Comments by "Gabor Rajnai" (@gaborrajnai6213) on "Russian troops begin Belarus deployment | DW News" video.

  1. Come on, I wanted to give them a point, that they asked at least an Eastern European, not a British, whose expertise is that he once visited the Seremetevo transit.
    2
  2.  @royalpanther6391  Well, the world is a bigger place than western Europe and North America.
    2
  3. They always try, but Ukrie missiles are easy prey for air defense. Its so sad, in the good old Soviet times they knew how to manufacture a rocket.
    1
  4.  @alkismavridis1  Well Russians at least have some own technology, what Ukries don't have anymore. The good times, when all of the big soviet rocket engineers were ukrainian are passed.
    1
  5. Thats called information warfare.
    1
  6. I think French are doing it too.
    1
  7. Lol you cant even properly handle the ukries.
    1
  8. Trust me, they can. Ukries outclassed 5:1, they aren't doing anything near Kherson just posing for the media. Their best idea is to blow up the dam and wash the russians away, which is not a bad one, but HIMARS rockets arent powerful enough to demolish a dam. Maybe their seamine idea is better.
    1
  9. Not everyone can assassinate civilians with drones as the US president does.
    1
  10. You meen the Korean war? It was called a "police action" by the yanks. Fun fact: they didn't have a war since WWII officially.
    1
  11. That weaker country is a troll in itself, but besides that we got the vibes.
    1
  12. Nope, NATO doesn't have an obligation to do that.
    1
  13.  Veles  Counterterrorism? Seriously? These guys are idolizing people who blow up gaspipes, and bridges, plant car bombs into some journalist's car, have death squads. There is no will for counterterrorism left in the west.
    1
  14. That wouldn't make any strategic sense. Ukraine is the strongest in the west.
    1
  15. ​ @chill2363  Well, they don't run, they digged in near Kherson.
    1
  16. Well, no, they wont join in the forseeable future, nor to the NATO, nor to the EU. They are simply ineligible. Ursula or Stoltenberg don't have the authority to promise such things.
    1
  17. Group BRICS, you know, 4 bil people on that group chat.
    1
  18. He has nukes deployed, so noone will cross his border, except maybe the ukries.
    1
  19. @Tiff Bannen Actually wake me up, when there are 1 million civilian dead. That was the Iraq toll.
    1
  20. ​@spinozasdreams Lol, the Dunkirk runners? Don't think so.
    1
  21. @spinozasdreams There was a Mirror report, that their whole military would fit into the Wembley stadium 😁
    1
  22. @777 No, it wont.
    1
  23. @777 NATO actually knows, that Putin didn't invaded for 20 years, so he wont invade in the future, besides if we invade we risk a nuclear war, and there is no reason to think that we have to fight it later, only a very distinct possibility.
    1
  24. ​@777 Ukraine is an independent country, to whom we have no obligations whatsoever. Risking WWIII for it is an overshoot.
    1
  25. If it takes 8 years to gear up to take 20 percent of Ukraine, that would take 128 years.
    1
  26. You know, using landmines is actually illegal. Besides they should do the digging in a region which is called the Chernobyl exclusion zone, so by the end, their nice soldiers would grow a second head.
    1
  27. Devastating defeat from Lithuania 😁😁😁
    1
  28. Lol, no NATO won't intervene, at least a dozen country would veto it. But you can go.
    1