and they are still sending their immigrants here through our shared open borders. The EU globalist elites travel around the world to their meetings in private jets, or their super yachts, while dictating to the majority to not travel, wanting to lock us down in 15 minute cities. Now they are introducing insects into our diets, which they have added to flour, pasta, bread and sauces, while they dine on the finest foods and wine. Tells you all you need to know and how evil and insidious they are.
    3
  1585. 3
  1586. 3
  1587. 3
  1588. 3
  1589. 3
  1590. 3
  1591. 3
  1592. 3
  1593. 3
  1594. 3
  1595. 3
  1596. 3
  1597. 3
  1598. 3
  1599. 3
  1600. 3
  1601. 3
  1602. 3
  1603. 3
  1604. 3
  1605. 3
  1606. 3
  1607. 3
  1608. 3
  1609. 3
  1610. 3
  1611. 3
  1612. 3
  1613. 3
  1614. 3
  1615. 3
  1616. 3
  1617. 3
  1618. 3
  1619. 3
  1620. 3
  1621. 3
  1622. 3
  1623. 3
  1624. 3
  1625. 3
  1626. 3
  1627. 3
  1628. 3
  1629. 3
  1630. 3
  1631. 3
  1632. 3
  1633. 3
  1634. 3
  1635. 3
  1636. 3
  1637. 3
  1638. 3
  1639. 3
  1640. 3
  1641. 3
  1642. 3
  1643. 3
  1644. 3
  1645. 3
  1646. 3
  1647. 3
  1648. 3
  1649. 3
  1650. 3
  1651. 3
  1652. 3
  1653. 3
  1654. 3
  1655. 3
  1656. 3
  1657. 3
  1658. 3
  1659. 3
  1660. 3
  1661. 3
  1662. 3
  1663. 3
  1664. 3
  1665. 3
  1666. 3
  1667. 3
  1668. 3
  1669. 3
  1670. 3
  1671. 3
  1672. 3
  1673. 3
  1674. 3
  1675. 3
  1676. 3
  1677. 3
  1678. 3
  1679. 3
  1680. 3
  1681. 3
  1682. 3
  1683. 3
  1684. 3
  1685. 3
  1686. 3
  1687. 3
  1688. 3
  1689. 3
  1690. 3
  1691. 3
  1692. 3
  1693. 3
  1694. 3
  1695. 3
  1696. 3
  1697. 3
  1698. 3
  1699. 3
  1700. 3
  1701. 3
  1702. 3
  1703. 3
  1704. 3
  1705. 3
  1706. 3
  1707. 3
  1708. 3
  1709. 3
  1710. 3
  1711. 3
  1712. 3
  1713. 3
  1714. 3
  1715. 3
  1716. 3
  1717. 3
  1718. 3
  1719. 3
  1720. 3
  1721. 3
  1722. 3
  1723. 3
  1724. 3
  1725. 3
  1726. 3
  1727. 3
  1728. 3
  1729. 3
  1730. 3
  1731. 3
  1732. 3
  1733. 3
  1734. 3
  1735. 3
  1736. 3
  1737. 3
  1738. 3
  1739. 3
  1740. 3
  1741. 3
  1742. 3
  1743. 3
  1744. 3
  1745. 3
  1746. 3
  1747. 3
  1748. 3
  1749. 3
  1750. 3
  1751. 3
  1752. 3
  1753. 3
  1754. 3
  1755. 3
  1756. 3
  1757. 3
  1758. 3
  1759. 3
  1760. 3
  1761. 3
  1762. Of course they are illegal, the Establishment, government and police know they are breaking the law, yet continue to welcome them with open arms. Same thing is happening across the Western world. The flood gates were swung fully open at the start of lockdown, they were being ferried in via air, road and sea, while we were arrested for daring to venture from our homes, breaking their illegal Covid curfew. Prince Charles sized upon the lockdown at COP26 summit, he warned that the world ( Globalist elites) have a one-off “golden opportunity” to seize something good from the coronavirus pandemic as he launched The Great Reset project. ''As we move from rescue to recovery, therefore, we have a unique but rapidly shrinking window of opportunity to learn lessons and reset ourselves on a more sustainable path. “It is an opportunity we have never had before and may never have again. He talked of a 'war-like footing' is needed. Charles listened as Professor Klaus Schwab, executive chairman of the World Economic Forum, called for a new social contract and warned against ignoring racism. “So we must use all the levers we have at our disposal, knowing that each and every one of us (global elite) has a vital role to play.” Prof Schwab said the coronavirus crisis had exposed the fundamental lack of social cohesion, fairness, inclusion, and equality.(Pro-migration) “We have a choice to remain passive, which would lead to the amplification of many of the trends we see today – polarisation, nationalism, racism, and ultimately increased social unrest and conflicts,” he said. “But we have another choice. We can build a new social contract, particularly integrating the next generation(Of immigrants). We can change our behaviour to be in harmony with nature again… In short, we need a Great Reset. “We have to mobilise all constituents (puppets) of our global society to work together.” The prince added: “I can only hope that as this current crisis passes, we are able to reflect on, and shape, the type of world we want for ourselves (Global elites) and for future generations.” (migrant replacement population) 'Doublespeak' for the Great Reset, New World Order, enforced mass immigration of the Western world. Hate speech and racism laws, in order to enforce this unwanted change of population replacement on the people of the Western world.
    3
  1763. 3
  1764. 3
  1765. 3
  1766. 3
  1767. 3
  1768. 3
  1769. 3
  1770. 3
  1771. 3
  1772. 3
  1773. 3
  1774. 3
  1775. NOOOO! We have thousands of them here already protesting on our streets! The Jews can keep them, we are not their dustbin! America are kicking them out let them take them! Times of India - 4/2/2025 'Gaza Is Hell': Trump To Kick Out Palestinians From Gaza? Netanyahu Caught Smiling On Camera.' Politico - 6/2/2025 'Trump doubles down on kicking Palestinians out of Gaza' 'U.S. president claims no American soldiers will be needed for “one of the greatest and most spectacular developments of its kind on Earth.” 'The Palestinians should be resettled into “far safer and more beautiful communities,” fitted with “new and modern homes,” Trump said in an early morning post on Truth Social. The forced evacuation would give Palestinians “a chance to be happy, safe, and free,” he added.' 'Trump called the project “one of the greatest and most spectacular developments of its kind on Earth,” which he claimed would not require any U.S. military presence.' BBC - 10/2/2025 'US President Donald Trump has said the two million Palestinians who would be resettled in neighbouring countries under his plan to take over and rebuild the Gaza Strip would have no right of return.' A clip of the interview was released a day after Trump said he was "committed to buying and owning Gaza", despite global condemnation of the plan he unveiled last week. But Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu praised Trump's proposal as "revolutionary and creative". 'The UN has warned that any forced displacement of civilians from occupied territory is strictly prohibited under international law and "tantamount to ethnic cleansing".
    3
  1776. 3
  1777. 3
  1778. 3
  1779. 3
  1780. 3
  1781. 3
  1782. 3
  1783. 3
  1784. 3
  1785. 3
  1786. 3
  1787. 3
  1788. 3
  1789. 3
  1790. 3
  1791. 3
  1792. 3
  1793. 3
  1794. 3
  1795. 3
  1796. 3
  1797. 3
  1798. 3
  1799. 3
  1800. 3
  1801. 3
  1802. 3
  1803. 3
  1804. 3
  1805. 3
  1806. 3
  1807. 3
  1808. 3
  1809. 3
  1810. 3
  1811. 3
  1812. 3
  1813. 3
  1814. 3
  1815. 3
  1816. 3
  1817. 3
  1818. 3
  1819. 3
  1820. 3
  1821. 3
  1822. 3
  1823. 3
  1824. 3
  1825. 3
  1826. 3
  1827. 3
  1828. 3
  1829. 3
  1830. 3
  1831. 3
  1832. 3
  1833. 3
  1834. 3
  1835. 3
  1836. 3
  1837. 3
  1838. 3
  1839. 3
  1840. 3
  1841. 3
  1842. 3
  1843. 3
  1844. 3
  1845. 3
  1846. 3
  1847. 3
  1848. 3
  1849. 3
  1850. 3
  1851. 3
  1852. 3
  1853. 3
  1854. 3
  1855. 3
  1856. 3
  1857. 3
  1858. 3
  1859. 3
  1860. 3
  1861. 3
  1862. 3
  1863. 3
  1864. 3
  1865. 3
  1866. 3
  1867. 3
  1868. 3
  1869. 3
  1870. 3
  1871. 3
  1872. 3
  1873. 3
  1874. 3
  1875. 3
  1876. 3
  1877. 3
  1878. 3
  1879. 3
  1880. 3
  1881. In the 1970s The Paedophile Information Exchange was an organisation with around 300 members which used its links inside government and the civil liberties movement to lobby for the decriminalisation of sex with children as young as four years old! In March 1976, the National Council for Civil Liberties (NCCL), called for an equal age of consent of 14, or 10, in Britain. The submission was signed by Harriet Harman, who was a legal officer for the NCCL at the time before becoming an MP in 1982. Harman denies ever supporting the age of consent being lowered to 10, and claimed that right-wing newspapers the Daily Mail and The Telegraph had tried to make her "guilty by association" with fringe groups that had previously been connected to the NCCL. Miranda Sawyer, British journalist specialised in music and youth culture, suggested that "we have sexual feelings from a very early age", considering that sex is "natural behaviour". She favoured lowering the age of consent to 12. 2013 David Cameron has rejected an "offensive" suggestion by officials that the age of sexual consent might be reduced to 14. In November 2013, a leading public health expert and Faculty of Public Health president, Professor John Ashton, called for the age of consent to be lowered to 15. Evidence from some of the groups who have advocated for lowering the age of consent have included known and convicted paedophiles within some of the organisations, for example the Paedophile Information Exchange. With such people in our establishment it is little wonder the likes of Jimmy Saville got away with it!
    3
  1882. 3
  1883. 3
  1884. 3
  1885. 3
  1886. 3
  1887. 3
  1888. 3
  1889. 3
  1890. 3
  1891. 3
  1892. 3
  1893. 3
  1894. 3
  1895. 3
  1896. 3
  1897. 3
  1898. 3
  1899. 3
  1900. 3
  1901. 3
  1902. 3
  1903. 3
  1904. 3
  1905. 3
  1906. 3
  1907. 3
  1908. 3
  1909. 3
  1910. 3
  1911. 3
  1912. 3
  1913. 3
  1914. 3
  1915. 3
  1916. 3
  1917. 3
  1918. 3
  1919. 3
  1920. 3
  1921. 3
  1922. 3
  1923. 3
  1924. 3
  1925. 3
  1926. 3
  1927. 3
  1928. 3
  1929. 3
  1930. 3
  1931. 3
  1932. 3
  1933. 3
  1934. 3
  1935. 3
  1936. 3
  1937. 3
  1938. 3
  1939. 3
  1940. 3
  1941. 3
  1942. 3
  1943. 3
  1944. 3
  1945. 3
  1946. 3
  1947. 3
  1948. 3
  1949. 3
  1950. 3
  1951. 3
  1952. 3
  1953. 3
  1954. 3
  1955. 3
  1956. 3
  1957. 3
  1958. 3
  1959. 3
  1960. 2
  1961. 2
  1962. 2
  1963. 2
  1964. 2
  1965. 2
  1966. 2
  1967. 2
  1968. 2
  1969. 2
  1970. 2
  1971. 2
  1972. 2
  1973. 2
  1974. 2
  1975. 2
  1976. 2
  1977. 2
  1978. 2
  1979. 2
  1980. 2
  1981. 2
  1982. 2
  1983. 2
  1984. 2
  1985. 2
  1986. 2
  1987. 2
  1988. 2
  1989. 2
  1990. 2
  1991. 2
  1992. 2
  1993. 2
  1994. 2
  1995. 2
  1996. 2
  1997. 2
  1998. 2
  1999. 2
  2000. 2
  2001. 2
  2002. 2
  2003. 2
  2004. 2
  2005. 2
  2006. 2
  2007. 2
  2008. 2
  2009. 2
  2010. 2
  2011. 2
  2012. 2
  2013. 2
  2014. 2
  2015. 2
  2016. 2
  2017. 2
  2018. 2
  2019. 2
  2020. 2
  2021. 2
  2022. 2
  2023. 2
  2024. 2
  2025. 2
  2026. 2
  2027. 2
  2028. 2
  2029. 2
  2030. 2
  2031. 2
  2032. 2
  2033. 2
  2034. 2
  2035. 2
  2036. 2
  2037. 2
  2038. 2
  2039. 2
  2040. 2
  2041. 2
  2042. 2
  2043. 2
  2044. 2
  2045. 2
  2046. 2
  2047. 2
  2048. 2
  2049. 2
  2050. 2
  2051. 2
  2052. 2
  2053. 2
  2054. 2
  2055. 2
  2056. 2
  2057. 2
  2058. 2
  2059. 2
  2060. 2
  2061. 2
  2062. 2
  2063. 2
  2064. 2
  2065. 2
  2066. 2
  2067. 2
  2068. 2
  2069. 2
  2070. 2
  2071. 2
  2072. 2
  2073. 2
  2074. 2
  2075. 2
  2076. 2
  2077. 2
  2078. 2
  2079. 2
  2080. 2
  2081. 2
  2082. 2
  2083. 2
  2084. 2
  2085. 2
  2086. 2
  2087. 2
  2088. 2
  2089. 2
  2090. 2
  2091. 2
  2092. 2
  2093. 2
  2094. 2
  2095. 2
  2096. 2
  2097. 2
  2098. 2
  2099. 2
  2100. 2
  2101. 2
  2102. 2
  2103. 2
  2104. 2
  2105. 2
  2106. 2
  2107. 2
  2108. 2
  2109. 2
  2110. 2
  2111. 2
  2112. 2
  2113. 2
  2114. 2
  2115. 2
  2116. 2
  2117. 2
  2118. 2
  2119. 2
  2120. 2
  2121. 2
  2122. 2
  2123. 2
  2124. 2
  2125. 2
  2126. 2
  2127. 2
  2128. 2
  2129. 2
  2130. 2
  2131. 2
  2132. 2
  2133. 2
  2134. 2
  2135. 2
  2136. 2
  2137. 2
  2138. 2
  2139. 2
  2140. 2
  2141. 2
  2142. 2
  2143. 2
  2144. 2
  2145. 2
  2146. 2
  2147. 2
  2148. 2
  2149. 2
  2150. 2
  2151. 2
  2152. 2
  2153. 2
  2154. 2
  2155. 2
  2156. 2
  2157. 2
  2158. 2
  2159. 2
  2160. 2
  2161. 2
  2162. 2
  2163. 2
  2164. 2
  2165. 2
  2166. 2
  2167. 2
  2168. 2
  2169. 2
  2170. 2
  2171. 2
  2172. 2
  2173. 2
  2174. 2
  2175. 2
  2176. 2
  2177. 2
  2178. 2
  2179. 2
  2180. 2
  2181. 2
  2182. 2
  2183. 2
  2184. 2
  2185. 2
  2186. 2
  2187. 2
  2188. 2
  2189. 2
  2190. 2
  2191. 2
  2192. 2
  2193. 2
  2194. 2
  2195. 2
  2196. 2
  2197. 2
  2198. 2
  2199. 2
  2200. 2
  2201. 2
  2202. I am glad you mentioned the 'Windrush myth' Simon, no matter how many times I try to mention this fact they refuse to believe this: 'A month before the ship Empire Windrush was due to dock in May 1948, the acting governor of Jamaica sent an urgent telegram, via airmail so it would be swiftly received, warning the British government about the boat’s arrival: ''I regret to inform you that more than 350 troop-deck passages by EMPIRE WINDRUSH … have been booked by men who hope to find employment in the United Kingdom, and that it is likely that this number will be increased by another 100 before the vessel leaves. Most of them have no particular skill and few will have more than a few pounds on their arrival. Public announcements on the difficulty of obtaining work have not discouraged these bookings…'' This was the first the British government knew of the Jamaicans onboard the Windrush coming to Britain. Britain had invited Europeans, made homeless by war, to come to Britain post war via the European Voluntary Workers scheme, for nursing, textile, factory and mill work. In total some 91,000 people came to the UK between 1946 and 1949 under the various EVW schemes. Once the Caribbean's heard of this, they too wanted to come to Britain, as there was mass unemployment and rioting at that time in the Caribbean. The Jamaicans were not invited by the British government, they were economic immigrants seeking a better life. Britain lost around 300,000 at war, Britain's population in 1948 was around 50 million, the myth we lost so many at war that we needed mass immigration, is simply not true!
    2
  2203. 2
  2204. 2
  2205. 2
  2206. 2
  2207. 2
  2208. 2
  2209. 2
  2210. 2
  2211. 2
  2212. 2
  2213. 2
  2214. 2
  2215. 2
  2216. 2
  2217. 2
  2218. 2
  2219. 2
  2220. 2
  2221. 2
  2222. 2
  2223. 2
  2224. 2
  2225. 2
  2226. 2
  2227. 2
  2228. 2
  2229. 2
  2230. 2
  2231. 2
  2232. 2
  2233. 2
  2234. 2
  2235. 2
  2236. 2
  2237. 2
  2238. 2
  2239. 2
  2240. 2
  2241. 2
  2242. 2
  2243. 2
  2244. 2
  2245. 2
  2246. 2
  2247. 2
  2248. 2
  2249. 2
  2250. 2
  2251. 2
  2252. 2
  2253. 2
  2254. 2
  2255. 2
  2256. 2
  2257. 2
  2258. 2
  2259. 2
  2260. 2
  2261. 2
  2262. 2
  2263. 2
  2264. 2
  2265. 2
  2266. 2
  2267. 2
  2268. 2
  2269. 2
  2270. 2
  2271. 2
  2272. 2
  2273. 2
  2274. 2
  2275. 2
  2276. 2
  2277. 2
  2278. 2
  2279. 2
  2280. 2
  2281. 2
  2282. 2
  2283. 2
  2284. 2
  2285. 2
  2286. 2
  2287. 2
  2288. 2
  2289. 2
  2290. 2
  2291. 2
  2292. 2
  2293.  @ConradAinger  We know that Iberian Beakers, British Beakers, or Sicilian EBA – representing the most likely closest source population of speakers of Proto-Galaico-Lusitanian, Pre-Celtic Indo-European, and Proto-Elymian, respectively – have already been successfully tested for a direct origin among Western European Beakers in Olalde et al. (2018), Olalde et al. (2019), and Fernandes et al. (2019). This success in ascertaining a closer Beaker source is probably due to the physical isolation of the specific groups (related to Germany_Beaker, Netherlands_Beaker, and NE_Mediterranean_Beaker samples, respectively) after their migration into regions dominated by peoples without Steppe-related ancestry. Furthermore, Celtic-speaking populations expanding with Urnfield south of the Pyrenees also show a good fit with a source close to France_Beaker. Now, there is a simpler way to understand what kind of Steppe-related ancestry is proper of Bell Beakers. I tested two simple models for some Beaker groups: Yamnaya + Hungary Baden vs. Corded Ware + GAC Poland. After all, the Bell Beaker folk should prefer a source more closely related to either Yamnaya Hungary or Central European Corded Ware: Models of admixture for Bell Beaker groups Interestingly, models including Yamnaya + Baden show good fits for the most important groups related to North-West Indo-Europeans, including Bell Beakers from Germany, the Netherlands, Italy, and Poland, representing the most likely closest source populations of speakers of Pre-Proto-Celtic, Pre-Proto-Germanic, Proto-Italo-Venetic, and Pre-Proto-Balto-Slavic, respectively. Here we see that, at least in this analysis there are reasonable models with CordedWareNeolithic is a mix of either WHG or LBKNeolithic and YamnayaEBA. (…) The point of this note is not to give a serious phylogenetic analysis but the results here certainly support a major Steppe contribution to the Corded Ware population, which is entirely concordant with the archaeology Carlos Quiles. Yamnaya-Hungarian, did not replace but admixed, so was not a replacement of Brittonic peoples but an admixture. According to Jones et al. (2015) and Haak et al. (2015), autosomal tests indicate that the Yamnaya people were the result of a genetic admixture between two different hunter-gatherer populations: distinctive "Eastern Hunter-Gatherers" (EHG), from Eastern Europe, with high affinity to the Mal'ta–Buret' culture or other, closely related people from Siberia and a population of "Caucasus hunter-gatherers" (CHG) who probably arrived from the Caucasus or Iran. Each of those two populations contributed about half the Yamnaya DNA. This admixture is referred to in archaeogenetics as Western Steppe Herder (WSH) ancestry. A 2022 study by Lazaridis et al. found that the typical phenotype among the Yamnaya population was brown eyes, brown hair, and light to intermediate skin colour. None of their Yamnaya samples were predicted to have either blue eyes or blond hair, in contrast with later Steppe groups in Russia and Central Asia, as well as the Bell Beaker culture in Europe, who did carry these phenotypes in high proportions.
