Comments by "Gabor Rajnai" (@gaborrajnai6213) on "Sabine Hossenfelder"
channel.
-
3
-
3
-
2
-
The problem is that you dont understand what capitalism is. I will help you out, it has to do something with capital. So if that capital is pushed to the economy by the state, well, that is what you could call socialism. If private capital would be effective you wouldnt talk about taxes need to be pushed into some project, which is in other words capital gained and redistributed by the state. That point in essence proves that private capital was in this case less effective than state capital. Cold logic. But it could be derived essentially why private capital is desired by some political groups, it has nothing to do with efficiency, or progress. Has to do more, that democratic political systems are by definition can be held accountable, while private enterprizes dont. If a politician gives the control of basic utilities to his son, that is called nepotism. If the same basic utility is given by a capitalist to his son, thats a private business. If a public owned company creates debt, its a scandal, if a private owned company creates debt, it is a private business, if it goes into bankrupcy it can be bailed out to save some workplaces. If a plotical group makes a disinformation campaign to further their interest, it is lying, if it is done by a petrol company, thats an understandable commercial. If NASA blows up a single rocket from taxpayers money, its incompetence, if Musk blows up 10 rockets from government money, its learning on the fly. By privatizing companies the political class is giving away its basic responsibilities to people, who can do as they pleased to do without any responsibility to the public. They dont even risk their capital anymore, because they are fed by a bizarre welfare system, which supports the rich.
2
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Dear, you cant even predict the weather tomorrow, and you sell me, that you actually know what will be the temperature in 2050. Either you have no grasp of math, or try to panick everyone for a moneygrab. But OK, go into it, so you obviously found a way around system complexity, that alone worth a Fields medal in Mathematics, yeah, because suprise, its not a shtty physics, or climatology problem, but a deeper level pure mathematical problem. You are welcome to use mathematics as a tool for your menial things, but if mathematics say something is impossible, it wont be possible in your menial tasks, just because you wish it so hard. Climate is a complex system, where a minor adjustment on one parameter deviates the results of the endproduct to the extreme, you can speculate and make those predictions, but they dont worth too much, theres no cheating or clever thinking, even if those models would be 100% precise in the past they wouldnt guarantee anything to the future. Yeah, real scientists you know have models, because the paper can bear anything written on it, that doesnt mean, those are even remotely likely outcomes, mostly interesting mind games, and real scientists dont even refer their mind games as likely outcomes, not even on the papers you are referring to.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1