Comments by "Evgeniya" (@evgeniya7853) on "Anders Puck Nielsen" channel.

  1. 46
  2. 19
  3. 18
  4. 8
  5. 8
  6. 7
  7. 7
  8. 6
  9. 6
  10. 6
  11. The United States has not just "not ratified," it has passed a special law on the Rome Statute called the "Law on the Protection of American Military Personnel," which states that no American citizen or ally can be arrested or detained by order of the ICC. The Law, among its provisions, contains the following. No agency or organization of the U.S. government, any state or local government may extradite any U.S. person to the International Criminal Court or support the transfer of any U.S. citizen or permanent resident to the ICC. No agency or organization of the U.S. Government or any state or local government, including any court, may provide support to the International Criminal Court. No agent of the International Criminal Court may conduct in the United States or in any territory under U.S. jurisdiction any investigative activity related to the preliminary investigation, investigation, prosecution or other proceedings before the International Criminal Court. ❗In 2006, ICC Prosecutor Fatou Bensouda opened a preliminary investigation into US actions in Afghanistan, trying to find understanding from the Obama administration, but met the same resistance from the Democratic Party as the Republican one. The investigation was postponed for 11 years. In 2017, after President Donald Trump took office, Bensouda officially appealed to the ICC judges with a request to authorize the launch of an investigation into war crimes committed by the US armed forces and the CIA. In 2018, the US authorities announced that they would arrest ICC judges and impose sanctions on all those involved in the investigation. The judges understood the signal – and in 2019, a decision followed: Bensouda was refused to initiate an investigation, and in its justification the court referred to the "complexity and variability of the political climate." In 2020, the "changeable climate" changed towards the decline of Trump – and Bensouda managed to appeal this decision. The investigation was authorized. The Trump administration, in turn, said that such actions by the ICC "threaten to undermine U.S. sovereignty." In September of the same year, the United States imposed personal sanctions against Bensouda and another high–ranking employee of the ICC Prosecutor's office, Fakiso Mochochoko… What clear-cut boys😂
    6
  12. 6
  13. 6
  14. 6
  15. 5
  16. 5
  17. 5
  18. 5
  19. 5
  20. 5
  21. 5
  22. 5
  23. 5
  24. 5
  25. 5
  26. 5
  27. 5
  28. 5
  29. 5
  30. Requirements of the Russian Federation to the United States and NATO on security guarantees (December 2021) The demands were ignored. As a result, these demands will be fulfilled at the cost of millions of lives, the destruction of an entire state, riots and economic collapse in Europe Draft agreements between Russia, NATO and the United States on security guarantees. The main provisions of the first document: — exclude the further expansion of NATO and the accession of Ukraine to the alliance; — not to deploy additional military and weapons outside the countries where they were in May 1997 (before joining the alliance of Eastern European countries) – except in exceptional cases with the consent of Russia and NATO members; — to abandon any NATO military activity in Ukraine, Eastern Europe, Transcaucasia, and Central Asia; — do not deploy medium-range and shorter-range missiles where they can hit the territory of the other side; — not to conduct exercises and other actions with a strength of more than a brigade in the agreed border zone, regularly exchange information about military exercises; — to confirm that the parties do not consider each other as opponents, to consolidate the agreement to resolve all disputes peacefully and to refrain from the use of force; — to give an obligation not to create conditions that can be regarded as a threat by the other party; — Create hotlines for emergency contacts. The main provisions of the second document are: — not to deploy weapons and forces in areas where it will be perceived by the other side as a threat to national security; — refrain from flying heavy bombers in nuclear and non-nuclear equipment outside their skies, from where they can hit targets on the territory of the other side; — refrain from the presence of warships in areas outside national waters, from where they can hit targets on the territory of the other side; — not to deploy medium-range and shorter-range missiles abroad and in areas from where they can hit targets on the territory of the other side; — not to deploy nuclear weapons abroad and return those already deployed, as well as eliminate the infrastructure for the deployment of nuclear weapons outside its territory; — not to conduct military exercises with the development of scenarios for the use of nuclear weapons and not to prepare the military of non-nuclear countries to use nuclear weapons; — The United States undertakes to exclude further expansion of NATO to the east and to refuse admission to the alliance of post-Soviet countries; — The United States undertakes not to create military bases in post-Soviet countries, not to use their military infrastructure and not to develop military cooperation with them ❗Putin outlined his wishes very clearly and clearly back in 2021
    5
  31. 4
  32. 4
  33. 4
  34. 4
  35. 4
  36. 4
  37. 4
  38. 4
  39. 4
  40. 4
  41. 4
  42. 4
  43. The UN Charter, in Articles 106 and 107, gives the right to the winners of the Second World War - the USSR, the USA, Great Britain and China - to apply all measures against the countries that fought against them to prevent actions aimed at revising the results of the Second World War. In particular, it is possible to use military force against these countries. To do this, it is enough to notify the other three winning countries, but not to get their consent. Forceful coercion of countries that want to revise the Yalta-Potsdam system in Europe can also be carried out by Russia, which is the legal successor of the USSR. Russia can stop attempts to revive Nazism in Germany, Hungary, Romania, Austria, Bulgaria, Finland, Croatia, Slovenia, Czech Republic, Slovakia, Italy, Spain, Norway, Denmark, Holland, Japan. Articles 106 and 107 of the UN Charter also apply to all those countries that refuse to inherit from the USSR – Latvia, Estonia, Lithuania. Their attitude that there was a Soviet occupation and the treaties of Friendship and cooperation concluded by them with the Third Reich move these countries into the ranks of the Hitlerite coalition. The same position is taken by modern Ukraine, which accepts as its predecessor the military-political formations of the OUN-UPA, created by Ukrainian fascists. Proves that all these post-Soviet republics belong to the Hitlerite coalition. Hence the possibility of revising the territorial acquisitions of countries that position themselves as supporters of the Hitlerite coalition. Plus SPONSORS OF the Nazi regimes (USA and Britain)
    4
  44. 4
  45. 4
  46. 4
  47. 4
  48. 4
  49. 4
  50. 4
  51. 4
  52. 4
  53. 4
  54. 4
  55. 4
  56. 4
  57. 4
  58. 4
  59. 4
  60. 4
  61. 4
  62. 4
  63. 4
  64. 4
  65. 4
  66. 4
  67. 4
  68. 4
  69. 4
  70. 4
  71. 4
  72. 4
  73. 4
  74. 4
  75. 4
  76. 4
  77. 4
  78. 4
  79. 4
  80. 4
  81. 4
  82. 4
  83. 4
  84. 4
  85. 4
  86. 4
  87. 4
  88. 4
  89. 4
  90. 4
  91. 4
  92. 4
  93. 4
  94. 4
  95. 4
  96. 4
  97. 4
  98. 4
  99. 4
  100. 3
  101. 3
  102. 3
  103. 3
  104. 3
  105. 3
  106. 3
  107. 3
  108. 3
  109. 3
  110. 3
  111. 3
  112. 3
  113. 3
  114. 3
  115. 3
  116. 3
  117. 3
  118. 3
  119. 3
  120. 3
  121. 3
  122. 3
  123. 3
  124. 3
  125. 3
  126. 3
  127. 3
  128. 3
  129. 3
  130. 3
  131. 3
  132. 3
  133. 3
  134. 3
  135.  @WhiteRoseOfResistance  You European beings should be reminded of the ESSENCE of the Ukrainian conflict. ❗THE MINSK AGREEMENTS 1. Immediate and comprehensive ceasefire in certain areas of Donetsk and Luhansk regions of Ukraine and its strict implementation starting at 00:00. (Kiev time) on February 15, 2015. 2. Withdrawal of all heavy weapons by both sides at equal distances in order to create a security zone at least 50 km wide from each other for artillery systems with a caliber of 100 mm or more, a security zone 70 km wide for MLRS and 140 km wide for MLRS Tornado-S, Uragan, Smerch and tactical Tochka U missile systems: 3. Ensure effective monitoring and verification of the ceasefire and withdrawal of heavy weapons by the OSCE from the first day of withdrawal using all necessary technical means, including satellites, UAVs, radar systems, etc. 4. On the first day after the recusal, start a dialogue on the modalities of holding local elections in accordance with Ukrainian legislation and the Law of Ukraine "On the Temporary procedure of Local Self-Government in certain areas of Donetsk and Luhansk regions", as well as on the future regime of these areas on the basis of this law. 5. Ensure pardon and amnesty by enacting a law prohibiting the prosecution and punishment of individuals in connection with events that took place in certain areas of Donetsk and Luhansk regions of Ukraine. 6. Ensure the release and exchange of all hostages and illegally detained persons on the basis of the "all for all" principle. This process must be completed no later than the fifth day after the withdrawal. 7. To ensure safe access, delivery, storage and distribution of humanitarian aid to those in need on the basis of an international mechanism. 8. Determining the modalities for the full restoration of socio-economic ties, including such social transfers as the payment of pensions and other payments (receipts and incomes, timely payment of all utility bills, resumption of taxation within the legal framework of Ukraine). 9. Restoration of full control over the state border by the Government of Ukraine in the entire conflict zone, which should begin on the first day after the local elections and end after a comprehensive political settlement (local elections in certain areas of Donetsk and Luhansk regions based on the law of Ukraine and constitutional reform) by the end of 2015 10. Withdrawal of all foreign armed formations, military equipment, and mercenaries from the territory of Ukraine under OSCE supervision. The disarmament of all illegal groups. 11. Carrying out constitutional reform in Ukraine with the entry into force by the end of 2015 of a new constitution, which assumes decentralization as a key element (taking into account the specifics of certain districts of Donetsk and Luhansk regions, agreed with representatives of these regions), as well as the adoption of permanent legislation on the special status of certain districts of Donetsk and Lugansk regions by the end of 2015. 12. Based on the Law of Ukraine "On the Temporary procedure of local Self-government in certain areas of Donetsk and Luhansk regions", issues related to local elections will be discussed and coordinated with representatives of certain areas of Donetsk and Luhansk regions within the framework of the trilateral contact group. The elections will be conducted in compliance with relevant OSCE standards, with monitoring by the OSCE/ODIHR. 13. To intensify the activities of the trilateral contact group, including through the establishment of working groups on the implementation of relevant aspects of the Minsk agreements. They will reflect the composition of the trilateral contact group. Note. Such measures, in accordance with the law "On a special procedure for local Self-government in Certain areas of Donetsk and Luhansk regions," include the following:: - exemption from punishment, persecution and discrimination of persons related to the events that took place in certain areas of Donetsk and Luhansk regions; - The right to linguistic self-determination; - participation of local self-government bodies in the appointment of heads of prosecutor's offices and courts in certain areas of Donetsk and Luhansk regions; - an opportunity for central executive authorities to conclude agreements with relevant local governments on the economic, social and cultural development of certain areas of Donetsk and Luhansk regions; - The state supports the socio-economic development of certain areas of Donetsk and Luhansk regions; - assistance from the central authorities in cross-border cooperation in certain areas of Donetsk and Lugansk regions with the regions of the Russian Federation; - creation of people's militia units by decision of local councils in order to maintain public order in certain areas of Donetsk and Luhansk regions; - the powers of deputies of local councils and officials elected in early elections appointed by the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine by this law may not be terminated prematurely. Participants of the Trilateral Contact Group: Ambassador Heidi Tagliavini The Second President of Ukraine, Leonid Kuchma Ambassador of the Russian Federation to Ukraine M.Y. Zurabov A.V. Zakharchenko – Head of the Donetsk People's Republic I.V. Plotnitsky – Head of the Lugansk People's Republic
    3
  136. 3
  137. 3
  138. 3
  139. 3
  140. 3
  141. 3
  142. 3
  143. 3
  144. 3
  145. 3
  146. 3
  147. 3
  148. 3
  149. 3
  150. 3
  151. 3
  152. 3
  153. 3
  154. 3
  155. 3
  156. 3
  157. 3
  158. 3
  159. 3
  160. 3
  161. 3
  162. 3
  163. 3
  164. 3
  165. 3
  166. 3
  167. 3
  168. 3
  169. Important information for general development Chronology of the ban on the Russian language in the so-called "Ukraine" 02/23/2014 - The Verkhovna Rada of "Ukraine" deprived the Russian language of the status of a regional language 08/29/2015 - Russian language will be removed from the Ukrainian passport Russian Russian 16.06.2016 - Introduction of language quotas on radio and television (25% in Russian) 05.09.2017 - Ban on the Russian language in the field of education 04/25/2019 - All government officials, employees, representatives of the spheres of trade, services, education, medicine, culture must speak and use the Ukrainian language in the performance of their duties. Reduction of quotas for the Russian language to 10%. All cultural events should be held in the Ukrainian language 04/25/2019 - All sites and pages on social networks must be in Ukrainian or duplicated 04/16/2020 - All advertising must be in Ukrainian 07/16/2020 - Scientific and medical fields should be published in Ukrainian or English 07/16/2020 - Transport navigation must be in Ukrainian 07/06/2020 - "There are things, for example, the issue of language is a very important, fundamental issue for the state. We cannot have any second mov, Russian, not because it does not need to be studied, it does not need to be known. If we are talking about Ukraine, then there should be only the state Ukrainian language," said Secretary of the National Security Council Danilov. 01/16/2021 - Enterprises of all forms of ownership in the service sector, including online stores, should switch to Ukrainian 07/16/2021 - A mandatory exam for knowledge of Ukrainian for civil servants is introduced 07/16/2021 - Excursions must be conducted in Ukrainian (excluding foreign languages) 07/16/2021 - At least 50% of books must be sold in Ukrainian 07/16/2021 - All films must be shown exclusively in Ukrainian 16.01.2022 - Language quotas for print media are introduced Russian Russian 16.04.2022 - Commissioner for the Protection of the state language Taras Kremen: "Starting from the new academic year, in those schools where such a discipline as "Russian language" is still taught, it should be replaced with other subjects or by increasing the proportion of studying existing disciplines" 04/15/2022 - Educational Ombudsman Sergei Gorbachev called the conditions for learning Russian: "If we agree to teach Russian, then each lesson should begin with the words "Russia is an aggressor country. Putin is a war criminal. Russia is to blame for the genocide of the Ukrainian people" 05/25/2022 - The Ukrainian Institute of Books intends to seize 100 million books, including Russian classics, fairy tales and romance novels Law of Ukraine No. 2704-VIII of April 25, 2019 On ensuring the functioning of the Ukrainian language as the state language (with amendments and additions as of 12/31/2023)
    3
  170. 3
  171. 3
  172. 3
  173. 3
  174. 3
  175. 3
  176. 3
  177. 3
  178. 3
  179. 3
  180. 3
  181. 3
  182. 3
  183. 3
  184. 3
  185. 3
  186. 3
  187. 3
  188. 3
  189. 3
  190. 3
  191. 3
  192. 3
  193. 3
  194. 3
  195. 3
  196. 3
  197. 3
  198. 3
  199. 3
  200. 3
  201. 3
  202. Requirements of the Russian Federation to the United States and NATO on security guarantees (December 2021) The demands were ignored. As a result, these demands will be met at the cost of millions of lives, the destruction of an entire state, riots and economic collapse in Europe ❗Draft agreements between Russia, NATO and the United States on security guarantees. The main provisions of the first document: — exclude further expansion of NATO and Ukraine's accession to the alliance; — not to deploy additional military and weapons outside the countries where they were in May 1997 (before joining the alliance of Eastern European countries) – except in exceptional cases with the consent of Russia and NATO members; — to abandon any NATO military activity in Ukraine, Eastern Europe, Transcaucasia, and Central Asia; — do not deploy medium-range and shorter-range missiles where they can hit the territory of the other side; — not to conduct exercises and other actions with a strength of more than a brigade in the agreed border zone, regularly exchange information about military exercises; — to confirm that the parties do not consider each other as opponents, to consolidate the agreement to resolve all disputes peacefully and to refrain from the use of force; — to give an obligation not to create conditions that can be regarded as a threat by the other party; — Create hotlines for emergency contacts. ❗The main provisions of the second document are: — not to deploy weapons and forces in areas where it will be perceived by the other side as a threat to national security; — refrain from flying heavy bombers in nuclear and non-nuclear equipment outside their skies, from where they can hit targets on the territory of the other side; — to refrain from the presence of warships in areas outside national waters, from where they can hit targets on the territory of the other side; — not to deploy medium-range and shorter-range missiles abroad and in areas from where they can hit targets on the territory of the other side; — not to deploy nuclear weapons abroad and return those already deployed, as well as eliminate the infrastructure for the deployment of nuclear weapons outside its territory; — not to conduct military exercises with the development of scenarios for the use of nuclear weapons and not to prepare the military of non-nuclear countries to use nuclear weapons; — The United States undertakes to exclude further expansion of NATO to the east and to refuse admission to the alliance of post-Soviet countries; — The United States undertakes not to create military bases in post-Soviet countries, not to use their military infrastructure and not to develop military cooperation with them.