    2
  2294. 2
  2295. 2
  2296. 2
  2297. 2
  2298. 2
  2299. 2
  2300. 2
  2301. 2
  2302. 2
  2303. 2
  2304. 2
  2305. 2
  2306. 2
  2307. 2
  2308. 2
  2309. 2
  2310. 2
  2311. 2
  2312. 2
  2313. 2
  2314. 2
  2315. 2
  2316. 2
  2317. 2
  2318. 2
  2319. 2
  2320. 2
  2321. 2
  2322. 2
  2323. 2
  2324. 2
  2325. 2
  2326. 2
  2327. 2
  2328. 2
  2329. 2
  2330. 2
  2331. 2
  2332. 2
  2333. 2
  2334. 2
  2335. 2
  2336. 2
  2337. 2
  2338. 2
  2339. 2
  2340. 2
  2341. 2
  2342. 2
  2343. 2
  2344. 2
  2345. 2
  2346. 2
  2347. 2
  2348. 2
  2349. 2
  2350. 2
  2351. 2
  2352. 2
  2353. 2
  2354. 2
  2355. 2
  2356. 2
  2357. 2
  2358. 2
  2359. 2
  2360. 2
  2361. 2
  2362. 2
  2363. 2
  2364. 2
  2365. 2
  2366. 2
  2367. 2
  2368. 2
  2369. 2
  2370. 2
  2371. 2
  2372. 2
  2373. 2
  2374. 2
  2375. 2
  2376. 2
  2377. 2
  2378. 2
  2379. 2
  2380. 2
  2381. 2
  2382. 2
  2383. 2
  2384. 2
  2385. 2
  2386. 2
  2387. 2
  2388. 2
  2389. 2
  2390. 2
  2391. 2
  2392. 2
  2393. 2
  2394. 2
  2395. 2
  2396. 2
  2397. 2
  2398. 2
  2399. 2
  2400. 2
  2401. 2
  2402. 2
  2403. 2
  2404. 2
  2405. 2
  2406. 2
  2407. 2
  2408. 2
  2409. 2
  2410. 2
  2411. 2
  2412. 2
  2413. 2
  2414. 2
  2415. 2
  2416. 2
  2417. 2
  2418. 2
  2419. 2
  2420. 2
  2421. 2
  2422. 2
  2423. 2
  2424. 2
  2425. 2
  2426. 2
  2427. 2
  2428. 2
  2429. 2
  2430. 2
  2431. 2
  2432. 2
  2433. 2
  2434. 2
  2435. 2
  2436. 2
  2437. 2
  2438. 2
  2439. 2
  2440. 2
  2441. 2
  2442. 2
  2443. 2
  2444. 2
  2445. 2
  2446. 2
  2447. 2
  2448. 2
  2449. 2
  2450. 2
  2451. 2
  2452. 2
  2453. 2
  2454. 2
  2455. 2
  2456. 2
  2457. 2
  2458. 2
  2459. 2
  2460. 2
  2461. 2
  2462. 2
  2463. 2
  2464. 2
  2465. 2
  2466. 2
  2467. 2
  2468. 2
  2469. 2
  2470. 2
  2471. 2
  2472. 2
  2473. 2
  2474. 2
  2475. 2
  2476. 2
  2477. 2
  2478. 2
  2479. 2
  2480. 2
  2481. 2
  2482. 2
  2483. 2
  2484. 2
  2485. 2
  2486. 2
  2487. 2
  2488. 2
  2489. 2
  2490. 2
  2491. 2
  2492. 2
  2493. 2
  2494. 2
  2495. 2
  2496. 2
  2497. 2
  2498. 2
  2499. 2
  2500. 2
  2501. 2
  2502. 2
  2503. 2
  2504. 2
  2505. 2
  2506. 2
  2507. 2
  2508. 2
  2509. 2
  2510. 2
  2511. 2
  2512. 2
  2513. 2
  2514. 2
  2515. 2
  2516. 2
  2517. 2
  2518. 2
  2519. 2
  2520. 2
  2521. 2
  2522. 2
  2523. 2
  2524. 2
  2525. 2
  2526. 2
  2527. 2
  2528. 2
  2529. 2
  2530. 2
  2531. 2
  2532. 2
  2533. 2
  2534. 2
  2535. 2
  2536. 2
  2537. 2
  2538. 2
  2539. 2
  2540. 2
  2541. 2
  2542. 2
  2543. 2
  2544. 2
  2545. 2
  2546. 2
  2547. 2
  2548. 2
  2549. 2
  2550. 2
  2551. 2
  2552. 2
  2553. 2
  2554. 2
  2555. 2
  2556. 2
  2557. 2
  2558. 2
  2559. 2
  2560. 2
  2561. 2
  2562. 2
  2563. 2
  2564. 2
  2565. 2
  2566. 2
  2567. 2
  2568. 2
  2569. 2
  2570. 2
  2571. 2
  2572. 2
  2573. 2
  2574. 2
  2575. 2
  2576. 2
  2577. 2
  2578. 2
  2579. 2
  2580. 2
  2581. 2
  2582. 2
  2583. 2
  2584. 2
  2585. 2
  2586. 2
  2587. 2
  2588. 2
  2589. 2
  2590. 2
  2591. 2
  2592. 2
  2593. 2
  2594. 2
  2595. 2
  2596. 2
  2597. 2
  2598. 2
  2599. 2
  2600. 2
  2601. 2
  2602. 2
  2603. 2
  2604. 2
  2605. 2
  2606. 2
  2607. 2
  2608. 2
  2609. 2
  2610. 2
  2611. 2
  2612. 2
  2613. 2
  2614. 2
  2615. 2
  2616. 2
  2617. 2
  2618. 2
  2619. 2
  2620. 2
  2621. 2
  2622. 2
  2623. 2
  2624. 2
  2625. 2
  2626. 2
  2627. 2
  2628. 2
  2629. 2
  2630. 2
  2631. 2
  2632. 2
  2633. 2
  2634. 2
  2635. 2
  2636. 2
  2637. 2
  2638. 2
  2639. 2
  2640. 2
  2641. 2
  2642. 2
  2643. 2
  2644. 2
  2645. 2
  2646. 2
  2647. 2
  2648. 2
  2649. 2
  2650. 2
  2651. 2
  2652. 2
  2653. 2
  2654. 2
  2655. 2
  2656. 2
  2657. 2
  2658. 2
  2659. 2
  2660. 2
  2661. 2
  2662. 2
  2663. 2
  2664. 2
  2665. 2
  2666. 2
  2667. 2
  2668. 2
  2669. 2
  2670. 2
  2671. 2
  2672. 2
  2673. 2
  2674. 2
  2675. 2
  2676. 2
  2677. 2
  2678. 2
  2679. 2
  2680. 2
  2681. 2
  2682. 2
  2683. 2
  2684. 2
  2685. 2
  2686. 2
  2687. 2
  2688. 2
  2689. 2
  2690. 2
  2691. 2
  2692. 2
  2693. 2
  2694. 2
  2695. 2
  2696. 2
  2697. 2
  2698. 2
  2699. 2
  2700. 2
  2701. 2
  2702. 2
  2703. 2
  2704. 2
  2705. 2
  2706. 2
  2707. 2
  2708. 2
  2709. 2
  2710. 2
  2711. 2
  2712. 2
  2713. 2
  2714. 2
  2715. 2
  2716. 2
  2717. 2
  2718. 2
  2719. 2
  2720. 2
  2721. 2
  2722. 2
  2723. 2
  2724. 2
  2725. 2
  2726. 2
  2727. 2
  2728. 2
  2729. 2
  2730. 2
  2731. 2
  2732. 2
  2733. 2
  2734. 2
  2735. 2
  2736. 2
  2737. 2
  2738. 2
  2739. 2
  2740. 2
  2741. 2
  2742. 2
  2743. 2
  2744. 2
  2745. 2
  2746. 2
  2747. 2
  2748. 2
  2749. 2
  2750. 2
  2751. 2
  2752. 2
  2753. 2
  2754. 2
  2755. 2
  2756. 2
  2757. 2
  2758. 2
  2759. 2
  2760. 2
  2761. 2
  2762. 2
  2763. 2
  2764. 2
  2765. 2
  2766. 2
  2767. 2
  2768. 2
  2769. 2
  2770. 2
  2771. 2
  2772. 2
  2773. 2
  2774. 2
  2775. 2
  2776. 2
  2777. 2
  2778. 2
  2779. 2
  2780. 2
  2781. 2
  2782. 2
  2783. 2
  2784. 2
  2785. 2
  2786. 2
  2787. 2
  2788. 2
  2789. 2
  2790. 2
  2791. 2
  2792. 2
  2793. 2
  2794. 2
  2795. 2
  2796. 2
  2797. 2
  2798. 2
  2799. 2
  2800. 2
  2801. 2
  2802. 2
  2803. 2
  2804. 2
  2805. 2
  2806. 2
  2807. 2
  2808. 2
  2809. 2
  2810. 2
  2811. 2
  2812. 2
  2813. 2
  2814. 2
  2815. 2
  2816. 2
  2817. 2
  2818. 2
  2819. 2
  2820. 2
  2821. 2
  2822. 2
  2823. 2
  2824. 2
  2825. 2
  2826. 2
  2827. 2
  2828. 2
  2829. 2
  2830. 2
  2831. 2
  2832. 2
  2833. 2
  2834. 2
  2835. 2
  2836. 2
  2837. 2
  2838. 2
  2839. 2
  2840. 2
  2841. 2
  2842. 2
  2843. 2
  2844. 2
  2845. 2
  2846. 2
  2847. 2
  2848. 2
  2849. 2
  2850. 2
  2851. 2
  2852. 2
  2853. 2
  2854. 2
  2855. 2
  2856. 2
  2857. 2
  2858. 2
  2859. 2
  2860. 2
  2861. 2
  2862. 2
  2863. 2
  2864. 2
  2865. 2
  2866. 2
  2867. 2
  2868. 2
  2869. 2
  2870. 2
  2871. 2
  2872. 2
  2873. In 2015 Angela Merkel opened Germany's borders to immigration, to over a million foreign immigrants, causing a mass exodus of foreign immigration streaming into Europe, from Africa, Asia and the Middle East, which has not stopped since. It resulted in mass r*pes of German women and girls. The immigrants were given EU German passports which allowed them to live in any country within the EU. Many then headed for other countries in the EU, many of which came to UK even though we were not officially in the EUs Schengen Area. The UK already had millions of EU European immigrants that had came to our country, now UK was becoming so inundated with these new foreign EU immigrants that, then Prime minister David Cameron, went over to Europe and asked the EU, to put a pause on immigration into UK. The EU flatly refused to halt FOM to UK, hence why he was pressured to call a referendum on exiting the EU, which he wrongly thought would lose, it won instead, hence why he resigned. He should have instead, called a referendum on stopping UK immigration. The Brexit we voted for never happened, instead it was overturned in the UK courts to a watered down Brexit, we are still in the EU, still paying them and still accepting their immigration, still under their laws and rules! It was the Labour government who opened UKs borders to world mass immigration in 1947, then again in 1997 by Tony Blair's Labour government, the Conservative government carried on with Labours immigration policies, now again with Starmer's Labour government, who seems to have no intention of stopping mass immigration, but are busy legislating laws to protect the immigrants even more, stopping our freedom of speech, even speaking about it, jailing those who do, which is all skewed against us native British.
    2
  2874. 2
  2875. 2
  2876. 2
  2877. 2
  2878. 2
  2879. 2
  2880. 2
  2881. 2
  2882. 2
  2883. 2
  2884. 2
  2885. 2
  2886. 2
  2887. 2
  2888. 2
  2889. 2
  2890. 2
  2891. 2
  2892. 2
  2893. 2
  2894. 2
  2895. 2
  2896. 2
  2897. 2
  2898. 2
  2899. 2
  2900. 2
  2901. 2
  2902. 2
  2903. 2
  2904. 2
  2905. 2
  2906. 2
  2907. 2
  2908. 2
  2909. 2
  2910. 2
  2911. 2
  2912. 2
  2913. 2
  2914. 2
  2915. 2
  2916. 2
  2917. 2
  2918. 2
  2919. 2
  2920. 2
  2921. 2
  2922. 2
  2923. 2
  2924. 2
  2925. 2
  2926. Some archaeologists say that the study does not prove the scale of the British Beaker invasion, but agree that it is a major work that typifies how huge ancient-DNA studies are disrupting archaeology. It’s “ground-breaking”, says Benjamin Roberts, an archaeologist at Durham University, UK. The variety of Beaker artefacts makes it hard to define them as emerging from one distinctive culture: many researchers prefer to call their spread the ‘Bell Beaker phenomenon’, says Marc Vander Linden, an archaeologist at University College London. The distinctive pots, possibly used as drinking vessels, are nearly ubiquitous; flint arrowheads, copper daggers and stone wrist guards are common, too. But there are regional differences in ceramics and burial style. And the immense, yet discontinuous, geographical range of Beaker sites — from Scandinavia to Morocco, and Ireland to Hungary — has sown more confusion. After a few hundred years, the pots vanish from the record. Reich’s team calculates that Britain saw a greater than 90% shift in its genetic make-up. But Roberts says he 'doesn’t see evidence' for such a huge shift in the archaeological record. The rise of cremation in Bronze Age Britain could have biased the finding, he cautions, because it might have eliminated bones that could have been sampled for DNA. Although archaeologists are excited to see ancient DNA yield breakthroughs in problems that have vexed their field for decades, says Linden, he expects some push back against the latest study’s conclusions. “It’s not at all the end of the story.”
    2
  2927. 2
  2928. 2
  2929. 2
  2930. 2
  2931. 2
  2932. 2
  2933. 2
  2934. 2
  2935. 2
  2936. 2
  2937. 2
  2938. 2
  2939. 2
  2940. 2
  2941. 2
  2942. 2
  2943. 2
  2944. 2
  2945. 2
  2946. 2
  2947. 2
  2948. 2
  2949. 2
  2950. 2
  2951. 2
  2952. 2
  2953. 2
  2954. 2
  2955. 2
  2956. 2
  2957. 2
  2958. 2
  2959. 2
  2960. 2
  2961. 2
  2962. 2
  2963. 2
  2964. 2
  2965. 2
  2966. 2
  2967. 2
  2968. 2
  2969. 2
  2970. Low wages have been kept artificially low, compared to the economy, by cheap foreign labour of immigrant workers. Immigration drives down wages and the elites get richer via cheap labour, Brits get poorer as taxes rise and their wages do not, in line with inflation. When jobs are being advertised for diversity hire only, even by our RAF, no wonder Brits cannot get a job, yet the rich use the excuse they are too lazy, even though they could not afford to live on low wages. Young British cannot even get social housing because most has been prioritised for immigrants, lack of housing drives up property prices so they have little or no chance of ever getting on the property ladder. If they are lucky enough to inherit a property, without a job, they could not afford the inheritance tax to keep it! Many end up homeless on the streets. Britain is also no longer a safe country due to mass unfettered immigration, crime rates are high, free speech is being eroded, British culture and history are being eroded, they are becoming second class citizens in their own country with a two-tier system. Britain is in debt of over £3 trillion and rising daily, taxes will keep rising to pay off this debt, but wages will stagnate, the economy is collapsing because of it, British GDP is low, out of the 50 states of USA, Britain's GDP ranks 49th beating only Mississippi whose output is rising at a faster rate than Britain’s! When the crash comes, it will bring with it the threat of future civil war, no wonder there are so many young Brits leaving the country, who can blame them?!
    2
  2971. 2
  2972. 2
  2973. 2
  2974. 2
  2975. 2
  2976. 2
  2977. 2
  2978. 2
  2979. 2
  2980. 2
  2981. 2
  2982. 2
  2983. 2
  2984. 2
  2985. 2
  2986. 2
  2987. 2
  2988. 2
  2989. 2
  2990. 2
  2991. 2
  2992. 2
  2993. 2
  2994. 2
  2995. 2
  2996. 2
  2997. 2
  2998. 2
  2999. 2
  3000. 1
  3001. 1
  3002. 1
  3003. 1
  3004. 1
  3005. 1
  3006. 1
  3007. 1
  3008. 1
  3009. 1
  3010. 1
  3011. 1
  3012. 1
  3013. 1
  3014. 1
  3015. 1
  3016. 1
  3017. 1
  3018. 1
  3019. 1
  3020. 1
  3021. 1
  3022. 1
  3023. 1
  3024. 1
  3025. 1
  3026. 1
  3027. 1
  3028. 1
  3029. 1
  3030. 1
  3031. 1
  3032. 1
  3033. 1
  3034. 1
  3035. 1
  3036. 1
  3037. 1
  3038. 1
  3039. 1
  3040. 1
  3041. 1
  3042. 1
  3043. 1
  3044. 1
  3045. 1
  3046. 1
  3047. 1
  3048. 1
  3049. 1
  3050. 1
  3051. 1
  3052. 1
  3053. The Danes were a North Germanic tribe inhabiting southern Scandinavia, including the area now comprising Denmark proper, northern and eastern England, and the Scanian provinces of modern-day southern Sweden, during the Nordic Iron Age and the Viking Age. The Angles were Germanic invaders who came from the Danish-German border and conquered most of Roman Britannia, giving the country its later name, England (Angle land), and dividing it up into seven kingdoms. The Dutch people are believed to originate from the same Nordic Bronze Age culture as the Norse/Danes (a.k.a. Vikings), a common ancestry that ultimately connects all Germanic cultures and languages. The Normans are Dane Vikings originally from Denmark. 'By the 830s, the Vikings arrived from Denmark and began raiding in what is today France, finding the standing Carolingian government in the midst of an ongoing civil war. The Vikings were only one of several groups who found the weakness of the Carolingian empire an attractive target. The Vikings used the same tactics in France as they did in England: plundering the monasteries, markets and towns; imposing tribute or "Danegeld" on the people they conquered; and killing the bishops, disrupting ecclesiastical life and causing a sharp decline in literacy. The duchy of Normandy was founded by Rollo (Hrolfr) the Walker, a Viking leader in the early 10th century. In 911, the Carolingian king Charles the Bald ceded land including the lower Seine valley to Rollo, in the Treaty of St Clair sur Epte. That land was extended to include what is today all of Normandy by AD 933 when the French King Ralph granted "the land of the Bretons" to Rollo's son William Longsword. The Bretons were Britons. They were all North Western Europeans like the British.' So the Angles, Saxons, Jutes and Friesians were of mainly Dane-Norse-Saxon Viking ancestry, North Western Europeans, same as the Britons. Among the Anglo-Saxons invasions were also Britons, returning after Roman occupation, who had mixed with the Angles and Saxons in Europe. The Britons, called the Bretons in France, also helped the Normans (Dane Vikings) in the invasion of Britain in the Norman conquest. Many Britons had escaped to France during the Roman invasion of Britain, which was later named after them and called Brittany translated - 'little Britannia', Breton translated - Briton, our own people.
    1
  3054. 1
  3055. 1
  3056. 1
  3057. 1
  3058. 1
  3059. 1
  3060. 1
  3061. 1
  3062. 1
  3063. 1
  3064. 1
  3065. 1
  3066. 1
  3067. 1
  3068. 1
  3069. 1
  3070. 1
  3071. 1
  3072. 1
  3073. 1
  3074. 1
  3075. 1
  3076. 1
  3077. 1
  3078. 1
  3079. 1
  3080. 1
  3081. 1
  3082. 1
  3083. 1
  3084. 1
  3085. 1
  3086. 1
  3087. 1
  3088. 1
  3089. 1
  3090. 1
  3091. 1
  3092. 1
  3093. 1
  3094. 1
  3095. 1
  3096. 1
  3097. 1
  3098. 1
  3099. 1
  3100. 1
  3101. 1
  3102. 1
  3103. 1
  3104. 1
  3105. 1
  3106. 1
  3107. 1
  3108. 1
  3109. 1
  3110. 1
  3111. 1
  3112. 1
  3113. 1
  3114. 1
  3115. 1
  3116. 1
  3117. 1
  3118. 1
  3119. 1
  3120. 1
  3121. 1
  3122. 1
  3123. 1
  3124. 1
  3125. 1
  3126. 1
  3127. 1
  3128. 1
  3129. 1
  3130. 1
  3131. 1
  3132. 1
  3133. 1
  3134. 1
  3135. 1
  3136. 1
  3137. 1
  3138. 1
  3139. 1
  3140. 1
  3141. 1
  3142. 1
  3143. 1
  3144. 1
  3145. 1
  3146. 1
  3147. 1
  3148. 1
  3149. 1
  3150. 1
  3151. 1
  3152. 1
  3153. 1
  3154. 1
  3155. 1
  3156. 1
  3157. 1
  3158. 1
  3159. 1
  3160. 1
  3161. 1
  3162. 1
  3163. 1
  3164. 1
  3165. 1
  3166. 1
  3167. 1
  3168. 1
  3169. 1
  3170. 1
  3171. 1
  3172. 1
  3173. 1
  3174. 1
  3175. 1
  3176. 1
  3177. 1
  3178. 1
  3179. 'This manipulation is consistent with the warnings in Ephesians, where the Apostle Paul wrote, “For our struggle is not against flesh and blood, but against the rulers, against the authorities, against the powers of this dark world and against the spiritual forces of evil in the heavenly realms” (Ephesians 6:12). The agenda of these secret societies is often linked to the promotion of ideologies that contradict biblical teachings, including the push for a one-world government, erosion of traditional values, and the undermining of Christian faith.' 'The "Ten Point Plan" that seeks to transform societal norms by gradually eroding Christian values. The plan calls for the breakdown of traditional family structures, the promotion of alternative lifestyles, and the removal of Christianity from public spaces. While these ideas may appear to advocate for a more inclusive society, they often work against the moral foundation provided by the Bible.' 'One of the most contentious subjects is the influence of secret societies like the Illuminati. While some consider these discussions as mere fantasy, there are undeniable connections between such organizations and the manipulation of global events. The Illuminati, which originated as a group dedicated to the promotion of the so-called Enlightenment ideals (knowledge given by Lucifer), is widely believed to have evolved into a network that seeks to control global affairs from behind the scenes. Critics suggest that this control is wielded through influence over financial institutions, political figures, and media conglomerates.'
    1
  3180. 1
  3181. 1
  3182. 1
  3183. 1
  3184. 1
  3185. 1
  3186. 1
  3187. 1
  3188. 1
  3189. 1
  3190. 1
  3191. 1
  3192. 1
  3193. 1
  3194. 1
  3195. 1
  3196. 1
  3197. 1
  3198. 1
  3199. 1
  3200. 1
  3201. 1
  3202. 1
  3203. 1
  3204. 1
  3205. 1
  3206. 1
  3207. 1
  3208. 1
  3209. 1
  3210. 1
  3211. 1
  3212. 1
  3213. 1
  3214. 1
  3215. 1
  3216. 1
  3217. 1
  3218. 1
  3219. 1
  3220. 1
  3221. 1
  3222. 1
  3223. 1
  3224. 1
  3225. 1
  3226. 1
  3227. 1
  3228. 1
  3229. 1
  3230. 1
  3231. 1
  3232. 1
  3233. 1
  3234. 1
  3235. 1
  3236. 1
  3237. 1
  3238. 1
  3239. 1
  3240. 1
  3241. 1
  3242. 1
  3243. 1
  3244. 1
  3245. 1
  3246. 1
  3247. 1
  3248. 1
  3249. 1
  3250. 1
  3251. 1
  3252. 1
  3253. 1
  3254. 1
  3255. 1
  3256. 1
  3257. 1
  3258. 1
  3259. 1
  3260. 1
  3261. 1
  3262. 1
  3263. 1
  3264. 1
  3265. 1
  3266. 1
  3267. 1
  3268.  @candy-le4nh  Don't take my word for it listen to what Sir John Redwood had to say : How joining the EU led to a big decline in UK industry June 16, 2016 There are also crucial issues to understand about how the asymmetric single market did damage to UK industry. When we joined the EEC, now the EU, in 1973, more barriers to trade had been pulled down in manufacturing than in services. EU rules were often such that UK industry was badly damaged by the shock of joining and the continued shock of staying in as the rules increased and tightened. When the UK joined the EU we had a 45 million tonnes a year steel industry. Today we are battling to save an 11 million tonnes industry. When we joined the EU we had a 400,000 tonnes a year aluminium industry. Today we have just 43,000 tonnes of capacity left. When we joined the EU we had 20 million tonnes of cement capacity. Today we have 12 million tonnes. Just before we joined the EEC in 1971 we had a 1 million tonnes a year fishing industry. Today we have 600,000 tonnes. The October 2013 government “Future of Manufacturing” Report shows that between 1951 and 1973 metals output rose 3% a year. Since joining the EEC/EU it has declined by more than 6% Between 1951 and 1973 food and drink output rose by 5.6% per year. Since joining the EEC/EU it has fallen by 1% a year. Between 1951 and 1973 textiles output expanded at 2.6% a year. Since joining the EEC/EU it has fallen by more than 6% a year. Whilst it may not be fair to blame all this decline on membership of the EU, as there are other factors, it nonetheless shows categorically that joining the EU and helping create the so called single market has not helped us grow and has not saved many of our industries from decline. In some cases EU policies are the main driver of the disaster. The Common Fishing Policy is clearly the main reason for the dreadful decline of our fishing industry, as many foreign vessels were licenced to take our fish. Our energy intensive businesses were often damaged by the high energy prices required by the EU common energy policy. The EU has prevented UK subsidy of industry under its state aids rules, but has often provided subsidised loans and grants to businesses to set up elsewhere in the EU. The UK has seen a spate of factory closures balanced by new and expanded facilities in poorer EU countries. The UK lost van production to Turkey, car capacity to Slovakia, chocolate to Poland, domestic appliances to the Netherlands and the Czech Republic and metal containers to Poland amongst others in recent years. In various cases there was an EU grant or loan involved in the new capacity. Looking at our huge balance of payments deficit today in goods with the rest of the EU, we can see the long term impact of the EU’s damage to our manufacturing capacity. This April’s balance of payments figures show us in heavy deficit in machinery, vehicles, electrical machinery, mineral fuels, plastics, iron and steel, wood and clothing. Last year our total goods trade deficit hit £85 billion with the rest of the EU. Between 2008 and 2015 our exports grew at 5% with the rest of the world, whilst falling with the EU. Perhaps remain might like to answer the following questions: Why have we suffered industrial decline and closures with production shifting elsewhere in Europe since joining the EEC? Why do trade in surplus with the rest of the world but have such a huge deficit with the EU? Why have we ended up importing fish, electricity, steel and much else when we used to self sufficient?
