Comments by "Gabor Rajnai" (@gaborrajnai6213) on "What’s behind NATO’s ‘Steadfast Defender 24’ maneuver? | DW News" video.

  1. Theres an entire wikipedia entry listing the sources of such an agreement. The only point what NATO can make is that it was brokered with the Soviet Union not Russia.
    6
  2. Since UK is the farthest from the Polish border their readiness should be tested the most. Germans can get there on foot.
    4
  3. Why would we spend on sligshots in a war which is waged with ballistic missiles.
    2
  4. Can we agree that tanks and airplanes wont help us out?  @tages_matuna 
    1
  5. Do they?
    1
  6. Yep, he didnt get it how NATO operates, thatswhy he talked pure BS.
    1
  7. I cant say otherwise than google it, since youtube does not allow to post links. The point of any agreement, is that with an agreement we can avoid war between our states. So we didnt have a formal paper with Russia and they entered into war.  @justmynickname 
    1
  8. Until its honoured. If its not, then it doesnt matter, if its written in gold, or just told. Theres no world police to get there and have an interstate matter settled.  @__3800 
    1
  9. The problem with the Americans is not that they are not right on making some weaponsystems would be beneficial for Europe, the problem with them is that they want to maintain their nuclear monopoly in the meantime, meanwhile, those are the weapons woth to build.
    1
  10. If Europe takes on Russia alone, why would we care what the US do in China, moreover, why would we support them in the Middle East? We dont have enemies there. They have.
    1