Comments by "John Smith" (@JohnSmith-op7ls) on "Martin DeCoder" channel.

  1. “Activist” now means nothing more than “narcissist”. People who take action are described specifically by those actions. Calling yourself an activist is vague and meaningless. It’s self adulation and an attention seeking tactic. Calling someone else an activist just tells everyone you’re gullible.
    39
  2. She was trying to steer the narrative away from having to provide any information that would reveal she was lying. The daughter might ask specific questions. She thought it was easier to preempt that and steer away with a lame joke. She’s constantly preempting everything to be vague so she can dodge any claims that get called out as false.
    20
  3. Why would anyone be in that audience.
    7
  4.  @be_a_bright_sparkle3687  That’s called cold reading and is exactly what’s being shown in this video
    5
  5. Is that what they’re calling pimps now?
    4
  6. What about when I wash the car I bought? Unpaid work! What about when I brush my teeth? Unpaid work!
    4
  7. So you got one thing vaguely right. We all do that. Did you keep track of all the things that didn’t end up happening?
    4
  8. All an act, all part of the scam. Surprised she didn’t randomly pull a bottle of hot sauce out of her purse and talk about it to her god
    3
  9. She can’t even speak English. Ebonics isn’t a thing.
    3
  10. 300 years to reach gender equality lol. Fake narrative that genders can ever be equal. Fake narrative that they need to be equal. Made up numbers about how long the impossible state of equality will take. Even identical twins aren’t equal. The only equality that matters and can be achieved is equality under the law. And women already have that. They endlessly move the goalposts because it’s a scam. The grift is pretending to fix a fake and endless problem.
    2
  11. No, they’re just looking like that because they see the grift isn’t working and it makes them uncomfortable. Then when it does work on someone else, they perk up. They’re all in on it.
    2
  12.  @mollypitcher9380  You know she took that spot in law school away from an Asian kid who actually worked for it
    2
  13. But some of her pedo friends are married so I guess that makes her an expert somehow
    1
  14.  @throughthoroughthought8064  Prove it or say nothing.
    1
  15.  @throughthoroughthought8064  The claim, which you have no idea if it even happened much less exactly as described, is that this person told a guy they would win a prize, at a school fair. Would be super easy to find out what prizes were being given out. Like I said, prove it even happened much less it being psychic powers and not dumb luck. I mean, you tell a person they’ll win a prize in a place where they’re giving out prizes and the odds aren’t exactly impossible. And again, that’s assuming it even happened.
    1
  16.  @throughthoroughthought8064  I’ve followed parapsychology for decades and there is nothing even remotely approaching proof of psychic powers. At best you have some statistics based on small scale studies which, if you rationalize away methodological issues and squint hard enough, you can claim “statistically significant” results that imply there’s something going on besides chance. Even the few studies that were fairly well done but far from perfect, they still tested small groups of people. If you were using the same approach for studying the efficacy of medical treatments, you’d never get FDA approval. But even if you pretend these small scale, unideal studies somehow demonstrate what you’d see if better studies were done at large scale, of hundreds of thousands of subjects or more, it still doesn’t demonstrate that psychic abilities exist, much less provide any framework to build a testable, working model of. At best they suggest that something may be causing results that are a bit better than chance. Claiming that points to psychic powers being a thing is just a variation of the god of the gaps fallacy. And none of this has anything, at all, to do with this specific person in question or their claimed story. Even if you pretend some statistical abnormalities found in subject counts that wouldn’t pass muster to draw conclusion in medical or even nutritional epidemiology (which is notorious for having low standards), AND you pretend that this abnormality must be due to psychic powers existing, in now way does it prove that OP has such powers or if they do, that they are capable of the result claimed, or if they are, that they were the cause of the claim, which you don’t even know if it even happened or not. You’ve built a really precarious house of cards to stand on here.
    1
  17.  @brigitteverstraete4327  Always the real troll who calls others a troll first
    1
  18.  @killingqueen666 Excuses, excuses. Let’s pretend you’re not lying or just delusional. You’re still admitting what you do is useless. Either way, there’s no value in what you do.
    1
  19. She speaks for black grifters everywhere.
    1