    1
  3269. 1
  3270. 1
  3271. I read Douglas Murray's book 'Strange death of Europe' back in 2017 where he talked about Islam in Europe. I have witnessed with my own eyes grade II listed pub buildings be demolished for Mosques and housing, by Labour Muslim councillors. Muslims do not drink, hence getting rid of our pubs, they do not smoke, hence getting rid of cigarettes, dogs and gambling will be next. The silencing of church bells because it offends them, in favour of Adhan. The majority of London's prime property is now owned by Muslim Arabs, the roads frequented by their children revving their toys, the latest Ferrari, Bentley, Lamborghini super cars. The most expensive properties in London are owned by Muslim Arabs. The capital’s biggest landowners: Qataris own as much land as the Queen and TfL put together. The Abrahamic Family House, a mosque, church, and synagogue all sharing a multi-faith campus in Abu Dhabi (the capital of the United Arab Emirates (UAE) opened in March 1st this year. The aim is one faith for all, a global one world order, central power, no nations states, run by the ultra rich. The fact we are being swamped, with mainly young Muslim men from Africa and the Middle East is no coincidence. King Charles even adding the two other faiths in his coronation, spoke volumes. It is happening across all the West not just here in Britain and Europe, America, Canada, Australia and New Zealand too. There is only one conclusion, Could it be the intentional genocide of the 1.1 billion white Europeans left on this planet?
    1
  3272. 1
  3273. 1
  3274. 1
  3275. 1
  3276. 1
  3277. 1
  3278. 1
  3279. 1
  3280. 1
  3281. 1
  3282. 1
  3283. 1
  3284. 1
  3285. 1
  3286.  @MrB-vj1vg  What about he African diaspora? Over 170 million people of African descent that live all over the world. The African diaspora is represented across the continents with approximately 39 million in North America, 113 million in Latin America 14 million in the Caribbean and 4 million in Europe! What about the Indian diaspora? The largest migrant population in the world! According to the Ministry of External Affairs report updated on 26 November 2024, there are 35.4 million non-resident Indians (NRIs) and People of Indian Origins (PIOs) (including OCIs) residing outside India. The Indian diaspora comprise the world's largest overseas diaspora. Every year, 2.5 million Indians immigrate overseas, making India the nation with the highest annual number of emigrants in the world. Stats of Census 2021- Birmingham - 49% white, 2nd largest ethnic group - Pakistani Wolverhampton - 49% white, 2nd largest ethnic group - Indian Manchester - 48% white, 2nd largest ethnic group - Pakistani Coventry - 47% white, 2nd largest ethnic group - Indian Peterborough - 46% white, 2nd largest ethnic group - Indian London - 45% white, 2nd largest ethnic group - Indian Bradford - 45% white, 2nd largest ethnic group - Pakistani Luton - 45% white, 2nd largest ethnic group - Pakistani Leicester - 41% white, 2nd largest ethnic group - Indian Slough - 35% white, 2nd largest ethnic group - Indian Saville town Yorkshire - fewer than 1% white, second largest ethnic group - 93% Pakistani 4 years later those stats are even lower for the indigenous British! And there are many more minority white areas. The British never made Indians or Pakistanis minorities in their own towns and cities!
    1
  3287.  @MrB-vj1vg  Aborigines -The total area of land in the Indigenous estate in Australia as at 2023 was 536 million hectares (70%), and the total area of forest in the Indigenous estate as 70 million hectares, as reported in Indicator 6.4a Area of forest to which Indigenous people have use and rights that protect their special values and are recognised through formal and informal management regimes of Australia’s State of the Forests Report. Native Americans - Approximately 326 reservations are Federally Recognized totalling some 55 million acres. 44 million acres are tribal trust lands. 11 million acres are individually owned. There are 12 State-recognized reservations. As of 2025, Over a million acres has been added to the land holdings of Indian tribes throughout the country in the past three years. The Maori are not indigenous of New Zealand they are Polynesians, The city of York in England has been there longer than the Maori have been in New Zealand! The Aborigines, Native Americans and Maori are not the ones invading Britain! Indians and Pakistanis are! Using it as a lame excuse to colonise Britain, making the British minorities in their own towns and cities, when it is none of their business what Britain did in other countries! During WWII Indian nationalists and Gandhi campaigned to get the 170,000 British out of India, mainly military, administrators and their families, they left in 1947! India's population at that time was 345 million! Now they need to do the same for the British!
    1
  3288. 1
  3289. 1
  3290. 1
  3291. 1
  3292. 1
  3293. 1
  3294. 1
  3295. 1
  3296. 1
  3297. 1
  3298. 1
  3299. 1
  3300. 1
  3301. 1
  3302. 1
  3303. 1
  3304. 1
  3305. 1
  3306. 1
  3307. 1
  3308. 1
  3309. 1
  3310. 1
  3311. 1
  3312. 1
  3313. 1
  3314. 1
  3315. 1
  3316. 1
  3317. 1
  3318. Yes the Muslim white slavery trade, by the Ottomans, Moors and Barbary pirates, mainly stealth night time raids on sleeping unsuspecting Brits. But it was abduction raids of the British for their Muslim slave trade, the attacks were mainly from Spain which had been colonised and ruled by Muslim Moors. The Raid on Mounts Bay also known as the Spanish attack on Mounts Bay was a Spanish raid on Cornwall, England, that took place between 2 and 4 August 1595 in the context of the Brittany Campaign during the Anglo-Spanish war of 1585-1604. It was conducted by a Spanish naval squadron led by Carlos de Amésquita on patrol from Brittany, France. The Spanish made landfall in Mount's Bay, then sacked and burned Newlyn, Mousehole, Penzance, and Paul, beating a militia force under Francis Godolphin in the process. In the wake of the defeat of the Spanish Armada in 1588, Philip II of Spain reorganised his navy. He was intent on establishing advanced bases in western France from which his navy could constantly threaten England and Ireland. In 1593 Blavet had been established by the Spanish in Brittany and news of this caused concern in England. Carlos de Amesquita commanded three companies of arquebusiers and four galleys (Nuestra Señora de Begoña, Salvador, Peregrina and Bazana)[ from the fleet under Pedro de Zubiaur. He sailed from Blavet, on 26 July with the aim of raiding a part of the English coastline. There were a number of reasons - one was to regain the treasure and cargo ships captured by the English off Pernambuco four months earlier. There were also rumours that Francis Drake was preparing a major expedition against Panama and the Spanish action in England could delay or even defeat it. Another was to hold an English port or coastline which would then be used as a base for raids and act as a powerful bargaining tool for future peace negotiations. Cornwall, since the Prayer Book Rebellion in 1549, offered hope to the Spanish that many of the Cornish might happily convert back to the Catholic faith. History repeating itself. Muslims have never invaded at and colonised Britain like they did Spain for 800 years and other parts of Europe like the Balkans for longer. Now they are flooding in daily, Britain needs a Spanish Reconquista!
    1
  3319. 1
  3320. 1
  3321. 1
  3322. 1
  3323. 1
  3324. 1
  3325. 1
  3326. 1
  3327. 1
  3328. 1
  3329. 1
  3330. 1
  3331. 1
  3332. 1
  3333. 1
  3334. 1
  3335. 1
  3336. 1
  3337. 1
  3338. 1
  3339. 1
  3340. 1
  3341. 1
  3342. 1
  3343. 1
  3344. 1
  3345. 1
  3346. 1
  3347. 1
  3348. 1
  3349. 1
  3350. 1
  3351. 1
  3352. 1
  3353. 1
  3354. 1
  3355. 1
  3356. 1
  3357. 1
  3358. 1
  3359. 1
  3360. 1
  3361. 1
  3362. 1
  3363. 1
  3364. 1
  3365. 1
  3366. 1
  3367. 1
  3368. 1
  3369. 1
  3370. 1
  3371. 1
  3372. 1
  3373. 1
  3374. 1
  3375. 1
  3376.  @j.b.2263  In their initial stages of expansion, the Ottomans were leaders of the Turkish warriors for the faith of Islam, known by the honorific title ghāzī (Arabic: “raider”), who fought against the shrinking Christian Byzantine state. The ancestors of Osman I, the founder of the dynasty, were members of the Kayı tribe who had entered Anatolia along with a mass of Turkmen Oğuz nomads. Those nomads, migrating from Central Asia, established themselves as the Seljuq dynasty in Iran and Mesopotamia in the mid-11th century, overwhelmed Byzantium after the Battle of Manzikert (1071), and occupied eastern and central Anatolia during the 12th century. The Ottomans spoke Arabic at main, which was the legal and religious language of the empire, was also spoken regionally, mainly in Arabia, North Africa, Mesopotamia and the Levant. They spoke Arabic, were of Abrahamic descent, practised Islam, language Quranic Arabic had Arabic customs and traditions, yet you say they were not Arabs? They invaded parts of Eastern Europe, converting Europeans. The transformation of Anatolia into the modern nation of Turkey occurred over several historical phases. The Turkification of Anatolia began under the Seljuk Empire in the late 11th century. The Seljuks were followed by the Ottoman Empire, which ruled Anatolia from the late 13th century until the early 20th century. The newly established Turkish government chose “Turkey” as the sole official name, ending the dichotomy between “Ottoman Empire” and “Turkey” in 1920–1923. In Turkey today the main religion is Islam. Islam is the most practiced religion in Turkey. As much as 90% of the population follows the Sunni Madhab of Islam.( Qatar) Most Turkish Sunni Muslims belong to the Hanafi school of jurisprudence. The established presence of Islam in the region that now constitutes modern Turkey dates back to the later half of the 11th century, when the Seljuks started expanding into eastern Anatolia. Christianity is a minority religion in Turkey today, though it was once the majority faith, before invasions. In the second half of the first millennium CE, Turkic peoples were gradually streaming into most of Central Asia from their original homeland in the Altai mountains of western Mongolia.
    1
  3377. 1
  3378. 1
  3379. 1
  3380. 1
  3381. 1
  3382. 1
  3383. 1
  3384. 1
  3385. 1
  3386. 1
  3387. 1
  3388. 1
  3389. 1
  3390. 1
  3391. 1
  3392. 1
  3393. 1
  3394. 1
  3395. 1
  3396. 1
  3397. 1
  3398. 1
  3399. 1
  3400. 1
  3401. 1
  3402. 1
  3403. 1
  3404. 1
  3405. 1
  3406. 1
  3407. 1
  3408. 1
  3409. 1
  3410. 1
  3411. 1
  3412. 1
  3413. 1
  3414. 1
  3415. 1
  3416. 1
  3417. 1
  3418. 1
  3419. 1
  3420. 1
  3421. 1
  3422. 1
  3423. 1
  3424. 1
  3425. 1
  3426. 1
  3427. 1
  3428. 1
  3429. 1
  3430. 1
  3431. 1
  3432. 1
  3433. 1
  3434. 1
  3435. 1
  3436. 1
  3437. 1
  3438. 1
  3439. 1
  3440. 1
  3441. 1
  3442. 1
  3443. 1
  3444. 1
  3445. 1
  3446. 1
  3447. 1
  3448. 1
  3449. 1
  3450. 1
  3451. 1
  3452. 1
  3453. 1
  3454. 1
  3455. 1
  3456. 1
  3457. 1
  3458. 1
  3459. 1
  3460. 1
  3461. 1
  3462. 1
  3463. 1
  3464. 1
  3465. 1
  3466. 1
  3467. 1
  3468. 1
  3469. 1
  3470. 1
  3471. 1
  3472. 1
  3473. 1
  3474. 1
  3475. 1
  3476. 1
  3477. 1
  3478. 1
  3479. 1
  3480. 1
  3481. 1
  3482. 1
  3483. 1
  3484. 1
  3485. 1
  3486. 1
  3487. 1
  3488. 1
  3489. 1
  3490. 1
  3491. 1
  3492. 1
  3493. 1
  3494. 1
  3495. 1
  3496. 1
  3497. 1
  3498. 1
  3499. 1
  3500. 1
  3501. 1
  3502. 1
  3503. 1
  3504. 1
  3505. 1
  3506. 1
  3507. 1
  3508. 1
  3509. 1
  3510. 1
  3511. 1
  3512. 1
  3513. 1
  3514. 1
  3515. 1
  3516. 1
  3517. 1
  3518. 1
  3519. 1
  3520. 1
  3521. 1
  3522. 1
  3523. 1
  3524. 1
  3525. 1
  3526. 1
  3527. 1
  3528. 1
  3529. 1
  3530. 1
  3531. 1
  3532. 1
  3533. 1
  3534. 1
  3535. 1
  3536. 1
  3537. 1
  3538. 1
  3539. 1
  3540. 1
  3541. 1
  3542. 1
  3543. 1
  3544. 1
  3545. 1
  3546. 1
  3547. 1
  3548. 1
  3549. 1
  3550. 1
  3551. 1
  3552. 1
  3553. 1
  3554. 1
  3555. 1
  3556. 1
  3557. 1
  3558. 1
  3559. 1
  3560. 1
  3561. 1
  3562. 1
  3563. 1
  3564. 1
  3565. 1
  3566. 1
  3567. 1
  3568. 1
  3569. 1
  3570. 1
  3571. 1
  3572. 1
  3573. 1
  3574. 1
  3575. 1
  3576. 1
  3577. 1
  3578. 1
  3579. 1
  3580. 1
  3581. 1
  3582. 1
  3583. 1
  3584. 1
  3585. 1
  3586. 1
  3587. 1
  3588. 1
  3589. 1
  3590. 1
  3591. 1
  3592. 1
  3593. 1
  3594. 1
  3595. 1
  3596. 1
  3597. 1
  3598. 1
  3599. 1
  3600. 1
  3601. 1
  3602. 1
  3603. 1
  3604. 1
  3605. 1
  3606. 1
  3607. 1
  3608. 1
  3609. 1
  3610. 1
  3611. 1
  3612. 1
  3613. 1
  3614. 1
  3615. 1
  3616. 1
  3617. 1
  3618. 1
  3619. 1
  3620. 1
  3621. 1
  3622. 1
  3623. 1
  3624. 1
  3625. 1
  3626. 1
  3627. 1
  3628. 1
  3629. 1
  3630. 1
  3631. 1
  3632. 1
  3633. 1
  3634. 1
  3635. 1
  3636. 1
  3637. 1
  3638. 1
  3639. 1
  3640. 1
  3641. 1
  3642. 1
  3643. 1
  3644. 1
  3645. 1
  3646. 1
  3647. 1
  3648. 1
  3649. 1
  3650. 1
  3651. 1
  3652. 1
  3653. 1
  3654. 1
  3655. 1
  3656. 1
  3657. 1
  3658. 1
  3659. 1
  3660. 1
  3661. 1
  3662. 1
  3663. 1
  3664. 1
  3665. 1
  3666. 1
  3667. 1
  3668. 1
  3669. 1
  3670. 1
  3671. 1
  3672. 1
  3673. 1
  3674. 1
  3675. 1
  3676. 1
  3677. 1
  3678. 1
  3679. 1
  3680. 1
  3681. 1
  3682. 1
  3683. 1
  3684. 1
  3685. 1
  3686. 1
  3687. 1
  3688. 1
  3689. 1
  3690. 1
  3691. 1
  3692. 1
  3693. 1
  3694. 1
  3695. 1
  3696. 1
  3697. 1
  3698. 1
  3699. 1
  3700. 1
  3701. 1
  3702. 1
  3703. 1
  3704. 1
  3705. 1
  3706. 1
  3707. 1
  3708. 1
  3709. 1
  3710. 1
  3711. 1
  3712. 1
  3713. 1
  3714. 1
  3715. 1
  3716. 1
  3717. 1
  3718. 1
  3719. 1
  3720. 1
  3721. 1
  3722. 1
  3723. 1
  3724. 1
  3725. 1
  3726. 1
  3727. 1
  3728. 1
  3729. 1
  3730. 1
  3731. 1
  3732. 1
  3733. 1
  3734. 1
  3735. 1
  3736. 1
  3737. 1
  3738. 1
  3739. 1
  3740. 1
  3741. 1
  3742. 1
  3743. 1
  3744. 1
  3745. 1
  3746. 1
  3747. 1
  3748. 1
  3749. 1
  3750. 1
  3751. 1
  3752. 1
  3753. 1
  3754. 1
  3755. 1
  3756.  @NuclearHendrix  South America yes, as my earlier post states- 'Several Native American tribes have passed down legends of a race of white giants who were wiped out. We’ll take a look at a few such legends, including those among the Choctaw and the Comanches of the United States down Choctaw Horatio Bardwell Cushman wrote in his 1899 book “History of the Choctaw, Chickasaw, and Natchez Indians”: “The tradition of the Choctaws . . . told of a race of giants that once inhabited the now State of Tennessee, and with whom their ancestors fought when they arrived in Mississippi in their migration from the west. … Their tradition states the Nahullo (race of giants) was of wonderful stature.” Cushman said “Nahullo” came to be used to describe all white people, but it originally referred specifically to a giant white race with whom the Choctaw came into contact when they first crossed the Mississippi River. The Nahullo were said to be cannibals whom the Choctaw killed whenever the opportunity arose. Comanches Chief Rolling Thunder of the Comanches, a tribe from the Great Plains, gave the following account of an ancient race of white giants in 1857: “Innumerable moons ago, a race of white men, 10 feet high, and far more rich and powerful than any white people now living, here inhabited a large range of country, extending from the rising to the setting sun. Their fortifications crowned the summits of the mountains, protecting their populous cities situated in the intervening valleys. “They excelled every other nation which was flourished, either before or since, in all manner of cunning handicraft—were brave and warlike—ruling over the land they had wrested from its ancient possessors with a high and haughty hand. Compared with them the palefaces of the present day were pygmies, in both art and arms. …” The chief explained that when this race forgot justice and mercy and became too proud, the Great Spirit wiped it out and all that was left of their society were the mounds still visible on the tablelands. This account was documented by Dr. Donald “Panther” Yates, a researcher and author of books on Native American history, on his blog. Navajo Yates also writes of the Starnake people of Navajo legend, describing them as: “A regal race of white giants endowed with mining technology who dominated the West, enslaved lesser tribes, and had strongholds all through the Americas. They were either extinguished or ‘went back to the heavens.'” Manta In 1553, Pedro Cieza de León wrote in “Chronicle of Peru” about legendary giants described to him by the Manta indigenous people: “There are, however, reports concerning giants in Peru, who landed on the coast at the point of Santa Elena. … The natives relate the following tradition, which had been received from their ancestors from very remote times. Paiutes The Paiutes are said to have an oral tradition that told of red-haired, white, cannibals about 10 feet tall who lived in or near what is now known as Lovelock Cave in Nevada.
    1
  3757. 1
  3758. 1
  3759. 1
  3760. 1
  3761. 1
  3762. 1
  3763. 1
  3764. 1
  3765. 1
  3766. 1
  3767. 1
  3768. 1
  3769. 1
  3770.  @n30418  You really are brainwashed aren't you! Britain's Industrial revolution, had nothing to do with Tea, spices and cotton! The Industrial Revolution started with the British inventing and creating machinery, automation for manufacturing and industry, all invented by British innovation. Yes the Brits were shrewd and clever, by buying raw goods and manufacturing them themselves, saving money. That is called business! 'The very first cotton mills in India, however, were powered by the British. Bowreah Mills was built for £200,000, for 20,000 spindles and 100 looms, and was a pioneering attempt at imperial technology transfer to India. The mill employed European women to teach machine-spinning skills to local workers.' 'The credit for erecting the steam-powered first cotton mills—the Bowreah Cotton Mill (1818) and Fort Gloster Mill (1830) in Calcutta—goes to the Englishmen and not the natives. Gradually, Indian capital entrenched itself into this industry and Bombay and Ahmedabad sprouted as the great centres of this industry. C. N.' The false statement we would have lost two world wars without Indians, is untrue. There were approximately 127.2 million soldiers who fought in WWII. British - 3.5 million America - 16,112,566 million Indians - 2.5 million Australia - 730,000 Canadians - 1.1 million New Zealand - 140,000 France - 1.25 million etc, etc Out of the 127.7 million soldiers who fought in the war, the Commonwealth soldiers numbered 15 million, many included above, of which 2.5 million were Indian volunteers. It was a WORLD war not a British war, ALL were fighting for world peace. Britain fought for a year alone, against Germany in the Battle of Britain and won! The rest of the war was a group effort by the allies.
    1
  3771.  @n30418  You really are brainwashed aren't you! Britain's Industrial revolution, had nothing to do with Tea, spices and cotton! The Industrial Revolution started with the British inventing and creating machinery, automation for manufacturing and industry, all invented by British innovation. Yes the Brits were shrewd and clever, by buying raw goods and manufacturing them themselves, saving money. That is called business! 'The very first cotton mills in India, however, were powered by the British. Bowreah Mills was built for £200,000, for 20,000 spindles and 100 looms, and was a pioneering attempt at imperial technology transfer to India. The mill employed European women to teach machine-spinning skills to local workers.' 'The credit for erecting the steam-powered first cotton mills—the Bowreah Cotton Mill (1818) and Fort Gloster Mill (1830) in Calcutta—goes to the Englishmen and not the natives. Gradually, Indian capital entrenched itself into this industry and Bombay and Ahmedabad sprouted as the great centres of this industry. C. N.' The false statement we would have lost two world wars without Indians, is untrue. There were approximately 127.2 million soldiers who fought in WWII. British - 3.5 million America - 16,112,566 Indians - 2.5 million Australia - 730,000 Canadians - 1.1 million New Zealand - 140,000 France - 1.25 million etc, etc Out of the 127.7 million soldiers who fought in the war, the Commonwealth soldiers numbered 15 million, many included above, of which 2.5 million were Indian volunteers. It was a WORLD war not a British war, ALL were fighting for world peace. Britain fought for a year alone, against Germany in the Battle of Britain and won! The rest of the war was a group effort by the allies.
