Comments by "Gabor Rajnai" (@gaborrajnai6213) on "NATO makes major changes to address new threats | DW News" video.

  1. Well, theres a reason why Poland and the Balitc states generally disappear for centuries from the worldmaps. Their foreign policies are straight out suicidal.
    7
  2. We told them its not a good idea to retreat from Afghanistan, because it will show NATO weak, but they didnt care.
    5
  3. There was a try to form a SEATO, which was for the pacific.  @IRBry 
    5
  4. Nope, if you want to be independent from the US then you need the nuclear deterrence first and foremost.
    5
  5. Europe has 1200 + fourth gen fighter aircrafts. Russia has 500.
    5
  6. Yeah they do this because they are slavs, and they know Russia will forgive them whatever they do.  @TakZ000 
    2
  7. Yeah, but Biden showed that he coopted Trump's policies when he betrayed the Afghan government. From that moment on American committment is universally questionable.
    2
  8. I like Canadians. They can remain.
    2
  9. It will. It has nothing to do with Germany at all. If Germans rearm themselves, that will be a redsign for the brits and the poles, you cant do anything about it.  @Dudelsackpfeifer 
    1
  10. Lol I guess the US showed us that you can be militaristic and capitalistic at them same time.  @macmcleod1188 
    1
  11. Since Urkainians didnt give the water what Crimea needed, that was a very logical move from them.  @Veritas.0 
    1
  12. Anyone who thinks that it can win a nuclear war with tanks and airplanes is living in an alternate reality.
    1
  13. I would be more comfortable, if the Baltic states wouldnt provoke Russians, and going against basic human rights an UN charters regarding the treatment of Russian minority there. I dont think our military exists to defend some ethnic cleansing, if they want ot proceed, they are on their own.
    1
  14. Lol if Chechnya is a country, then Crimea is a country as well. Because theres no place called Chechnya, its the southern part of the Russian federation. @wahrheitssucher7575
    1
  15. What do we get in return?
    1
  16. I hate to tell it again and again, but Europe needs the nuclear deterrence. Spending on tanks against a nuclear superpower does worth nothing. While Europe cant show up 1000+ tactical and strategic warheads ready to be delivered by bombers submarines and ICBM's theres no way it can be independent form the US.  @filipe5722 
    1
  17. As far as my history knowledge goes you annexed your East German neighbour. @wahrheitssucher7575
    1
  18. The reason is called BAE systems, and some juicy contracts.
    1
  19. France is a country in the EU not the EU itself. French nuclear stockpile do not guarantee security to other states, because thats under the control of the French president, not under the control of our government. Besides whats the point to have 100 more tanks. Having 100 nukes is a guarantee against Russia, 100 tanks is a joke.
    1
  20. Because NATO has all those weapons just in bigger quantities.
    1
  21. It has the capabilities to break Russian anti air with SEAD missions. Of course it would be costly but it can be done.  @ericp1139 
    1