Comments by "John Smith" (@JohnSmith-op7ls) on "Based Camp with Simone & Malcolm Collins" channel.

@sammhyde7589 As opposed to what? Some hyper political or hyper career focused woman? That’s boring from the start
13
You don’t know anything about traditional relationships if you think money and looks being a factor is somehow a modern thing. You’re also taking incel rhetoric and projecting it on men dating outside their nationality which is apples and oranges.
13
@ Harvard using gaslighting to try and explain away other gaslighting
8
They can’t shame you if you feel no shame. And they can never get rid of their insecurity and envy pretending they’re the better choice
7
@Gopfs BS, stop pretending you get to define terms here
6
@ Maybe in a few cultures that are openly xenophobic like the Han Chinese and Indians but in the vast majority of cultures, marrying “your own” isn’t part of it. Maybe some individuals would prefer their kids marry inside their culture but that’s a personal preference. What defines traditional is up to the culture and individual although most definitions will have things in common which then provide a generalized definition. E.g having kids, marriage. There probably isn’t a single culture on the planet that didn’t develop though intermingling (including marrying) with other cultures, except maybe the North Sentinelese or some other ultra rare uncontacted tribe
6
They covered that. Survivorship, she mentions it.
5
@nicolem889 Strawman
3
@каркуша-н7п Nah it’s just that people never take into account generations. One person is talking about Boomers or Gen X, someone else is talking about Zoomers and then wondering why they see differences
3
@bevs9995 Colorism is pathetic, especially coming from someone who has probably been butthurt all their life for being too pale
3
@KyleTremblayTitularKtrey The whole “French court” analogy has no meaning with regards to what Left and Right mean today or have meant for the last two hundred years. You’re conflating those who were pro aristocracy to those who weren’t. The Physiocrats who invented liberalism in France and England in the 17th century were capitalists and true liberals. Their ideology has nothing in common with socialism or the Leftism of the 18th, 19th, or 20th centuries.
3
Modern Leftism is inherently nihilist and suicidal. That’s why they’re so easily manipulated and are actually Managerialists.
3
We’ve already strung together various specialized models and “AGI”, whatever that even means beyond a buzzword, didn’t happen. ANNs really do not work like BNNs, even one of the two guys who coined the term “neural network” regretted that name for the inapt comparison it draws to how the human mind actually works, which is far from a solved problem. ANNs are a highly crude attempt at emulating vaguely similar training and output capabilities. They aren’t simulating BNNs, we don’t even have system close to having the capacity to do that, even to our limited understanding of how they actually work. Just like you can’t strap together a bunch of steam engines and get a warp drive, a bunch of LLMs working together don’t magically become human level intelligence. You need a fundamentally different architecture and leading researchers agree on this, LLMs have a use, but are near their limit. You can squeeze more accuracy and capabilities out of them but this is just adding more blades to a Swiss Army knife. More specialized but ultimately just a bigger dumb tool without awareness, without an internal world model and the ability to make accurate predictions from it, without the ability to learn in real time, and so on. We haven’t seen anything emerge from the growing complexity of these models that goes in that direction, despite the BS marketing hype of Sam Altman and some lunatic Google dev who made nonsense claims amd got suspended for it.
2
Although what’s interesting is in men who are sociopaths, you see the same sort of feminine, systemic takedown of opponents through manipulation of them and those around them
2
There’s nothing progressive about modern “progressives”. This is just a lame tactic Marxists use, taking positive sounding terms and misusing them to gaslight people into thinking their evil is good. Actual progressives try and improve things. Modern “progressives” cling to a failed 19th century ideology created by a sociopath who was so bad at managing his personal finances that he blew through his inheritance and refused to get a job and wasted his money trying to keep up appearances while his kids died from the poverty he forced on them. Imagine thinking someone who was more concerned with appearing rich than to take care of his own kids, to the point where four of them died, had some magical solution to socioeconomic.
2
With real AI and advanced robotics, the rich don’t need to placate the plebs anymore. They also don’t need to worry about their hired security getting a case of morality. This lets them use machines to progressively contain most people while using various tactics to lower their population, picking out only the ones they still need for various jobs and depravity. Think the Matrix except it’s rich people running the machines and it’s not VR, it’s city sized gulags
2
@ How does that mean easy? It’s “modern” women who are openly promiscuous, proud of being sex workers, don’t want kids. That’s easy.
2
Leftists/Manageralists and socialists are not liberals. Both sides are conservative the moment they get something they want, they seek to conserve whatever social, political, and economic norms they’ve managed to establish.
2
Multi modals systems have been a thing for a while now
2
No, not Liberalism. Managerialism, cultural Marxism. These people are NOT liberals, they only misappropriate that term as part of their indentation hijacking of existing ideologies and movements. Liberalism is fundamentally based on the idea of autonomy/agency/self-determination.
2
Let’s just be clear since it seems everyone perpetrates this lie now… Leftists are not Liberals. Liberalism is capitalism. The word capitalist was created by socialists as a derogatory term for liberals. Liberalism is about individuality, personal liberty, strong property rights, legal protection for free trade, and the idea of rule of law over the rule of aristocracy. The Left has never been about Liberalism. Also, fascism has always been a Leftist ideology. Mussolini was a die hard Marxist, the editor of a Marxist newspaper into his 20s, and socialized 2/3s of Italy’s economy by the end of the war, with plans to nationalize the rest had he remained in power. He and Hitler were very much socialists, they just took a novel approach to it which the Leninists and Stalinists hated because socialists hate competing forms of socialism.