    1
  3772. 1
  3773. 1
  3774. 1
  3775. 1
  3776. 1
  3777. 1
  3778. 1
  3779. 1
  3780. 1
  3781. 1
  3782. 1
  3783. 1
  3784. 1
  3785. 1
  3786. 1
  3787. 1
  3788. 1
  3789. 1
  3790. 1
  3791. 1
  3792. 1
  3793. 1
  3794. 1
  3795. 1
  3796. 1
  3797. 1
  3798. 1
  3799. 1
  3800. 1
  3801. 1
  3802. 1
  3803. 1
  3804. 1
  3805. 1
  3806. 1
  3807. 1
  3808. 1
  3809. 1
  3810. 1
  3811. 1
  3812. 1
  3813. 1
  3814. Jenrick is indeed an odious man it seems. During the Covid-19 pandemic, Jenrick urged the people to stay home in lockdown. Yet flouted Government restrictions twice himself. In June 2020, Jenrick faced questions over his links to a Conservative donor after it emerged that he met an Israeli businessman, Idan Ofer, with an interest in the future of a multibillion-pound project that Jenrick, then exchequer secretary to the Treasury, was overseeing. Ofer stated that the £10,000 donation via his Quantum Pacific business was made at the behest of Conservative Friends of Israel, of which Jenrick was a member. Jenrick admitted that Ofer was a family friend. The same month, it was reported that Conservative councillors approved a planning application for an extension to Jenrick's townhouse despite officials objecting to the scheme three times over its damaging impact in a conservation area. Remainer Jenrick was opposed to Brexit prior to the 2016 referendum. Jenrick has been Chair of the All Party Parliamentary Group (APPG) on International Trade & Investment and Vice Chairman of the Groups on China and France. As Chairman of the APPG for the Prevention of Genocide and Crimes against Humanity, he along with Home Secretary Amber Rudd met Nadia Murad, an Iraqi Yazidi human rights activist who was in 2018 awarded the Nobel Peace Prize, to discuss how the UK could help with the reconstruction of Yazidi areas.( He certainly isn't bothered about English genocide, with mass immigration) On 26 July 2019, he said, "I want tackling antisemitism and ensuring that the Jewish community feels protected and respected to be one of my priorities as Secretary of State"( he cares not, for the protection and safety of the British Citizens with illegal mass immigration). On 14 January 2020, Jenrick approved a £1 billion luxury housing development of 1,500 homes on Westferry Road, Isle of Dogs, proposed by Richard Desmond, a Conservative Party donor and owner of Northern & Shell. A Government planning inspector had advised against permitting the scheme, as it would not deliver enough affordable housing and as the height of the tower would be detrimental to the character of the area. When Jenrick approved the scheme on 14 January, he knew that an approval by that date would enable Desmond to avoid having to pay a council-imposed infrastructure levy of between £30 and £50 million, which could have been used for funding schools and health clinics. The list goes on, Jenrick certainly has dirty hands! And he cares not, for the Genocide of the indigenous English/British, with unfettered, mass illegal immigration to our small Island home.
    1
  3815. 1
  3816. 1
  3817. 1
  3818. 1
  3819. 1
  3820. 1
  3821. 1
  3822. 1
  3823. 1
  3824. 1
  3825. 1
  3826. 1
  3827. 1
  3828. 1
  3829. 1
  3830. 1
  3831. 1
  3832. 1
  3833. 1
  3834. 1
  3835. 1
  3836. 1
  3837. 1
  3838. 1
  3839. 1
  3840. 1
  3841. 1
  3842. 1
  3843. 1
  3844. 1
  3845. 1
  3846. 1
  3847. 1
  3848. 1
  3849. Britain has always been very generous on the whole to Jewish immigration. We had a Jewish settlement in England in 1070, when William the Conqueror ( a Viking born in France) bought Jews to England. We have accepted many Jews throughout the proceeding centuries. the Ashkenazi Jews who arrived in large numbers from the 1880s onwards, however, things were very different. They were from poor, rural families in villages and small towns and were escaping the terror of pogroms in Eastern Europe. The oldest Jewish newspaper The Jewish Chronicle was founded in England in 1841. In 1858 the first Jewish Member of Parliament (MP) Lionel de Rothschild took his seat in Parliament. Numbers increased steadily through natural growth until there were about 65,000 Jews in the UK in 1880. Most were of Sephardi origin, originating in Spain and Portugal. Many were middle class and relatively well off. 70,000 Jewish refugees were accepted into Britain in 1939 at the start of WWII an additional 10,000 made it to Britain during the war. Some came on transit visas, which meant that they stayed in Britain temporarily, while waiting to be accepted by another country. Others entered the country by having obtained employment or a guarantor, or via Kindertransport. The Jewish children were put in foster homes or boarding schools. Some Jewish refugees were said to be German/ Austrian spies disguised as Jews. The transition camps were a way of keeping Britain safe, not only from spies and fake illegal immigrants, but from the diseases they bought with them, while they awaited deportation to other countries such as Australia and America. Food was rationed and scarce for everyone in Britain during the war. I entirely sympathise with their plight they had endured during and after the war. But it reminds me of immigration today that is flooding the West from the rest of the world, will history repeat itself and another WW breakout and the same thing happen again? Rather than people uprooting themselves, maybe it is better to stay where you belong and keep your roots firmly planted?
    1
  3850. 1
  3851. 1
  3852. 1
  3853. 1
  3854. 1
  3855. 1
  3856. 1
  3857. 1
  3858. 1
  3859. 1
  3860. 1
  3861. 1
  3862. 1
  3863. 1
  3864. 1
  3865. 1
  3866. 1
  3867. 1
  3868. 1
  3869. 1
  3870. 1
  3871. 1
  3872. 1
  3873. 1
  3874. 1
  3875. 1
  3876. 1
  3877. 1
  3878. 1
  3879. 1
  3880. 1
  3881. 1
  3882. 1
  3883. 1
  3884. 1
  3885. 1
  3886. 1
  3887. 1
  3888. 1
  3889. 1
  3890. 1
  3891. 1
  3892. 1
  3893. 1
  3894. 1
  3895. 1
  3896. 1
  3897. 1
  3898. 1
  3899. 1
  3900. 1
  3901. 1
  3902. 1
  3903. 1
  3904. 1
  3905. 1
  3906. 1
  3907. 1
  3908. 1
  3909. 1
  3910. 1
  3911. 1
  3912. 1
  3913. 1
  3914. 1
  3915. 1
  3916. 1
  3917. 1
  3918. 1
  3919. 1
  3920. 1
  3921. 1
  3922. 1
  3923. 1
  3924. 1
  3925. 1
  3926. 1
  3927. 1
  3928. 1
  3929. 1
  3930. 1
  3931. 1
  3932. 1
  3933. 1
  3934. 1
  3935. 1
  3936. 1
  3937. 1
  3938. 1
  3939. 1
  3940. 1
  3941. 1
  3942. 1
  3943. 1
  3944. 1
  3945. 1
  3946.  @ShanghaiRooster  You need to read about the 'sacking of Delhi' by Nader Shah, who invaded the Mughal empire. Nader entered Delhi with Mohammed Shah as his vassal on 20 March 1739. Nader sent forth 1,000 cavalrymen to each district of the city to ensure the collection of taxes. But perhaps the greatest riches were plundered from the treasuries of the Mughal dynasty's capital. The Peacock Throne was also taken away by the Persian army, and thereafter served as a symbol of Persian imperial might. Among a trove of other fabulous jewels, Nader also gained the Koh-i-Noor ("Mountain of Light") and Darya-ye Noor ("Sea of Light") diamonds. It is estimated that the total worth of the treasures plundered was perhaps 700 million rupees. (Wonder what value that is in todays money?) Persian troops left Delhi at the beginning of May 1739, also taking with them thousands of elephants, horses, and camels, all loaded with the booty they had collected. The plunder seized from India was so rich that Nader stopped taxation in Persia for a period of three years following his return. So remind us again, what was left for the British to supposedly plunder? As you said the British riches came from the opium trade mainly, Commerce, tea plantations and the cotton trade and from our inventions and industry, like the railways. The East India Company was dissolved in 1874. The British Raj was from 1858 - 1947 and lasted 89 years. Where British administration taught them how to run their own newly united country India.
    1
  3947. 1
  3948. 1
  3949. 1
  3950. 1
  3951. 1
  3952. 1
  3953. 1
  3954. 1
  3955. 1
  3956. 1
  3957. 1
  3958. 1
  3959. 1
  3960. 1
  3961. 1
  3962. 1
  3963. 1
  3964. 1
  3965. 1
  3966. 1
  3967. 1
  3968. 1
  3969. 1
  3970. 1
  3971. 1
  3972. 1
  3973. 1
  3974. 1
  3975. 1
  3976. 1
  3977. 1
  3978. 1
  3979. 1
  3980. 1
  3981. 1
  3982. 1
  3983. 1
  3984. "Remember Cawnpore!". The siege of Cawnpore' 200 British women and children captured by the rebels were raped and butchered, in what came to be known as the Bibi Ghar massacre, their remains then thrown down a nearby well. A group of British officers and soldiers set out to the Bibi Ghar to rescue the captives, assuming that they were still alive. However, when they reached the site, they found it empty and blood-splattered, with the bodies of most of the 200 women and children having already been dismembered and thrown down the courtyard well or into the Ganges. Piles of children's clothing and severed women's hair blew on the wind and lodged in tree branches around the compound. In the courtyard, the tree nearest the well was smeared with the brains of numerous children and infants who had been dashed headfirst against the trunk and thrown down the well. That is why the British retaliated, their innocent wives and children had been butchered by the Indians! Which resulted in the revenge Jallianwala Bagh, Amristar massacre. So tell the Whole story of the truth, not just the bits that fit your anti-British rhetoric! Yes all 176 empires in the world were evil, so was slavery, which is probably as old as mankind himself. The whites took white slaves long before any black slaves. So did Africans take white slaves and sold them in Africa. Africans enslaved their own people and sold them to the Arabs for 1,300 years! The Atlantic slave trade was started by the Portuguese and Spanish 200 years, before the British became involved! At least the British helped stop slavery! So stop with the racist anti-British propaganda!
    1
  3985. 1
  3986. 1
  3987. 1
  3988. 1
  3989. 1
  3990. 1
  3991. 1
  3992. 1
  3993. 1
  3994. 1
  3995. 1
  3996. 1
  3997. 1
  3998. 1
  3999. 1
  4000. 1
  4001. 1
  4002. 1
  4003. 1
  4004. 1
  4005. 1
  4006. 1
  4007. 1
  4008. 1
  4009. 1
  4010. 1
  4011. 1
  4012. 1
  4013. 1
  4014. 1
  4015. 1
  4016. 1
  4017. 1
  4018. 1
  4019. 1
  4020. 1
  4021. 1
  4022. 1
  4023. 1
  4024. 1
  4025. 1
  4026. 1
  4027. 1
  4028. 1
  4029. 1
  4030. 1
  4031. 1
  4032. 1
  4033. 1
  4034. 1
  4035. 1
  4036. 1
  4037. 1
  4038. 1
  4039. 1
  4040. 1
  4041. 1
  4042. 1
  4043. 1
  4044. 1
  4045. 1
  4046. 1
  4047.  @michaeld5888  Basques are indigenous to, and primarily inhabit, an area traditionally known as the Basque Country (Basque: Euskal Herria)—a region that is located around the western end of the Pyrenees on the coast of the Bay of Biscay and straddles parts of north-central Spain and south-western France. So the Basques were a mix of Iberian and French who shared a common language, like the Celts. The distinctiveness noted by studies of 'classical' genetic markers (such as blood groups) and the apparently "pre-Indo-European" nature of the Basque language has resulted in a popular and long-held misleading view that Basques are "living fossils" of the earliest modern humans who colonised Europe. Partly for these reasons, anthropological and genetic studies from the beginning and the end of the 20th century theorized that the Basques are the descendants of the original Cro-Magnons. Although they are genetically distinctive in some ways due to isolation, the Basques are still very typically European in their Y-DNA and mtDNA sequences, and in some other genetic loci. These same sequences are widespread throughout the Western half of Europe, especially along the Western fringe of the continent. Studies based on the Y chromosome genetically relate the Basques with the Celtic Welsh, and Irish. Yes the Celts invaded the British Isles in around 500 BC. However some Britons/Bretons fled Britain during the Anglo-Saxon invasions and settled in what is now called Brittany which was named after them. We are all Western Europeans, Britain is a North Western European country and was once joined to mainland Europe which is now under the sea. Britain was still populated during the ice age, as Woolly Mammoth bones turn up on the beaches of Britain all the time with stone axe tools, marks on the bones, where they had been hunted and meat cut from their bones with flint tools.
    1
  4048. 1
  4049. 1
  4050. 1
  4051. 1
  4052. 1
  4053. 1
  4054. 1
  4055. 1
  4056. 1
  4057. 1
  4058. 1
  4059. 1
  4060. 1
  4061. 1
  4062. 1
  4063. 1
  4064. 1
  4065. 1
  4066. 1
  4067. 1
  4068. 1
  4069. 1
  4070. 1
  4071. 1
  4072. 1
  4073. 1
  4074. 1
  4075. 1
  4076. 1
  4077. 1
  4078. 1
  4079. 1
  4080. 1
  4081. 1
  4082. 1
  4083. 1
  4084. 1
  4085. 1
  4086. 1
  4087. 1
  4088. 1
  4089. 1
  4090. 1
  4091. 1
  4092. 1
  4093. 1
  4094. 1
  4095. 1
  4096. 1
  4097. 1
  4098. 1
  4099. 1
  4100. 1
  4101. 1
  4102. 1
  4103. 1
  4104. 1
  4105. 1
  4106. 1
  4107. 1
  4108. 1
  4109. 1
  4110. 1
  4111. 1
  4112. 1
  4113. 1
  4114. 1
  4115. 1
  4116. 1
  4117. 1
  4118. 1
  4119. 1
  4120. 1
  4121. 1
  4122. 1
  4123. 1
  4124. 1
  4125. 1
  4126. 1
  4127. 1
  4128. 1
  4129. 1
  4130.  @Skanderbeg-t8z  Here research this - Ronen Shoval - 'History, it seems, has a way of repeating itself. Just as the Roman Empire struggled to maintain unity in the face of internal divisions and external pressures, so too did Europe in the aftermath of two world wars. Recognizing the dangers of division, Europe’s leaders envisioned a new political order to prevent internal conflicts. Much like royal marriages in the Middle Ages, the idea was to lower the walls of enmity by fostering closeness. The European Union, with its supranational governance, common currency, and open borders, was designed to transcend the perilous nationalism that had torn Europe apart in the first half of the 20th century. This vision was anchored in a deep commitment to liberal values—democracy, human rights, and the rule of law—while simultaneously rejecting the destructive nationalisms of the past. The belief was that by blurring national lines and promoting diversity, Europe could forge a more inclusive and harmonious society. However, this grand vision contained the seeds of its own downfall, much like the Tower of Babel. Europe’s attempt to build a unified political and economic entity devoid of a shared moral foundation has led to confusion and fragmentation, rather than unity. The postmodern rejection of absolute truths, which underpinned the European project, has fostered moral relativism and eroded the sense of justice and the willingness to defend the future. Europe's economic and cultural prosperity has made it a magnet for immigrants. The European ideals of inclusivity and diversity are noble and form the foundation of the Pax Europa that followed World War II. However, the European Union's pacifist vision, which nurtures a life of comfort, takes the achievements of the past for granted. As a result, Europe not only fails to recognize that there are those who seek to exploit its values to advance totalitarian agendas, but it also refuses to use military force to maintain its place in the world. Moreover, the prosperity that Europe enjoyed attracted those who sought to benefit from its advantages without integrating into its social fabric. These migrants, instead of assimilating, have often sought to transform Europe from within. Unlike previous waves of immigrants, many among the recent Muslim influx have shown little interest in integrating into the European vision. Instead, they often seek to impose their own values on their host countries, leading to escalating friction and, in some instances, outright violence. The rise of Islamist extremism in Europe is not merely a security threat; it is the symptom of a deeper cultural crisis. Europe, having lost confidence in its own identity, is now struggling to defend the very values it professes to uphold.'
    1
  4131. 1
  4132. 1
  4133. 1
  4134. 1
  4135. 1
  4136. 1
  4137. 1
  4138. 1
  4139. 1
  4140. 1
  4141. 1
  4142. 1
  4143. 1
  4144. 1
  4145. 1
  4146. 1
  4147. 1
  4148. 1
  4149. @ That is not true! Britain invited Europeans via European Voluntary Workers (EVW) was the collective name given to continental Europeans invited by the British government to work in the UK in the immediate Post-World War II period, to help people who have become homeless during the war and to support labour shortages in industry. Programmes inviting staff include Balt Cygnet, which recruited Baltic women for nursing, housework and textile work. In spite of its name, Balt Cygnet also accepted applicants from Ukraine, Poland and countries in the Balkans, among others. In total some 91,000 Europeans came to the UK between 1946 and 1949. They were only needed until the British soldiers were demobbed and returned to their jobs. Only 300,000 British soldiers were killed in WWII out of an army of 3.5 million men. The population of Britain at that time was 50 million. Britain never really needed any immigration as the women had been working in the factories in industry, while the men were away, even building tanks and aircraft for war and running the farms. It was the British themselves that rebuilt the bombed out buildings in Britain, along with the Irish and Eastern Europeans. Britain only started getting immigration 70 years ago after the war. In fact the majority of the British had never even seen a person of colour until the 1950s - 1980s! Britons today are 90% - 60% Brittonic DNA with only a 10% - 40% Anglo-Saxon admixture, only 38% of Britain is of Anglo-Saxon heritage, 62% are Britons. The Angles, Saxons and Jutes were all North Western Europeans, like the British, they were distant cousins. Britain is a North Western European country. And we stayed that way for 1,400 years until the immigration of the last 70 years. In fact Britain has had more immigration in the last 20 years than we ever had in the last 2000 years!
    1
  4150. 1
  4151.  @harmen8362  Britain is part of the European continent, how can our own European people be immigrants by moving to another part of Europe in their own continent?! We share the same cultures, traditions and Christian religion. So stop with the woke left grift that Britain has always been multicultural is has not! The Romans left Britain , there is very little Roman DNA in Britain. The Anglo-Saxons were also many Britons returning after the Roman's left, our own people, not immigrants! It is nothing to do with colour so put your woke race card away! Others of foreign origin have absolutely NO ancestry in the British Isles whatsoever! They are economic immigrants flooding our shores and it has to be reversed, remigrations and deportations are needed. We have seen in peoples lifetime how immigration has changed Britain and not for the better! Soaring crime rates, st*bbings, r*pes, R*pe gangs, t*rrorism, dr*g gangs, m*rders, ac*d attacks, car-jackings, muggings, thefts, 'honour k*llings, FGM etc, it is not safe anymore for women and children to walk the streets, let alone the men! Lack of - housing, doctors, dentists, school places, NHS, congested roads, sewage systems cannot cope, so our rivers and seas being polluted with sewage because our overpopulated infrastructure cannot cope! Oh yes they have made a massive contribution, they are the majority taking over the country! Stats of 2021- Birmingham - 49% white, 2nd largest ethnic group - Pakistani Wolverhampton - 49% white, 2nd largest ethnic group - Indian Manchester - 48% white, 2nd largest ethnic group - Pakistani Coventry - 47% white, 2nd largest ethnic group - Indian Peterborough - 46% white, 2nd largest ethnic group - Indian London - 45% white, 2nd largest ethnic group - Indian Bradford - 45% white, 2nd largest ethnic group - Pakistani Luton - 45% white, 2nd largest ethnic group - Pakistani Leicester - 41% white, 2nd largest ethnic group - Indian Slough - 35% white, 2nd largest ethnic group - Indian 4 years later those stats are even lower for the indigenous British! So no, your woke left lies and propaganda will not wash! Now troll off!
    1
  4152.  @harmen8362  Britain is part of the European continent, how can our own European people be immigrants by moving to another part of Europe in their own continent?! We share the same cultures, traditions and Christian religion. So stop with the woke left grift that Britain has always been multicultural is has not! The Romans left Britain , there is very little Roman DNA in Britain. The Anglo-Saxons were also many Britons returning after the Roman's left, our own people, not immigrants! It is nothing to do with colour so put your woke race card away! Others of foreign origin have absolutely NO ancestry in the British Isles whatsoever! They are economic immigrants flooding our shores and it has to be reversed, remigrations and deportations are needed. We have seen in peoples lifetime how immigration has changed Britain and not for the better! Soaring crime rates, st*bbings, r*pes, R*pe gangs, t*rrorism, dr*g gangs, m*rders, ac*d attacks, car-jackings, muggings, thefts, 'honour k*llings, FGM etc, it is not safe anymore for women and children to walk the streets, let alone the men! Lack of - housing, doctors, dentists, school places, NHS, congested roads, sewage systems cannot cope, so our rivers and seas being polluted with sewage because our overpopulated infrastructure cannot cope! Oh yes they have made a massive contribution, they are the majority taking over the country! Stats of 2021- Birmingham - 49% white, 2nd largest ethnic group - Pakistani Wolverhampton - 49% white, 2nd largest ethnic group - Indian Manchester - 48% white, 2nd largest ethnic group - Pakistani Coventry - 47% white, 2nd largest ethnic group - Indian Peterborough - 46% white, 2nd largest ethnic group - Indian London - 45% white, 2nd largest ethnic group - Indian Bradford - 45% white, 2nd largest ethnic group - Pakistani Luton - 45% white, 2nd largest ethnic group - Pakistani Leicester - 41% white, 2nd largest ethnic group - Indian Slough - 35% white, 2nd largest ethnic group - Indian 4 years later those stats are even lower for the indigenous British! So no, your woke left lies and propaganda will not wash! Now troll off!
    1
  4153. 1
  4154. 1
  4155. 1
  4156. 1
  4157. 1
  4158. 1
  4159. 1
  4160. 1
  4161. 1
  4162. 1
  4163. By the early 1970s, many Indians in Southeast Africa and Uganda were employed in the sartorial and banking businesses and Indophobia was already ingrained by the start of President Amin’s rule in 1971. While not all Ugandan Asians were well off, they were on average better off than the indigenous communities. They constituted 1% of the population while earning a fifth of the national income. Amin carried out a census of Asians in Uganda and publicly accused them of economic misconduct and ethnic insularity. In 1972 Amin expelled all Asians from Uganda and seized their property. President Amin denounced the Ugandan Asians as "Bloodsuckers" and warned any remaining in the country after November 8, 1972, risked being imprisoned in military camps. Amin declared that Britain would need to take on the responsibility of caring for British subjects who were of Asian origin. He gave British subjects a deadline of three months to leave, which meant November 8, 1972. August 9, 1972 - The policy was expanded to include citizens of India, Pakistan and Bangladesh. The British government ultimately permitted them to move to the UK through the Uganda Resettlement Board. There were objections to the arrival of the Ugandan Asians in the UK - Leicester City Council even took out newspaper advertisements at the time warning them not to come to the city seeking jobs and homes. Today the City of Leicester is now minority white with a large Asian population. At that time in 1970s Britain, we had massive unemployment, Britain's economy was crumbling, as we grappled with the oil crisis and years of national strikes, with power cuts, inflation and rubbish on the streets. Many British struggled to feed their families. Rishi Sunak, Priti Patel, Suella Braverman are some of the parliamentary members, 2nd generation immigrants, whose parents/grandparents were African born expelled Asians. Under whose watch we have had 'record numbers' of mainly Asian immigration, both legal and illegal. Why were they not returned to their own motherlands in Asia?