    3
  203. 3
  204. 3
  205. 3
  206. 3
  207. 3
  208. 3
  209. 3
  210. 3
  211. 3
  212. 3
  213. EXCERPT from the Address of Russian President Putin on November 21, 2024: In connection with attacks by Western long-range missiles on the territory of Russia Continuing the course of escalation of the conflict in Ukraine provoked by the West, the United States and its NATO allies previously announced that they were giving permission for the use of their long-range precision weapons systems on the territory of the Russian Federation. Experts are well aware, and the Russian side has repeatedly stressed this, that it is impossible to use such weapons without the direct participation of military specialists from countries producing such weapons. On November 19, six ATACMS tactical missiles manufactured by the United States and on November 21, during a combined missile attack by Storm Shadow systems manufactured by the United Kingdom and HIMARS manufactured by the United States, military facilities in the territory of the Russian Federation – in the Bryansk and Kursk regions were attacked. Since that moment, as we have repeatedly stressed earlier, the regional conflict in Ukraine provoked by the West has acquired elements of a global character. Our air defense systems repelled these attacks... Once again, I would like to emphasize that the use of such weapons by the enemy is not able to influence the course of hostilities in the zone of a special military operation. Our troops are successfully advancing along the entire line of contact. All the tasks that we set for ourselves will be solved. In response to the use of American and British long-range weapons, on November 21 of this year, the Russian Armed Forces launched a combined attack on one of the facilities of the military-industrial complex of Ukraine. In combat conditions, one of the newest Russian medium–range missile systems was tested, in this case with a ballistic missile in a nuclear-free hypersonic equipment. Our rocket scientists called it "Hazel." The tests were successful, and the launch goal was achieved. On the territory of Ukraine, in the city of Dnepropetrovsk, one of the largest and most famous industrial complexes since the Soviet Union was hit, which still produces rocket technology and other weapons. We are developing medium-range and shorter-range missiles as a response to US plans to produce and deploy medium-range and shorter-range missiles in Europe and the Asia-Pacific region. We believe that the United States made a mistake by unilaterally destroying the treaty on the elimination of intermediate-range and shorter-range missiles in 2019 under a far-fetched pretext. Today, the United States not only produces such equipment, but, as we can see, during the training of its troops, they have worked out the issues of transferring their promising missile systems to different regions of the world, including Europe. Moreover, during the exercises, they conduct training on their use. Let me remind you that Russia has voluntarily, unilaterally committed itself not to deploy medium-range and shorter-range missiles until such time as American weapons of this kind appear in any region of the world. I repeat: we are conducting combat tests of the Oreshnik missile system in response to the aggressive actions of NATO countries against Russia. The issue of further deployment of medium-range and shorter-range missiles will be decided by us, depending on the actions of the United States and its satellites. The targets for destruction during further tests of our newest missile systems will be determined by us based on threats to the security of the Russian Federation. We consider ourselves entitled to use our weapons against the military facilities of those countries that allow their weapons to be used against our facilities, and in the event of an escalation of aggressive actions, we will respond just as decisively and in a mirror manner. I recommend that the ruling elites of those countries that have plans to use their military contingents against Russia seriously think about this... To date, there are no means of countering such weapons. Missiles attack targets at a speed of 10 Mach – 2.5–3 kilometers per second. Modern air defense systems available in the world and missile defense systems created by the Americans in Europe do not intercept such missiles, this is excluded. I would like to emphasize once again that it is not Russia, but the United States that has destroyed the international security system and, continuing to fight and cling to its hegemony, is pushing the whole world towards a global conflict. We have always preferred and are now ready to resolve all disputed issues by peaceful means, but we are also ready for any development of events
    3
  214. 3
  215. 3
  216. 3
  217. 3
  218. 3
  219. 3
  220. 3
  221. 3
  222. 3
  223. 3
  224. 3
  225. 3
  226. 3
  227. 3
  228. 3
  229. 3
  230. 3
  231. 3
  232. 3
  233. 3
  234. 3
  235. 3
  236. 3
  237. 3
  238. 3
  239. 3
  240. 3
  241. 3
  242. 3
  243. 3
  244. 3
  245. 3
  246. 3
  247. 3
  248. 3
  249. 3
  250. 3
  251. 3
  252. 3
  253. 3
  254. 3
  255. 3
  256. 3
  257. 3
  258. 3
  259. 3
  260. 3
  261. 3
  262. 3
  263. 3
  264. 3
  265. 3
  266. 3
  267. 3
  268. 3
  269. 3
  270. 3
  271. 3
  272. 3
  273. 3
  274. Back in December 2021, Russia openly stated what it wants. For those who have memory problems 👇 Requirements of the Russian Federation to the United States and NATO on security guarantees (December 2021) The demands were ignored. As a result, these demands will be met at the cost of millions of lives, the destruction of an entire state, riots and economic collapse in Europe ❗Draft agreements between Russia, NATO and the United States on security guarantees. The main provisions of the first document: — exclude further expansion of NATO and Ukraine's accession to the alliance; — not to deploy additional military and weapons outside the countries where they were in May 1997 (before joining the alliance of Eastern European countries) – except in exceptional cases with the consent of Russia and NATO members; — to abandon any NATO military activity in Ukraine, Eastern Europe, Transcaucasia, and Central Asia; — do not deploy medium-range and shorter-range missiles where they can hit the territory of the other side; — not to conduct exercises and other actions with a strength of more than a brigade in the agreed border zone, regularly exchange information about military exercises; — to confirm that the parties do not consider each other as opponents, to consolidate the agreement to resolve all disputes peacefully and to refrain from the use of force; — to give an obligation not to create conditions that can be regarded as a threat by the other party; — Create hotlines for emergency contacts. ❗The main provisions of the second document are: — not to deploy weapons and forces in areas where it will be perceived by the other side as a threat to national security; — refrain from flying heavy bombers in nuclear and non-nuclear equipment outside their skies, from where they can hit targets on the territory of the other side; — to refrain from the presence of warships in areas outside national waters, from where they can hit targets on the territory of the other side; — not to deploy medium-range and shorter-range missiles abroad and in areas from where they can hit targets on the territory of the other side; — not to deploy nuclear weapons abroad and return those already deployed, as well as eliminate the infrastructure for the deployment of nuclear weapons outside its territory; — not to conduct military exercises with the development of scenarios for the use of nuclear weapons and not to prepare the military of non-nuclear countries to use nuclear weapons; — The United States undertakes to exclude further expansion of NATO to the east and to refuse admission to the alliance of post-Soviet countries; — The United States undertakes not to create military bases in post-Soviet countries, not to use their military infrastructure and not to develop military cooperation with them.
    3
  275. 3
  276. 3
  277. 3
  278. 3
  279. 3
  280. 3
  281. 3
  282. 3
  283. 3
  284. 3
  285. 3
  286. 3
  287. 3
  288. 3
  289. 3
  290. 3
  291. 3
  292. 3
  293. 3
  294. 3
  295. 3
  296. 3
  297. 3
  298. 3
  299. 3
  300. 3
  301. 3
  302. 3
  303. 3
  304. 3
  305. 3
  306. 3
  307. 3
  308. 3
  309. 3
  310. 3
  311. 3
  312. 3
  313. 3
  314. 3
  315. 3
  316. 3
  317. 3
  318. 3
  319. 3
  320. 3
  321. 3
  322. 3
  323. 3
  324. 3
  325. ❗The Minsk agreements were the only guarantee of preserving the territorial integrity of Ukraine. However, Ukraine did not want to fulfill them THE MINSK AGREEMENTS 1. Immediate and comprehensive ceasefire in certain areas of Donetsk and Luhansk regions of Ukraine and its strict implementation starting at 00:00. (Kiev time) on February 15, 2015. 2. Withdrawal of all heavy weapons by both sides at equal distances in order to create a security zone at least 50 km wide from each other for artillery systems with a caliber of 100 mm or more, a security zone 70 km wide for MLRS and 140 km wide for MLRS Tornado-S, Uragan, Smerch and tactical Tochka U missile systems: 3. Ensure effective monitoring and verification of the ceasefire and withdrawal of heavy weapons by the OSCE from the first day of withdrawal using all necessary technical means, including satellites, UAVs, radar systems, etc. ❗4. On the first day after the recusal, start a dialogue on the modalities of holding local elections in accordance with Ukrainian legislation and the Law of Ukraine "On the Temporary procedure of Local Self-Government in certain areas of Donetsk and Luhansk regions", as well as on the future regime of these areas on the basis of this law. 5. Ensure pardon and amnesty by enacting a law prohibiting the prosecution and punishment of individuals in connection with events that took place in certain areas of Donetsk and Luhansk regions of Ukraine. 6. Ensure the release and exchange of all hostages and illegally detained persons on the basis of the "all for all" principle. This process must be completed no later than the fifth day after the withdrawal. 7. To ensure safe access, delivery, storage and distribution of humanitarian aid to those in need on the basis of an international mechanism. 8. Determining the modalities for the full restoration of socio-economic ties, including such social transfers as the payment of pensions and other payments (receipts and incomes, timely payment of all utility bills, resumption of taxation within the legal framework of Ukraine). 9. Restoration of full control over the state border by the Government of Ukraine in the entire conflict zone, which should begin on the first day after the local elections and end after a comprehensive political settlement (local elections in certain areas of Donetsk and Luhansk regions based on the law of Ukraine and constitutional reform) by the end of 2015 10. Withdrawal of all foreign armed formations, military equipment, and mercenaries from the territory of Ukraine under OSCE supervision. The disarmament of all illegal groups. 11. Carrying out constitutional reform in Ukraine with the entry into force by the end of 2015 of a new constitution, which assumes decentralization as a key element (taking into account the specifics of certain districts of Donetsk and Luhansk regions, agreed with representatives of these regions), as well as the adoption of permanent legislation on the special status of certain districts of Donetsk and Lugansk regions by the end of 2015. 12. Based on the Law of Ukraine "On the Temporary procedure of local Self-government in certain areas of Donetsk and Luhansk regions", issues related to local elections will be discussed and coordinated with representatives of certain areas of Donetsk and Luhansk regions within the framework of the trilateral contact group. The elections will be conducted in compliance with relevant OSCE standards, with monitoring by the OSCE/ODIHR. 13. To intensify the activities of the trilateral contact group, including through the establishment of working groups on the implementation of relevant aspects of the Minsk agreements. They will reflect the composition of the trilateral contact group. Note. Such measures, in accordance with the law "On the Special Procedure for Local Self-Government in Certain Areas of Donetsk and Luhansk regions," include the following:: - exemption from punishment, persecution and discrimination of persons related to the events that took place in certain areas of Donetsk and Luhansk regions; - The right to linguistic self-determination; - participation of local self-government bodies in the appointment of heads of prosecutor's offices and courts in certain areas of Donetsk and Luhansk regions; - an opportunity for central executive authorities to conclude agreements with relevant local governments on the economic, social and cultural development of certain areas of Donetsk and Luhansk regions; - The state supports the socio-economic development of certain areas of Donetsk and Luhansk regions; - assistance from central authorities in cross-border cooperation in certain areas of Donetsk and Luhansk regions with regions of the Russian Federation; - creation of people's militia units by decision of local councils in order to maintain public order in certain areas of Donetsk and Luhansk regions; - the powers of deputies of local councils and officials elected in early elections appointed by the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine by this law may not be terminated prematurely. Participants of the Trilateral Contact Group: Ambassador Heidi Tagliavini The Second President of Ukraine, Leonid Kuchma Ambassador of the Russian Federation to Ukraine M.Y. Zurabov A.V. Zakharchenko – Head of the Donetsk People's Republic I.V. Plotnitsky – Head of the Lugansk People's Republic
    3
  326. 3
  327. 3
  328. 3
  329. 3
  330. 3
  331. 3
  332. 3
  333. 3
  334. 3
  335. 3
  336. 3
  337. 3
  338. 3
  339. 3
  340. 3
  341. 3
  342. 3
  343. 3
  344. 3
  345. 3
  346. 3
  347. 3
  348. 3
  349. 3
  350. 3
  351. 3
  352. 3
  353. 3
  354. 3
  355. 3
  356. 3
  357. 3
  358. 3
  359. 3
  360. 3
  361. 3
  362. The UN Charter, in Articles 106 and 107, gives the right to the winners of the Second World War - the USSR, the USA, Great Britain and China - to apply all measures against the countries that fought against them to prevent actions aimed at revising the results of the Second World War. In particular, it is possible to use military force against these countries. To do this, it is enough to notify the other three winning countries, but not to get their consent. Forceful coercion of countries that want to revise the Yalta-Potsdam system in Europe can also be carried out by Russia, which is the legal successor of the USSR. Russia can stop attempts to revive Nazism in Germany, Hungary, Romania, Austria, Bulgaria, Finland, Croatia, Slovenia, Czech Republic, Slovakia, Italy, Spain, Norway, Denmark, Holland, Japan. Articles 106 and 107 of the UN Charter also apply to all those countries that refuse to inherit from the USSR – Latvia, Estonia, Lithuania. Their attitude that there was a Soviet occupation and the treaties of Friendship and cooperation concluded by them with the Third Reich move these countries into the ranks of the Hitlerite coalition. The same position is taken by modern Ukraine, which accepts as its predecessor the military-political formations of the OUN-UPA, created by Ukrainian fascists. Proves that all these post-Soviet republics belong to the Hitlerite coalition. Hence the possibility of revising the territorial acquisitions of countries that position themselves as supporters of the Hitlerite coalition. Plus SPONSORS OF the Nazi regimes (USA and Britain)
    3
  363. 3
  364. 3
  365. 3
  366. 3
  367. 3
  368. 3
  369. 3
  370. 3
  371. 3
  372. 3
  373. 3
  374. 3
  375. 3
  376. 3
  377. 3
  378. 3
  379. 3
  380. 3
  381. 3
  382. 3
  383. 3
  384. 3
  385. 3
  386. 3
  387. 3
  388. 3
  389. 3
  390. 3
  391. 3
  392. 3
  393. 3
  394. 3
  395. 3
  396. 3
  397. 3
  398. 3
  399. 3
  400. 3
  401. 3
  402. 3
  403. 3
  404. 3
  405. 3
  406. 3
  407. 3
  408. 3
  409. 3
  410. 3
  411. 3
  412. 3
  413. The UN Charter, in Articles 106 and 107, gives the right to the winners of the Second World War - the USSR, the USA, Great Britain and China - to apply all measures against the countries that fought against them to prevent actions aimed at revising the results of the Second World War. In particular, it is possible to use military force against these countries. To do this, it is enough to notify the other three winning countries, but not to get their consent. Forceful coercion of countries that want to revise the Yalta-Potsdam system in Europe can also be carried out by Russia, which is the legal successor of the USSR. Russia can stop attempts to revive Nazism in Germany, Hungary, Romania, Austria, Bulgaria, Finland, Croatia, Slovenia, Czech Republic, Slovakia, Italy, Spain, Norway, Denmark, Holland, Japan. Articles 106 and 107 of the UN Charter also apply to all those countries that refuse to inherit from the USSR – Latvia, Estonia, Lithuania. Their attitude that there was a Soviet occupation and the treaties of Friendship and cooperation concluded by them with the Third Reich move these countries into the ranks of the Hitlerite coalition. The same position is taken by modern Ukraine, which accepts as its predecessor the military-political formations of the OUN-UPA, created by Ukrainian fascists. Proves that all these post-Soviet republics belong to the Hitlerite coalition. Hence the possibility of revising the territorial acquisitions of countries that position themselves as supporters of the Hitlerite coalition. Plus SPONSORS OF the Nazi regimes (USA and Britain)
