Comments by "Whoops" (@cooliipie) on "Nature on PBS" channel.

  1. Microevolution is very different from the theory of Macroevolution. The difference is that this genetic information already exists in the animal. Versus new information being added (eventually creating it into an entirely new species unbreathable from the previous species) which has never been proven to be possible.
    2
  2. Microevolution is very different from the theory of Macroevolution. The difference is that this genetic information already exists in the animal. Versus new information being added (eventually creating it into an entirely new species unbreathable from the previous species) which has never been proven to be possible.
    2
  3. They aren't wrong. Microevolution is very different from the theory of Macroevolution. The difference is that this genetic information already exists in the animal. Versus new information being added (eventually creating it into an entirely new species unbreathable from the previous species) which has never been proven to be possible.
    2
  4. Microevolution is very different from the theory of Macroevolution. The difference is that this genetic information already exists in the animal. Versus new information being added (eventually creating it into an entirely new species unbreathable from the previous species) which has never been proven to be possible.
    1
  5. I feel dogs and dolphins are closer emotionally
    1
  6. Microevolution is very different from the theory of Macroevolution. The difference is that this genetic information already exists in the animal. Versus new information being added (eventually creating it into an entirely new species unbreathable from the previous species) which has never been proven to be possible.
    1
  7. Micro is change within a species. Macro was change into another species. Mutation an adaptation typically occurs from death/ loss of DNA. Mutation as a defect is never an advantage. You can make a wolf into a dog, but you can't make a dog into a wolf. It has never been proven that one species can change into another species to the point where they can no longer reproduce. No matter how much an animal changes it is still that animal. From a German Shepherd to a chihuahua, they will always be a dog. No matter what you do to the creature, no matter what changes from the environment, loss, mutation, it will always be a dog. This is where the theory of evolution falls apart.
    1
  8. Micro is change within a species. Macro was change into another species. Mutation an adaptation typically occurs from death/ loss of DNA. Mutation as a defect is never an advantage. You can make a wolf into a dog, but you can't make a dog into a wolf. It has never been proven that one species can change into another species to the point where they can no longer reproduce. No matter how much an animal changes it is still that animal. From a German Shepherd to a chihuahua, they will always be a dog. No matter what you do to the creature, no matter what changes from the environment, loss, mutation, it will always be a dog. This is where the theory of evolution falls apart.
    1
  9. Microevolution is very different from the theory of Macroevolution. The difference is that this genetic information already exists in the animal. Versus new information being added (eventually creating it into an entirely new species unbreathable from the previous species) which has never been proven to be possible.
    1
  10.  @richardbritton4675  ....No. Mutations are the loss of DNA. You can make a wolf into a dog, but you can never make a dog back into a wolf.
    1
  11. Micro is change within a species. Macro was change into another species. Mutation an adaptation typically occurs from death/ loss of DNA. Mutation as a defect is never an advantage. You can make a wolf into a dog, but you can't make a dog into a wolf. It has never been proven that one species can change into another species to the point where they can no longer reproduce. No matter how much an animal changes it is still that animal. From a German Shepherd to a chihuahua, they will always be a dog. No matter what you do to the creature, no matter what changes from the environment, loss, mutation, it will always be a dog. This is where the theory of evolution falls apart.
    1
  12. Microevolution is very different from the theory of Macroevolution. The difference is that this genetic information already exists in the animal. Versus new information being added (eventually creating it into an entirely new species unbreathable from the previous species) which has never been proven to be possible.
    1
  13.  @earlysda  Micro is change within a species. Macro was change into another species. Mutation an adaptation typically occurs from death/ loss of DNA. Mutation as a defect is never an advantage. You can make a wolf into a dog, but you can't make a dog into a wolf. It has never been proven that one species can change into another species to the point where they can no longer reproduce. No matter how much an animal changes it is still that animal. From a German Shepherd to a chihuahua, they will always be a dog. No matter what you do to the creature, no matter what changes from the environment, loss, mutation, it will always be a dog. This is where the theory of evolution falls apart.
    1
  14. Micro is change within a species. Macro was change into another species. Mutation an adaptation typically occurs from death/ loss of DNA. Mutation as a defect is never an advantage. You can make a wolf into a dog, but you can't make a dog into a wolf. It has never been proven that one species can change into another species to the point where they can no longer reproduce. No matter how much an animal changes it is still that animal. From a German Shepherd to a chihuahua, they will always be a dog. No matter what you do to the creature, no matter what changes from the environment, loss, mutation, it will always be a dog. This is where the theory of evolution falls apart.
    1
  15. It's a cat..
    1