    1
  4164. 1
  4165. 1
  4166. 1
  4167. 1
  4168. 1
  4169. 1
  4170. 1
  4171. 1
  4172.  @MrMegagoldenarms  Thanks for your copy and paste, which fits your chosen narrative, here is mine. Humans are very closely related to chimpanzees. According to a study, humans and chimpanzees share between 95% and 98.5% of their DNA. Another source states that humans share about 98.7% of their DNA with chimpanzees. This genetic similarity is due to the fact that humans and chimpanzees share a common ancestor, which they split from 10,000,000 years ago, as well as anatomical features, complex social hierarchies, and problem-solving skills. Chimpanzees are mainly white skinned, some have black faces, hands and feet. Is their white skin a recent skin mutation or have they/ our their shared ancestor, always been white? The ones who 'walked' out of Africa, purportedly between 300,000 to 800,000 years ago, were 'ape- like hominids', not the humans we see today. Homo-erectus an ape-like hominid now extinct, purportedly left 1-2 million years ago. They do not really know exact dates. Nor do they know what colour their skin was. In Britain, England, stone tools were found over 700,000 years old along with fossilised footprints 300,000 years old. ''Traditionally, we've imagined a single birthplace somewhere in sub-Saharan Africa, perhaps pinching away from a group like Homo heidelbergensis. But the fossils, genes, and archaeology tell a very different story. "In the fossil record, we see a mosaic-like, continental-wide trend toward the modern human form," says Scerri. "The fact that these features appear at different places at different times tells us that these populations were not well connected." This idea of a local "Cradle of Humankind" needs to be thrown out according to researchers, in favour of a multiregionalism explanation. Their hypothesis describes a picture of diverse populations of human ancestors scattered across the continent exploiting an array of ecosystems, each far more anatomically distinct than today's populations. Instead of strictly isolated hunter gatherers eking out a meagre existence, it looks like there was still occasional but significant cross-pollination between these separate communities. "This fits with a subdivided population model in which genetic exchanges are neither random nor frequent," says Scerri. What makes us unique as modern humans is a patchwork of traits that evolved in numerous regions at different points in time.
    1
  4173. 1
  4174. 1
  4175. 1
  4176. 1
  4177. 1
  4178. 1
  4179. 1
  4180. 1
  4181. 1
  4182. 1
  4183. 1
  4184. 1
  4185. 1
  4186. 1
  4187. 1
  4188. 1
  4189. 1
  4190. 1
  4191. 1
  4192. 1
  4193. 1
  4194. 1
  4195. 1
  4196. 1
  4197. 1
  4198. 1
  4199. 1
  4200. 1
  4201. 1
  4202. 1
  4203. 1
  4204. 1
  4205. 1
  4206. 1
  4207. 1
  4208. 1
  4209. 1
  4210. 1
  4211. 1
  4212. 1
  4213. 1
  4214. 1
  4215. 1
  4216. 1
  4217. 1
  4218. 1
  4219. 1
  4220. 1
  4221. 1
  4222. 1
  4223. 1
  4224. 1
  4225. 1
  4226. 1
  4227. 1
  4228. 1
  4229. 1
  4230. 1
  4231. 1
  4232. 1
  4233. 1
  4234. 1
  4235. 1
  4236. 1
  4237. 1
  4238. 1
  4239. 1
  4240. 1
  4241. 1
  4242. 1
  4243. 1
  4244. 1
  4245. 1
  4246. 1
  4247. 1
  4248. 1
  4249. 1
  4250. 1
  4251. 1
  4252. 1
  4253. 1
  4254. 1
  4255. 1
  4256. 1
  4257. 1
  4258. 1
  4259. 1
  4260. 1
  4261. 1
  4262. 1
  4263. 1
  4264. 1
  4265. The UK is accelerating its Islamization at an ever-increasing speed. The desire of the British establishment to submit to Islam appears to be overwhelming. ''A network of Islamist extremists operating in the UK will continue to use charities and taxpayer money to fund the spread of divisive, illiberal and intolerant views within our communities". Among the charities detailed in the report, are several Islamic charities involved in dawa [outreach, proselytization], such as the Islamic Education and Research Academy (iERA), as well as several charities connected to Hamas and the Muslim Brotherhood, such as the Muslim Charities Forum (MCF) and Islamic Relief. Deploying taxpayer money to support Islamic charities is not the only way in which the UK embraces Islamization. The British establishment has even let itself and its police be lectured by radical Islamist organizations such as Mend on what Islam is -- and has doggedly refused to listen to any dissident voices. Large parts of the British population, therefore, have nowhere to turn with their frustrations at the rapid Islamization of British society. Britain has suffered many Muslim terrorist attacks already, plus the grooming gang scandals with the rapes of thousands of children. Ninety per cent' of 43,000 extremists on MI5 watchlist are Islamist terror suspects, none are deported, yet every day and each week, hundreds of mainly lone Muslim men are allowed to illegally invade our country and still the government import even more in legally. Our traitorous government have no intention of deporting any. No other organizations appear willing to have an open discussion about the ongoing Islamization of Britain. A situation that seems bound to continue, unless or until the British establishment -- political, security, educational, clerical and cultural -- begins to address, openly and honestly, the rapidly increasing speed of Islamization into British society.
    1
  4266. 1
  4267. 1
  4268. 1
  4269. 1
  4270. 1
  4271. 1
  4272. 1
  4273. 1
  4274. 1
  4275. 1
  4276. 1
  4277. 1
  4278. 1
  4279. 1
  4280. 1
  4281. 1
  4282. 1
  4283. 1
  4284. 1
  4285. 1
  4286. 1
  4287. 1
  4288. 1
  4289. 1
  4290. 1
  4291. 1
  4292. 1
  4293. 1
  4294. 1
  4295. 1
  4296. 1
  4297. 1
  4298. 1
  4299. 1
  4300. 1
  4301. 1
  4302. 1
  4303. 1
  4304. 1
  4305. 1
  4306. 1
  4307. 1
  4308. 1
  4309. 1
  4310. 1
  4311. 1
  4312. 1
  4313. 1
  4314. 1
  4315. 1
  4316. 1
  4317. 1
  4318. 1
  4319. 1
  4320. 1
  4321. 1
  4322. 1
  4323. 1
  4324. 1
  4325. 1
  4326. 1
  4327. 1
  4328. 1
  4329. 1
  4330. 1
  4331. 1
  4332.  @richardcooley9730  Sorry but the new Windsor framework has basically took UK back into the EU by the back door Giving UK sovereignty back to EU via N.Ireland. The Windsor Framework: a backdoor to Brexit betray - The Windsor Framework certainly marks an end to Brexit – in more ways than one. This is because the Windsor Framework, Sunak’s renegotiated version of the Northern Ireland Protocol, gives the EU control of Northern Ireland and by extension, control of the UK. It essentially torpedoes the UK-EU trade agreement, destroying any notion of a relationship between equals, and it returns the UK to law-taker status. This will have a real, tangible impact on the UK’s ability to govern itself. For example, a bill is currently making its way through parliament that would outlaw importing hunting trophies of endangered species. This is not only the will of the UK government – it is also a popular policy with the public. It will be rendered pointless, however, by the Windsor Framework. The compromise offered by the framework means that trophies can still be brought back to Northern Ireland. EU law will remain dominant in Northern Ireland and the EU does not intend to introduce any similar hunting-trophy ban. Once in Northern Ireland, there are several ways the trophies then pass seamlessly into the UK. This will happen time and again. Successive UK governments – of all parties – will want to pass new laws and follow through on campaign promises. The only way they will be able to do so is if the EU agrees. For instance, earlier this year, the EU made it lawful for partially defatted cricket powder – an insect product – to be put into food. All sorts of things from pasta to flour to beer can now legally contain cricket powder in the EU. Food with this powder will also be allowed into the UK, in the same way that the supposedly illegal hunting trophies would be. And our government will be powerless to stop it. The UK won’t even have a say over how products containing the cricket powder are labelled. All that will lie with the EU. So we are back in the EU via the back door.
    1
  4333. 1
  4334. 1
  4335. 1
  4336. 1
  4337. 1
  4338. 1
  4339. 1
  4340. 1
  4341. 1
  4342. 1
  4343. 1
  4344. 1
  4345. 1
  4346. 1
  4347. 1
  4348. 1
  4349. 1
  4350. 1
  4351. 1
  4352. 1
  4353. 1
  4354. 1
  4355. 1
  4356. 1
  4357. 1
  4358. 1
  4359. 1
  4360. 1
  4361. 1
  4362. 1
  4363. 1
  4364. 1
  4365. 1
  4366. 1
  4367. 1
  4368. 1
  4369. 1
  4370. 1
  4371. 1
  4372. 1
  4373. 1
  4374. 1
  4375. 1
  4376. 1
  4377. 1
  4378. 1
  4379. 1
  4380. There was a time, not so long ago, in Britain when the poor had no money to visit a doctor or pay for medicines, infant mortality was high and many poor were lucky to live to their 40's. Pre-NHS medication/hospitals for the poor also started in the 'work houses' in the 1900s , 'well the rich must keep their slaves healthy!' Once I read a book about the history of the Staffordshire Bull Terrier whose origins came from the 'Pit dog/fighting dog' in the Black Country. Their beloved 'pets' were often fought in the pits, not because of their love of dog fighting, but for money for medicines for their children/ families because of poverty, (medications/ doctors were expensive in the 1800s). It was illegal, so they would take the babies pram and put them in, to bring them back home, (there were bobbies on the beat in those days!) covered with the baby blankets in the pram, hence why they got their name the 'nanny dog', one way or another the dogs took care of the children! Medicine in 1800s was a scary combination of chance and quackery with preparations of mercury, arsenic, iron, opium, morphine, cocaine and phosphorous also popular. 'That which does not kill you, makes you an addict!' If we scrapped the NHS today and privatised all hospitals and doctors, things would quickly revert to the past. (Government would still take over £5000 NHS a year taxes from wages) In America people still die today who do not have expensive medical insurance! The private medical sector also inflates the prices of medicines for greed, just like the Canadian/American owned veterinary chains operating in the UK today, who bought the rip-off pet insurance with them! Exploitation of the poor by the greed of the rich! The 'haves and have nots' is still as prevalent today as it has always been!
    1
  4381. 1
  4382. 1
  4383. 1
  4384. 1
  4385. 1
  4386. 1
  4387. 1
  4388. 1
  4389. 1
  4390. 1
  4391. 1
  4392. 1
  4393. 1
  4394. 1
  4395. 1
  4396. 1
  4397. 1
  4398. 1
  4399. 1
  4400. 1
  4401. 1
  4402. 1
  4403. 1
  4404. 1
  4405. 1
  4406. 1
  4407. 1
  4408. 1
  4409. 1
  4410. 1
  4411. 1
  4412. 1
  4413. 1
  4414. 1
  4415. 1
  4416. 1
  4417. 1
  4418. 1
  4419. 1
  4420. 1
  4421. 1
  4422. 1
  4423. 1
  4424. 1
  4425. 1
  4426. 1
  4427. 1
  4428. 1
  4429. 1
  4430. 1
  4431. 1
  4432. 1
  4433. 1
  4434. 1
  4435. 1
  4436. 1
  4437. 1
  4438. 1
  4439. 1
  4440. 1
  4441. 1
  4442. 1
  4443. 1
  4444. 1
  4445. 1
  4446. 1
  4447. 1
  4448. 1
  4449. 1
  4450. 1
  4451. 1
  4452. 1
  4453. 1
  4454. 1
  4455. 1
  4456. 1
  4457. 1
  4458. 1
  4459. 1
  4460. 1
  4461. 1
  4462. 1
  4463. 1
  4464. 1
  4465. 1
  4466. 1
  4467. 1
  4468. 1
  4469. 50,000 illegal undocumented immigrants, is an invasion, and they are still coming. They have no rights to be here! There are no homes to house them in. Britain is full. There are no homes for British citizens and their children or the British homeless on the streets. That guy is totally woke and deluded. We are a small Island, we have taken in millions of refugees here since the 1800s. What about the rights of the indigenous population? There are cities in Britain now that are majority foreign immigrants, the Brits are the minority. All UK immigration needs to stop, other countries need to take them in. We will not concrete over our countryside and farmland to house them all and be forced to eat EUs insects! Send them all back to France or their own countries, it will eventually cause a civil war here and then none will be safe. There are over 400 hotels in Britain housing Illegal Immigrants, mainly men, that came over from France in dinghies with no documents. They are mainly from the Middle East, Africa and Albania. They entered the country Illegally. There are legal ways to claim asylum. The Ukrainians are being given shelter and will return home once the war is over in the Ukraine. The UK taxpayers are paying for all this and most cannot afford to eat or heat their homes. There is also a housing crisis in the UK, they are full, there is no housing, also the UK has their own homeless people living on the streets. The Rwanda scheme, which has cost £140 million so far, is a swap scheme, they will only take roughly 200 immigrants and in return we have to take Rwandan sick, ill or disabled in return. So it does nothing to stem the flow of over-crowding, of Immigration in the UK. So far none have been sent to Rwanda and probably none will, a total waste of taxpayers money. There are roughly 50,000 migrants in hotels, rising daily, costing £7million+ a day. There are no homes to put them in, It is a small Island. UKs debt is £2.45 trillion, and rising by millions a day. Britain is no longer a rich country, especially for the working classes, nor has it any room left to house the rest of the world.
    1
  4470. 1
  4471. 1
  4472. 1
  4473. 1
  4474. 1
  4475. 1
  4476. 1
  4477. 1
  4478. 1
  4479. 1
  4480. 1
  4481. 1
  4482. 1
  4483. 1
  4484. 1
  4485. 1
  4486. 1
  4487. 1
  4488. 1
  4489. 1
  4490.  @Jacob234-nh2cv  The Goidelic Celts were first to invade Britain 750 BC - 42 AD. They were later pushed into Ireland by their cousins the Brythonic Celts. What we do know is that the people we call Celts gradually infiltrated Britain over the course of the centuries between about 500 and 100 B.C. There was probably never an organized Celtic invasion; for one thing, the Celts were so fragmented and given to fighting among themselves that the idea of a concerted invasion would have been ludicrous. The Celts were a group of peoples loosely tied by similar language, religion, and cultural expression. They were not centrally governed, and quite as happy to fight each other as any non-Celt. They were warriors, living for the glories of battle and plunder. The Brittonic DNA are the descendants of the ancient peoples of the British Isles, who today we call English, Scottish, Welsh and Northern Irish, that were here before the Germanic and Scandinavian invasions and still live here today in all four countries of the British Isles, whether they have some admixture with the Germanic/Scandinavian tribes invaders descendants or not. Cheddar mans descendant still lives in the same area today, 10,000 years later! The Romans invited the Saxons to Britain to help them fight the Picts/Scots. There were many battles between Anglo-Saxons and Britons. It is a myth that there is no Brittonic DNA in England, just because we were invaded. East Anglia is where the Angles settled, and later the Vikings, hence Norfolk, Norse folk. The Jutes settled in Kent and the Saxons settled in Wessex, Sussex and Essex. The Anglo-Saxons ruled Northumbria, it was their main kingdom. Yes they invaded, settled, changed our language and renamed our country and towns, introduced royalty and mixed with the Britons, hence 60% -70% Brittonic DNA and only 30% -40% Anglo-Saxon/ Scandinavian DNA admixture. We stayed that way for nearly 2000 years before the onset of foreign mass immigration of the last 70years.
    1
  4491. 1
  4492. 1
  4493. 1
  4494. 1
  4495. 1
  4496. 1
  4497. 1
  4498. 1
  4499. 1
  4500. 1
  4501. 1
  4502. 1
  4503. 1
  4504. 1
  4505. The most important natural renewable resource is water which is very important for all life on earth. Ground water, rivers and reservoirs are the main traditional sources and supplies of water in many regions of the world. These resources are under threat from ever-increasing demands due to changes in land use and growing populations. Shortages and increase in the cost of potable water is caused by the stress from droughts and high exploitation on water supplies. In many areas around the world, water supplies have been steadily decreasing. In order to increase water resources, many countries are conducting weather modification activities which are located in semiarid regions of the world. India, Indonesia, Malaysia, Thailand and UAE are some of the countries involved in weather modification activities. Cloud seeding is known as one of the weather modification processes, simply a method of artificially encouraging a cloud to produce rain . In addition to cloud seeding, other terms are also used such as man-made precipitation enhancement, artificial weather modification, rainmaking and so on. It involves spraying small particles such as dry ice and silver iodide aerosols into upper part of clouds to form rain by trying to simulate the precipitation process in the clouds in order to increase it. UAE was one of the first countries in the Middle East to take on cloud seeding technology to increase its existing water sources and rainfall. Cloud seeding program started in UAE by establishing UAE Research Program for Rain Enhancement Science (UAEREP). UAEREP is a program designed to improve water security in arid and semi-arid areas around the world. Last year, UAE conducted 242 missions, which was up from 177 in 2016. Growing up, I never saw completely white skies over Britain, unless it was snowing, now nearly every day is a complete white-out, blocking out the sun. Facing facts, aeroplanes are causing pollution of our skies either way. During lockdown the skies became blue again.
    1
  4506. 1
  4507. 1
  4508. 1
  4509. 1
  4510. 1
  4511. 1
  4512. 1
  4513. 1
  4514. 1
  4515. 1
  4516. 1
  4517. 1
  4518. 1
  4519. 1
  4520. 1
  4521. 1
  4522. 1
  4523. 1
  4524. 1
  4525. 1
  4526. 1
  4527. 1
  4528. 1
  4529. 1
  4530. 1
  4531. 1
  4532. 1
  4533. 1
  4534. 1
  4535. 1
  4536. 1
  4537. 1
  4538.  @thetruth9210  Stop gaslighting, wit liberal left woke BS! We were known by the rest of Europe as the Britons from Britannia, of the British Isle. The Britons did not keep written records so we do not know what we called ourselves collectively! Tribes are just extended families over centuries. Ancient Greek Pytheas of Massalia, explorer and astronomer from the Greek colony of Massalia (modern-day Marseille, France), made a voyage of exploration to Northern Europe in about 325 BC. On this voyage, he circumnavigated and visited a considerable part of the British Isles. The first known written use of the word Britain was an ancient Greek transliteration of the original P-Celtic term. Pytheas brought back the P-Celtic form from more geographically accessible regions where Welsh or Breton are spoken presently. Furthermore, some proto-Celtic was spoken over all of Greater Britain, and this particular spelling is prototypical of those more populous regions, but there is no evidence that Pytheas distinguished between the peoples of the archipelago.( in other words we were seen as all the same!) 'The numerous population of natives, he says, live in thatched cottages, store their grain in subterranean caches and bake bread from it. They are "of simple manners" (ēthesin haplous) and are content with plain fare. They are ruled by many kings and princes who live in peace with each other. Their troops fight from chariots, as did the Greeks in the Trojan War.' Britain is a union of the three countries of the British Isles. We are all mostly mixed with each other over thousands of years. England today is still 62% Brittonic, only 38% of England today are direct descendants of the Anglo-Saxons. The English today are still majority Brittonic DNA with a 10% - 40% Anglo-Saxon admixture, so the Britons were not replaced, rather the Anglo-Saxons, who came in different waves, integrated into our indigenous Brittonic culture. The English, Scottish, Welsh, Northern Irish and Irish are all mixed with each other by DNA whether you like that or not! You will not divide us, we are all the indigenous peoples of these Isles, all North Western Europeans, united we stand divided we fall!
    1
  4539.  @thetruth9210  Stop gaslighting, wit liberal left woke BS! We were known by the rest of Europe as the Britons from Britannia, of the British Isle. The Britons did not keep written records so we do not know what we called ourselves collectively! Tribes are just extended families over centuries. Ancient Greek Pytheas of Massalia, explorer and astronomer from the Greek colony of Massalia (modern-day Marseille, France), made a voyage of exploration to Northern Europe in about 325 BC. On this voyage, he circumnavigated and visited a considerable part of the British Isles. The first known written use of the word Britain was an ancient Greek transliteration of the original P-Celtic term. Pytheas brought back the P-Celtic form from more geographically accessible regions where Welsh or Breton are spoken presently. Furthermore, some proto-Celtic was spoken over all of Greater Britain, and this particular spelling is prototypical of those more populous regions, but there is no evidence that Pytheas distinguished between the peoples of the archipelago.( in other words we were seen as all the same!) 'The numerous population of natives, he says, live in thatched cottages, store their grain in subterranean caches and bake bread from it. They are "of simple manners" (ēthesin haplous) and are content with plain fare. They are ruled by many kings and princes who live in peace with each other. Their troops fight from chariots, as did the Greeks in the Trojan War.' Britain is a union of the three countries of the British Isles. We are all mostly mixed with each other over thousands of years. England today is still 62% Brittonic, only 38% of England today are direct descendants of the Anglo-Saxons. The English today are still majority Brittonic DNA with a 10% - 40% Anglo-Saxon admixture, so the Britons were not replaced, rather the Anglo-Saxons, who came in different waves, integrated into our indigenous Brittonic culture. The English, Scottish, Welsh, Northern Irish and Irish are all mixed with each other by DNA whether you like that or not! You will not divide us, we are all the indigenous peoples of these Isles, all North Western Europeans, united we stand divided we fall!
    1
  4540. 1
  4541. 1
  4542. 1
  4543. 1
  4544. 1
  4545. 1
  4546. 1
  4547. 1
  4548. 1
  4549. 1
  4550. 1
  4551. 1
  4552. 1
  4553. 1
  4554. 1
  4555. 1
  4556. 1
  4557. 1
  4558. 1
  4559. 1
  4560. 1
  4561. 1
  4562. 1
  4563. 1
  4564. 1
  4565. 1
  4566. 1
  4567. 1
  4568. 1
  4569. 1
  4570. 1
  4571. 1
  4572. 1
  4573. 1
  4574. 1
  4575. 1
  4576. 1
  4577. 1
  4578. 1
  4579. 1
  4580. 1
  4581. 1
  4582. 1
  4583. 1
  4584. 1
  4585. 1
  4586. 1
  4587. 1
  4588. 1
  4589. 1
  4590. 1
  4591. 1
  4592. 1
  4593. 1
  4594. 1
  4595. 1
  4596. 1
  4597. 1
  4598. 1
  4599. 1
  4600. 1
  4601. 1
  4602. 1
  4603. 1
  4604. 1
  4605. 1
  4606. 1
  4607. 1
  4608. 1
  4609. 1
  4610. 1
  4611. 1
  4612. 1
  4613. 1
  4614. 1
  4615. 1
  4616. 1
  4617. 1
  4618. 1
  4619. 1
  4620. 1
  4621. 1
  4622. 1
  4623. 1
  4624. 1
  4625. 1
  4626. 1
  4627. 1
  4628. 1
  4629. 1
  4630. 1
  4631. 1
  4632. 1
  4633. 1
  4634. 1
  4635. 1
  4636. 1
  4637. 1
  4638. 1
  4639. 1
  4640. 1
  4641. 1
  4642. 1
  4643. 1
  4644. 1
  4645. 1
  4646. 1
  4647. 1
  4648. 1
  4649. 1
  4650. 1
  4651. 1
  4652. 1
  4653. 1
  4654. 1
  4655. 1
  4656. 1
  4657. 1
  4658. 1
  4659. 1
  4660. 1
  4661. 1
  4662. 1
  4663. 1
  4664. 1
  4665. 1
  4666.  @stephfoxwell4620  Here Steph I will share with you what an American has to say about British DNA in Americans. Jamie Odom U.S. Army National Guard (IT Department)5y I do Genealogy on the side and from the work I have done on my customers most Americans have some British ancestory. I have had customers that swore they were German because of some old story handed down down and found out that they were British. After working on family history for the last 10 years I can tell you that because the British were here first they created a base. Anyone migrating to America after that is going to marry into that base with some exceptions. My story is like a lot of Americans. My dad’s name is Swanson. My dad always said we were Swedish because the name sounds like it is from Sweden. I took my dad’s family all the way back to Virginia in 1645. Come to find out the Swanson’s came from London, England as indentured servants. I took them back further to the 1500’s. Still in England in the 1500s -no Swedish. I did a DNA test recently with ancestry.com. My ancestry was 65 % British, 7% Scandinavian and 22% Western European. I cannot find any records on these Western Europeans. So the DNA confirmed my research. Everyone I had taken back which is about 800 people were from England, Scotland, Wales and Ireland. On top of that my DNA on ancestry.com, will show you all the people that match your DNA type in America that has done the test. I have 900 pages so far of people that are related to me. They all have about the same DNA. A little more British or less British and a little more Western European in some areas but always some British. I bee this is mostly the makeup of white Americans with some exceptions. To tell you the truth a good portion of African Americans also have that makeup. Some Americans that know that they are English will usually not state that they are English American because it shows that you might be bragging or something so this is why most Americans will not say I’m British American. It kind of sounds like duh.. of course so you will say you are of the ancestory that is a little more exotic and exciting.