    3
  414. 3
  415. 3
  416. 3
  417. 3
  418. 3
  419. 3
  420. 3
  421. 3
  422. 3
  423. 3
  424. 3
  425. 2
  426. 2
  427. 2
  428. 2
  429. 2
  430. 2
  431. 2
  432. 2
  433. 2
  434. 2
  435. 2
  436. 2
  437. 2
  438. 2
  439. 2
  440. The UN Charter, in Articles 106 and 107, gives the right to the winners of the Second World War - the USSR, the USA, Great Britain and China - to apply all measures against the countries that fought against them to prevent actions aimed at revising the results of the Second World War. In particular, it is possible to use military force against these countries. To do this, it is enough to notify the other three winning countries, but not to get their consent. Forceful coercion of countries that want to revise the Yalta-Potsdam system in Europe can also be carried out by Russia, which is the legal successor of the USSR. Russia can stop attempts to revive Nazism in Germany, Hungary, Romania, Austria, Bulgaria, Finland, Croatia, Slovenia, Czech Republic, Slovakia, Italy, Spain, Norway, Denmark, Holland, Japan. Articles 106 and 107 of the UN Charter also apply to all those countries that refuse to inherit from the USSR – Latvia, Estonia, Lithuania. Their attitude that there was a Soviet occupation and the treaties of Friendship and cooperation concluded by them with the Third Reich move these countries into the ranks of the Hitlerite coalition. The same position is taken by modern Ukraine, which accepts as its predecessor the military-political formations of the OUN-UPA, created by Ukrainian fascists. Proves that all these post-Soviet republics belong to the Hitlerite coalition. Hence the possibility of revising the territorial acquisitions of countries that position themselves as supporters of the Hitlerite coalition. Plus SPONSORS OF the Nazi regimes (USA and Britain)
    2
  441. 2
  442. 2
  443. 2
  444. 2
  445. 2
  446. 2
  447. 2
  448. 2
  449. 2
  450. 2
  451. 2
  452. 2
  453. 2
  454. 2
  455. 2
  456. 2
  457. 2
  458. 2
  459. 2
  460. 2
  461. 2
  462. 2
  463. 2
  464. 2
  465. 2
  466. 2
  467. 2
  468. 2
  469. 2
  470. 2
  471. 2
  472. 2
  473. 2
  474. 2
  475. 2
  476. 2
  477. 2
  478. 2
  479. 2
  480. 2
  481. 2
  482. 2
  483. 2
  484. 2
  485. 2
  486. 2
  487. 2
  488. 2
  489. 2
  490. 2
  491. 2
  492. 2
  493. 2
  494. 2
  495. 2
  496. 2
  497. 2
  498. 2
  499. 2
  500. 2
  501. 2
  502. 2
  503. 2
  504. 2
  505. 2
  506. 2
  507. 2
  508. 2
  509. 2
  510. 2
  511. 2
  512. 2
  513. 2
  514. 2
  515. 2
  516. 2
  517. 2
  518. 2
  519. 2
  520. 2
  521. 2
  522. 2
  523. 2
  524. 2
  525. 2
  526. 2
  527. 2
  528. 2
  529. 2
  530. 2
  531. 2
  532. 2
  533. 2
  534. 2
  535. 2
  536. 2
  537. 2
  538. 2
  539. 2
  540. 2
  541. 2
  542. 2
  543. 2
  544. 2
  545. 2
  546. 2
  547. 2
  548. 2
  549. 2
  550. 2
  551. 2
  552. 2
  553. 2
  554. 2
  555. 2
  556. 2
  557. 2
  558. 2
  559. 2
  560. 2
  561. 2
  562. 2
  563. 2
  564. 2
  565. 2
  566. 2
  567. 2
  568. 2
  569. 2
  570. 2
  571. Requirements of the Russian Federation to the United States and NATO on security guarantees (December 2021) The demands were ignored. As a result, they will be carried out at the cost of millions of lives, the destruction of an entire state, riots and economic collapse in Europe ❗Draft agreements of Russia with NATO and the United States on security guarantees. The main provisions of the first document: — exclude the further expansion of NATO and the accession of Ukraine to the alliance; — not to deploy additional military and weapons outside the countries where they were in May 1997 (before joining the alliance of Eastern European countries) – except in exceptional cases with the consent of Russia and NATO members; — to abandon any NATO military activity in Ukraine, Eastern Europe, Transcaucasia, and Central Asia; — do not deploy medium-range and shorter-range missiles where they can hit the territory of the other side; — not to conduct exercises and other actions with a strength of more than a brigade in the agreed border zone, regularly exchange information about military exercises; — to confirm that the parties do not consider each other as opponents, to consolidate the agreement to resolve all disputes peacefully and to refrain from the use of force; — to give an obligation not to create conditions that can be regarded as a threat by the other party; — Create hotlines for emergency contacts. ❗The main provisions of the second document are: — not to deploy weapons and forces in areas where it will be perceived by the other side as a threat to national security; — refrain from flying heavy bombers in nuclear and non-nuclear equipment outside their skies, from where they can hit targets on the territory of the other side; — to refrain from the presence of warships in areas outside national waters, from where they can hit targets on the territory of the other side; — not to deploy medium-range and shorter-range missiles abroad and in areas from where they can hit targets on the territory of the other side; — not to deploy nuclear weapons abroad and return those already deployed, as well as eliminate the infrastructure for the deployment of nuclear weapons outside its territory; — not to conduct military exercises with the development of scenarios for the use of nuclear weapons and not to prepare the military of non-nuclear countries to use nuclear weapons; — The United States undertakes to exclude further expansion of NATO to the east and to refuse admission to the alliance of post-Soviet countries; — The United States undertakes not to create military bases in post-Soviet countries, not to use their military infrastructure and not to develop military cooperation with them
    2
  572. 2
  573. 2
  574. 2
  575. 2
  576. 2
  577. 2
  578. 2
  579. 2
  580. 2
  581. 2
  582. 2
  583. 2
  584. 2
  585. 2
  586. 2
  587. 2
  588. 2
  589. 2
  590. 2
  591. 2
  592. 2
  593. 2
  594. 2
  595. 2
  596. 2
  597. 2
  598. 2
  599. 2
  600. 2
  601. 2
  602. 2
  603. 2
  604. 2
  605. 2
  606. 2
  607. 2
  608. 2
  609. 2
  610. 2
  611. 2
  612. 2
  613. 2
  614. 2
  615. 2
  616. 2
  617. 2
  618. 2
  619. 2
  620. 2
  621. 2
  622. 2
  623. 2
  624. 2
  625. 2
  626. 2
  627. 2
  628. 2
  629. 2
  630. 2
  631. 2
  632. 2
  633. 2
  634. 2
  635. 2
  636. 2
  637. 2
  638. 2
  639. 2
  640. 2
  641. 2
  642. 2
  643. 2
  644. 2
  645. 2
  646. 2
  647. 2
  648. 2
  649. 2
  650. 2
  651. 2
  652. 2
  653. 2
  654. 2
  655. 2
  656. 2
  657. 2
  658. 2
  659. 2
  660. 2
  661. 2
  662. 2
  663. 2
  664. 2
  665. 2
  666. 2
  667. 2
  668. 2
  669.  @pilky_boooi  THE MINSK AGREEMENTS 1. Immediate and comprehensive ceasefire in certain areas of the Donetsk and Luhansk regions of Ukraine and its strict implementation starting at 00:00. (Kiev time) February 15, 2015. 2. Withdrawal of all heavy weapons by both sides at equal distances in order to create a security zone at least 50 km wide from each other for artillery systems with a caliber of 100 mm or more, a security zone 70 km wide for MLRS and 140 km wide for MLRS Tornado-S, Hurricane, Tornado and tactical Tochka U missile systems: 3. Ensure effective monitoring and verification of the ceasefire and withdrawal of heavy weapons by the OSCE from the first day of withdrawal using all necessary technical means, including satellites, UAVs, radar systems, etc. 4. On the first day after the withdrawal, to begin a dialogue on the modalities of holding local elections in accordance with Ukrainian legislation and the law of Ukraine "On the Temporary order of Local Self-Government in certain areas of Donetsk and Luhansk regions", as well as on the future regime of these areas on the basis of this law. 5. To ensure pardon and amnesty by enacting a law prohibiting the prosecution and punishment of persons in connection with events that took place in certain areas of Donetsk and Luhansk regions of Ukraine. 6. Ensure the release and exchange of all hostages and illegally detained persons on the basis of the principle of "all for all". This process must be completed no later than the fifth day after the withdrawal. 7. To ensure safe access, delivery, storage and distribution of humanitarian aid to those in need on the basis of an international mechanism. 8. Determination of modalities for the full restoration of socio-economic ties, including such social transfers as payment of pensions and other payments (income and income, timely payment of all utility bills, resumption of taxation within the legal framework of Ukraine). 9. Restoration of full control over the state border by the Government of Ukraine in the entire conflict zone, which should begin on the first day after local elections and end after a comprehensive political settlement (local elections in certain areas of Donetsk and Luhansk regions on the basis of the law of Ukraine and constitutional reform) by the end of 2015 10. Withdrawal of all foreign armed formations, military equipment, as well as mercenaries from the territory of Ukraine under the supervision of the OSCE. The disarmament of all illegal groups. 11. Carrying out constitutional reform in Ukraine with the entry into force by the end of 2015 of the new constitution, which assumes decentralization as a key element (taking into account the peculiarities of certain districts of Donetsk and Luhansk regions, agreed with representatives of these regions), as well as the adoption of permanent legislation on the special status of certain districts of Donetsk and Luhansk regions by the end of 2015. 12. On the basis of the Law of Ukraine "On the Temporary Order of Local Self-Government in certain areas of Donetsk and Luhansk regions", issues related to local elections will be discussed and coordinated with representatives of certain areas of Donetsk and Luhansk regions within the framework of the trilateral contact group. The elections will be held in compliance with the relevant OSCE standards, with monitoring by the OSCE ODIHR. 13. To intensify the activities of the trilateral contact group, including through the creation of working groups on the implementation of relevant aspects of the Minsk agreements. They will reflect the composition of the trilateral contact group. Note. Such measures in accordance with the law "On the special procedure of local self-government in certain areas of Donetsk and Luhansk regions" include the following: - exemption from punishment, persecution and discrimination of persons related to the events that took place in certain areas of Donetsk and Luhansk regions; - The right to linguistic self-determination; - participation of local self-government bodies in the appointment of heads of prosecutor's offices and courts in certain districts of Donetsk and Luhansk regions; - an opportunity for the central executive authorities to conclude agreements with the relevant local government bodies on the economic, social and cultural development of certain districts of Donetsk and Luhansk regions; - the state supports the socio-economic development of certain districts of Donetsk and Luhansk regions; - assistance from the central authorities to cross-border cooperation in certain areas of Donetsk and Luhansk regions with the regions of the Russian Federation; - creation of people's militia detachments by decision of local councils in order to maintain public order in certain areas of Donetsk and Luhansk regions; - the powers of deputies of local councils and officials elected in early elections appointed by the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine by this law cannot be terminated prematurely. Participants of the Trilateral Contact Group: Ambassador Heidi Tagliavini The Second President of Ukraine L.D. Kuchma Ambassador of the Russian Federation to Ukraine M.Y. Zurabov A.V. Zakharchenko – Head of the Donetsk People's Republic I.V. Plotnitsky – Head of the Luhansk People's Republic
    2
  670. 2
  671. 2
  672. 2
  673. 2
  674. 2
  675. 2
  676. 2
  677. 2
  678. 2
  679. 2
  680. 2
  681. 2
  682. 2
  683. 2
  684. 2
  685. 2
  686. 2
  687. 2
  688. 2
  689. 2
  690. 2
  691. 2
  692. Requirements of the Russian Federation to the United States and NATO on security guarantees (December 2021) The demands were ignored. As a result, these demands will be fulfilled at the cost of millions of lives, the destruction of an entire state, riots and economic collapse in Europe Draft agreements between Russia, NATO and the United States on security guarantees. The main provisions of the first document: — exclude the further expansion of NATO and the accession of Ukraine to the alliance; — not to deploy additional military and weapons outside the countries where they were in May 1997 (before joining the alliance of Eastern European countries) – except in exceptional cases with the consent of Russia and NATO members; — to abandon any NATO military activity in Ukraine, Eastern Europe, Transcaucasia, and Central Asia; — do not deploy medium-range and shorter-range missiles where they can hit the territory of the other side; — not to conduct exercises and other actions with a strength of more than a brigade in the agreed border zone, regularly exchange information about military exercises; — to confirm that the parties do not consider each other as opponents, to consolidate the agreement to resolve all disputes peacefully and to refrain from the use of force; — to give an obligation not to create conditions that can be regarded as a threat by the other party; — Create hotlines for emergency contacts. The main provisions of the second document are: — not to deploy weapons and forces in areas where it will be perceived by the other side as a threat to national security; — refrain from flying heavy bombers in nuclear and non-nuclear equipment outside their skies, from where they can hit targets on the territory of the other side; — refrain from the presence of warships in areas outside national waters, from where they can hit targets on the territory of the other side; — not to deploy medium-range and shorter-range missiles abroad and in areas from where they can hit targets on the territory of the other side; — not to deploy nuclear weapons abroad and return those already deployed, as well as eliminate the infrastructure for the deployment of nuclear weapons outside its territory; — not to conduct military exercises with the development of scenarios for the use of nuclear weapons and not to prepare the military of non-nuclear countries to use nuclear weapons; — The United States undertakes to exclude further expansion of NATO to the east and to refuse admission to the alliance of post-Soviet countries; — The United States undertakes not to create military bases in post-Soviet countries, not to use their military infrastructure and not to develop military cooperation with them
    2
  693. 2
  694. 2
  695. 2
  696. 2
  697. 2
  698. 2
  699. 2
  700. 2
  701. 2
  702. 2
  703. 2
  704. 2
  705. 2
  706. 2
  707. 2
  708. 2
  709. 2
  710. 2
  711. 2
  712. 2
  713. 2
  714. 2
  715. 2
  716. 2
  717. 2
  718. 2
  719. 2
  720. 2
  721. 2
  722. 2
  723. 2
  724. 2
  725. 2
  726. 2
  727. 2
  728. 2
  729. 2
  730. 2
  731. 2
  732. 2
  733. 2
  734. 2
  735. 2
  736. 2
  737. 2
  738. 2
  739. 2
  740. 2
  741. 2
  742. 2
  743. 2
  744. 2
  745. 2
  746. 2
  747. 2
  748. 2
  749. 2
  750. 2
  751. 2
  752. 2
  753. 2
  754. 2
  755. 2
  756. 2
  757. 2
  758. 2
  759. 2
  760. 2
  761. 2
  762. 2
  763. 2
  764. 2
  765. 2
  766. 2
  767. 2
  768. 2
  769. 2
  770. 2
  771. 2
  772. 2
  773. 2
  774. 2
  775. 2
  776. 2
  777. 2
  778. 2
  779. 2
  780. 2
  781. 2
  782. 2
  783. 2
  784. 2
  785. 2
  786. 2
  787. 2
  788. 2
  789. 2
  790. 2
  791. 2
  792. 2
  793. 2
  794. 2
  795. 2
  796. 2
  797. 2
  798. 2
  799. 2
  800. 2
  801. 2
  802. 2
  803. 2
  804. 2
  805. 2
  806. 2
  807. 2
  808. 2
  809. 2
  810. 2
  811. 2
  812. 2
  813. 2
  814. 2
  815. 2
  816. 2
  817. 2
  818. 2
  819. 2
  820. 2
  821. 2
  822. 2
  823. 2
  824. 2
  825. 2
  826. 2
  827. 2
  828. 2
  829. 2
  830. 2
  831. 2
  832. 2
  833. 2
  834. 2
  835. 2
  836. 2
  837. 2
  838. 2
  839. 2
  840. 2
  841. 2
  842. 2
  843. 2
  844. 2
  845. 2
  846. 2
  847. 2
  848. 2
  849. 2
  850. 2
  851. 2
  852. 2
  853. 2
  854. 2
  855. 2
  856. 2
  857. 2
  858. 2
  859. 2
  860. 2
  861. 2
  862. 2
  863. 2
  864. 2
  865. 2
  866. 2
  867. 2
  868. 2
  869. 2
  870. 2
  871. 2
  872. 2
  873. 2
  874. 2
  875. 2
  876. 2
  877. 2
  878. 2
  879. 2
  880. 2
  881. 2
  882. 2
  883. 2
  884. 2
  885. 2
  886. 2
  887. 2
  888. 2
  889. 2
  890. 2
  891. 2
  892. 2
  893. 2
  894. 2
  895. 2
  896. 2
  897. 2
  898. 2
  899. 2
  900. 2
  901. 2
  902. 2
  903. 2
  904. 2
  905. 2
  906. 2
  907. 2
  908. 2
  909. 2
  910. 2
  911. 2
  912. 2
  913. 2
  914. 2
  915. 2
  916. 2
  917. 2
  918. 2
  919. 2
  920. 2
  921. 2
  922. 2
  923. 2
  924. 2
  925. 2
  926. 2
  927. 2
  928. 2
  929. 2
  930. 2
  931. 2
  932. 2
  933. 2
  934. 2
  935. 2
  936. 2
  937. 2
  938. 2
  939. 2
  940. 2
  941. 2
  942. 2
  943. 2
  944. 2
  945. 2
  946. 2
  947. 2
  948. 2
  949. 2
  950. 2
  951. 2
  952. 2
  953. 2
  954. 2
  955. 2
  956. 2
  957. 2
  958. 2
  959. 2
  960. 2
  961. 2
  962. 2
  963. 2
  964. 2
