Comments by "Gabor Rajnai" (@gaborrajnai6213) on "The Hill" channel.

  1. Lol Hungary would never ever let the EU sanction Tucker, so as long as we have any power in the EU, it wont happen.
    28
  2. You mean the guys who cite the Bible constanlty about their god given rights to do things? I guess thats the definition of a theocracy.
    7
  3. Not to be offensive, but twitter is really not that popular outside of the US. I actually dont know anyone who use it.
    1
  4. It is about the right or wrong. The excuses what the Israeli supporters use are the very same excuses what every single colonial opressor used to steal lands from aboriginals. 100 years ago they made westerns where the native americans were the constant baddies and the colonists were the good guys. Now these countries condemning what they made 200 years ago, yet they defend anotherone made today.
    1
  5. Well the US is interpretting international law quite liberally so to speak. So lets see what the Geneve convention says about this problem with a Russian Ukrainian example instead of Israel Palestine just to make it universal. So lets say Putin captures Kiyiv, and he sends there 1 million settlers. Lets say Ukrainians recapture Kiyiv. Waht should they do with the settlers who occupied Ukrainian flats, which their original occupants most likely want back? To disencourage such tricks in combat, sending settlers into an occupied zone qualifies as a warcrime. The settlers themselves are not considered as civilians, but comabattants, who could be detained into POW camps according to the general rules of warfare. Settlers posessions can be seized, and themselves can be deported at any convenient time without any reprecussion. So so called Israeli civilian hostages are neither civilians, nor hostages, but by legal definition prisoners of war, since they were caught in an official warzone, in a territory, which noone recognizes as part of Israel, who could be detained until an agreement is made on them, or the conflict officially terminates.
    1
  6. So to make a historical discourse many american think their country became independent, because their residents wanted to pursue freedom, while in reality, they started the indepenence mainly because British wanted to abolish slavery in their colonies, and the plantation owners didn't like this turn of events. Slavery is not just a sidestory of the XIX. century history of the USA, but rather the groundwork behind their genesis and explanation behind most of their actions in that time period. The high grade independence of statewise legislatures were intended to defend plantation owners from a central abolitionist movement, the annexation of Texas, and early southern and western expansions were pathways to relocate their business in case of a state became pro abolitionist. Even the finance sector gave mortgages based on the number of slaves owned by a plantation owner, not the acreage of his plantation.
    1
  7. Dont you have organizations like the CIA and FBI to deal with such organizations as AIPAC?
    1