    1
  4667. 1
  4668. 1
  4669. 1
  4670. 1
  4671. 1
  4672. 1
  4673. 1
  4674. 1
  4675. 1
  4676. 1
  4677. 1
  4678. 1
  4679. 1
  4680. 1
  4681. 1
  4682. 1
  4683. 1
  4684. 1
  4685. 1
  4686. 1
  4687. 1
  4688. 1
  4689. 1
  4690. 1
  4691. 1
  4692. 1
  4693. 1
  4694. 1
  4695. 1
  4696. 1
  4697. 1
  4698. 1
  4699. 1
  4700. 1
  4701. 1
  4702. 1
  4703. 1
  4704. 1
  4705. 1
  4706. 1
  4707. 1
  4708. 1
  4709. 1
  4710. 1
  4711. 1
  4712. 1
  4713. 1
  4714. 1
  4715. 1
  4716. 1
  4717. 1
  4718. 1
  4719. 1
  4720. 1
  4721. 1
  4722. 1
  4723. 1
  4724. 1
  4725. 1
  4726. 1
  4727. 1
  4728. 1
  4729. 1
  4730. 1
  4731. 1
  4732. 1
  4733. 1
  4734. 1
  4735. 1
  4736. 1
  4737. 1
  4738. 1
  4739. 1
  4740. 1
  4741. 1
  4742. 1
  4743. 1
  4744. 1
  4745. 1
  4746. 1
  4747. 1
  4748. 1
  4749. 1
  4750. 1
  4751. 1
  4752. 1
  4753. 1
  4754. 1
  4755. 1
  4756. 1
  4757. 1
  4758. 1
  4759. 1
  4760. 1
  4761. 1
  4762. 1
  4763. 1
  4764. 1
  4765. 1
  4766. 1
  4767. 1
  4768. 1
  4769. 1
  4770. 1
  4771. 1
  4772. 1
  4773. 1
  4774. 1
  4775. 1
  4776. 1
  4777. 1
  4778. 1
  4779. 1
  4780. 1
  4781. 1
  4782. 1
  4783. 1
  4784. 1
  4785. 1
  4786. 1
  4787. 1
  4788. 1
  4789. 1
  4790. 1
  4791. 1
  4792. 1
  4793. 1
  4794. 1
  4795. 1
  4796. 1
  4797. 1
  4798. 1
  4799. 1
  4800. 1
  4801. 1
  4802. 1
  4803. 1
  4804. 1
  4805. 1
  4806. 1
  4807. I remember during lockdown how beautifully sunny and blue the sky was with no aeroplanes flying. The Sun gives us vitamin D. April 4, 2024 By Corbin Hiar & E&E News Geoengineering Test Quietly Launches Salt Crystals into Atmosphere A solar geoengineering experiment in San Francisco could lead to brighter clouds that reflect sunlight. The risks are numerous. CLIMATEWIRE | The nation's first outdoor test to limit global warming by increasing cloud cover launched Tuesday from the deck of a decommissioned aircraft carrier in the San Francisco Bay. The experiment, which organizers didn't widely announce to avoid public backlash, marks the acceleration of a contentious field of research known as solar radiation modification. The concept involves shooting substances such as aerosols into the sky to reflect sunlight away from the Earth. The move led by researchers at the University of Washington has renewed questions about how to effectively and ethically study promising climate technologies that could also harm communities and ecosystems in unexpected ways. The experiment is spraying microscopic salt particles into the air, and the secrecy surrounding its timing caught even some experts off guard. "Since this experiment was kept under wraps until the test started, we are eager to see how public engagement is being planned and who will be involved," said Shuchi Talati, the executive director of the Alliance for Just Deliberation on Solar Geoengineering, a non-profit that seeks to include developing countries in decisions about solar modification, also known as geoengineering. She is not involved in the experiment and only learned about it after being contacted by a reporter. The Coastal Atmospheric Aerosol Research and Engagement, or CAARE, project is using specially built sprayers to shoot trillions of sea salt particles into the sky in an effort to increase the density — and reflective capacity — of marine clouds. The experiment is taking place, when conditions permit, atop the USS Hornet Sea, Air & Space Museum in Alameda, California, and will run through the end of May, according to a weather modification form the team filed with federal regulators. The project comes as global heat continues to obliterate monthly and yearly temperature records and amid growing interest in solar radiation modification from Silicon Valley funders and some environmental groups. It also follows the termination of a Harvard University experiment last month that planned to inject reflective aerosols into the stratosphere near Sweden before it was canceled after encountering opposition from Indigenous groups. Solar radiation modification is controversial because widespread use of technologies like marine cloud brightening could alter weather patterns in unclear ways and potentially limit the productivity of fisheries and farms. It also wouldn't address the main cause of climate change — the use of fossil fuels — and could lead to a catastrophic spike in global temperatures if major geoengineering activities were discontinued before greenhouse gases decrease to manageable levels.
    1
  4808. 1
  4809. 1
  4810. 1
  4811. 1
  4812. 1
  4813. 1
  4814. 1
  4815. 1
  4816. 1
  4817. 1
  4818. 1
  4819. 1
  4820. 1
  4821. 1
  4822. 1
  4823. 1
  4824. 1
  4825. 1
  4826. 1
  4827. 1
  4828. 1
  4829. 1
  4830. 1
  4831. 1
  4832. 1
  4833.  @BeBe-vh4ry  Of course they are the Angles renamed our country England, the Angles came from the Angeln peninsula, which is on the Baltic Sea coast of Schleswig-Holstein. The Old Saxons, were the Germanic people of "Old" Saxony (Latin: Antiqua Saxonia) which became a Carolingian "stem duchy" in 804, in what is now northern Germany. The Old Saxony was lying on the ocean coast, between Frisia and the Danes. The first Saxons clearly mentioned in ancient records were the "Old Saxons" who became important during the late Roman Empire as coastal raiders who attacked from the north using boats, in a similar sense to the much later term Viking.( they were the 'old' Vikings). They included Frisians, Angles and Jutes, who stretched from what is now the Netherlands to what is now Denmark, as well as coastal parts of the territory which came to be called Saxony. It has been proposed that these coastal Saxons and the later Saxons of Carolingian times should be seen as distinct, but related peoples, who were referred to by the same name, such as the Dutch and Deutschen (Germans) today. So not the same as modern day Germans but related. Britons did mix with them after the invaded and settled here and we stayed that way for nearly 2000 years. The Celts were the first to invade in 43AD. Celtic peoples (/ ˈkɛltɪk / KEL-tik) were a collection of Indo-European peoples in Europe and Anatolia, identified by their use of Celtic languages and other cultural similarities. Major Celtic groups included the Gauls; the Celtiberians and Gallaeci of Iberia; the Britons, Picts, and Gaels of Britain and Ireland; the Boii; and the Galatians. A mix of different peoples from Europe.
    1
  4834.  @BeBe-vh4ry  Wrong! Ancient Britons are still living in England today and have 60%-90% ancient Brittonic DNA, with only a 10%-40% Angle, Saxon, Scandinavian admixture. Who do you think the Angles and Saxons were invading, Scotch mist? Ancient (English) Briton Cheddar mans descendant still lives in the same area in England today, 10,000 years later! Ancient Britons are actually classed as Celtic people today, as I say Celts were tribes of ancient Europeans, not a race of people, that is why they had several different languages, like Irish, Scottish, Welsh and Brittonic all different languages. The name Englaland was first applied to the territory of the Anglo-Saxons after their invasion from northern Germany and southern Denmark around 450 AD. [The earliest tribes that are typically called Germanic, date to about 750 BC, and inhabited the northern coast of present-day Germany, along with southern Scandinavia. Over the next 750 years, these tribes gradually expanded their territory, pushing their way west into modern Belgium and the Netherlands, east into Poland and the Ukraine, and as far south as the Danube River. ( All Celtic areas) the Germanic tribes gradually began to consolidate their territories and identities. The second and third centuries saw the growth of several tribes, including the Alamanni, Bavarii, Burgundians, Chatti, Franks, Frisii, Lombards, Ostrogoths, Saxons, Sicambri, Thuringii, Vandals, and Visigoths. (mixed Europeans who then settled in Southern and Western Europe). So stop with the untrue myth that Britons were replaced by Angles and Saxons, they were not, their numbers were negligible, if anything they are the ones who got integrated into the Brittonic culture. In fact even after all of Britain's invasions, we have had more immigration in the last 20 years, than we ever had in the last 2000 years!
    1
  4835. 1
  4836. 1
  4837. 1
  4838. 1
  4839. 1
  4840. 1
  4841. 1
  4842. 1
  4843. 1
  4844. 1
  4845. 1
  4846. 1
  4847. 1
  4848. 1
  4849. 1
  4850. 1
  4851. 1
  4852. 1
  4853. 1
  4854. 1
  4855. 1
  4856. 1
  4857. 1
  4858. 1
  4859. 1
  4860. 1
  4861. 1
  4862. 1
  4863. 1
  4864. 1
  4865. 1
  4866. 1
  4867. 1
  4868. 1
  4869. 1
  4870. 1
  4871. 1
  4872. 1
  4873. 1
  4874. 1
  4875. 1
  4876. 1
  4877. 1
  4878. 1
  4879. 1
  4880. 1
  4881. 1
  4882. 1
  4883. 1
  4884. 1
  4885. 1
  4886. 1
  4887. 1
  4888. 1
  4889. 1
  4890. 1
  4891. 1
  4892. 1
  4893. 1
  4894. 1
  4895. 1
  4896. 1
  4897. 1
  4898. 1
  4899. 1
  4900.  @Kurtofon  Look at my first post, I mentioned Romans et al I was not specifically talking about the Vikings but ALL of our invasions around a 2000 year time frame! I did not mention the Bell beakers 2450 BC, because I was speaking generically! I am not so sure they were so foreign to us, the Britons used to trade their wares such as Tin, gold, silver and cattle, to do that they would probably have travelled to places in Europe nearby and others would have travelled here to trade. After all it was our trade in these commodities that attracted the Romans to invade us in the first place in 43 AD! Some of our settlers/ invaders were friendly, some were not and came to steal. Point is closely related Europeans settled here, we settled in other European countries too! Britons today have 90% - 60% Brittonic DNA with a 10% - 40% Anglo - Saxon admixture. It dispels the woke narrative that Britons are all descendants of our European invaders, and only came into being 1000-2000 years ago, when we have always been here! Enforcing a false narrative to suit their woke multicultural globalist agenda! Like saying Cheddar man was black, when scientists said they cannot determine skin colour from his DNA but they still purport the lie. Strange as Britain, one of the most North Westerly European countries, must have been the only 'black' country in all of Europe, laughable! Funnier still his descendant still resides in the same area today, 10,000 years later and he is white! But hey, do not let a little thing like that, demolish their woke lies!
    1
  4901.  @Kurtofon  Look at my first post, I mentioned Romans et al I was not specifically talking about the Vikings but ALL of our invasions around a 2000 year time frame! I did not mention the Bell beakers 2450 BC, because I was speaking generically! I am not so sure they were so foreign to us, the Britons used to trade their wares such as Tin, gold, silver and cattle, to do that they would probably have travelled to places in Europe nearby and others would have travelled here to trade. After all it was our trade in these commodities that attracted the Romans to invade us in the first place in 43 AD! Some of our settlers/ invaders were friendly, some were not and came to steal. Point is closely related Europeans settled here, we settled in other European countries too! Britons today have 90% - 60% Brittonic DNA with a 10% - 40% Anglo - Saxon admixture. It dispels the woke narrative that Britons are all descendants of our European invaders, and only came into being 1000-2000 years ago, when we have always been here! Enforcing a false narrative to suit their woke multicultural globalist agenda! Like saying Cheddar man was black, when scientists said they cannot determine skin colour from his DNA but they still purport the lie. Strange as Britain, one of the most North Westerly European countries, must have been the only 'black' country in all of Europe, laughable! Funnier still his descendant still resides in the same area today, 10,000 years later and he is white! But hey, do not let a little thing like that, demolish their woke lies!
    1
  4902. 1
  4903. 1
  4904. 1
  4905. 1
  4906. 1
  4907.  pappi360  The Dutch in India were also successful in capturing parts of Bengal and Surat, where they established colonies in 1627 and 1616, respectively. Several European powers, including England, Portugal, the Netherlands, and France, invaded India and established their colonies. The British came to India as traders to open trade routes. Britain had been trading in India since about 1600. In 1775 the Battle of Plassey, pitted 3,000 soldiers of the British East India Company against the 50,000-strong army of the young Nawab of Bengal, Siraj ud Daulah, and his French East India Company allies. (Basically a war between Britain and France for trading rights and colonisation.) The Nawab lost at least 500 troops, while Britain lost only 22. Britain seized the modern equivalent of about $5 million from the Bengali treasury and took over French land, in what was known as 'spoils of war' in those days, which everyone practised. The British introduced Western ideas and technology, built a railway system and created a civil service, law and democracy, education, commerce, medicines etc They banned practices like Sati and child marriage. Point is you say nothing of the other colonists only the British! There were 176 Empires in the world, things were different back in history than it is today. Maybe the Europeans got the idea of colonisation from the Ottomans and Moors who violently invaded and colonised Europe? That is called history, Europe has moved on, so should India and stop living in the past. Britain has given £billions to India over the decades and continues to give them Aid even today. You cannot blame Britain for the poverty in India today, that is the fault of your own rich elite rulers. They send a rocket to the moon when they could have given that money to help the poor!
    1
  4908. 1
  4909. 1
  4910. 1
  4911. 1
  4912. 1
  4913. 1
  4914. 1
  4915. 1
  4916. 1
  4917. 1
  4918. 1
  4919. 1
  4920. 1
  4921. 1
  4922. Yes! In chapter 36 of this 1998 ‘Act’ he attempted to repeal the 1795 Act and the death penalty for high treason but Blair had no lawful authority to do so, and he committed treason in his attempt. He would be in prison today if only the people would stand united under their constitution as the law demands. Blair actually committed three acts of Treason in all, and did not possess the authority to do so. An example of such a treasonous act would be a year earlier at the signing of the Amsterdam Treaty in 1997 which increased the European Union’s powers for action at community level, and included further European integration in legislative, police, judicial, customs and security matters and strengthened Europol. This was a clear act of treason, and because of this, Tony Blair was in fact, actually never the Prime Minister at law. Much like any criminal in supposed “public office”, Blair tried to get rid of the penalty of the crime he was guilty of. The former Labour Prime Minister controversially swept aside 1,400 years of history by setting up a new US-style Supreme Court in place of the Law Lords in 2005. According to parliamentary records, on November 10, 2009, Conservative MP Shailesh Vara addressed the House of Commons, saying: "Given that it was widely reported that the decision to set up a Supreme Court was taken by Tony Blair and Lord Falconer over a glass of whisky, and that the annual cost of running the Supreme Court is some £14million whereas the cost of the previous arrangement was £3million a year, does the Minister agree that it has proved to be a very expensive glass of whisky?”
    1
  4923. 1
  4924. 1
  4925. 1
  4926. 1
  4927. 1
  4928. 1
  4929. 1
  4930. 1
  4931. 1
  4932. 1
  4933. 1
  4934. 1
  4935. 1
  4936. 1
  4937. 1
  4938. 1
  4939. 1
  4940. 1
  4941. 1
  4942. 1
  4943. First they came for our Brittonic ethnicity, of the English, Scottish and Welsh, in 1948, now they come for our English Ethnicity in 2025! The Britons- English, Scottish and Welsh are the indigenous ancestral natives of the British Isles, known collectively as the British, who are white North western Europeans, Britain is a white North Western European country. All this happened in just 77 years, with Labours traitorous British Nationality Act of 1948, which stated anyone from the Commonwealth countries could now call themselves British! Even though they had never even set foot in the British Isles, were non-natives, no indigenous ancestry, descendancy or history in the British Isles what so ever! Britain and the British existed long before the British Empire or the Commonwealth ever existed, Britain is the motherland of the indigenous Britons not the world! The Anglo-Saxons, who came 1,400 years ago, were also white North Western Europeans, closely related, distant cousins, if you will and their numbers were negligible. Among them were also Britons from Albion, returning after Roman occupation, who has escaped to mainland Europe and mixed with the Northern Europeans while there. 62% of the indigenous English in England today are of majority ancient Brittonic DNA, only 38% are the direct descendants of the Anglo-Saxons. Meaning England today is still majority ancient Brittonic. The English today have 60% - 90% Brittonic DNA with only a 10% - 40% Anglo-Saxon admixture. The Viking Angles, Saxons, Jutes and Normans were all mainly Danes and Norse, North western Europeans like the Britons, closely related and distant cousins of the Britons, the same peoples! Anyone who is of foreign origin born in England, does not make them ethnically English nor Brittonic, they are 100% of foreign origin. A passport only gives citizenship, it does not alter anyone's ancestry or DNA!
    1
  4944. 1
  4945. 1
  4946. 1
  4947. 1
  4948.  @basylpeterjones  I never said anything about 100% Brittonic/Anglo-Saxon DNA, you did! I said they were a mix, the English today have 60% - 90% Brittonic DNA with only a 10% - 40% Anglo-Saxon admixture. Only 38% of England today is of Anglo-Saxon descent mainly in East Anglia as you said, 62% of the English are still majority Brittonic! The woke lefty myth only Welsh, Scottish and Cornish are the real Britons is for the birds! There is very little Roman DNA in Britain we did not get on and they left Britain 410 AD and the Brits went back to farming and left their buildings to crumble! The Bell Beakers were thought to have 'replaced' the Britons, but the Britons cremated their dead, so there were no bones for Anthropologists to find, they were wrong, we are still here today, as we find with todays DNA testing! 10,000 year old Cheddar mans descendant still lives in the same area of England today! So do many other ancient descendant Britons. The Britons living in England were not replaced by Anglo-Saxons, their numbers were negligible, they came in 3 waves and they integrated into our majority Brittonic culture and we adopted theirs. Many of the Anglo-Saxons who came after the Romans left were also Britons returning after Roman occupation, who had escaped to Europe and mixed with other Europeans. Some of the British escaped to Wales, southern England and to France which was named after them, Brittany, translates to 'little Britannia', Breton translates to 'Briton'. But many Britons remained in what is now called England today, nee Albion. The Bretons/Britons helped the Normans (Dane Vikings (King Rollo) who invaded and settled in France) to invade Britain. Mainly Danish, Norse and southern Swedish, Northern Saxons, aka Anglo-Saxons, invaded Britain and mixed with the Britons. As I already said we are all North Western Europeans, same people! North Western Europeans are not Asians, Africans, Middle Eastern or Arab! So that globalist woke left lame excuse for the world colonising Britain today, saying we were always a country of immigrants anyway, won't wash! First they came for our Brittonic British ancestry in 1948, now they come for our English ancestry 2025!
    1
  4949. 1
  4950. 1
  4951. 1
  4952. 1
  4953. 1
  4954. 1
  4955. 1
  4956. 1
  4957. 1
  4958. 1
  4959. 1
  4960. 1
  4961. 1
  4962. 1
  4963. 1
  4964. 1
  4965. 1
  4966. 1
  4967. 1
  4968. 1
  4969. 1
  4970. 1
  4971. 1
  4972. 1
  4973. 1
  4974. 1
  4975. 1
  4976. 1
  4977. 1
  4978. 1
  4979. 1
  4980. 1
  4981. 1
  4982. 1
  4983. 1
  4984. 1
  4985. 1
  4986. 1
  4987. 1
  4988. 1
  4989. 1
  4990. 1
  4991. 1
  4992. 1
  4993. 1
  4994. 1
  4995. 1
  4996. 1
  4997. 1
  4998. 1
  4999. 1
  5000. 1
  5001. 1
  5002. 1
  5003. 1
  5004. 1
  5005. 1
  5006. 1
  5007. 1
  5008. 1
  5009. 1
  5010. 1
  5011. 1
  5012. 1
  5013. 1
  5014. 1
  5015. 1
  5016. 1
  5017. 1
  5018. 1
  5019. 1
  5020. 1
  5021. 1
  5022. 1
  5023. 1
  5024. 1
  5025. 1
  5026. 1
  5027. 1
  5028. 1
  5029. 1
  5030. 1
  5031. 1
  5032. 1
  5033. 1
  5034. 1
  5035. 1
  5036. 1
  5037. 1
  5038. 1
  5039. 1
  5040. 1
  5041. 1
  5042. 1
  5043. 1
  5044. 1
  5045. 1
  5046. 1
  5047. 1
  5048. 1
  5049. 1
  5050. 1
  5051. 1
  5052. 1
  5053. 1
  5054. 1
  5055. 1
  5056. 1
  5057. 1
  5058. 1
  5059. 1
  5060. 1
  5061. 1
  5062. 1
  5063. 1
  5064. 1
  5065. 1
  5066. 1
  5067. 1
  5068. 1
  5069. 1
  5070. 1
  5071. 1
  5072. 1
  5073. 1
  5074. 1
  5075. 1
  5076. 1
  5077. '' The migrants are using local free buses in Dunkirk and Calais to travel from their camps or accommodation to the beaches before walking to the sand dunes and hiding ready for the smugglers to bring their boats. They were filmed taking the buses by an undercover BBC team posing as a migrant with a pregnant wife and two-year-old daughter with a charge of £2,800 to cross the Channel. The disclosure provoked fury in Britain. Dover MP Natalie Elphicke said it was “breathtaking.” “I am raising this with the Home Secretary. It clearly needs to be addressed urgently,” she told the Telegraph. 13 October 2022. The UK has committed to providing almost £500 million over three years to help France curb small boat crossings of migrants across the Channel. This funding was announced during a summit in Paris between UK Prime Minister Rishi Sunak and President Emmanuel Macron. The money will be used to support additional law enforcement officers and the establishment of a new detention center in France. Two WEF puppets destroying the UK and laundering UK tax payers money! Nov 14, 22 (Reuters) - Britain and France on Monday signed an agreement worth 72.2 million euros ($74.5 million) over the coming year to ramp up efforts to stop illegal migrants from making perilous journeys across the Channel. March 10/23 PARIS, March 10 (Reuters) - Britain will pay France around 480 million pounds ($577 million) over three years to try to stop migrants travelling in small boats across the Channel Rwanda = £370 million. The government are throwing England's money around like confetti and larger numbers of immigrants are coming faster than ever!