  965.  @jesan733  The real essence of the Minsk Agreements are Paragraphs 4-13. It will be useful to read carefully. THE MINSK AGREEMENTS 1. Immediate and comprehensive ceasefire in certain areas of Donetsk and Luhansk regions of Ukraine and its strict implementation starting at 00:00. (Kiev time) on February 15, 2015. 2. Withdrawal of all heavy weapons by both sides at equal distances in order to create a security zone at least 50 km wide from each other for artillery systems with a caliber of 100 mm or more, a security zone 70 km wide for MLRS and 140 km wide for MLRS Tornado-S, Uragan, Smerch and tactical Tochka U missile systems: 3. Ensure effective monitoring and verification of the ceasefire and withdrawal of heavy weapons by the OSCE from the first day of withdrawal using all necessary technical means, including satellites, UAVs, radar systems, etc. ❗4. On the first day after the recusal, start a dialogue on the modalities of holding local elections in accordance with Ukrainian legislation and the Law of Ukraine "On the Temporary procedure of Local Self-Government in certain areas of Donetsk and Luhansk regions", as well as on the future regime of these areas on the basis of this law. 5. Ensure pardon and amnesty by enacting a law prohibiting the prosecution and punishment of individuals in connection with events that took place in certain areas of Donetsk and Luhansk regions of Ukraine. 6. Ensure the release and exchange of all hostages and illegally detained persons on the basis of the "all for all" principle. This process must be completed no later than the fifth day after the withdrawal. 7. To ensure safe access, delivery, storage and distribution of humanitarian aid to those in need on the basis of an international mechanism. 8. Determining the modalities for the full restoration of socio-economic ties, including such social transfers as the payment of pensions and other payments (receipts and incomes, timely payment of all utility bills, resumption of taxation within the legal framework of Ukraine). 9. Restoration of full control over the state border by the Government of Ukraine in the entire conflict zone, which should begin on the first day after the local elections and end after a comprehensive political settlement (local elections in certain areas of Donetsk and Luhansk regions based on the law of Ukraine and constitutional reform) by the end of 2015 10. Withdrawal of all foreign armed formations, military equipment, and mercenaries from the territory of Ukraine under OSCE supervision. The disarmament of all illegal groups. 11. Carrying out constitutional reform in Ukraine with the entry into force by the end of 2015 of a new constitution, which assumes decentralization as a key element (taking into account the specifics of certain districts of Donetsk and Luhansk regions, agreed with representatives of these regions), as well as the adoption of permanent legislation on the special status of certain districts of Donetsk and Lugansk regions by the end of 2015. 12. Based on the Law of Ukraine "On the Temporary procedure of local Self-government in certain areas of Donetsk and Luhansk regions", issues related to local elections will be discussed and coordinated with representatives of certain areas of Donetsk and Luhansk regions within the framework of the trilateral contact group. The elections will be conducted in compliance with relevant OSCE standards, with monitoring by the OSCE/ODIHR. 13. To intensify the activities of the trilateral contact group, including through the establishment of working groups on the implementation of relevant aspects of the Minsk agreements. They will reflect the composition of the trilateral contact group. Note. Such measures, in accordance with the law "On the Special Procedure for Local Self-Government in Certain Areas of Donetsk and Luhansk regions," include the following:: - exemption from punishment, persecution and discrimination of persons related to the events that took place in certain areas of Donetsk and Luhansk regions; - The right to linguistic self-determination; - participation of local self-government bodies in the appointment of heads of prosecutor's offices and courts in certain areas of Donetsk and Luhansk regions; - an opportunity for central executive authorities to conclude agreements with relevant local governments on the economic, social and cultural development of certain areas of Donetsk and Luhansk regions; - The state supports the socio-economic development of certain areas of Donetsk and Luhansk regions; - assistance from central authorities in cross-border cooperation in certain areas of Donetsk and Luhansk regions with regions of the Russian Federation; - creation of people's militia units by decision of local councils in order to maintain public order in certain areas of Donetsk and Luhansk regions; - the powers of deputies of local councils and officials elected in early elections appointed by the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine by this law may not be terminated prematurely. Participants of the Trilateral Contact Group: Ambassador Heidi Tagliavini The Second President of Ukraine, Leonid Kuchma Ambassador of the Russian Federation to Ukraine M.Y. Zurabov A.V. Zakharchenko – Head of the Donetsk People's Republic I.V. Plotnitsky – Head of the Lugansk People's Republic
    2
  966. 2
  967. 2
  968. 2
  969. 2
  970. 2
  971. 2
  972. 2
  973. 2
  974. 2
  975. 2
  976. 2
  977. 2
  978. 2
  979. 2
  980. 2
  981. 2
  982. 2
  983. 2
  984. 2
  985. 2
  986. 2
  987. 2
  988. 2
  989. 2
  990. 2
  991. 2
  992. 2
  993. 2
  994. 2
  995. 2
  996. 2
  997. 2
  998. 2
  999. 2
  1000. 2
  1001. 2
  1002. 2
  1003. 2
  1004. 2
  1005. 2
  1006. 2
  1007. 2
  1008. 2
  1009. 2
  1010. 2
  1011. 2
  1012. 2
  1013. 2
  1014. 2
  1015. 2
  1016. 2
  1017. 2
  1018. 2
  1019. 2
  1020. 2
  1021. 2
  1022. 2
  1023. 2
  1024. 2
  1025. 2
  1026. 2
  1027. 2
  1028. 2
  1029. 2
  1030. 2
  1031. 2
  1032. 2
  1033. 2
  1034. 2
  1035. 2
  1036. 2
  1037. 2
  1038. 2
  1039. 2
  1040. 2
  1041. 2
  1042. 2
  1043. 2
  1044. 2
  1045. 2
  1046. 2
  1047. 2
  1048. 2
  1049. 2
  1050. 2
  1051. 2
  1052. 2
  1053. 2
  1054. 2
  1055. 2
  1056. 2
  1057. 2
  1058. 2
  1059. 2
  1060. Requirements of the Russian Federation to the United States and NATO on security guarantees (December 2021) The demands were ignored. As a result, these demands will be met at the cost of millions of lives, the destruction of an entire state, riots and economic collapse in Europe ❗Draft agreements between Russia, NATO and the United States on security guarantees. The main provisions of the first document: — exclude further expansion of NATO and Ukraine's accession to the alliance; — not to deploy additional military and weapons outside the countries where they were in May 1997 (before joining the alliance of Eastern European countries) – except in exceptional cases with the consent of Russia and NATO members; — to abandon any NATO military activity in Ukraine, Eastern Europe, Transcaucasia, and Central Asia; — do not deploy medium-range and shorter-range missiles where they can hit the territory of the other side; — not to conduct exercises and other actions with a strength of more than a brigade in the agreed border zone, regularly exchange information about military exercises; — to confirm that the parties do not consider each other as opponents, to consolidate the agreement to resolve all disputes peacefully and to refrain from the use of force; — to give an obligation not to create conditions that can be regarded as a threat by the other party; — Create hotlines for emergency contacts. ❗The main provisions of the second document are: — not to deploy weapons and forces in areas where it will be perceived by the other side as a threat to national security; — refrain from flying heavy bombers in nuclear and non-nuclear equipment outside their skies, from where they can hit targets on the territory of the other side; — to refrain from the presence of warships in areas outside national waters, from where they can hit targets on the territory of the other side; — not to deploy medium-range and shorter-range missiles abroad and in areas from where they can hit targets on the territory of the other side; — not to deploy nuclear weapons abroad and return those already deployed, as well as eliminate the infrastructure for the deployment of nuclear weapons outside its territory; — not to conduct military exercises with the development of scenarios for the use of nuclear weapons and not to prepare the military of non-nuclear countries to use nuclear weapons; — The United States undertakes to exclude further expansion of NATO to the east and to refuse admission to the alliance of post-Soviet countries; — The United States undertakes not to create military bases in post-Soviet countries, not to use their military infrastructure and not to develop military cooperation with them
    2
  1061. 2
  1062. 2
  1063. 2
  1064. 2
  1065. 2
  1066. 2
  1067. 2
  1068. 2
  1069. 2
  1070. 2
  1071. 2
  1072. 2
  1073. 2
  1074. 2
  1075. 2
  1076. 2
  1077. 2
  1078. 2
  1079. 2
  1080. 2
  1081. 2
  1082. 2
  1083. 2
  1084. 2
  1085. 2
  1086. 2
  1087. 2
  1088. 2
  1089. 2
  1090. 2
  1091. 2
  1092. 2
  1093. 2
  1094. 2
  1095. 2
  1096. 2
  1097. 2
  1098. 2
  1099. 2
  1100. 2
  1101. 2
  1102. 2
  1103. 2
  1104. 2
  1105. 2
  1106. 2
  1107. 2
  1108. 2
  1109. 2
  1110. 2
  1111. 2
  1112. 2
  1113. 2
  1114. 2
  1115. 2
  1116. 2
  1117. 2
  1118. 2
  1119. 2
  1120. 2
  1121. 2
  1122. 2
  1123. 2
  1124. 2
  1125. 2
  1126. 2
  1127. 2
  1128. 2
  1129. 2
  1130. 2
  1131. 2
  1132. 2
  1133. 2
  1134. 2
  1135. 2
  1136. 2
  1137. 2
  1138. 2
  1139. 2
  1140. 2
  1141. 2
  1142. 2
  1143. 2
  1144. 2
  1145. 2
  1146. 2
  1147. 2
  1148. 2
  1149. 2
  1150. 2
  1151. 2
  1152. 2
  1153. 2
  1154. 2
  1155. 2
  1156. 2
  1157. 2
  1158. 2
  1159. 2
  1160. 2
  1161. 2
  1162. 2
  1163. 2
  1164. 2
  1165. 2
  1166. 2
  1167. 2
  1168. 2
  1169. 2
  1170. 2
  1171. 2
  1172. 2
  1173. 2
  1174. 2
  1175. 2
  1176. 2
  1177. 2
  1178. 2
  1179. 2
  1180. 2
  1181. 2
  1182. 2
  1183. 2
  1184. 2
  1185. 2
  1186. 2
  1187. 2
  1188. 2
  1189. 2
  1190. 2
  1191. 2
  1192. 2
  1193. 2
  1194. 2
  1195. 2
  1196. 2
  1197. 2
  1198. 2
  1199. 2
  1200. 2
  1201. 2
  1202. 2
  1203. 2
  1204. 2
  1205. 2
  1206. 2
  1207. 2
  1208. 2
  1209. 2
  1210. 2
  1211. 2
  1212. 2
  1213. 2
  1214. 2
  1215. 2
  1216. 2
  1217. 2
  1218. 2
  1219. 2
  1220. 2
  1221. 2
  1222. 2
  1223. 2
  1224. 2
  1225. 2
  1226. 2
  1227. 2
  1228. 2
  1229. 2
  1230. 2
  1231. 2
  1232. 2
  1233. 2
  1234. 2
  1235. 2
  1236. 2
  1237. 2
  1238. 2
  1239. 2
  1240. 2
  1241. 2
  1242. 2
  1243. 2
  1244. 2
  1245. 2
  1246. 2
  1247. 2
  1248. 2
  1249. 2
  1250. 2
  1251. 2
  1252. 2
  1253. 2
  1254. 2
  1255. 2
  1256. 2
  1257. 2
  1258. 2
  1259. 2
  1260. 2
  1261. 2
  1262. 2
  1263. 2
  1264. 2
  1265. 2
  1266. 2
  1267. 2
  1268. 2
  1269. 2
  1270. 2
  1271. 2
  1272. 2
  1273. 2
  1274. 2
  1275. 2
  1276. 2
  1277. 2
  1278. 2
  1279. 2
  1280. 2
  1281. 2
  1282. 2
  1283. 2
  1284. 2
  1285. 2
  1286. 2
  1287. 2
  1288. 2
  1289. 2
  1290. 2
  1291. 2
  1292. 2
  1293. 2
  1294. 2
  1295. 2
  1296. 2
  1297. 2
  1298. 2
  1299. 2
  1300. 2
  1301. 2
  1302. 2
  1303. 2
  1304. 2
  1305. 2
  1306. 2
  1307. 2
  1308. 2
  1309. 2
  1310. 2
  1311. 2
  1312. 2
  1313. 2
  1314. 2
  1315. 2
  1316. 2
  1317. 2
  1318. 2
  1319. 2
  1320. 2
  1321. 2
  1322. 2
  1323. 2
  1324. 2
  1325. 2
  1326. 2
  1327. 2
  1328. 2
  1329. 2
  1330. 2
  1331. 2
  1332. 2
  1333. 2
  1334. 2
  1335. 2
  1336. 2
  1337. 2
  1338. 2
  1339. 2
  1340. 2
  1341. 2
  1342. 2
  1343. 2
  1344. 2
  1345. 2
  1346. 2
  1347. 2
  1348. 2
  1349. 2
  1350. 2
  1351. 2
  1352. 2
  1353. 2
  1354. 2
  1355. 2
  1356. 2
  1357. 2
  1358. 2
  1359. 2
  1360. 2
  1361. 2
  1362. 2
  1363. 2
  1364. 2
  1365. 2
  1366. 2
  1367. 2
  1368. 2
  1369. 2
  1370. 2
  1371. 2
  1372. 2
  1373.  @rayisafitzpatrick9523  "Participants of the Trilateral Contact Group" and "parties to the conflict" are somewhat different concepts. Russia's responsibilities in this case are equal to those of Ambassador Heidi Tagliavini... THE MINSK AGREEMENTS 1. Immediate and comprehensive ceasefire in certain areas of the Donetsk and Luhansk regions of Ukraine and its strict implementation starting at 00:00. (Kiev time) February 15, 2015. 2. Withdrawal of all heavy weapons by both sides at equal distances in order to create a security zone at least 50 km wide from each other for artillery systems with a caliber of 100 mm or more, a security zone 70 km wide for MLRS and 140 km wide for MLRS Tornado-S, Hurricane, Tornado and tactical Tochka U missile systems: 3. Ensure effective monitoring and verification of the ceasefire and withdrawal of heavy weapons by the OSCE from the first day of withdrawal using all necessary technical means, including satellites, UAVs, radar systems, etc. 4. On the first day after the withdrawal, start a dialogue on the modalities of holding local elections in accordance with Ukrainian legislation and the law of Ukraine "On the Temporary Order of Local Self-Government in certain areas of Donetsk and Luhansk regions", as well as on the future regime of these areas on the basis of this law. 5. To ensure pardon and amnesty by enacting a law prohibiting the prosecution and punishment of persons in connection with the events that took place in certain areas of Donetsk and Luhansk regions of Ukraine. 6. Ensure the release and exchange of all hostages and illegally detained persons on the basis of the principle of "all for all". This process must be completed no later than the fifth day after the withdrawal. 7. To ensure safe access, delivery, storage and distribution of humanitarian aid to those in need on the basis of an international mechanism. 8. Determination of modalities for the full restoration of socio-economic ties, including such social transfers as payment of pensions and other payments (income and income, timely payment of all utility bills, resumption of taxation within the legal framework of Ukraine). 9. Restoration of full control over the state border by the Government of Ukraine in the entire conflict zone, which should begin on the first day after local elections and end after a comprehensive political settlement (local elections in certain areas of Donetsk and Luhansk regions on the basis of the law of Ukraine and constitutional reform) by the end of 2015 10. Withdrawal of all foreign armed formations, military equipment, as well as mercenaries from the territory of Ukraine under the supervision of the OSCE. The disarmament of all illegal groups. 11. Carrying out constitutional reform in Ukraine with the entry into force by the end of 2015 of the new constitution, which assumes decentralization as a key element (taking into account the peculiarities of certain districts of Donetsk and Luhansk regions, agreed with representatives of these regions), as well as the adoption of permanent legislation on the special status of certain districts of Donetsk and Luhansk regions by the end of 2015. 12. On the basis of the Law of Ukraine "On the Temporary Order of Local Self-Government in certain areas of Donetsk and Luhansk regions", issues related to local elections will be discussed and coordinated with representatives of certain areas of Donetsk and Luhansk regions within the framework of the trilateral contact group. The elections will be held in compliance with the relevant OSCE standards, with monitoring by the OSCE ODIHR. 13. To intensify the activities of the trilateral contact group, including through the creation of working groups on the implementation of relevant aspects of the Minsk agreements. They will reflect the composition of the trilateral contact group. Note. Such measures in accordance with the law "On the special procedure of local Self-government in certain areas of Donetsk and Luhansk regions" include the following: - exemption from punishment, persecution and discrimination of persons related to the events that took place in certain areas of Donetsk and Luhansk regions; - The right to linguistic self-determination; - participation of local self-government bodies in the appointment of heads of prosecutor's offices and courts in certain districts of Donetsk and Luhansk regions; - an opportunity for the central executive authorities to conclude agreements with the relevant local government bodies on the economic, social and cultural development of certain districts of Donetsk and Luhansk regions; - the state supports the socio-economic development of certain districts of Donetsk and Luhansk regions; - assistance from the central authorities to cross-border cooperation in certain areas of Donetsk and Luhansk regions with the regions of the Russian Federation; - creation of people's militia units by decision of local councils in order to maintain public order in certain areas of Donetsk and Luhansk regions; - the powers of deputies of local councils and officials elected in early elections appointed by the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine by this law cannot be terminated prematurely. Participants of the Trilateral Contact Group: Ambassador Heidi Tagliavini The Second President of Ukraine L.D. Kuchma Ambassador of the Russian Federation to Ukraine M.Y. Zurabov A.V. Zakharchenko – Head of the Donetsk People's Republic I.V. Plotnitsky – Head of the Luhansk People's Republic
    2
  1374. 2
  1375. 2
  1376. 2
  1377. 2
  1378. 2
  1379. 2
  1380. 2
  1381. 2
  1382. 2
  1383. 2
  1384. 2
  1385. 2
  1386. 2
  1387. 2
  1388. 2
  1389. 2
  1390. 2
  1391. 2
  1392. 2
  1393. 2
  1394. 2
  1395. 2
  1396. 2
  1397. 2
  1398. 2
  1399. 2
  1400. 2
  1401. 2
  1402. 2
  1403. 2
