Comments by "Gabor Rajnai" (@gaborrajnai6213) on "Ryan McBeth" channel.

Ryan, its simply cant go that China is marching around the globe offering business opporunities for Africa for Asia, for Latin America, fro Greenland, followed up by Americans offering threats and insults, which are mainly empty BTW. You incredibly start looking like the Soviet Union, and Chinese start looking like who the Americans were 40 years ago, the guys who understand business. If Americans want to build airports in Greenland, build mines in Greenland theres absolutely no obstacle to that, some of the American companies already doing it. If Americans want exclusive rights that means they have to invest more, because what your politicians do is outright comical.
5
The difference between Ukraine and wartime Britain is that wartime Brtiain ran a unity government, where every single party was part of the government. There was no reason to call an election since very party would have named Churchill as prime minister. Zelensky dont do that, he just use his party and the liberals as his powerbase, so he is technically illegitimate.
3
An enormous amount of effort and money has gone into poisoning the world against Palestine. Read the Le Monde essay Hasbara The Dark art of spinning a war, Isrel portraying itself as the victim of the wicked Arabs and spreading fake news that is only debunked after it has done its damage.
3
You are one of the most reliable sources of information regarding Ukraine and Russia. I sometimes questioned the validity of your claims, but those turned out to be right every single time! So keep it up, we need this especially since disinformation will be on steroids!
3
We could buy it and make it a Tahiti 2.0. Americans dont have the taste to run a place like Hawaii. French do. (Just joking)
3
I lost it at the point where you got the 17.000 Ukie KIA credible, with the usual BS that Russians are on the offensive. You were on the offensive in Iraq does that mean that you had 100.000 KIA, while the Saddam troops had 1000, because they were on the defensive? This simply doesnt work the way you portray it. Russians used 150.000 strong army for their initial assault, thatwhy ukies had a chance to make their thunderruns in Kherson with their 500.000 strong army. Which was BTW another offensive, and another bloodshed. So you tell that a 1:3 KIA to wounded ratio applies, that means, that Russians actually up to 150.000-100.000 KIA =50.000 remaining russians +300.000 injured Ghost soldiers coming from somewhere math, who miraculously materialised on the frontlines to get injured, because they were there even before the first mobilization round in Russia to get injured. How should we interpret that you think Russians lost 100.000 men by just making on offense on a single city, meanwhile Ukies have 10.000 KIA by conquering according to them 1000 km2, in conditions, when air superiority is with the russians, artillery superiority is with the russians, tank superiority is with the russians? You really buy into that with 3 operating HIMARS batterries at any given time you can actually counter 900 russian heavy artillery batterries? Even if every single shot of them is a bullseye, thats a 1to300 kill ratio, and your artillery systems are not THAT superior. We all know the only way to do it is to push great human waves, and try to overwhelm Russian defenses by sheer numbers, which has a catastrophic kill ratio to the attacking side, because in this case the defence actually has the ammo to wreak havoc on their lines. Classic soviet style strategy straight out of Zhukov's playbook, employed by both sides.
2
Noone recognized the Monroe doctrine as a valid point in international politics. All of the European powers kept their colonies in North and South America regardless of what the US thought about it.
2
@ChristoffRevan I see hasbara trolls arrived... how is the weather in your Tel Aviv outpost comrade?
1
Didnt he win on the premise that he will close down this shtshow? But if anyone can show some grand strategy how to win this, they are welcome....
1
I dont think Poland is the most reliable NATO ally. They dont take part in the Bosnian, and Kosovo missions, so thats 50% off. UK is the most reliable NATO ally, they took part in every single mission.
1
Did you just mention freedom, democracy and Modi's India in one sentence? At least dont be a hypocite, America wants Russia on his side for the very same reason America wants India on his side regardless of their politics.
1
Yeah, now thats what I call real fact checking. Although the core problem remains which is never to have a system which you cant afford to lose... Maybe Chinese didnt get it thistime, but they can get it once...