    1
  5078. 1
  5079.  @b1ueocean  Fred Lugard was an administrator he was winding the country up for independence in 1960 and joined the two Nigeria's together which his wife named Nigeria. Empire ended in 1945, the countries of the empire are independent countries today, so tell us are there any white people in the Nigerian government today? 'Nigeria Becomes The First Country To Officially Ban The Use Of all non-Nigerian Models, voice-over artists, In Advertising 2022.' 'Henry Okelue - Slavery, was not an invention of the West. It predates all written records. On the African continent itself, slavery predated the arrival of Europeans by centuries, and it sill continues until this day. However, until first, the Trans-Saharan slave trade, then the Trans-Atlantic slave trade, the exchange of humans was “benign”. Africa as a continent, bled from slavery for 14 centuries: 10 centuries to the Arab World, and another four to the Western World. The Arab slave trade started in the 8th century AD very likely because Islam prohibits Muslims from enslaving each other. Despite this prohibition, human labour was needed for certain tasks, so the Arabs had to forage into the African hinterlands to get slaves. To start with, they stayed on the East coast of Africa, close to the Rift Valley, but as they traded, they spread their religion. This meant that the former slaving areas went out of the picture for slavery, so eventually, they reached West Africa. Time went by and West Africans became wise to the prohibition of slavery by Islam, and started to convert to Islam. This meant that it is safe to assume that Arab enslavement of Africans may have eventually ended.' Many Nigerians became rich from the enslavement and sale of their own people.
    1
  5080. 1
  5081. 1
  5082. 1
  5083. 1
  5084. 1
  5085. 1
  5086. 1
  5087. 1
  5088. 1
  5089. 1
  5090. 1
  5091. 1
  5092. 1
  5093. 1
  5094. 1
  5095. 1
  5096. 1
  5097. 1
  5098. 1
  5099. 1
  5100. 1
  5101. 1
  5102. 1
  5103. 1
  5104. 1
  5105. 1
  5106. 1
  5107. 1
  5108. 1
  5109. 1
  5110. 1
  5111. 1
  5112. 1
  5113. 1
  5114. 1
  5115. 1
  5116. 1
  5117. 1
  5118. 1
  5119. 1
  5120. 1
  5121. 1
  5122. 1
  5123. 1
  5124. 1
  5125. 1
  5126. 1
  5127. 1
  5128. 1
  5129. 1
  5130. 1
  5131. 1
  5132. 1
  5133. 1
  5134. 1
  5135. 1
  5136. 1
  5137. 1
  5138. 1
  5139. 1
  5140. 1
  5141. 1
  5142. 1
  5143. 1
  5144. 1
  5145. 1
  5146. 1
  5147. 1
  5148. 1
  5149. 1
  5150. 1
  5151. 1
  5152. 1
  5153. 1
  5154. 1
  5155. 1
  5156. 1
  5157. 1
  5158. 1
  5159. 1
  5160. 1
  5161. 1
  5162. 1
  5163. 1
  5164. 1
  5165. 1
  5166. 1
  5167. 1
  5168. 1
  5169. 1
  5170. 1
  5171. 1
  5172. 1
  5173. 1
  5174. 1
  5175.  @PohjanKarhu  North western Europeans are represented by people from as far west as Ireland, as far north as Norway, as far east as Finland, and as far south as France. This vast region encompasses a diverse group of nations with distinct cultural and historical ties. Many North western Europeans can trace their heritage back to countries such as Great Britain and Ireland, Northern Germany, Denmark, Sweden, Norway, the Netherlands, Northern France, Belgium, and other geographically or culturally connected places. Northern Europe consists of the Scandinavian countries of Sweden, Denmark, Norway, and Iceland, as well as Finland, the United Kingdom, and Ireland. Within this region, ethnic Scandinavians, Celts, and Finns are the predominant groups. The cultures and languages of these nations have evolved over centuries, creating a diverse tapestry of Northern European ethnicity. What does Europe West mean on ancestry DNA? The term “Europe West” on ancestry DNA refers to a genetic cluster that includes modern-day Germany, France, Belgium, Netherlands, Luxembourg, Lichtenstein, Switzerland, and in some cases, Austria, western Poland, the Czech Republic, and Denmark. These regions have historical and genetic connections, which are reflected in the DNA of individuals with European West ancestry. What is considered Northwestern Europe in DNA? In DNA testing, Northwestern Europeans are represented by people from as far west as Ireland, as far north as Norway, as far east as Finland, and as far south as France. The genetic markers found in individuals from these countries indicate a shared ancestry and connection throughout much of history, shaped by migration and interaction along the North and Baltic Seas. In conclusion, North western European ethnicity encompasses a diverse range of nations, cultures, and languages. From Ireland to Norway, Finland to France, the people of North western Europe 'share a common genetic ancestry' and are connected by their history and cultural traits.
    1
  5176. 1
  5177. ​ @carsonianthegreat4672  The richest Celtic archeological site is a huge cemetery found near Hallstat in Salkammergut, Austria. It contained 2,000 Iron Age graves, filled with sophisticated heavy swords, daggers, axes, caldrons, pottery and jewelry with geometric and animal designs. The discovery became known as the Hallstat culture and was dated to the eight to fifth centuries B.C. The Gauls emerged around the 5th century BC as bearers of La Tène culture north and west of the Alps. By the 4th century BC, they were spread over much of what is now France, Belgium, Switzerland, Southern Germany, Austria, and the Czech Republic. The Gauls were basically Celts that lived in Gaul (France) as well as in extreme northern Italy and areas in Germany and elsewhere in Europe. Celtic Origins - The Origins and Spread of Celtic Cultures of the Hiberii, Scotti, Picti, Germani, Helvetii, Alemanii, Teutonii, Goetii (Goths) Etc. The Celtic Goths migrated from Sweden across the Baltic Sea, through what is now Russia and the Ukraine to the Black Sea. From there they migrated into the Balkans and divided into two groups the Ostrogoths (East Goths) and Visagoths (West Goths). In recent history, ‘Celt’ generally refers to people from Ireland and Scotland, and people from Wales, Cornwall, the Isle of Mann, Brittany (in France), and Galicia (in Spain). But these names over-simplify the ancient story of the Celts, which much is broader and deeper than we thought just a few years ago. The genetic maps, in summaries of dozens of studies, published since 2004 show that the Austrians, Croatians, Hungarians, Germans and Ukrainians were so similar to one another that there was no need to indicate more than one of them in the pie charts with the maps. They show amazing similarities to most of northern Europe, peoples of the British isles, and yet some peoples of central and west Asia as well. The first major differences seen in genetic compositions are in the extreme north western islands of Britain. This 2016 video from researchers at Trinity College, Dublin Ireland, and Queen’s University Belfast, gives a very brief overview of how the recent science of DNA analysis, together with Archaeology, can trace the multiple migrations of peoples over the past 10 millennia, showing how they have combined to produce today’s Celts. The basic framework of the Celtic society was composed of extended families and clans who were based within their particular territorial confines and governed by a strong code of personal honour. Although it is a cliché, one characteristic of Celtic Culture is the willingness to rise against any challenge to their territory or honour, and often, just to raid each others goods and livestock. Celts were not a race of people they were ancient European tribes!
    1
  5178. 1
  5179. 1
  5180. 1
  5181.  @carsonianthegreat4672  White Americans are of European origin! Europe is a white continent, the ancient motherland of the white man. America is a new country and is inhabited by the world - multicultural. Ancient North Western Europeans mixed only among their own, not the rest of the world! Many Irish, English, Welsh and Scottish are mixed with each other! The Goidelic Celts were first to invade Britain. They were later pushed into Ireland by their cousins the Brythonic (or British) Celts. The Brythonic occupied present day England and Wales. By the time Julius Caesar was ready to launch his Roman invasion of Britain, more Celts had crossed over from Gaul, and had settled in the south-east of England. These were largely the Belgic tribes, from what is now southern Belgium and northern France, and they were related to the Britons already here. Gaul was from the Atlantic coast to the banks of the Rhine, and from the North Sea to the Pyrenees, the lands of the Gauls were as diverse as the people themselves. For instance the 'French' Normans were Danes of Danish descent, Northern Saxons. All North Western Europeans have mixed with each other over centuries. The genetic difference between Southern French/Spanish/Portuguese and Sicilians is larger than the difference between Russians and Irish. There was Swedish colonization around the Baltic by the Swedes that go into Latvia, Estonia and parts of nearby Russia around St Petersburg. A North Western European is a North Western European! Now troll off!
    1
  5182. 1
  5183. 1
  5184. 1
  5185. 1
  5186. 1
  5187. 1
  5188. 1
  5189. 1
  5190. 1
  5191. 1
  5192. 1
  5193. 1
  5194. 1
  5195. 1
  5196. 1
  5197. 1
  5198. 1
  5199. 1
  5200. 1
  5201. 1
  5202. 1
  5203. 1
  5204. 1
  5205. 1
  5206. 1
  5207. 1
  5208. 1
  5209. 1
  5210. 1
  5211. 1
  5212. 1
  5213. 1
  5214. 1
  5215. 1
  5216. 1
  5217. 1
  5218. 1
  5219. 1
  5220. 1
  5221. 1
  5222. 1
  5223. 1
  5224. 1
  5225. 1
  5226. 1
  5227. 1
  5228. @ ''The Normans of England first invaded Ireland in 1169, which led Friedrich Engels to observe in a letter (1856) to Karl Marx that “Ireland may be regarded as the first English colony”. The Irish were even in the British army and navy and helped the British colonize the world, they were in the British army in India too and were also plantation overseers in the Caribbean, like Bob Marley's father. It has been estimated that during the North American conflict, from the British Army 16% of the rank and file and 31% of the COs were Irishmen. There were Irishmen fighting on both sides; a standout story from the diary of Sergeant Roger Lamb recalls how Patrick Maguire of the 9th Regiment of Foot spotted his own brother fighting on the side of the American Patriots during the Saratoga campaign. In following years, the Irish would swell the ranks to the extent that by 1813 the British Army's total manpower was "1/2 English, 1/6 Scottish and 1/3 Irish." Despite the large number of deaths in the United Irish conflict, Irishmen; Catholic and Protestant; flocked to join the British Army and the Royal Navy with the rise of Napoleon Bonaparte in Europe. 'I am full willing to leave my manson and to go into the interiors of Africa to fight vountarilly for Queen Victoria and as far as there is life in my bones and breath in my body, I will not let any foreign invasion tramp on Queen's land. However, if her or her leaders ever turns with cruelty on the Irish race, I will be the first to raise my sword to fight against her. I will have plenty of Irishmen at my side, for they are known to be the bravest race in the world.' — Michael McDonough, a teenager enlisting in the Connaught Rangers, 1898. 'Ireland did not leave the British Empire in 1916, but in 1921 after a negotiated settlement with Britain.' - source Irish Central 1/2/23. Both Canada and Ireland were in the British Empire until their independence. The British Empire ended after WWII in 1947. Clear enough?
    1
  5229. 1
  5230. 1
  5231. 1
  5232. 1
  5233. 1
  5234. 1
  5235. 1
  5236. 1
  5237. 1
  5238. 1
  5239. 1
  5240. 1
  5241. 1
  5242. 1
  5243. 1
  5244. 1
  5245. 1
  5246. 1
  5247. 1
  5248. 1
  5249. 1
  5250. 1
  5251. 1
  5252. 1
  5253. 1
  5254. 1
  5255. 1
  5256. 1
  5257. 1
  5258. 1
  5259. 1
  5260. 1
  5261. 1
  5262. 1
  5263. 1
  5264. 1
  5265. 1
  5266. 1
  5267. 1
  5268. 1
  5269. 1
  5270. 1
  5271. 1
  5272. 1
  5273. 1
  5274. 1
  5275. 1
  5276. 1
  5277. 1
  5278. 1
  5279. 1
  5280. 1
  5281. 1
  5282. 1
  5283. 1
  5284. 1
  5285. 1
  5286. 1
  5287. 1
  5288. 1
  5289. 1
  5290. 1
  5291. 1
  5292. 1
  5293. 1
  5294. 1
  5295. 1
  5296. 1
  5297. 1
  5298. 1
  5299. 1
  5300. 1
  5301. 1
  5302. 1
  5303. 1
  5304. 1
  5305. 1
  5306. 1
  5307. 1
  5308. 1
  5309. 1
  5310. 1
  5311. 1
  5312. 1
  5313. 1
  5314. 1
  5315. 1
  5316. 1
  5317. 1
  5318. 1
  5319. 1
  5320. 1
  5321. 1
  5322. 1
  5323. 1
  5324. 1
  5325. 1
  5326. 1
  5327. 1
  5328. 1
  5329. 1
  5330. 1
  5331. 1
  5332. 1
  5333. 1
  5334. 1
  5335. 1
  5336. 1
  5337. 1
  5338. 1
  5339. 1
  5340. 1
  5341. 1
  5342. 1
  5343. 1
  5344. 1
  5345. 1
  5346. 1
  5347. 1
  5348. 1
  5349. 1
  5350. 1
  5351. 1
  5352. 1
  5353. 1
  5354. 1
  5355. 1
  5356. 1
  5357. 1
  5358. 1
  5359. 1
  5360. 1
  5361. 1
  5362. 1
  5363. 1
  5364. 1
  5365. 1
  5366. 1
  5367. 1
  5368. 1
  5369. 1
  5370. 1
  5371. On 31 March 1939, in response to Nazi Germany's defiance of the Munich Agreement and its occupation of Czechoslovakia, the United Kingdom pledged the support of itself and France with the Anglo-Polish agreement, to assure Polish independence. It was signed in 25 August 1939. Just 6 days later Germany invaded Poland. The Luftwaffe gained air superiority over the Polish air force, 1,150 German aircraft bomb Warsaw. With civilian losses estimated at 200,000 Poland surrenders to Germany. Polish lands are divided between the Soviet Union and Germany, as are 660,000 prisoners of war. For the poor Poles however, many worse atrocities were still to come! The passenger liner SS Athenia is the first British ship to be sunk by Nazi Germany in the war. Carrying 1,103 civilian passengers, including 300 Americans, she had departed Liverpool bound for Montreal. Torpedoes fired from the German submarine U-30, would see 98 passengers and 19 crew members killed. The Luftwaffe attacked the Royal Naval base at Scapa Flow on the 6th September 1939. A Skua aircraft from Ark Royal shoots down the first German plane of the war. Churchill did not become the British Prime minister until 1940. So the Germans dropped bombs on us first, saying 'we can hardly blame Germany' for retaliating, when it was they who were the invading warmongers! If Germany had not invaded other European countries there would not have even been WWII. The bombing of Dresden was a joint British and American aerial bombing attack on the city, to destroy Germanys industrial heart land which supplied war materials. The allied bombers, who had lost family, friends and comrades in the war, sure took their revenge. In four raids between 13 and 15 February 1945, 772 heavy bombers of the Royal Air Force (RAF) and 527 of the United States Army Air Forces (USAAF) dropped more than 3,900 tons of high-explosive bombs and incendiary devices on the city. The bombing and the resulting firestorm destroyed more than 1,600 acres (6.5 km2) of the city centre. Up to 25,000 people were killed. '' Well you could hardly blame them''!
    1
  5372. 1
  5373. 1
  5374. 1
  5375. 1
  5376. 1
  5377. 1
  5378. 1
  5379. 1
  5380. 1
  5381. 1
  5382. 1
  5383. 1
  5384.  thomasrobert4654  In chapter 36 of this 1998 ‘Act’ Blair attempted to repeal the 1795 Act and the death penalty for high treason but Blair had no lawful authority to do so, and he committed treason in his attempt. He would be in prison today if only the people would stand united under their constitution as the law demands. Blair actually committed three acts of Treason in all, and did not possess the authority to do so. An example of such a treasonous act would be a year earlier at the signing of the Amsterdam Treaty in 1997 which increased the European Union’s powers for action at community level, and included further European integration in legislative, police, judicial, customs and security matters and strengthened Europol. This was a clear act of treason, and because of this, Tony Blair was in fact, actually never the Prime Minister at law. Much like any criminal in supposed “public office”, Blair tried to get rid of the penalty of the crime he was guilty of. There is also the common law crime of treason. An offence of attempting to overthrow the government of a state to which the offender owes allegiance; or of betraying the state into the hands of a foreign power. We we’re never in the EU or the so called “common market” to begin with. This is not only because constitutional law dictates that no foreign powers may have jurisdiction over the United Kingdom, but because the Heath administration lied by telling the country that the ECA would not affect the UK’s sovereignty. The Kilmuir Letter, which was written in December, 1960, evidenced that there would indeed be “loss of sovereignty” and was hidden for thirty years leaving the public completely. This damning letter to Edward Heath by the then-Lord Chancellor attempted to remind the Prime Minister of the treacherous steps that he was about to take upon signing the Treaty of Rome. Another document released from the Foreign and Commonwealth Office after thirty years of secrecy titled case file 30/1048 also meticulously documents the Heath administrations Treason, Sedition and Fraud which were used to admit us to the “common market” which later flourished into the European “Union.” The solution never was Brexit. As it turns out, the so-called referendum on the 23rd of June, 2016 did nothing but confuse the people more. The (not so) Great Repeal Bill converts all existing EU law into British law which is illegal. The EU Military integration and absorption of the UK Armed Forces is still underway, with no debate in either purporting parliaments. Never since 1972 have the people been so betrayed. The solution is very simple. In 2001 the Crown was deposed. It has been law for 16 years for the people of the UK to put an end to the institutionalized tyranny and reassert their laws and customs, however this fact has been covered up by impostors within the treasonous regime.
    1
  5385. 1
  5386. 1
  5387. 1
  5388. 1
  5389. 1
  5390. 1
  5391. 1
  5392. 1
  5393. 1
  5394. 1
  5395. 1
  5396. 1
  5397. 1
  5398. 1
  5399. 1
  5400. 1
  5401. 1
  5402. 1
  5403. 1
  5404. 1
  5405. 1
  5406. 1
  5407. 1
  5408. 1
  5409. 1
  5410. 1
  5411. 1
  5412. 1
  5413. 1
  5414. 1
  5415. 1
  5416. 1
  5417. 1
  5418. 1
  5419. 1
  5420. 1
  5421. 1
  5422. 1
  5423. 1
  5424. 1
  5425. 1
  5426. 1
  5427. 1
  5428. 1
  5429. 1
  5430. 1
  5431. 1
  5432. 1
  5433. 1
  5434. 1
  5435. 1
  5436. 1
  5437. 1
  5438. 1
  5439. 1
  5440. 1
  5441. 1
  5442. 1
  5443. 1
  5444. 1
  5445. 1
  5446. 1
  5447. 1
  5448. 1
  5449. 1
  5450. 1
  5451. 1
  5452. 1
  5453. 1
  5454. 1
  5455. 1
  5456. 1
  5457. 1
  5458. 1
  5459. 1
  5460. 1
  5461. 1
  5462. 1
  5463. 1
  5464. 1
  5465. 1
  5466. 1
  5467. 1
  5468. 1
  5469. 1
  5470. 1
  5471. 1
  5472. 1
  5473. 1
  5474. 1
  5475. 1
  5476. 1
  5477. 1
  5478. 1
  5479. 1
  5480. 1
  5481. 1
  5482. 1
  5483. 1
  5484. 1
  5485. 1
  5486. 1
  5487. 1
  5488. 1
  5489. 1
  5490. 1
  5491. 1
  5492. 1
  5493. 1
  5494. 1
  5495. 1
  5496. 1
  5497. 1
  5498. 1
  5499. 1
  5500. 1
  5501. 1
  5502. 1
  5503. 1
  5504. 1
  5505. 1
  5506. 1
  5507. 1
  5508. 1
  5509. 1
  5510. 1
  5511. 1
  5512. 1
  5513. 1
  5514. 1
  5515. 1
  5516. 1
  5517. 1
  5518. 1
  5519. 1
  5520. 1
  5521. 1
  5522. 1
  5523. 1
  5524. 1
  5525. 1
  5526. 1
  5527. 1
  5528. 1
  5529. 1
  5530. 1
  5531. 1
  5532. 1
  5533. 1
  5534. 1
  5535. 1
  5536. 1
  5537. 1
  5538. 1
  5539. 1
  5540. 1
  5541. 1
  5542. 1
  5543. 1
  5544. 1
  5545. 1
  5546. 1
  5547. 1
  5548. 1
  5549. 1
  5550. 1
  5551. 1
  5552. 1
  5553. 1
  5554. 1
  5555. 1
  5556. 1
  5557. 1
  5558. 1
  5559. 1
  5560. 1
  5561. 1
  5562. 1
  5563. 1
  5564. 1
  5565. 1
  5566. 1
  5567. 1
  5568. 1
  5569. 1
  5570. 1
  5571. 1
  5572. 1
  5573. 1
  5574. 1
  5575. 1
  5576. 1
  5577. 1
  5578. 1
  5579. 1
  5580. 1
  5581. 1
  5582. 1
  5583. 1
  5584. 1
  5585. 1
  5586. 1
  5587. 1
  5588. 1
  5589. 1
  5590. 1
  5591. 1
  5592. 1
  5593. 1
  5594. 1
  5595. 1
  5596. 1
  5597. 1
  5598. 1
  5599. 1
  5600. 1
  5601. 1
  5602. 1
  5603. 1
  5604. 1
  5605. 1
  5606. 1
  5607. 1
  5608. 1
  5609. 1
  5610. 1
  5611. 1
  5612. 1
  5613. 1
  5614. 1
  5615. 1
  5616. 1
  5617. 1
  5618. 1
  5619. 1
  5620. 1
  5621. 1
  5622. 1
  5623. 1
  5624. 1
  5625. 1
  5626. 1
  5627. 1
  5628. 1
  5629. 1
  5630. 1
  5631. 1
  5632. 1
  5633. 1
  5634. 1
  5635. 1
  5636. 1
  5637. 1
  5638. 1
  5639. 1
  5640. When I read about the deaths of the British aid workers, it reminded me of the American USS Liberty that was torpedoed by Israel in 1967. A total of 34 Americans were killed and 172 were wounded as a result of the unprovoked attack. Survivors of the USS Liberty have compiled evidence to argue that it should be tried as a war crime. Also when the British were attacked on July 22, 1946, the King David Hotel in Jerusalem was bombed, destroying the centre of the British Mandatory administration. The attack by the Irgun pre-state Jewish underground killed 91 and wounded 46. Among the dead were British employees, both civilian and military, members of the hotel staff, both Jewish and Arab, and other bystanders. The act of terror shocked the British, and helped accelerate their decision to withdraw from Palestine two years later. It also led to a split within the Jewish community in the Land of Israel: the mainstream Jewish Agency and Haganah attempted to dissociate themselves from the operation - though it had in fact been carried out at their behest. The proposal to blow up the hotel -- specifically its southern section – came from Menachem Begin, later 'Israel's prime minister' but then, head of the Irgun Zvai Leumi (National Military Organization), also known by its Hebrew acronomyn, Etzel. [But approval for the operation came from top officials of the Haganah – Moshe Sneh, the chief of general headquarters, and Yitzhak Sadeh, commander of the Palmach, the militia’s elite commando unit.