  1404.  @BubnHubn  The only thing required of Ukraine was to implement the Minsk agreements. According to UN Security Council Resolution S/RES/2202 (2015) THE MINSK AGREEMENTS 1. Immediate and comprehensive ceasefire in certain areas of the Donetsk and Luhansk regions of Ukraine and its strict implementation starting at 00:00. (Kiev time) February 15, 2015. 2. Withdrawal of all heavy weapons by both sides at equal distances in order to create a security zone at least 50 km wide from each other for artillery systems with a caliber of 100 mm or more, a security zone 70 km wide for MLRS and 140 km wide for MLRS Tornado-S, Hurricane, Tornado and tactical Tochka U missile systems: 3. Ensure effective monitoring and verification of the ceasefire and withdrawal of heavy weapons by the OSCE from the first day of withdrawal using all necessary technical means, including satellites, UAVs, radar systems, etc. 4. On the first day after the withdrawal, to begin a dialogue on the modalities of holding local elections in accordance with Ukrainian legislation and the law of Ukraine "On the Temporary order of Local Self-Government in certain areas of Donetsk and Luhansk regions", as well as on the future regime of these areas on the basis of this law. 5. To ensure pardon and amnesty by enacting a law prohibiting the prosecution and punishment of persons in connection with the events that took place in certain areas of Donetsk and Luhansk regions of Ukraine. 6. Ensure the release and exchange of all hostages and illegally detained persons on the basis of the principle of "all for all". This process must be completed no later than the fifth day after the withdrawal. 7. To ensure safe access, delivery, storage and distribution of humanitarian aid to those in need on the basis of an international mechanism. 8. Determination of modalities for the full restoration of socio-economic ties, including such social transfers as payment of pensions and other payments (income and income, timely payment of all utility bills, resumption of taxation within the legal framework of Ukraine). 9. Restoration of full control over the state border by the Government of Ukraine in the entire conflict zone, which should begin on the first day after local elections and end after a comprehensive political settlement (local elections in certain areas of Donetsk and Luhansk regions on the basis of the law of Ukraine and constitutional reform) by the end of 2015 10. Withdrawal of all foreign armed formations, military equipment, as well as mercenaries from the territory of Ukraine under the supervision of the OSCE. The disarmament of all illegal groups. 11. Carrying out constitutional reform in Ukraine with the entry into force by the end of 2015 of the new constitution, which assumes decentralization as a key element (taking into account the peculiarities of certain districts of Donetsk and Luhansk regions, agreed with representatives of these regions), as well as the adoption of permanent legislation on the special status of certain districts of Donetsk and Luhansk regions by the end of 2015. 12. On the basis of the Law of Ukraine "On the Temporary Order of Local Self-Government in certain areas of Donetsk and Luhansk regions", issues related to local elections will be discussed and coordinated with representatives of certain areas of Donetsk and Luhansk regions within the framework of the trilateral contact group. The elections will be held in compliance with the relevant OSCE standards, with monitoring by the OSCE ODIHR. 13. To intensify the activities of the trilateral contact group, including through the creation of working groups on the implementation of relevant aspects of the Minsk agreements. They will reflect the composition of the trilateral contact group. Note. Such measures in accordance with the law "On the special procedure of local Self-government in certain areas of Donetsk and Luhansk regions" include the following: - exemption from punishment, persecution and discrimination of persons related to the events that took place in certain areas of Donetsk and Luhansk regions; - The right to linguistic self-determination; - participation of local self-government bodies in the appointment of heads of prosecutor's offices and courts in certain districts of Donetsk and Luhansk regions; - an opportunity for the central executive authorities to conclude agreements with the relevant local self-government bodies on the economic, social and cultural development of certain districts of Donetsk and Luhansk regions; - the state supports the socio-economic development of certain districts of Donetsk and Luhansk regions; - assistance from the central authorities to cross-border cooperation in certain areas of Donetsk and Luhansk regions with the regions of the Russian Federation; - creation of people's militia detachments by decision of local councils in order to maintain public order in certain areas of Donetsk and Luhansk regions; - the powers of deputies of local councils and officials elected in early elections appointed by the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine by this law cannot be terminated prematurely. Participants of the Trilateral Contact Group: Ambassador Heidi Tagliavini The Second President of Ukraine L.D. Kuchma Ambassador of the Russian Federation to Ukraine M.Y. Zurabov A.V. Zakharchenko – Head of the Donetsk People's Republic I.V. Plotnitsky – Head of the Luhansk People's Republic
    2
  1405.  @BubnHubn  Requirements of the Russian Federation to the United States and NATO on security guarantees (December 2021) The demands were ignored. As a result, these demands will be met at the cost of millions of lives, the destruction of an entire state, riots and economic collapse in Europe Draft agreements between Russia, NATO and the United States on security guarantees. The main provisions of the first document: — exclude further expansion of NATO and Ukraine's accession to the alliance; — not to deploy additional military and weapons outside the countries where they were in May 1997 (before joining the alliance of Eastern European countries) – except in exceptional cases with the consent of Russia and NATO members; — to abandon any NATO military activity in Ukraine, Eastern Europe, Transcaucasia, and Central Asia; — do not deploy medium-range and shorter-range missiles where they can hit the territory of the other side; — not to conduct exercises and other actions with a strength of more than a brigade in the agreed border zone, regularly exchange information about military exercises; — to confirm that the parties do not consider each other as opponents, to consolidate the agreement to resolve all disputes peacefully and to refrain from the use of force; — to give an obligation not to create conditions that can be regarded as a threat by the other party; — Create hotlines for emergency contacts. The main provisions of the second document are: — not to deploy weapons and forces in areas where it will be perceived by the other side as a threat to national security; — refrain from flying heavy bombers in nuclear and non-nuclear equipment outside their skies, from where they can hit targets on the territory of the other side; — to refrain from the presence of warships in areas outside national waters, from where they can hit targets on the territory of the other side; — not to deploy medium-range and shorter-range missiles abroad and in areas from where they can hit targets on the territory of the other side; — not to deploy nuclear weapons abroad and return those already deployed, as well as eliminate the infrastructure for the deployment of nuclear weapons outside its territory; — not to conduct military exercises with the development of scenarios for the use of nuclear weapons and not to prepare the military of non-nuclear countries to use nuclear weapons; — The United States undertakes to exclude further expansion of NATO to the east and to refuse admission to the alliance of post-Soviet countries; — The United States undertakes not to create military bases in post-Soviet countries, not to use their military infrastructure and not to develop military cooperation with them. ❗This is a legitimate requirement. The borders of NATO in 1997 were fixed in the Founding Act on Mutual Relations, Cooperation and Security between the Russian Federation and the North Atlantic Treaty Organization on May 27, 1997 (see the text on the NATO website).
    2
  1406. 2
  1407. 2
  1408. 2
  1409. 2
  1410. 2
  1411. 2
  1412. 2
  1413. 2
  1414. 2
  1415. 2
  1416. 2
  1417. 2
  1418. 2
  1419. 2
  1420. 2
  1421. 2
  1422. 2
  1423. 2
  1424. 2
  1425. 2
  1426. 2
  1427. 2
  1428.  @lepetitroquet9410  1. It is ridiculous to hear that a request to maintain a neutral status is an act of aggression. Is Europe threatening Switzerland and Austria? Since they are not members of the alliance. For Russia, the neutral status of neighboring countries is a matter of border SECURITY. Given the length of the borders of the Russian Federation, it is very difficult to build a system of their protection. However, if the neighbors change their neutral status to membership in a MILITARY alliance, Russia is forced to engage in military strengthening of its borders. The "neighbors" have nothing to complain about - what kind of response did they expect? Poppy fields with butterflies all along the border? 2. In 2008, Georgia invaded Abkhazia and North Ossetia. The UN Security Council resolution recognized Georgia's aggression against these two republics (and not Russia's "aggression" at all, if you don't know). Sometimes it is useful to look at the UN website before opening your mouth 3. "Then, in 2013, Putin intervened in Ukrainian politics" Are you saying that the organization and financing ($5 billion was allocated) of a coup d'etat in a FOREIGN country is not interference? Since when has a coup d'etat ceased to be a crime under the Constitution of all countries, including Ukraine? What kind of compliance does Ukraine expect from others if it has violated its own state-forming document? 4. So you claim that the use of Armed Forces and the use of heavy weapons (bombers, tanks, MLRS) Is it normal inside the country against its own population (bombing of Donbass cities)? 5. "the policy of appeasement turned out to be ineffective" Maybe it was just necessary to IMPLEMENT the Minsk agreements ratified by the UN Security Council? And also stop bombing cities and the population of Donbass? It was interesting to visit a parallel reality🤡
    2
  1429. 2
  1430. 2
  1431. 2
  1432. 2
  1433. 2
  1434. 2
  1435. 2
  1436. 2
  1437. 2
  1438. 2
  1439. 2
  1440. 2
  1441. 2
  1442. 2
  1443. 2
  1444. 2
  1445. 2
  1446. 2
  1447. 2
  1448. 2
  1449. 2
  1450. 2
  1451. 2
  1452. 2
  1453. 2
  1454. 2
  1455. 2
  1456. 2
  1457. 2
  1458. 2
  1459. 2
  1460. 2
  1461. 2
  1462. 2
  1463. 2
  1464. 2
  1465. 2
  1466. 2
  1467. 2
  1468. 2
  1469. 2
  1470. 2
  1471. 2
  1472. 2
  1473. 2
  1474. 2
  1475. 2
  1476. 2
  1477. 2
  1478. 2
  1479. 2
  1480. 2
  1481. 2
  1482. 2
  1483. 2
  1484. 2
  1485. 2
  1486. 2
  1487. 2
  1488. 2
  1489. 2
  1490. 2
  1491. 2
  1492. 2
  1493. 2
  1494. 2
  1495. 2
  1496. 2
  1497. 2
  1498. 2
  1499. 2
  1500. 2
  1501. 2
  1502. 2
  1503. 2
  1504. 2
  1505. 2
  1506. 2
  1507. 2
  1508. 2
  1509. 2
  1510. 2
  1511. 2
  1512. 2
  1513. 2
  1514. 2
  1515. 2
  1516. 2
  1517. 2
  1518. 2
  1519. 2
  1520. 2
  1521. 2
  1522. 2
  1523. 2
  1524. 2
  1525. 2
  1526. 2
  1527. 2
  1528. 2
  1529. 2
  1530. 2
  1531. 2
  1532. 2
  1533. 2
  1534. 2
  1535. 2
  1536. 2
  1537. 2
  1538. 2
  1539. Since December 2021, Russia has received data on NATO's plans to deploy 4 military brigades on the territory of Ukraine (2 land, 1 sea, 1 air). Moreover, an air brigade with the ability to carry nuclear warheads. By the end of the year, they would have provoked a conflict and launched full-scale military operations against Russia using nuclear weapons. The key role in this was assigned to the current American-controlled ruling elite in Ukraine and the nationalists. A plan of attack was being prepared with the destruction of the population on the territory of the Donetsk and Lugansk People's Republics. A day before the start of the war, fateful decisions were made to destroy the Russian-speaking population in Donbass. About a week before the start of the Russian special operation, the People's militia of the DPR intercepted a map of the offensive on Donbass from the AFU. It was clearly laid out when long-range artillery strikes would be carried out, when MLRS, when aviation, then strikes by the operational tactical group (OTG), respectively "North", "South" and "East". OTG Vostok was supposed to operate at the intersection of Donetsk and Lugansk. They had three days to go to the border, and the OTG "SOUTH" would act together with the "Aidar", who, according to the plan, were supposed to act as a barrier detachment. In the north, where Lugansk, the AFU were supposed to operate under the cover of the "Right Sector", they were supposed to meet in the Komsomolsk area south of Donetsk and cut off the LDPR from the border with Russia. It was planned to start a "full sweep" within two days. Moreover, Donetsk, Lugansk and several other cities were simply surrounded and blocked, that is, a complete blockade of settlements was envisaged, before a "complete sweep". This plan was developed jointly with NATO curators, since the Americans had previously transferred about 5,000 of their soldiers to Poland, plus there was also the Polish army – according to the plan, they were supposed to block the Kaliningrad grouping of Russia, so that if anything it could not advance to the attacked territory of southeastern Ukraine. The second group is a thousand soldiers of the Stryker brigade (armored vehicles) in Romania. This group blocked Transnistria so that the peacekeepers stationed there could not advance through the South to Odessa. It was all a single set of actions that were supposed to begin on the night of February 24-25. However, suddenly, for them, the units of the LPR and DPR began to actively operate one day earlier with the support of the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation
    2
  1540. 2
  1541. 2
  1542. 2
  1543. 2
  1544. 2
  1545. 2
  1546. 2
  1547. 2
  1548. 2
  1549. 2
  1550. 2
  1551. 2
  1552. 2
  1553. 2
  1554. 2
  1555. 2
  1556. 2
  1557. 2
  1558. 2
  1559. 2
  1560. 2
  1561. 2
  1562. 2
  1563. 2
  1564. 2
  1565. 2
  1566. 2
  1567. 2
  1568. 2
  1569. 2
  1570. 2
  1571. 2
  1572. 2
  1573. 2
  1574. 2
  1575. 2
  1576. 2
  1577. 2
  1578. 2
  1579. 2
  1580. 2
  1581. 2
  1582. 2
  1583. 2
  1584. 2
  1585. 2
  1586. 2
  1587. 2
  1588. 2
  1589. 2
  1590. 2
  1591. 2
  1592. 2
  1593. 2
  1594. 2
  1595. 2
  1596. 2
  1597. 2
  1598. 2
  1599. 2
  1600. 2
  1601. 2
  1602. 2
  1603. 2
  1604. 2
  1605. 2
  1606. 2
  1607. 2
  1608. 2
  1609. 2
  1610. 2
  1611. 2
  1612. 2
  1613. 2
  1614. 2
  1615. 2
  1616. 2
  1617. 2
  1618. 2
  1619. 2
  1620. Requirements of the Russian Federation to the United States and NATO on security guarantees (December 2021) The demands were ignored. As a result, these demands will be met at the cost of millions of lives, the destruction of an entire state, riots and economic collapse in Europe. ❗Draft agreements between Russia, NATO and the United States on security guarantees. The main provisions of the first document are: — to exclude the further expansion of NATO and the accession of Ukraine to the alliance; — not to deploy additional military and weapons outside the countries where they were in May 1997 (before joining the alliance of Eastern European countries) – except in exceptional cases with the consent of Russia and NATO members; — abandon any NATO military activities in Ukraine, Eastern Europe, Transcaucasia, and Central Asia; — do not deploy intermediate-range and shorter-range missiles where they can hit the territory of the other side.; — not to conduct exercises and other actions with a strength exceeding the brigade in the agreed border zone, and regularly exchange information about military exercises.; — to confirm that the parties do not consider each other as adversaries, to consolidate the agreement to resolve all disputes peacefully and refrain from the use of force.; — to commit not to create conditions that could be regarded as a threat by the other side; — create hotlines for emergency contacts. ❗The main provisions of the second document are: — not to deploy weapons and forces in areas where it will be perceived by the other side as a threat to national security.; — refrain from flying heavy bombers in nuclear and non-nuclear equipment outside their skies, from where they can hit targets on the territory of the other side.; — to refrain from the presence of warships in areas outside national waters, from where they can hit targets on the territory of the other party; — not to deploy intermediate-range and shorter-range missiles abroad and in areas from where they can hit targets on the territory of the other side; — not to deploy nuclear weapons abroad and return those already deployed, as well as eliminate the infrastructure for the deployment of nuclear weapons outside its territory; — not to conduct military exercises to test scenarios for the use of nuclear weapons and not to train the military of non-nuclear countries to use nuclear weapons; — The United States undertakes to exclude further expansion of NATO to the east and refuse to admit post-Soviet countries to the alliance.; — The United States should commit itself not to establish military bases in post-Soviet countries, not to use their military infrastructure and not to develop military cooperation with them.