2
@Planeet-Long Most men do, your one example doesn’t disprove that. He wanted a young woman to have a kid with and take care of him. That’s pretty traditional. If he just wanted sex he didn’t have to get married and have a kid
2
There’s been a “softening” of far left rhetoric in some corporate media outlets recently but it has nothing to do with being based or any kind of ideological shift. It’s down to money. They’ve been bleeding cash and readership/viewership and with USAID all but shut down, and ActBlue on the chopping block, they can’t rely on these propaganda funding sources to prop up their earnings. It’s why CNN put a controlled opposition, right wing talking head on their channel. There’s not enough money to sustain these big companies just pandering to the dwindling Left.
2
@nicolem889 Why would anyone “submit” (like a dog?) to someone they had no attraction to unless they were being forced to? Attraction goes beyond just physical. Would you settle for a women you have no attraction to? As for virginity, lol, sad.
2
⁠⁠ @sloeberdoet Maybe, maybe not. Nobody knows how they really live.
2
So, this channel is the same person playing two androgynous characters?
2
In their ideology, every problem is a social problem, everything is a “human construct”. They actually think everything is just made up in our heads and therefore if it’s bad, it’s because we’re bad. Of course, none of them are willing to stand in front of a tidal wave and tell it to stop being dryist or something. Real problems take real effort and they’re too lazy and nihilistic to care about fixing them. They’ll never admit that though as it would unmask their agenda and ruin their performance. But inside, they know they don’t have the skills, courage, or motivation to stand up for real solutions to real problems. And this bothers them, so putting on a performance of caring about “social issues” becomes a coping mechanism to try (and fail) to fill the void that being fake creates
2
They’re still massively overpopulated which is why there’s a never ending stream of illegals from there. And subtract the 30+ million who came illegally and another 10 or so who came legally over the last 40 years and even with that big of an economic release valve they still can’t sustain themselves even with massive subsidies from remittances
1
That’s true. Any person holding an ideology based on a rigid fantasy of how things would perfect if everything was exactly how they want, is unable to handle reality which doesn’t care what you want
1
When it comes to people like that, I’m big on human sacrifice also
1
@ Not in the West. And you act as if skin tone is the only factor in attractiveness. You put a pretty face next to an ugly one with much lighter skin and nobody but maybe an Indian or some Han Chinese would take the lighter skin. And if you’re raising your kids in China or India, you actually messed up on that one. Same goes with having a fit body vs the bloated mess most women are now. Who isn’t going to take a nice fit body vs some chunky, cellulite, stretch marked up ordeal who happens to have pale skin? Again, aside from Indians and maybe black guys?
1
@sloeberdoet Colorism is more common outside the US. You see it a lot groups that are in general the same race but have different skin tones being seen as belonging to different social castes. You see it a lot in black, middle eastern, and Asian countries where lighter skin is preferred and it can go beyond just who people find attractive and can influence how people treat you in general, seeing darker skinned people as lower class
1
Europeans haven’t been “a people” since an ice age nearly whipped out humanity
1
@amelieklemets4103 Culture isn’t what you are unless you’ve done nothing with your life. It plays a part in giving you a basis but that’s it. And a lot of cultures have very little worth preserving
1
@bevs9995 Why would they wish to be white in countries where the men don’t want white women and the women don’t white men. Read the room
1
@somnathghosh6165 Lol, no way Korean are the first. Most are dumpy looking, there’s a reason why Korean is the cosmetic or surgery capital of the world, and there’s a reason Korean men go to SEA for women
1
@mrfarenheit9159His wife isn’t another nationality. Ethnicity has nothing to do with it. Marrying outside your ethnicity doesn’t make you a “passport bro”, otherwise it’s a meaningless term. White people aren’t a single ethnicity. To be sure, it’s a stupid term either way.
1
They’re not progressives, they’re Leftist/Manageralist conservatives and don’t even know it. They just call themselves whatever they’re told to with no understanding behind it.
1
Soon the majority will be robots but the tyrants will be the few oligarchs who own them
1
I’m not into morbidly obese women so the locals aren’t my style
1
The Left don’t even understand what the Left is. They actually think Liberalism is the opposite of Capitalism even though they are literally the same thing. That’s how comically confused they are and why they’re so easily manipulated. They have no idea what their identity is, they just parrot back whatever they’re told by the collective groupthink.
1
@miriamweller812That’s literally not what Left and Right means, what mentally handicapped person told you that lol. Elitism is rampant on the Left and always has been, all socialists embraced a ruling caste in practice despite some forms of socialism lying about hierarchy they don’t, fascism, which is a form of socialism, was probably the first socialist ideology to admit it. Current Leftism, aka Manageralism, worships an elitist hierarchy of academia and celebrity
1
@ Rihht of center mostly based on logic yeah. But there’s a lot of religious woo woo nonsense mixed into the right in general and that’s just a framework for manipulating feelings. The religion of the Left is socialism, managerialism, and nihilism. The right has traditional religions
1
The user absolutely does not determine the limits of LLMs, there are no magic prompts to make it do things it fundamentally can’t
1
@ There’s nothing “virtuous” about sticking with Thai men, much less rural ones lol. You’re just making stuff up. Thai men, especially the rural ones are the most promiscuous men on the planet. No virtue in that
1
Stop pretending you’re not a mutt. The Han are more genetically “pure” than “white people” which isn’t even based in genetics, and they’re friggen muts
1
@joe42m13 Yes, overwhelming the supply of labor, driving down wages, is a threat to everyone who isn’t already super rich
1
@m3po22 Poor people with lots of kids aren’t good customers. Nice try on the propaganda tho
1
@m3po22 You said they’re customers, they are, they’re bad customers. Learn basic reasoning skills, simpleton
1