1
I didnt believe the Russians shot down the Azeri passenger plane at first, not because I dont believe that they are capable of doing that simply I couldnt believe that a passenger plane can fly 100 kms and land after a direct hit from a Panshir. But you turned out to be right on thatone too.
1
Good, now lets talk about AIPAC, because they indeed are paying for American politicians, to push pro Israeli policies, and not 1000 dollars each... I dont see Joshue being angry about that, that a foreign government buying his politics, and siphoning out 10 billion in aid for a 100 million bribe...
1
@3DaysIn I did, I know Ryan doesnt lie intentionally, even if it is one of ours, thatswhy I started with the Good remark... that still doesnt make AIPAC a good faith actor, and even if it would be it has to go. Because brining politicians is unethical and Israel is a shady state without morals, which constantly ignores the international community.
1
Depends on what type of military aircraft. You definitely cant fly a bomber in the airspace of a neutral country without special permissions.
1
Why woud the EU be that fond of liberal world order? EU is a 500 million strong alliance, it will do excellently in the old imeprialism. The things which actually halt EU to be a superpower is exactly the liberal world order. If the EU would make a nuclear arsenal comparable to the US and Russia noone would dare to talk about Ukraine or Greenland.
1
I dont think the Chinese actually have any illusions about the American willingness to use anything and everything to stop a Taiwanese amphibious landing, so the normalization argument is rather moot. There werent any single war since 1945 where nuks werent considered as an option, even against bin Laden and his cavemen, because generals are just generals, if they have a weapon at their disposal, they will think about ways how to utilize it to their advantage.
1
@nazcamain We would be already fighting WW3 if the US EU or UN would have put boots on Ukrainian soil, so thats a nobrainer that didnt happen.
1
Yeah as you pointed out, Russians used Bataillon tactical groups in the beginning of the war, whith highly mechanized units, so there was not a possibility of human wave attacks, simply because any of those human waves cant match up the speed of a mechanized brigade, htey would just be a burden on the whole strategy. The sole battle where those potentially happened was the Battle of Bakhmut.
1
Trump looked at the map and realized that Russia has a 3000 miles long border with China... not that it will be an easy feat putting those two against eachother.
1
Do you really think that you can talk to your superiors about the illegal surveillance they conduct against millions without their consent? This is a little bit naive dont you think. Edward Snowden network administrator no344 walks in the supersecret installation hidden in the depth of a bunker in Hawaii, where thousands are working on illegal monitoring, that hey guys, what you do here is breaking the law, Obama looks at him with a recognition, that he trusted Colonel Evil in his eyes, and shuts down the whole operation. They know full well, that what they are doing is illegal, and they want to keep it in the shadows. They got their shiny Harvard diploma on knowing whats legal whats not, if they wanted to abide law, they wouldnt do what they have done to begin with. Yeah Snowden could have knocked Washington Post with his information, and he would be jailed for life. We have seen what these people did with Assange, who is not even a US citizen for giving out their secrets...
1
I love his merch ads...
1
Democrats going after Snowden is the worst possible path they can take. It just reinforce the vision that they want to abuse government power. It just gives credibility to Gabbard. I was with them up until the point when they started parrotting Snowden Snowden Snowden. Worst of all it was a republican idea to begin with. Obama and his mobsters never learn...
1
Lol anyone who believes that an AA missile does that amount of damage to a jet, does believe that Mickey Mouse is existing...
1
They wont sell it. Mainly because Greenlanders dont want to be Americans. Seriously have Americans looked into how they treat native Americans? Greenlanders know it full well, if they sell their island they will be pushed into a reservation.
1
You cant put everything up to politics. Countries need to know that on whose side the US is otherwise US cant make partnerships. Thats true for NATO and true for Russia too. Putin knows, that Xi wont betray him after the next election, and cant be sure thats the case with the US.
1