    2
  1621. 2
  1622. 2
  1623. 2
  1624. 2
  1625. 2
  1626. 2
  1627. 2
  1628. 2
  1629. 2
  1630. 2
  1631. 2
  1632. 2
  1633. 2
  1634. 2
  1635. 2
  1636. 2
  1637. 2
  1638. 2
  1639. 2
  1640. 2
  1641. 2
  1642. 2
  1643. 2
  1644. 2
  1645. 2
  1646. 2
  1647. 2
  1648. 2
  1649. 2
  1650. 2
  1651. 2
  1652. 2
  1653. 2
  1654. 2
  1655. 2
  1656. 2
  1657. 2
  1658. 2
  1659. 2
  1660. 2
  1661. 2
  1662. 2
  1663. 2
  1664. 2
  1665. 2
  1666. 2
  1667. 2
  1668. 2
  1669. 2
  1670. 2
  1671. 2
  1672. 2
  1673. 2
  1674. 2
  1675. 2
  1676. 2
  1677. 2
  1678. 2
  1679. 2
  1680. 2
  1681. 2
  1682. 2
  1683. 2
  1684. 2
  1685. 2
  1686. 2
  1687. 2
  1688. 2
  1689. 2
  1690. 2
  1691. 2
  1692. 2
  1693. 2
  1694. 2
  1695. 2
  1696. 2
  1697. 2
  1698. 2
  1699. 2
  1700. 2
  1701. 2
  1702. 2
  1703. 2
  1704. 2
  1705. 2
  1706. 2
  1707. 2
  1708. 2
  1709. Useful information for general development 👇 The countries to which Russia has given statehood Israel as a state could only emerge with the direct support of the USSR in 1945 Finland had never had its own state before 1802 Latvia had never had its own state before 1918 Estonia had never had its own state before 1918 Lithuania regained statehood in 1918 thanks to Russia Poland restored statehood with the help of Russia twice – in 1918 and 1944 Romania was born as a result of the Russian-Turkish wars, and became sovereign by the will of Russia in 1877 Moldova as a state was born inside the USSR Russian Russians regained their independence as a state as a result of the victory of Russian arms in the Russo-Turkish War of 1877-1878. As a "thank you", the state of Bulgaria participated in two world wars as part of anti-Russian coalitions Serbia regained its independence as a result of the Russian-Turkish War of 1877-1878 Azerbaijan has never had statehood and formed it only as part of the USSR. Armenia has been preserved physically and revived as a state only within the USSR Georgia was preserved physically and revived as a state only within the USSR Turkmenistan has never had statehood and formed it only as part of the USSR Kyrgyzstan has never had statehood and formed it only as part of the USSR Kazakhstan has never had statehood and formed it only as part of the USSR Mongolia had statehood under Genghis Khan and restored it only with the help of the USSR Belarus and Ukraine also gained statehood for the first time as a result of the Great October Revolution in the USSR. And in 1991, full independence - The liberation of Austria by the Red Army from the Third Reich in 1945 - Liberation of Czechoslovakia by the Red Army from the Third Reich in 1945 - The position of Catherine II in 1780 with the creation of the League of Armed Neutrality and the actual support of the North American United States in the struggle for their independence from Britain - Stalin's position in negotiations with the United States and Britain gave Germany the opportunity to preserve its statehood after the defeat in 1945 - Gorbachev's position made it possible to re-unite both Germany in 1990…
    2
  1710. 2
  1711. 2
  1712. 2
  1713. 2
  1714. 2
  1715. 2
  1716. 2
  1717. 2
  1718. 2
  1719. 2
  1720. 2
  1721. 2
  1722. 2
  1723. 2
  1724. 2
  1725. 2
  1726. 2
  1727. 2
  1728. 2
  1729. 2
  1730. 2
  1731. 2
  1732. 2
  1733. 2
  1734. 2
  1735. 2
  1736. 2
  1737. 2
  1738. 2
  1739. 2
  1740. 2
  1741. 2
  1742. 2
  1743. 2
  1744. 2
  1745. 2
  1746. 2
  1747. 2
  1748. 2
  1749. 2
  1750. 2
  1751. 2
  1752. 2
  1753. 2
  1754. 2
  1755. 2
  1756. 2
  1757. 2
  1758. 2
  1759. 2
  1760. 2
  1761. 2
  1762. 2
  1763. 2
  1764. 2
  1765. 2
  1766. 2
  1767. 2
  1768. 2
  1769. 2
  1770. 2
  1771. 2
  1772. 2
  1773. 2
  1774. 2
  1775. 2
  1776. 2
  1777. 2
  1778. 2
  1779. 2
  1780. 2
  1781. 2
  1782. 2
  1783. 2
  1784. 2
  1785. 2
  1786. 2
  1787. 2
  1788. 2
  1789. 2
  1790. 2
  1791. 2
  1792. 2
  1793. 2
  1794. 2
  1795. 2
  1796. 2
  1797. 2
  1798. 2
  1799. 2
  1800. 2
  1801. 2
  1802. 2
  1803. 2
  1804. 2
  1805. 2
  1806. 2
  1807. 2
  1808. 2
  1809. 2
  1810. 2
  1811. 2
  1812. 2
  1813. 2
  1814. 2
  1815. 2
  1816. 2
  1817. 2
  1818. 2
  1819. 2
  1820. 2
  1821. 2
  1822. 2
  1823. 2
  1824. 2
  1825. 2
  1826. 2
  1827. 2
  1828. 2
  1829. 2
  1830. 2
  1831. 2
  1832. 2
  1833. 2
  1834. 2
  1835. 2
  1836. 2
  1837. 2
  1838. 2
  1839. 2
  1840. 2
  1841. 2
  1842. 2
  1843. 2
  1844. 2
  1845. 2
  1846. 2
  1847. 2
  1848. 2
  1849. 2
  1850. 2
  1851. 2
  1852. 2
  1853. 2
  1854. 2
  1855. 2
  1856. 2
  1857. 2
  1858. 2
  1859. 2
  1860. 2
  1861. 2
  1862. 2
  1863. 2
  1864. 2
  1865. 2
  1866. 2
  1867. 2
  1868. 2
  1869. 2
  1870. 2
  1871. 2
  1872. 1
  1873. 1
  1874. 1
  1875. 1
  1876. 1
  1877. 1
  1878. 1
  1879. 1
  1880. 1
  1881. 1
  1882. 1
  1883. 1
  1884. 1
  1885. 1
  1886. 1
  1887. 1
  1888. 1
  1889. 1
  1890. 1
  1891. 1
  1892. 1
  1893. 1
  1894. 1
  1895. 1
  1896. 1
  1897. 1
  1898. 1
  1899. 1
  1900. 1
  1901. 1
  1902. 1
  1903. 1
  1904. 1
  1905. 1
  1906. 1
  1907. 1
  1908. 1
  1909. 1
  1910. 1
  1911. 1
  1912. 1
  1913. 1
  1914. 1
  1915. 1
  1916. 1
  1917. 1
  1918. 1
  1919. 1
  1920. 1
  1921. 1
  1922. 1
  1923. 1
  1924. 1
  1925. 1
  1926. 1
  1927. 1
  1928. 1
  1929. 1
  1930. 1
  1931. 1
  1932. 1
  1933. 1
  1934. 1
  1935. 1
  1936. 1
  1937. 1
  1938. 1
  1939. 1
  1940. 1
  1941. 1
  1942. 1
  1943. 1
  1944. 1
  1945. 1
  1946. 1
  1947. 1
  1948. 1
  1949. 1
  1950. 1
  1951. 1
  1952. 1
  1953. 1
  1954. 1
  1955. 1
  1956. 1
  1957. 1
  1958. 1
  1959. 1
  1960. 1
  1961. 1
  1962. 1
  1963. 1
  1964. 1
  1965. 1
  1966. 1
  1967. 1
  1968. 1
  1969. 1
  1970. 1
  1971. 1
  1972. 1
  1973. 1
  1974. 1
  1975. 1
  1976. 1
  1977. 1
  1978. 1
  1979. 1
  1980. 1
  1981. 1
  1982. 1
  1983. 1
  1984. 1
  1985. 1
  1986. 1
  1987. 1
  1988. 1
  1989. 1
  1990. 1
  1991. 1
  1992. 1
  1993. 1
  1994. 1
  1995. 1
  1996. 1
  1997. 1
  1998. 1
  1999. 1
  2000. 1
  2001. 1
  2002. 1
  2003. 1
  2004. 1
  2005. 1
  2006. 1
  2007. 1
  2008. 1
  2009. 1
  2010. 1
  2011. 1
  2012. 1
  2013. 1
  2014. 1
  2015. 1
  2016. 1
  2017. 1
  2018. 1
  2019. 1
  2020. 1
  2021. 1
  2022. 1
  2023. 1
  2024. 1
  2025. 1
  2026. 1
  2027. 1
  2028. 1
  2029. 1
  2030. 1
  2031. 1
  2032. 1
  2033. 1
  2034. 1
  2035. 1
  2036. 1
  2037. 1
  2038. 1
  2039. 1
  2040. 1
  2041. 1
  2042. 1
  2043. 1
  2044. 1
  2045. 1
  2046. 1
  2047. 1
  2048. 1
  2049. 1
  2050. 1
  2051. 1
  2052. 1
  2053. 1
  2054. 1
  2055. 1
  2056. 1
  2057. 1
  2058. 1
  2059. 1
  2060. 1
  2061. 1
  2062. 1
  2063. 1
  2064. 1
  2065. 1
  2066. 1
  2067. 1
  2068. 1
  2069. 1
  2070. 1
  2071. 1
  2072. 1
  2073. 1
  2074. 1
  2075. 1
  2076. 1
  2077. 1
  2078. 1
  2079. 1
  2080. 1
  2081. 1
  2082. 1
  2083. 1
  2084. 1
  2085. 1
  2086. 1
  2087. 1
  2088. 1
  2089. 1
  2090. 1
  2091. 1
  2092. 1
  2093. 1
  2094. 1
  2095. 1
  2096. 1
  2097. 1
  2098. 1
  2099. 1
  2100. 1
  2101. 1
  2102. 1
  2103. 1
  2104. 1
  2105. 1
  2106. 1
  2107. 1
  2108. 1
  2109. 1
  2110. 1
  2111. 1
  2112. 1
  2113. 1
  2114. 1
  2115. 1
  2116. 1
  2117. 1
  2118. 1
  2119. 1
  2120. 1
  2121. 1
  2122.  @heathclark318  The requirements of the Russian Federation to the United States and NATO on security guarantees, presented in December 2021. The demands were ignored. Upon completion of the special operation in Ukraine, Russia will again present these demands, but in a more stringent form. As a result, these demands will be fulfilled at the cost of millions of lives, the destruction of an entire state, riots and economic collapse in Europe Draft agreements between Russia and NATO and the United States on security guarantees. The main provisions of the first document: — exclude further expansion of NATO and Ukraine's accession to the alliance; — not to deploy additional military and weapons outside the countries where they were in May 1997 (before joining the alliance of Eastern European countries) – except in exceptional cases with the consent of Russia and NATO members; — to abandon any NATO military activity in Ukraine, Eastern Europe, Transcaucasia, and Central Asia; — do not deploy medium-range and shorter-range missiles where they can hit the territory of the other side; — not to conduct exercises and other actions with a strength of more than a brigade in the agreed border zone, regularly exchange information about military exercises; — to confirm that the parties do not consider each other as opponents, to consolidate the agreement to resolve all disputes peacefully and to refrain from the use of force; — to give an obligation not to create conditions that can be regarded as a threat by the other party; — Create hotlines for emergency contacts. The main provisions of the second document are: — not to deploy weapons and forces in areas where it will be perceived by the other side as a threat to national security; — refrain from flying heavy bombers in nuclear and non-nuclear equipment outside their skies, from where they can hit targets on the territory of the other side; — to refrain from the presence of warships in areas outside national waters, from where they can hit targets on the territory of the other side; — not to deploy medium-range and shorter-range missiles abroad and in areas from where they can hit targets on the territory of the other side; — not to deploy nuclear weapons abroad and return those already deployed, as well as eliminate the infrastructure for the deployment of nuclear weapons outside its territory; — not to conduct military exercises with the development of scenarios for the use of nuclear weapons and not to prepare the military of non-nuclear countries to use nuclear weapons; — The United States undertakes to exclude further expansion of NATO to the east and to refuse admission to the alliance of post-Soviet countries; — The United States undertakes not to create military bases in post-Soviet countries, not to use their military infrastructure and not to develop military cooperation with them
    1
  2123. 1
  2124. 1
  2125. 1
  2126. 1
  2127. 1
  2128. 1
  2129. 1
  2130. 1
  2131. 1
  2132. 1
  2133. 1
  2134. 1
  2135. 1
  2136. 1
  2137. 1
  2138. 1
  2139. 1
  2140. 1
  2141. 1
  2142. 1
  2143. 1
  2144. 1
  2145. 1
  2146. 1
  2147. 1
  2148. 1
  2149. 1
  2150. 1
  2151. 1
  2152. 1
  2153. 1
  2154. 1
  2155. 1
  2156. 1
  2157. 1
  2158. 1
  2159. 1
  2160. 1
  2161. 1
  2162. 1
  2163. 1
  2164. 1
  2165. 1
  2166. 1
  2167. 1
  2168. 1
  2169. 1
  2170. 1
  2171. 1
  2172. 1
  2173. 1
  2174. 1
  2175. 1
  2176. 1
  2177. 1
  2178. 1
  2179. 1
  2180. 1
  2181. 1
  2182. 1
  2183. 1
  2184. 1
  2185. 1
  2186. 1
  2187. 1
  2188. 1
  2189. 1
  2190. 1
  2191. 1
  2192. 1
  2193. 1
  2194. 1
  2195. 1
  2196. 1
  2197. 1
  2198. 1
  2199. 1
  2200. 1
  2201. 1
  2202. 1
  2203. 1
  2204. 1
  2205. 1
  2206.  @butterflyblueshorts  There was a war on one side of the scale, and the Minsk Agreements on the other THE MINSK AGREEMENTS 1. Immediate and comprehensive ceasefire in certain areas of the Donetsk and Luhansk regions of Ukraine and its strict implementation starting at 00:00. (Kiev time) February 15, 2015. 2. Withdrawal of all heavy weapons by both sides at equal distances in order to create a security zone at least 50 km wide from each other for artillery systems with a caliber of 100 mm or more, a security zone 70 km wide for MLRS and 140 km wide for MLRS Tornado-S, Hurricane, Tornado and tactical Tochka U missile systems: 3. Ensure effective monitoring and verification of the ceasefire and withdrawal of heavy weapons by the OSCE from the first day of withdrawal using all necessary technical means, including satellites, UAVs, radar systems, etc. 4. On the first day after the withdrawal, to begin a dialogue on the modalities of holding local elections in accordance with Ukrainian legislation and the law of Ukraine "On the Temporary order of Local Self-Government in certain areas of Donetsk and Luhansk regions", as well as on the future regime of these areas on the basis of this law. 5. To ensure pardon and amnesty by enacting a law prohibiting the prosecution and punishment of persons in connection with the events that took place in certain areas of Donetsk and Luhansk regions of Ukraine. 6. Ensure the release and exchange of all hostages and illegally detained persons on the basis of the principle of "all for all". This process must be completed no later than the fifth day after the withdrawal. 7. To ensure safe access, delivery, storage and distribution of humanitarian aid to those in need on the basis of an international mechanism. 8. Definition of modalities for the full restoration of socio-economic ties, including such social transfers as payment of pensions and other payments (income and income, timely payment of all utility bills, resumption of taxation within the legal framework of Ukraine). 9. Restoration of full control over the state border by the Government of Ukraine in the entire conflict zone, which should begin on the first day after local elections and end after a comprehensive political settlement (local elections in certain areas of Donetsk and Luhansk regions on the basis of the law of Ukraine and constitutional reform) by the end of 2015 10. Withdrawal of all foreign armed formations, military equipment, as well as mercenaries from the territory of Ukraine under the supervision of the OSCE. The disarmament of all illegal groups. 11. Carrying out constitutional reform in Ukraine with the entry into force by the end of 2015 of the new constitution, which assumes decentralization as a key element (taking into account the peculiarities of certain districts of Donetsk and Luhansk regions, agreed with representatives of these regions), as well as the adoption of permanent legislation on the special status of certain districts of Donetsk and Luhansk regions by the end of 2015. 12. On the basis of the Law of Ukraine "On the Temporary Order of Local Self-Government in certain areas of Donetsk and Luhansk regions", issues related to local elections will be discussed and coordinated with representatives of certain areas of Donetsk and Luhansk regions within the framework of the trilateral contact group. The elections will be held in compliance with the relevant OSCE standards, with monitoring by the OSCE ODIHR. 13. To intensify the activities of the trilateral contact group, including through the creation of working groups on the implementation of relevant aspects of the Minsk agreements. They will reflect the composition of the trilateral contact group. Note. Such measures in accordance with the law "On the special procedure of local Self-government in certain areas of Donetsk and Luhansk regions" include the following: - exemption from punishment, persecution and discrimination of persons related to the events that took place in certain areas of Donetsk and Luhansk regions; - The right to linguistic self-determination; - participation of local self-government bodies in the appointment of heads of prosecutor's offices and courts in certain districts of Donetsk and Luhansk regions; - an opportunity for the central executive authorities to conclude agreements with the relevant local government bodies on the economic, social and cultural development of certain districts of Donetsk and Luhansk regions; - the state supports the socio-economic development of certain districts of Donetsk and Luhansk regions; - assistance from the central authorities to cross-border cooperation in certain areas of Donetsk and Luhansk regions with the regions of the Russian Federation; - creation of people's militia units by decision of local councils in order to maintain public order in certain areas of Donetsk and Luhansk regions; - the powers of deputies of local councils and officials elected in early elections appointed by the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine by this law cannot be terminated prematurely. Participants of the Trilateral Contact Group: Ambassador Heidi Tagliavini The Second President of Ukraine L.D. Kuchma Ambassador of the Russian Federation to Ukraine M.Y. Zurabov A.V. Zakharchenko – Head of the Donetsk People's Republic I.V. Plotnitsky – Head of the Luhansk People's Republic