    1
  5641. 1
  5642. 1
  5643. 1
  5644. 1
  5645. 1
  5646. 1
  5647. 1
  5648. 1
  5649. 1
  5650. 1
  5651. 1
  5652. 1
  5653. 1
  5654. 1
  5655. 1
  5656. 1
  5657. 1
  5658. 1
  5659. 1
  5660. 1
  5661. 1
  5662. 1
  5663. 1
  5664. 1
  5665. 1
  5666. 1
  5667. 1
  5668. 1
  5669. 1
  5670. 1
  5671. 1
  5672. 1
  5673. 1
  5674.  @ONE_SERVANT_OF_AL-LAAH_73  You need to learn Indian history, India used to be many separate Kingdoms of warring tribes who fought each other. They even intoxicated their warring elephants before battle to scare their enemies! They had empires and the Mauryan empire ( Buddhist) attempted to spread nonviolence and peace across his empire. India had 5 great empires. Britain united India to bring peace. 'Remember Cawnpore!' The siege of Cawnpore - The massacre committed against innocent British women and children - ''When the British soldiers arrived, 200 women and children having already been dismembered and thrown down the courtyard well or into the Ganges. Piles of children's clothing and severed women's hair blew on the wind and lodged in tree branches around the compound. In the courtyard, the tree nearest the well was smeared with the brains of numerous children and infants who had been dashed headfirst against the trunk and thrown down the well.'' Do not tell me Indians were non-violent! That is why the British started killing the Indian rebels because of what they had done to their wives and children! "Remember Cawnpore!" becoming a war cry for the British soldiers for the rest of the conflict. There were only around 200,000 British in India during the Raj, mainly military, Administrators and their families. The population of India was 340 million! India wanted the British out even those born there for 4 generations, because the Indians did not see them as Indian natives, they saw them as British, because that is who they were. So at the end of empire the British returned to their motherland of Britain. Karma says so should you!
    1
  5675. 1
  5676. 1
  5677. 1
  5678. 1
  5679. 1
  5680. 1
  5681. 1
  5682. 1
  5683. 1
  5684. 1
  5685. 1
  5686. 1
  5687. 1
  5688. 1
  5689. 1
  5690. 1
  5691. 1
  5692. 1
  5693. 1
  5694. 1
  5695. 1
  5696. 1
  5697. 1
  5698. 1
  5699. 1
  5700. 1
  5701. 1
  5702. 1
  5703. 1
  5704. 1
  5705. 1
  5706. 1
  5707. 1
  5708. 1
  5709. 1
  5710. 1
  5711. 1
  5712. 1
  5713. 1
  5714. 1
  5715. 1
  5716. 1
  5717. 1
  5718. 1
  5719. 1
  5720. 1
  5721. 1
  5722. 1
  5723. 1
  5724. 1
  5725. 1
  5726. 1
  5727. 1
  5728. 1
  5729. 1
  5730. 1
  5731. 1
  5732. 1
  5733. 1
  5734. 1
  5735. 1
  5736. 1
  5737. 1
  5738. 1
  5739. 1
  5740. 1
  5741. 1
  5742. 1
  5743. 1
  5744. 1
  5745. 1
  5746. 1
  5747. 1
  5748. 1
  5749. 1
  5750. 1
  5751. 1
  5752. 1
  5753. 1
  5754. 1
  5755. 1
  5756. 1
  5757. 1
  5758. 1
  5759. 1
  5760. 1
  5761. 1
  5762. 1
  5763. 1
  5764. 1
  5765. 1
  5766. 1
  5767. 1
  5768. 1
  5769. 1
  5770. 1
  5771. 1
  5772. 1
  5773. 1
  5774. 1
  5775. 1
  5776. 1
  5777. 1
  5778. 1
  5779. 1
  5780. 1
  5781. 1
  5782. 1
  5783. 1
  5784. 1
  5785. 1
  5786. 1
  5787. 1
  5788. 1
  5789. 1
  5790. 1
  5791. 1
  5792. 1
  5793. 1
  5794. 1
  5795. 1
  5796. 1
  5797. 1
  5798. 1
  5799. 1
  5800. 1
  5801. 1
  5802. 1
  5803. 1
  5804. 1
  5805. 1
  5806. 1
  5807. 1
  5808. 1
  5809. 1
  5810.  @blackcat-mp7kh  There were many plagues in India, a lot of them died of plague. The British business men, used business acumen and bought the raw materials from India to produce their own cotton. All of which were privately owned businesses, yet you say ALL Brits, which is false, the majority of Brits were poor and did not own any businesses, they worked in the cotton mills in England for little pay and even the children as young as 3 years old were even killed being sent to retrieve bobbins while the machinery was still operating. "Remember Cawnpore!". The siege of Cawnpore' 120 British women and children captured by the rebels were raped and butchered in what came to be known as the Bibi Ghar massacre, their remains then thrown down a nearby well. A group of British officers and soldiers set out to the Bibighar to rescue the captives, assuming that they were still alive. However, when they reached the site, they found it empty and blood-splattered, with the bodies of most of the 200 women and children having already been dismembered and thrown down the courtyard well or into the Ganges. Piles of children's clothing and severed women's hair blew on the wind and lodged in tree branches around the compound. In the courtyard, the tree nearest the well was smeared with the brains of numerous children and infants who had been dashed headfirst against the trunk and thrown down the well. That is why the British retaliated, their innocent wives and children had been butchered by the Indians! That is why the British retalliated with Jllianwala Bgh Mssacre, because the Indians had raped and killed their innocent women and children! The British were invited to Administer India, they did not invade and conquer! Persian Nadir Shah 'sacked Delhi' not the British!
    1
  5811. 1
  5812. 1
  5813. 1
  5814. 1
  5815. 1
  5816. 1
  5817. 1
  5818. 1
  5819. 1
  5820. 1
  5821. 1
  5822. 1
  5823. 1
  5824. 1
  5825. 1
  5826. 1
  5827. 1
  5828. 1
  5829. 1
  5830. 1
  5831. 1
  5832. 1
  5833. 1
  5834. 1
  5835. 1
  5836. 1
  5837. 1
  5838. 1
  5839. 1
  5840. 1
  5841. 1
  5842. 1
  5843. 1
  5844. 1
  5845. 1
  5846. 1
  5847. 1
  5848. 1
  5849. 1
  5850. 1
  5851. 1
  5852. 1
  5853. 1
  5854. 1
  5855. 1
  5856. 1
  5857. 1
  5858. 1
  5859. 1
  5860. 1
  5861. 1
  5862. 1
  5863. 1
  5864. 1
  5865. 1
  5866. 1
  5867. 1
  5868. 1
  5869. 1
  5870. 1
  5871. 1
  5872. 1
  5873. 1
  5874. 1
  5875. 1
  5876. 1
  5877. 1
  5878. 1
  5879. 1
  5880. 1
  5881. 1
  5882. 1
  5883. 1
  5884. 1
  5885. 1
  5886. 1
  5887. 1
  5888. 1
  5889. 1
  5890. 1
  5891. 1
  5892. 1
  5893. 1
  5894. 1
  5895. 1
  5896. 1
  5897. 1
  5898. 1
  5899. 1
  5900. 1
  5901. 1
  5902. 1
  5903. 1
  5904. 1
  5905. 1
  5906. 1
  5907. 1
  5908. 1
  5909. 1
  5910. 1
  5911. 1
  5912. 1
  5913. 1
  5914. 1
  5915. 1
  5916. 1
  5917. 1
  5918. 1
  5919. 1
  5920. 1
  5921. 1
  5922. 1
  5923. 1
  5924. 1
  5925. 1
  5926. 1
  5927. 1
  5928. 1
  5929. 1
  5930. 1
  5931. 1
  5932. 1
  5933. 1
  5934. 1
  5935. 1
  5936. 1
  5937. 1
  5938. 1
  5939. 1
  5940. 1
  5941. 1
  5942. 1
  5943. 1
  5944. 1
  5945. 1
  5946. 1
  5947. 1
  5948. 1
  5949. 1
  5950. 1
  5951. 1
  5952. 1
  5953. 1
  5954. 1
  5955. 1
  5956. 1
  5957. 1
  5958. 1
  5959. 1
  5960. 1
  5961. 1
  5962. 1
  5963. 1
  5964. 1
  5965. 1
  5966. 1
  5967. 1
  5968. 1
  5969. 1
  5970. 1
  5971. 1
  5972. 1
  5973. 1
  5974. 1
  5975. 1
  5976. 1
  5977. 1
  5978. 1
  5979. 1
  5980. 1
  5981. 1
  5982. 1
  5983. 1
  5984. 1
  5985. 1
  5986. 1
  5987. 1
  5988. 1
  5989. 1
  5990. 1
  5991. 1
  5992. 1
  5993. 1
  5994. 1
  5995. 1
  5996. 1
  5997. 1
  5998. 1
  5999. 1
  6000. 1
  6001. 1
  6002. 1
  6003. 1
  6004. 1
  6005. 1
  6006. 1
  6007. 1
  6008. 1
  6009. 1
  6010. 1
  6011. 1
  6012. 1
  6013. 1
  6014. 1
  6015. 1
  6016. 1
  6017. 1
  6018.  @aag3752  Lets face it academia couldn't determine because they don't know, it is all mainly supposition and theory, anything to keep their funding! Africa also has cold areas where it snows, strange, no mutated blue eyed genes there. Its like when they dug up a female skeleton from the British coast and the BBC stated she was African, when she was a Sardinian at best who probably came on a Merchant ship to buy Tin. Ancient Britain was well known as exporters of Tin, gold and silver. Point is woke academia will claim left is right and right is left! And don't get started on the blond haired blue eyed North Western European mummies found in the desert of China! Cannot have people thinking Europeans travelled and explored the world, it was the rest of the world who came to Europe and mutated us, right? Strange because Neanderthals were white and had blue eyed genes even red hair! They lived as far west as what is now Wales Britain and as far east as the Altai mountains in Siberia. They also lived around the Mediterranean as far south as Israel and reached across from what is now Iran to Uzbekistan in the plains of Central Asia. Neanderthals thrived in warm forests, in the steppes and the lake basin in modern-day Germany around 123,000 years ago. Brown eye colour is best for snow not blue. Brown eyes are considered the best colour for snow because they are less sensitive to light and release less melatonin during the fall and winter. Blue eyes with lower pigment (blue or grey eyes) are more sensitive to light. ( Snow blindness). So academia hypothesis that Europeans eyes 'mutated' from brown to blue because of the ice age is for the birds!
    1
  6019. 1
  6020. 1
  6021. 1
  6022. 1
  6023. 1
  6024. 1
  6025. 1
  6026. 1
  6027. 1
  6028. 1
  6029. 1
  6030. 1
  6031. 1
  6032. 1
  6033. 1
  6034. 1
  6035. 1
  6036. 1
  6037. 1
  6038. 1
  6039. 1
  6040. 1
  6041. 1
  6042. 1
  6043. 1
  6044. 1
  6045. 1
  6046. 1
  6047. 1
  6048. 1
  6049. 1
  6050. 1
  6051. 1
  6052. 1
  6053. 1
  6054. 1
  6055. 1
  6056. 1
  6057. 1
  6058. 1
  6059. 1
  6060. 1
  6061. 1
  6062. 1
  6063. 1
  6064. 1
  6065. 1
  6066. 1
  6067. 1
  6068. 1
  6069. 1
  6070. 1
  6071. 1
  6072. 1
  6073. 1
  6074. 1
  6075. 1
  6076. 1
  6077. 1
  6078. 1
  6079. 1
  6080. 1
  6081. 1
  6082. 1
  6083. 1
  6084. 1
  6085. 1
  6086. 1
  6087. 1
  6088. 1
  6089. 1
  6090. 1
  6091. 1
  6092. 1
  6093. 1
  6094. 1
  6095. 1
  6096. 1
  6097. 1
  6098. 1
  6099. 1
  6100. 1
  6101. 1
  6102. 1
  6103. 1
  6104. 1
  6105. 1
  6106. 1
  6107. 1
  6108. 1
  6109. 1
  6110. 1
  6111. 1
  6112. 1
  6113. 1
  6114. 1
  6115. 1
  6116. 1
  6117. 1
  6118. 1
  6119. 1
  6120. 1
  6121. 1
  6122. 1
  6123. 1
  6124. 1
  6125. 1
  6126. 1
  6127. 1
  6128. 1
  6129. 1
  6130. 1
  6131. Problem is UK does not own its own energy. In the North East power is owned by American conglomerate Berkshire Hathaway, which is owned by US billionaire Warren Buffett. In London, the South East or the East of England, power is owned by billionaire Hong Kong owner, Li Ka-shing. EDF Energy UK is 100% owned by Électricité de France, a French public utility owned by the Government of France. Scottish Power is 100% owned by Iberdrola (listed in Spain), a Spanish energy electric utility which counts BlackRock and the Qatari Investment Authority as its major shareholders. In early 2019 Npower was bought by E.ON UK, making both subsidiaries of the German parent company E.ON SE (listed in Germany). Among the major shareholders of E.ON SE are RWE AG, another German energy company, Capital Group, a US asset manager, and the Canadian Pension Plan Investment Board, a Canadian Crown Corporation. Ovo Energy is privately owned and SSE is now part of Ovo (the two major shareholders of SSE are giant US asset managers: BlackRock and Invesco). The major shareholders of Centrica, the lesser-known parent company of British Gas, include the UK asset management firms Schroders and abrdn, as well as Bank of New York Mellon Corporation, a US investment bank. Around 50% of UK offshore wind is publicly owned right now, but only 0.07% of it is publicly owned by the UK. Instead, publicly owned companies from Denmark and Norway take the opportunities and make the profit. Shareholders around the world profit from our energy system and our outrageous bills! Each of these foreign owners makes hundreds of billions each year in profit from UK citizens! Rishi Sunaks', father-in-law's company, is a partner of the World Economic Forum.
    1
  6132. 1
  6133. 1
  6134. 1
  6135. 1
  6136. 1
  6137. 1
  6138. 1
  6139. 1
  6140. 1
  6141. 1
  6142. 1
  6143. 1
  6144. 1
  6145. 1
  6146. 1
  6147. 1
  6148. 1
  6149. 1
  6150. 1
  6151. 1
  6152. 1
  6153. 1
  6154. 1
  6155. 1
  6156. 1
  6157. 1
  6158. 1
  6159. 1
  6160. 1
  6161. 1
  6162. 1
  6163. 1
  6164. 1
  6165. 1
  6166. 1
  6167. 1
  6168. 1
  6169. 1
  6170. 1
  6171. 1
  6172. 1
  6173. 1
  6174. 1
  6175. 1
  6176. 1
  6177. 1
  6178. 1
  6179. 1
  6180. 1
  6181. 1
  6182. 1
  6183. 1
  6184. 1
  6185. 1
  6186. 1
  6187. 1
  6188. 1
  6189. 1
  6190. 1
  6191. 1
  6192.  @Roy1-ub9ij  UK provided around £2.3 billion in aid between 2016 and 2021, including £441 million in bilateral aid, £129 million in development investment via the Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office into Indian enterprises which generates returns, £749 million through multilateral channels, and £1 billion in investments through British International Investment (BII), the UK’s development finance institution. We find that, while the portfolio reflects the shared interests of the UK and Indian governments, it is fragmented across activities and spending channels, and lacks a compelling development rationale. BII invests 28% of its global portfolio by value in India, but much of its portfolio lacks strong ‘financial additionality’ (given India’s relatively mature financial markets) and does not have a clear link to inclusive growth and poverty reduction. UK aid has built research partnerships between UK and Indian institutions on global development challenges, but the research is weakly integrated with the rest of the portfolio. The UK’s support to India’s emerging role as an aid donor lacks a strong focus on results. There is little UK support for Indian democracy and human rights, despite negative trends in these areas. UK aid to India was meant to have stopped in 2015 after India said it did not want it, but a review by the UK aid spending watchdog has found that around £2.3 billion (Rs 23,000 crore) in UK aid went to India between 2016 and 2021 disguised as business investment.
    1
  6193. 1
  6194. 1
  6195. 1
  6196. 1
  6197. 1
  6198. 1
  6199. 1
  6200. 1
  6201. 1
  6202. 1
  6203. 1
  6204. 1
  6205. 1
  6206. 1
  6207. 1
  6208. 1
  6209. 1
  6210. 1
  6211. 1
  6212. 1
  6213. 1
  6214. 1
  6215. 1
  6216. 1
  6217. 1
  6218. 1
  6219. 1
  6220. 1
  6221. 1
  6222. 1
  6223. 1
  6224. 1
  6225. 1
  6226. 1
  6227. 1
  6228. 1
  6229. 1
  6230. 1
  6231. 1
  6232. 1
  6233. 1
  6234. 1
  6235. 1
  6236. 1
  6237. 1
  6238. 1
  6239. 1
  6240. 1
  6241. 1
  6242. 1
  6243. 1
  6244. 1
  6245. 1
  6246. 1
  6247. 1
  6248. 1
  6249. 1
  6250. 1
  6251. 1
  6252. 1
  6253. 1
  6254. 1
  6255. 1
  6256. 1
  6257. 1
  6258. 1
  6259. 1
  6260. 1
  6261. 1
  6262. 1
  6263. 1
  6264. 1
  6265. 1
  6266. Ronen Shoval - 'History, it seems, has a way of repeating itself. Just as the Roman Empire struggled to maintain unity in the face of internal divisions and external pressures, so too did Europe in the aftermath of two world wars. Recognizing the dangers of division, Europe’s leaders envisioned a new political order to prevent internal conflicts. Much like royal marriages in the Middle Ages, the idea was to lower the walls of enmity by fostering closeness. The European Union, with its supranational governance, common currency, and open borders, was designed to transcend the perilous nationalism that had torn Europe apart in the first half of the 20th century. This vision was anchored in a deep commitment to liberal values—democracy, human rights, and the rule of law—while simultaneously rejecting the destructive nationalisms of the past. The belief was that by blurring national lines and promoting diversity, Europe could forge a more inclusive and harmonious society. However, this grand vision contained the seeds of its own downfall, much like the Tower of Babel. Europe’s attempt to build a unified political and economic entity devoid of a shared moral foundation has led to confusion and fragmentation, rather than unity. The postmodern rejection of absolute truths, which underpinned the European project, has fostered moral relativism and eroded the sense of justice and the willingness to defend the future. Europe's economic and cultural prosperity has made it a magnet for immigrants. The European ideals of inclusivity and diversity are noble and form the foundation of the Pax Europa that followed World War II. However, the European Union's pacifist vision, which nurtures a life of comfort, takes the achievements of the past for granted. As a result, Europe not only fails to recognize that there are those who seek to exploit its values to advance totalitarian agendas, but it also refuses to use military force to maintain its place in the world. Moreover, the prosperity that Europe enjoyed attracted those who sought to benefit from its advantages without integrating into its social fabric. These migrants, instead of assimilating, have often sought to transform Europe from within. Unlike previous waves of immigrants, many among the recent Muslim influx have shown little interest in integrating into the European vision. Instead, they often seek to impose their own values on their host countries, leading to escalating friction and, in some instances, outright violence. The rise of Islamist extremism in Europe is not merely a security threat; it is the symptom of a deeper cultural crisis. Europe, having lost confidence in its own identity, is now struggling to defend the very values it professes to uphold.'
    1
  6267. 1
  6268. 1
  6269. 1
  6270. 1
  6271. 1
  6272. 1
  6273. 1
  6274. 1
  6275. 1
  6276. 1
  6277. 1
  6278. 1
  6279. 1
  6280. 1
  6281. 1
  6282. 1
  6283. 1
  6284. 1
  6285. 1
  6286. 1
  6287. 1
  6288. 1
  6289. 1
  6290. 1
  6291. 1
  6292. 1
  6293. 1
  6294. 1
  6295. 1
  6296. 1
  6297. 1
  6298. 1
  6299. 1
  6300. 1
  6301. 1
  6302. 1
  6303. 1
  6304. 1
  6305. 1
  6306. 1
  6307. 1
  6308. 1
  6309. 1
  6310. 1
  6311. 1
  6312. 1
  6313. 1
  6314. 1
  6315. 1
  6316. 1
  6317. 1
  6318. 1
  6319. 1
  6320. 1
  6321. 1
  6322. 1
  6323. 1
  6324. 1
  6325. 1
  6326. 1
  6327. 1
  6328. 1
  6329. 1
  6330. 1
  6331. 1
  6332. 1
  6333. 1
  6334. 1
  6335. 1
  6336. 1
  6337. 1
  6338. 1
  6339. 1
  6340. 1
  6341. 1
  6342. 1
  6343. 1
  6344. 1
  6345. 1
  6346. 1
  6347. 1
  6348. 1
  6349. 1
  6350. 1
  6351. 1
  6352. 1
  6353. 1
  6354. 1
  6355. In the past few months various videos have popped up on YT of Israeli military doing house invasions of Palestinians, attacking them in the streets. Orthodox Jews spitting on and assaulting Palestinian people and even Christian priests in Israel. I did not really understand why, I thought it violent and unchristianly. Recently in the news an old Palestinian lady evicted from her home she had always lived in, weeping and unable to take her belongings with her why? Is it true that Israel needs to expand? Although I find it abhorrent what Hamas has done and is doing to Israeli citizens, it all seems rather like history repeating itself? Today, Israel boasts one of the most technologically advanced military stockpiles in the world, and one of the world’s most effective workforces. Israel's military is one of the most advanced and powerful forces in the world. Its conventional weaponry, much of it purchased from the United States or produced by the highly developed Israeli arms industry, includes nearly 600 combat airplanes, 200 attack helicopters, 3,600 tanks, over 9,000 armoured personnel carriers, and 360 ballistic missiles. Its navy operates three Dolphin-class submarines believed capable of launching nuclear warheads. With an estimated 200-300 such warheads, Israel is considered the sixth-ranked nuclear power in the world and capable of delivering nuclear warheads by missile or from aircraft. Israel are more than capable and well prepared for war. To prevent WWIII I hope the West stays out of it and just offers aid if needed.
    1
  6356. 1
  6357. 1
  6358. 1
  6359. 1
  6360. 1
  6361. 1
  6362. 1
  6363. 1
  6364. 1
  6365. 1
  6366. 1
  6367. 1
  6368. 1
  6369. 1
  6370. 1
  6371. 1
  6372. 1
  6373. 1
  6374. 1
  6375. 1
  6376. 1
  6377. 1