Comments by "Whatever Whatever" (@whateverwhatever4026) on "Are All Cops Bastards? Police vs Criminals | Middle Ground" video.

  1. No matter the subject...no matter what's actually being discussed...there WILL ALWAYS be some bozos in the comments crying about America. No matter what. The video could be about squirrels, and there will STILL be Europeans crying about how their squirrels are better....
    68
  2. Hasan is crazy from the start....
    3
  3. Scar just tried to claim BOTH he wanted to be a cop, AND he got tickets on his bike. Bruh....You high. That never happened.
    3
  4. *Sigh* Slavery isn't when you commit a crime, ma'am. No matter how racist you are. And only care about skin colors. What ridiculous criminals these are. Not a single brain cell on the criminal's side and I blame Jubilee.
    3
  5. Emmett Til didn't even involve cops... 🤦🏿‍♂️🤦🏿‍♂️🤦🏿‍♂️
    2
  6.  @jackpfister1798  You usually don't....Acab. Member?
    2
  7.  @ChildishBoyJay757  The criminal side especially, wasn't even trying to listen and many of them repeatedly keep talking over each other. Charlie wouldn't listen to anything and was nonsensical literally the entire time. The two girls mostly just wanted to talk about their trauma, and were barely on subject much of the time. And Scar was just making up nonsense to be a part of the conversation... Again, I agree this is the correct method. It just wasn't well executed this time.... Honestly, Jubilee should have picked smarter criminals who did actually want to have a conversation.
    2
  8. U dum
    2
  9. "No one that represents a system helped me". Donna, that's a straight up lie. You had a lawyer. Probably multiple with a case that serious. And I don't believe you about that either. You probably did do it. It's double Jeopardy. Might as well own up to it, instead of lying more...
    2
  10. Europeans don't understand much...
    2
  11.  @saarah.fernandezz  You also don't have self defense period. Or freedom of speech. Or any number of rights that stem from the first two Amendments. But you sure do have a whole lot of stabbings...
    2
  12.  @manghoulish  I already addressed your ignorance. "No u" doesn't change anything. You started xenophobic, and that's still what you are...
    2
  13.  @manghoulish  More xenophobia. "Developed". You HAVE TO use the random qualifier "developed" because it excludes everywhere you don't like that disproves your point.... You don know words, or math. All you have is random hate for everywhere that's not Europe. Gross.
    2
  14.  @Bonnieurbartender  Like you did for the entire time you were filmed? Do you know the word hypocrisy exists?
    2
  15. They brought several examples and that's the one that stuck. Because its a group of people who hate cops. Of course the bad example is the one they'll keep focusing on..... Annnnd the point there would STILL be do you want that to happen again? Rather make that the standard, because the prompt is taking guns away. So everywhere is Uvlade....
    1
  16.  @drunkensaailor  All Europeans are mad at American EVERYWHERE. Dats wuz da point. You started crying first. "No u" won't work here...
    1
  17.  @Roy-w2o3f  Or Europeans just have big egos....And all squirrels are the same squirrels.
    1
  18.  @FeloniousDrunk1988  And? Our squirrels have freedom.
    1
  19. @justnickplease5756  *Our, and no. We can have a squirrel war if you like.
    1
  20.  @jackpfister1798  *Remember. Issa joke. Because more people do judge unfairly...Like you're doing now. Some bad doesn't mean all bad.
    1
  21. Like this? Because there wasn't much listening or understanding here. I agree on principle but this was a bad example...
    1
  22. Half of what the criminals are saying is just gibberish. I don't even know what they're trying to say half the time.
    1
  23. ATTENTION COMMENTS. The point of Uvlade is do you want everywhere being like that? If you take all pew pews away from police, then everywhere will not be helped the same way those kids weren't. You're all missing the point.
    1
  24. ....Different communities commit crimes in different ways.
    1
  25. Jubilee really couldn't bring in any intelligent criminals? I'm sure they're harder to find, but ANY?
    1
  26.  @jackpfister1798  Based ooon? Work place accidents and deaths? So because taxis and convince stores get robbed a lot, and fishing boats see a lot of storms, suddenly cops don't have dangerous jobs?
    1
  27. 😂🤣😂😂
    1
  28. A. Because youre asking for more violence. B. That's a terrible idea. C. Shootings happen everywhere, not just in schools. More actually. Duh. D. Regular cops are trained too. E. Some security guards are armed.
    1
  29. Prompt 2. Of course it is! There's obviously the opposite too, where some downplay it. And they're wrong too. But overall yeah. Duh. Look at this room as an example. Half of the group is irrationally mad at the other. I could name DOZENS of cases off the top of my head that were blown out of proportion because of bigotry against cops. MOST of the more infamously famous examples ffs. Like the ones that have catch phrases attached.
    1
  30. Donna needs to go to therapy. All she cares about is her alleged attack. It's barely 20 mins in, and she's brought it up twice and it was literally the first thing she brought up in the first place. I have my doubts about that, but the fact it's ALL she thinks about ever, really makes me think she at least believes it, and needs to go get help for that trauma. She's not even in the state to give opinions about this. Not even close...
    1
  31. Criminals hating being judged, but then make excuses for them judging cops like literally 2 mins later.... 🤦🏿‍♂️
    1
  32. NO. More good examples. Math is not on your side.
    1
  33. They already are....And I don't believe you that that's a serious question. Do you have any idea how many gun laws there are already?
    1
  34.  @gambinova1072  Maybe you should actually care, and do just any amount of research or even thought on the subject?
    1
  35.  @gambinova1072  They're not actually questions, just you demonstrating your ignorance and how little you care about the subject. There ARE plenty of regulations. Very obviously. And they're net positive (the thing, not the laws). YOU don't have any inputs, that's the issue. You don't even care enough to learn anything. You're just clinging to your ignorant preconceived opinions....
    1
  36.  @bruhlmfaoo3638  no u
    1
  37.  @bruhlmfaoo3638  *You're illiterate. You make my case for me. Stay mad, bruh.
    1
  38. Almost as if they're/you're attacking them at every opportunity....
    1
  39. U dum
    1
  40. You're wrong.
    1
  41. Time stamp?
    1
  42. That's literally the prompt and what they're arguing...
    1
  43.  @MelissaWitherspoon2  He said multiple times they shouldn't. And the best "quote" you could find for otherwise was "if you're swat..." And he didn't even finish what he was saying, and you had to assume and make it up. Sooo multiple times to not even really one.
    1
  44.  @MelissaWitherspoon2  But he literally did. And I'm not even wasting my time to timestamp the multiple times he did say it. You're being disingenuous af. .
    1
  45.  @MelissaWitherspoon2  You don't know what disingenuous means at all, huh? ....Anyways. Nooo he still said it repeatedly. While you made up the single time he added anything else. Sooo you're still just wrong. Easily. Later, Donna. Lol Typed that first part about your illiteracy before reading your obvious projects later in the comment. 1010% Donna just learned the word "disingenuous" exists, from me just now, and still refused to look it up. That's hilarious.
    1
  46.  @MelissaWitherspoon2  Annnd you made it up. Because it was the ONLY Thing you could cling to. Because the other 30 times he said something, it was exactly what you're saying he didn't say.....He DID say it. And this isn't even an argument.
    1
  47. Donna too...
    1