    1
  2207. 1
  2208. 1
  2209. 1
  2210. 1
  2211. 1
  2212. 1
  2213. 1
  2214. 1
  2215. 1
  2216. 1
  2217. 1
  2218. 1
  2219. 1
  2220. 1
  2221. 1
  2222. 1
  2223. 1
  2224. 1
  2225. 1
  2226. 1
  2227. 1
  2228. 1
  2229. 1
  2230. 1
  2231. 1
  2232. 1
  2233. 1
  2234. 1
  2235. 1
  2236. 1
  2237. 1
  2238. 1
  2239. 1
  2240. 1
  2241. 1
  2242. 1
  2243. 1
  2244. 1
  2245. 1
  2246. 1
  2247. 1
  2248. 1
  2249. 1
  2250. 1
  2251. 1
  2252. 1
  2253. 1
  2254. 1
  2255. 1
  2256. 1
  2257. 1
  2258. 1
  2259. 1
  2260. 1
  2261. 1
  2262. 1
  2263. 1
  2264. 1
  2265. 1
  2266. 1
  2267. 1
  2268. 1
  2269. 1
  2270. 1
  2271. 1
  2272. 1
  2273. 1
  2274. 1
  2275. 1
  2276. 1
  2277. 1
  2278. 1
  2279. 1
  2280. 1
  2281. 1
  2282. 1
  2283. 1
  2284. 1
  2285. 1
  2286. 1
  2287. 1
  2288. 1
  2289. 1
  2290. 1
  2291. 1
  2292. 1
  2293.  @BenJamin-rt7ui  Of course, the USA knew. What reaction should a dog who poops on the carpet expect? (this is a metaphor) Requirements of the Russian Federation to the United States and NATO on security guarantees (December 2021). The demands were ignored. As a result, they will be carried out at the cost of millions of lives, the destruction of an entire state, riots and economic collapse in Europe ❗Draft agreements of Russia with NATO and the United States on security guarantees. The main provisions of the first document: — exclude the further expansion of NATO and the accession of Ukraine to the alliance; — not to deploy additional military and weapons outside the countries where they were in May 1997 (before joining the alliance of Eastern European countries) – except in exceptional cases with the consent of Russia and NATO members; — to abandon any NATO military activity in Ukraine, Eastern Europe, Transcaucasia, and Central Asia; — do not deploy medium-range and shorter-range missiles where they can hit the territory of the other side; — not to conduct exercises and other actions with a strength of more than a brigade in the agreed border zone, regularly exchange information about military exercises; — to confirm that the parties do not consider each other as opponents, to consolidate the agreement to resolve all disputes peacefully and to refrain from the use of force; — to give an obligation not to create conditions that can be regarded as a threat by the other party; — Create hotlines for emergency contacts. The main provisions of the second document are: — not to deploy weapons and forces in areas where it will be perceived by the other side as a threat to national security; — refrain from flying heavy bombers in nuclear and non-nuclear equipment outside their skies, from where they can hit targets on the territory of the other side; — to refrain from the presence of warships in areas outside national waters, from where they can hit targets on the territory of the other side; — not to deploy medium-range and shorter-range missiles abroad and in areas from where they can hit targets on the territory of the other side; — not to deploy nuclear weapons abroad and return those already deployed, as well as eliminate the infrastructure for the deployment of nuclear weapons outside its territory; — not to conduct military exercises with the development of scenarios for the use of nuclear weapons and not to prepare the military of non-nuclear countries to use nuclear weapons; — The United States undertakes to exclude further expansion of NATO to the east and to refuse admission to the alliance of post-Soviet countries; — The United States undertakes not to create military bases in post-Soviet countries, not to use their military infrastructure and not to develop military cooperation with them
    1
  2294. 1
  2295. 1
  2296. 1
  2297. 1
  2298. 1
  2299. 1
  2300. 1
  2301. 1
  2302. 1
  2303. 1
  2304. 1
  2305. 1
  2306. 1
  2307. 1
  2308. 1
  2309. 1
  2310. 1
  2311. 1
  2312. 1
  2313. 1
  2314. 1
  2315. 1
  2316. 1
  2317. THE MINSK AGREEMENTS 1. Immediate and comprehensive ceasefire in certain areas of the Donetsk and Luhansk regions of Ukraine and its strict implementation starting at 00:00. (Kiev time) February 15, 2015. 2. Withdrawal of all heavy weapons by both sides at equal distances in order to create a security zone at least 50 km wide from each other for artillery systems with a caliber of 100 mm or more, a security zone 70 km wide for MLRS and 140 km wide for MLRS Tornado-S, Hurricane, Smerch and tactical Tochka U missile systems: 3. Ensure effective monitoring and verification of the ceasefire and withdrawal of heavy weapons by the OSCE from the first day of withdrawal using all necessary technical means, including satellites, UAVs, radar systems, etc. 4. On the first day after the withdrawal, to begin a dialogue on the modalities of holding local elections in accordance with Ukrainian legislation and the law of Ukraine "On the Temporary order of Local Self-government in certain areas of Donetsk and Luhansk regions", as well as on the future regime of these areas on the basis of this law. 5. To ensure pardon and amnesty by enacting a law prohibiting the prosecution and punishment of persons in connection with the events that took place in certain areas of Donetsk and Luhansk regions of Ukraine. 6. Ensure the release and exchange of all hostages and illegally detained persons on the basis of the principle of "all for all". This process must be completed no later than the fifth day after the withdrawal. 7. To ensure safe access, delivery, storage and distribution of humanitarian aid to those in need on the basis of an international mechanism. 8. Definition of modalities for the full restoration of socio-economic ties, including such social transfers as payment of pensions and other payments (income and income, timely payment of all utility bills, resumption of taxation within the legal framework of Ukraine). 9. Restoration of full control over the state border by the Government of Ukraine in the entire conflict zone, which should begin on the first day after local elections and end after a comprehensive political settlement (local elections in certain areas of Donetsk and Luhansk regions on the basis of the law of Ukraine and constitutional reform) by the end of 2015 10. Withdrawal of all foreign armed formations, military equipment, as well as mercenaries from the territory of Ukraine under the supervision of the OSCE. The disarmament of all illegal groups. 11. Carrying out constitutional reform in Ukraine with the entry into force by the end of 2015 of the new constitution, which assumes decentralization as a key element (taking into account the peculiarities of certain districts of Donetsk and Luhansk regions, agreed with representatives of these regions), as well as the adoption of permanent legislation on the special status of certain districts of Donetsk and Luhansk regions by the end of 2015. 12. On the basis of the Law of Ukraine "On the Provisional Order of Local Self-Government in certain areas of Donetsk and Luhansk regions", issues related to local elections will be discussed and coordinated with representatives of certain areas of Donetsk and Luhansk regions within the framework of the trilateral contact group. The elections will be held in compliance with the relevant OSCE standards, with monitoring by the OSCE ODIHR. 13. To intensify the activities of the trilateral contact group, including through the creation of working groups on the implementation of relevant aspects of the Minsk agreements. They will reflect the composition of the trilateral contact group. Note. Such measures in accordance with the law "On the special procedure of local self-government in certain areas of Donetsk and Luhansk regions" include the following: - exemption from punishment, persecution and discrimination of persons related to the events that took place in certain areas of Donetsk and Luhansk regions; - The right to linguistic self-determination; - participation of local self-government bodies in the appointment of heads of prosecutor's offices and courts in certain districts of Donetsk and Luhansk regions; - an opportunity for the central executive authorities to conclude agreements with the relevant local government bodies on the economic, social and cultural development of certain districts of Donetsk and Luhansk regions; - the state supports the socio-economic development of certain districts of Donetsk and Luhansk regions; - assistance from the central authorities to cross-border cooperation in certain areas of Donetsk and Luhansk regions with the regions of the Russian Federation; - creation of people's militia units by decision of local councils in order to maintain public order in certain areas of Donetsk and Luhansk regions; - the powers of deputies of local councils and officials elected in early elections appointed by the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine by this law cannot be terminated prematurely. Participants of the Trilateral Contact Group: Ambassador Heidi Tagliavini The Second President of Ukraine L.D. Kuchma Ambassador of the Russian Federation to Ukraine M.Y. Zurabov A.V. Zakharchenko – Head of the Donetsk People's Republic I.V. Plotnitsky – Head of the Luhansk People's Republic
    1
  2318. 1
  2319. 1
  2320. 1
  2321. 1
  2322. 1
  2323. 1
  2324. 1
  2325. 1
  2326. 1
  2327. 1
  2328. 1
  2329. 1
  2330. 1
  2331. 1
  2332. 1
  2333. 1
  2334. 1
  2335. 1
  2336. 1
  2337. 1
  2338. 1
  2339. 1
  2340. 1
  2341. 1
  2342. 1
  2343. 1
  2344. 1
  2345. 1
  2346. 1
  2347. 1
  2348. 1
  2349. 1
  2350. 1
  2351. 1
  2352. 1
  2353. 1
  2354. 1
  2355. 1
  2356. 1
  2357. 1
  2358. 1
  2359. 1
  2360. 1
  2361. 1
  2362. 1
  2363. 1
  2364. 1
  2365. 1
  2366. 1
  2367. 1
  2368. 1
  2369. 1
  2370. 1
  2371. 1
  2372. 1
  2373. 1
  2374. 1
  2375. 1
  2376. 1
  2377. 1
  2378. 1
  2379. 1
  2380. 1
  2381. 1
  2382. 1
  2383. 1
  2384. 1
  2385. 1
  2386. 1
  2387. 1
  2388. 1
  2389. 1
  2390. 1
  2391. 1
  2392. 1
  2393. 1
  2394. 1
  2395. 1
  2396. 1
  2397. 1
  2398. 1
  2399. 1
  2400. 1
  2401. 1
  2402. 1
  2403. 1
  2404. 1
  2405. 1
  2406. 1
  2407. 1
  2408. 1
  2409. 1
  2410. 1
  2411. 1
  2412. 1
  2413. 1
  2414. 1
  2415. 1
  2416. 1
  2417. 1
  2418. 1
  2419. 1
  2420. 1
  2421. 1
  2422. 1
  2423. 1
  2424. 1
  2425. 1
  2426. 1
  2427. 1
  2428. 1
  2429. 1
  2430. 1
  2431. 1
  2432. 1
  2433. 1
  2434. 1
  2435. 1
  2436. 1
  2437. 1
  2438. 1
  2439. 1
  2440. 1
  2441. 1
  2442. 1
  2443. 1
  2444. 1
  2445. 1
  2446. 1
  2447. 1
  2448. 1
  2449. 1
  2450. 1
  2451. 1
  2452. 1
  2453. 1
  2454. 1
  2455. 1
  2456. 1
  2457. 1
  2458. 1
  2459. 1
  2460. 1
  2461. 1
  2462. 1
  2463. 1
  2464. 1
  2465. 1
  2466. 1
  2467. 1
  2468. 1
  2469. 1
  2470. 1
  2471. 1
  2472. 1
  2473. 1
  2474.  @shaun7142  Some useless information: The UN Charter, in Articles 106 and 107, gives the right to the winners of the Second World War - the USSR, the USA, Great Britain and China - to apply all measures against the countries that fought against them to prevent actions aimed at revising the results of the Second World War. In particular, it is possible to use military force against these countries. To do this, it is enough to notify the other three winning countries, but not to get their consent. Forceful coercion of countries that want to revise the Yalta-Potsdam system in Europe can also be carried out by Russia, which is the legal successor of the USSR. Russia can stop attempts to revive Nazism in Germany, Hungary, Romania, Austria, Bulgaria, Finland, Croatia, Slovenia, Czech Republic, Slovakia, Italy, Spain, Norway, Denmark, Holland, Japan. Articles 106 and 107 of the UN Charter also apply to all those countries that refuse to inherit from the USSR – Latvia, Estonia, Lithuania. Their attitude that there was a Soviet occupation and the treaties of Friendship and cooperation concluded by them with the Third Reich move these countries into the ranks of the Hitlerite coalition. The same position is taken by modern Ukraine, which accepts as its predecessor the military-political formations of the OUN-UPA, created by Ukrainian fascists. Proves that all these post-Soviet republics belong to the Hitlerite coalition. Hence the possibility of revising the territorial acquisitions of countries that position themselves as supporters of the Hitlerite coalition. Plus SPONSORS OF the Nazi regimes (USA and Britain)
    1
  2475. 1
  2476. 1
  2477. 1
  2478. 1
  2479. 1
  2480. 1
  2481. 1
  2482. 1
  2483. 1
  2484. 1
  2485. 1
  2486. 1
  2487. 1
  2488. 1
  2489. 1
  2490. 1
  2491. 1
  2492. 1
  2493. 1
  2494. 1
  2495. 1
  2496.  @nattygsbord  The only thing Russia wants is to ensure the SECURITY of the Russian state. The wishes of the former republics in the post-Soviet space do not matter at the level of geopolitics. Relations between the two countries are governed by international treaties that assume OBLIGATIONS on BOTH sides. Which impose certain restrictions on BOTH sides (Russia is also limited in its desires). Ukraine and Kazakhstan have agreed to a NEUTRAL, non-aligned status. If countries wish to reconsider their status and join a military alliance hostile to Russia, this is their right. Only in this case, all guarantees of Russia in relation to them are automatically canceled. Russia will act towards them in the same way as towards any NATO country. In the event of a war with NATO, strikes will be equally inflicted not only on Europe, but also on Latvia, Lithuania, Estonia, Ukraine and others who have repeated the path of Ukraine. Therefore, Ukraine, which has freed itself from all obligations towards Russia, looks ridiculous and ridiculous, accusing Russia of violating some obligations. Seriously? This is not how it works in international relations. Ukraine has allowed itself to turn into a NATO springboard against Russia, opening the way to the Russian border for American military infrastructure... Therefore, Ukraine will face the fate of a "used bridgehead" If this is so difficult to understand, put Mexico on the border with the state of Texas in place of Ukraine. Mexico is also free to do whatever it wants, isn't it? Including inviting the Russian armed forces to the border with the United States, equipping Russian nuclear bases there... lol...
    1
  2497. 1
  2498. 1
  2499. 1
  2500. 1
  2501. 1
  2502. 1
  2503. 1
  2504. 1
  2505. 1
  2506. 1
  2507. 1
  2508. 1
  2509. 1
  2510. 1
  2511. 1
  2512. 1
  2513. 1
  2514. 1
  2515. 1
  2516. 1
  2517. 1
  2518. 1
  2519. 1
  2520. 1
  2521. 1
  2522. 1
  2523. 1
  2524. 1
  2525. 1
  2526. 1
  2527. 1
  2528. 1
  2529. 1
  2530. 1
  2531. 1
  2532. 1
  2533. 1
  2534. 1
  2535. 1
  2536. 1
  2537. 1
  2538. 1
  2539. 1
  2540. 1
  2541. 1
  2542. 1
  2543. 1
  2544. 1
  2545. 1
  2546. 1
  2547. 1
  2548. 1
  2549. 1
  2550. 1
  2551. 1
  2552. 1
  2553. 1
  2554. 1
  2555. 1
  2556. 1
  2557. 1
  2558. 1
  2559. 1
  2560. 1
  2561. 1
  2562. 1
  2563. 1
  2564. 1
  2565. 1
  2566. 1
  2567. 1
  2568. 1
  2569. 1
  2570. 1
  2571. 1
  2572. 1
  2573. 1
  2574. 1
  2575. 1
  2576. 1
  2577. 1
  2578. 1
  2579. 1
  2580. 1
  2581. 1
  2582.  @alcosound  THE MINSK AGREEMENTS 1. An immediate and comprehensive ceasefire in certain areas of the Donetsk and Luhansk regions of Ukraine and its strict implementation starting at 00:00. (Kiev time) February 15, 2015. 2. Withdrawal of all heavy weapons by both sides at equal distances in order to create a security zone at least 50 km wide from each other for artillery systems with a caliber of 100 mm or more, a security zone 70 km wide for MLRS and 140 km wide for MLRS Tornado-S, Hurricane, Smerch and tactical Tochka U missile systems: 3. Ensure effective monitoring and verification of the ceasefire and withdrawal of heavy weapons by the OSCE from the first day of withdrawal using all necessary technical means, including satellites, UAVs, radar systems, etc. 4. On the first day after the withdrawal, start a dialogue on the modalities of holding local elections in accordance with Ukrainian legislation and the law of Ukraine "On the Temporary Order of Local Self-Government in certain areas of Donetsk and Luhansk regions", as well as on the future regime of these areas on the basis of this law. 5. To ensure pardon and amnesty by enacting a law prohibiting the prosecution and punishment of persons in connection with the events that took place in certain areas of Donetsk and Luhansk regions of Ukraine. 6. Ensure the release and exchange of all hostages and illegally detained persons on the basis of the principle of "all for all". This process must be completed no later than the fifth day after the withdrawal. 7. To ensure safe access, delivery, storage and distribution of humanitarian aid to those in need on the basis of an international mechanism. 8. Determination of modalities for the full restoration of socio-economic ties, including such social transfers as payment of pensions and other payments (income and income, timely payment of all utility bills, resumption of taxation within the legal framework of Ukraine). 9. Restoration of full control over the state border by the Government of Ukraine in the entire conflict zone, which should begin on the first day after local elections and end after a comprehensive political settlement (local elections in certain areas of Donetsk and Luhansk regions on the basis of the law of Ukraine and constitutional reform) by the end of 2015 10. Withdrawal of all foreign armed formations, military equipment, as well as mercenaries from the territory of Ukraine under the supervision of the OSCE. The disarmament of all illegal groups. 11. Carrying out constitutional reform in Ukraine with the entry into force by the end of 2015 of the new constitution, which assumes decentralization as a key element (taking into account the specifics of certain districts of Donetsk and Luhansk regions, agreed with representatives of these regions), as well as the adoption of permanent legislation on the special status of certain districts of Donetsk and Luhansk regions by the end of 2015. 12. On the basis of the Law of Ukraine "On the Temporary Order of Local Self-Government in certain areas of Donetsk and Luhansk regions", issues related to local elections will be discussed and coordinated with representatives of certain areas of Donetsk and Luhansk regions within the framework of the trilateral contact group. The elections will be held in compliance with the relevant OSCE standards, with monitoring by the OSCE ODIHR. 13. To intensify the activities of the trilateral contact group, including through the creation of working groups on the implementation of relevant aspects of the Minsk agreements. They will reflect the composition of the trilateral contact group. Note. Such measures in accordance with the law "On the special procedure of local Self-government in certain areas of Donetsk and Luhansk regions" include the following: - exemption from punishment, persecution and discrimination of persons related to the events that took place in certain areas of Donetsk and Luhansk regions; - The right to linguistic self-determination; - participation of local self-government bodies in the appointment of heads of prosecutor's offices and courts in certain districts of Donetsk and Luhansk regions; - an opportunity for the central executive authorities to conclude agreements with the relevant local self-government bodies on the economic, social and cultural development of certain districts of Donetsk and Luhansk regions; - the state supports the socio-economic development of certain districts of Donetsk and Luhansk regions; - assistance from the central authorities to cross-border cooperation in certain areas of Donetsk and Luhansk regions with the regions of the Russian Federation; - creation of people's militia units by decision of local councils in order to maintain public order in certain areas of Donetsk and Luhansk regions; - the powers of deputies of local councils and officials elected in early elections appointed by the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine by this law cannot be terminated prematurely. Participants of the Trilateral Contact Group: Ambassador Heidi Tagliavini The Second President of Ukraine L.D. Kuchma Ambassador of the Russian Federation to Ukraine M.Y. Zurabov A.V. Zakharchenko – Head of the Donetsk People's Republic I.V. Plotnitsky – Head of the Luhansk People's Republic ❗This is A CONTACT GROUP (intermediaries). Agreements of this level can only be signed by Heads of State. Putin did not sign anything You might as well demand the implementation of the Minsk agreements from Ambassador Heidi Tagliavini😂
    1
  2583. 1
  2584. 1
  2585. 1
  2586. 1
  2587.  @nic.h  The UN Charter, in Articles 106 and 107, gives the right to the winners of the Second World War - the USSR, the USA, Great Britain and China - to apply all measures against the countries that fought against them to prevent actions aimed at revising the results of the Second World War. In particular, it is possible to use military force against these countries. To do this, it is enough to notify the other three winning countries, but not to get their consent. Forceful coercion of countries that want to revise the Yalta-Potsdam system in Europe can also be carried out by Russia, which is the legal successor of the USSR. Russia can stop attempts to revive Nazism in Germany, Hungary, Romania, Austria, Bulgaria, Finland, Croatia, Slovenia, Czech Republic, Slovakia, Italy, Spain, Norway, Denmark, Holland, Japan. Articles 106 and 107 of the UN Charter also apply to all those countries that refuse to inherit from the USSR – Latvia, Estonia, Lithuania. Their attitude that there was a Soviet occupation and the treaties of Friendship and cooperation concluded by them with the Third Reich move these countries into the ranks of the Hitlerite coalition. The same position is taken by modern Ukraine, which accepts as its predecessor the military-political formations of the OUN-UPA, created by Ukrainian fascists. Proves that all these post-Soviet republics belong to the Hitlerite coalition. Hence the possibility of revising the territorial acquisitions of countries that position themselves as supporters of the Hitlerite coalition. Plus SPONSORS OF the Nazi regimes (USA and Britain)
    1
  2588. 1
  2589. 1
  2590. 1
  2591. 1
  2592. 1
  2593. 1
  2594. 1
  2595. 1
  2596. 1
  2597. 1
  2598. 1
  2599. 1
  2600. 1
  2601. 1
  2602. 1
  2603. 1
  2604. 1
  2605. 1
  2606. 1
  2607. 1
  2608. 1
  2609. 1
  2610. 1
  2611. 1
  2612. 1
  2613. 1
  2614. 1
  2615. 1
  2616. 1
  2617. 1
  2618. 1
  2619. 1
  2620. 1
  2621. 1
  2622. 1
  2623. 1
  2624. 1
  2625. 1
  2626. 1
  2627. 1
  2628. 1
  2629. 1
  2630. 1
  2631. 1
  2632. 1
  2633. 1
  2634. 1
  2635. 1
  2636. 1
  2637. 1
  2638. 1
  2639. 1
  2640. 1
  2641. 1
  2642. 1
  2643. 1
  2644. 1
  2645. 1
  2646. 1
  2647. 1
  2648. 1
  2649. 1
  2650. 1
  2651. 1
  2652. 1
  2653. 1
  2654. 1
  2655. 1
  2656. 1
  2657. 1
  2658. 1
  2659. 1
  2660. 1
  2661. 1
  2662. 1
  2663. 1
  2664. 1
  2665. 1
  2666. 1
  2667. 1
  2668. 1
  2669. 1
  2670. 1
  2671. 1
  2672. 1
  2673. 1
  2674. 1
  2675.  @OlleSundblad  Ukraine has refused to fulfill its obligations under the Minsk agreements ratified by the UN Security Council THE MINSK AGREEMENTS 1. Immediate and comprehensive ceasefire in certain areas of the Donetsk and Luhansk regions of Ukraine and its strict implementation starting at 00:00. (Kiev time) February 15, 2015. 2. Withdrawal of all heavy weapons by both sides at equal distances in order to create a security zone at least 50 km wide from each other for artillery systems with a caliber of 100 mm or more, a security zone 70 km wide for MLRS and 140 km wide for MLRS Tornado-S, Hurricane, Tornado and tactical Tochka U missile systems: 3. Ensure effective monitoring and verification of the ceasefire and withdrawal of heavy weapons by the OSCE from the first day of withdrawal using all necessary technical means, including satellites, UAVs, radar systems, etc. 4. On the first day after the withdrawal, to begin a dialogue on the modalities of holding local elections in accordance with Ukrainian legislation and the law of Ukraine "On the Temporary order of Local Self-Government in certain areas of Donetsk and Luhansk regions", as well as on the future regime of these areas on the basis of this law. 5. To ensure pardon and amnesty by enacting a law prohibiting the prosecution and punishment of persons in connection with the events that took place in certain areas of Donetsk and Luhansk regions of Ukraine. 6. Ensure the release and exchange of all hostages and illegally detained persons on the basis of the principle of "all for all". This process must be completed no later than the fifth day after the withdrawal. 7. To ensure safe access, delivery, storage and distribution of humanitarian aid to those in need on the basis of an international mechanism. 8. Determination of modalities for the full restoration of socio-economic ties, including such social transfers as payment of pensions and other payments (income and income, timely payment of all utility bills, resumption of taxation within the legal framework of Ukraine). 9. Restoration of full control over the state border by the Government of Ukraine in the entire conflict zone, which should begin on the first day after local elections and end after a comprehensive political settlement (local elections in certain areas of Donetsk and Luhansk regions on the basis of the law of Ukraine and constitutional reform) by the end of 2015 10. Withdrawal of all foreign armed formations, military equipment, as well as mercenaries from the territory of Ukraine under the supervision of the OSCE. The disarmament of all illegal groups. 11. Carrying out constitutional reform in Ukraine with the entry into force by the end of 2015 of the new constitution, which assumes decentralization as a key element (taking into account the peculiarities of certain districts of Donetsk and Luhansk regions, agreed with representatives of these regions), as well as the adoption of permanent legislation on the special status of certain districts of Donetsk and Luhansk regions by the end of 2015. 12. On the basis of the Law of Ukraine "On the Temporary Order of Local Self-Government in certain areas of Donetsk and Luhansk regions", issues related to local elections will be discussed and coordinated with representatives of certain areas of Donetsk and Luhansk regions within the framework of the trilateral contact group. The elections will be held in compliance with the relevant OSCE standards, with monitoring by the OSCE ODIHR. 13. To intensify the activities of the trilateral contact group, including through the creation of working groups on the implementation of relevant aspects of the Minsk agreements. They will reflect the composition of the trilateral contact group. Note. Such measures in accordance with the law "On the special procedure of local Self-government in certain areas of Donetsk and Luhansk regions" include the following: - exemption from punishment, persecution and discrimination of persons related to the events that took place in certain areas of Donetsk and Luhansk regions; - The right to linguistic self-determination; - participation of local self-government bodies in the appointment of heads of prosecutor's offices and courts in certain districts of Donetsk and Luhansk regions; - an opportunity for the central executive authorities to conclude agreements with the relevant local government bodies on the economic, social and cultural development of certain districts of Donetsk and Luhansk regions; - the state supports the socio-economic development of certain districts of Donetsk and Luhansk regions; - assistance from the central authorities to cross-border cooperation in certain areas of Donetsk and Luhansk regions with the regions of the Russian Federation; - creation of people's militia detachments by decision of local councils in order to maintain public order in certain areas of Donetsk and Luhansk regions; - the powers of deputies of local councils and officials elected in early elections appointed by the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine by this law cannot be terminated prematurely. Participants of the Trilateral Contact Group: Ambassador Heidi Tagliavini The Second President of Ukraine L.D. Kuchma Ambassador of the Russian Federation to Ukraine M.Y. Zurabov A.V. Zakharchenko – Head of the Donetsk People's Republic I.V. Plotnitsky – Head of the Luhansk People's Republic
    1
  2676. 1
  2677. 1
  2678. 1
  2679. 1
  2680. 1
  2681. 1
  2682. 1
  2683. 1
  2684. 1
  2685. 1
  2686. 1
  2687. 1
  2688. 1
  2689. 1
  2690. 1
  2691. 1
  2692. 1
  2693. 1
  2694. 1
  2695. 1
  2696. 1
  2697. 1
  2698. 1
  2699. 1
  2700.  @martinskovpoulsen2736  Russia can recall and take a closer look at this Treaty: Final Settlement AGREEMENT with respect to Germany Article 1 1. The united Germany will include the territories of the German Democratic Republic, the Federal Republic of Germany and the whole of Berlin. Its external borders will finally become the borders of the GDR and the FRG from the date of entry into force of this Treaty. The confirmation of the final character of the borders of a united Germany is an essential part of the peaceful order in Europe. 2. The United Germany and the Republic of Poland confirm the existing border between them in a treaty that is binding in accordance with international law. 3. The united Germany has no territorial claims against other States and will not make such claims in the future either. 4. The Governments of the GDR and the FRG will ensure that the Constitution of the united Germany does not contain any provisions contrary to these principles. Accordingly, this applies to the provisions set out in the preamble, in the second sentence of article 23 and in article 146 of the Basic Law of Germany. 5. The Governments of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, the United States of America, the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics and the French Republic officially take note of the relevant commitments and statements of the Governments of the GDR and the FRG and declare that with their implementation the final character of the borders of the united Germany will be confirmed. Article 2 The governments of the GDR and Germany confirm their statements that only peace will come from German soil. According to the Constitution of the united Germany, actions that can and aim to disrupt peace between peoples, especially preparations for an offensive war, are unconstitutional and punishable. The Governments of the GDR and Germany declare that a united Germany will never use the weapons it possesses, except in accordance with its constitution and the UN Charter. Article 3 1. The Governments of the GDR and the FRG confirm their renunciation of the production, possession and disposal of nuclear, biological and chemical weapons. They declare that a united Germany will also adhere to these commitments. In particular, the rights and obligations arising from the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons of July 1, 1968, continue to apply to the united Germany. 2. The Government of Germany and the Government of the GDR made the following statement on August 30, 1990 in Vienna at the negotiations on conventional armed forces in Europe: "The German government undertakes to reduce the armed forces of the united Germany within 3-4 years to the number of 370,000 people (land forces, air force and naval forces). This reduction should begin with the entry into force of the first treaty on conventional armed forces in Europe. Within this cumulative upper limit, no more than 345,000 people will be included in the ground forces and air forces, which, in accordance with the agreed mandate, are the only subject of negotiations on conventional armed forces in Europe. The German Government sees in its commitment to reduce the land and air forces a significant German contribution to the reduction of conventional armed forces in Europe. It proceeds from the fact that in subsequent negotiations, other participants will also contribute to strengthening security and stability in Europe, including measures to limit the number of troops." The GDR Government fully aligned itself with this statement. 3. The Government of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, the USA, the USSR, and the French Republic take note of these statements by the Governments of the GDR and the FRG. Article 4 1. The Governments of the USSR, the GDR and the FRG declare that the USSR and the united Germany will settle by agreement the conditions and terms of the stay of Soviet troops in the territory of the present GDR and Berlin, as well as the implementation of the withdrawal of these troops, which will be completed by the end of 1994, in conjunction with the implementation of the obligations of the Governments of the GDR and the FRG, set out in paragraph 2 of Article 3 of this Agreement. 2. The Governments of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, the United States of America and the French Republic take note of this statement. Article 5 1. Until the completion of the withdrawal of Soviet troops from the territory of the present GDR and Berlin, in accordance with Article 4 of this Treaty, exclusively German territorial defense formations, not integrated into allied structures, to which German armed forces are attached to the rest of German territory, will be deployed in this territory as the armed forces of a united Germany. Subject to the settlement contained in paragraph 2 of this article, the troops of other States will not be stationed in this territory or carry out other military activities there during this period. 2. For the duration of the stay of Soviet troops in the territory of the present GDR and Berlin, the troops of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, the United States of America and the French Republic will, in accordance with the wishes of the German side, on the basis of an appropriate contractual settlement between the Government of the united Germany and the Governments of these States, continue to be stationed in Berlin. The number of personnel and the number of weapons of all non-German troops stationed in Berlin will not be greater than at the time of signing this Agreement. New categories of weapons will not be introduced there by the German armed forces. The Government of the united Germany will conclude agreements with the Governments of the States that have deployed troops in Berlin on fair terms, taking into account the relations existing with these States. 3. After the completion of the withdrawal of Soviet troops from the territory of the present GDR and Berlin, formations of the German armed forces may also be located in this part of Germany, attached to military allied structures in the same way as formations in the rest of German territory, but without nuclear weapons carriers. This does not apply to conventional weapons systems, which may have other abilities besides conventional ones, but which in this part of Germany are equipped for a conventional role and are intended only for such. Foreign troops and nuclear weapons or their carriers will not be stationed in this part of Germany and deployed there. Article 6 The right of the united Germany to participate in the unions, with all the rights and obligations arising from this, is not affected by this Treaty. Article 7 1. The United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, the United States, the USSR and the French Republic hereby terminate their rights and responsibilities with respect to Berlin and Germany as a whole. As a result, the relevant quadrilateral agreements, decisions and practices related to them are terminated and all relevant institutions of the four Powers are dissolved. 2. In accordance with this, the united Germany acquires full sovereignty over its internal and external affairs. Article 8 1. This Treaty is subject to ratification or acceptance as soon as possible. The ratification on the German side is carried out by the united Germany. This Treaty is thus valid for a united Germany. 2. Instruments of ratification or acceptance shall be deposited with the Government of the united Germany. It shall inform the Governments of the other Contracting Parties of the deposit of each instrument of ratification or acceptance. Article 9 This Treaty shall enter into force for the United Germany, the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, the United States, the USSR and the French Republic on the date of deposit by these States of the last instrument of ratification or acceptance. Article 10 The original of this Agreement, the texts of which in English, German, Russian and French are equally valid, shall be deposited with the Government of Germany, which will transmit certified copies to the Governments of the other Contracting Parties. In witness whereof the undersigned, duly authorized, have signed this Agreement. Done in Moscow on September 12, 1990
    1
  2701. 1
  2702.  @martinskovpoulsen2736  Russia can recall and take a closer look at this Treaty: Final Settlement AGREEMENT with respect to Germany Article 1 1. The united Germany will include the territories of the German Democratic Republic, the Federal Republic of Germany and the whole of Berlin. Its external borders will finally become the borders of the GDR and the FRG from the date of entry into force of this Treaty. The confirmation of the final character of the borders of a united Germany is an essential part of the peaceful order in Europe. 2. The United Germany and the Republic of Poland confirm the existing border between them in a treaty that is binding in accordance with international law. 3. The united Germany has no territorial claims against other States and will not make such claims in the future either. 4. The Governments of the GDR and the FRG will ensure that the Constitution of the united Germany does not contain any provisions contrary to these principles. Accordingly, this applies to the provisions set out in the preamble, in the second sentence of article 23 and in article 146 of the Basic Law of Germany. 5. The Governments of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, the United States of America, the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics and the French Republic officially take note of the relevant commitments and statements of the Governments of the GDR and the FRG and declare that with their implementation the final character of the borders of the united Germany will be confirmed. Article 2 The governments of the GDR and Germany confirm their statements that only peace will come from German soil. According to the Constitution of the united Germany, actions that can and aim to disrupt peace between peoples, especially preparations for an offensive war, are unconstitutional and punishable. The Governments of the GDR and Germany declare that a united Germany will never use the weapons it possesses, except in accordance with its constitution and the UN Charter. Article 3 1. The Governments of the GDR and the FRG confirm their renunciation of the production, possession and disposal of nuclear, biological and chemical weapons. They declare that a united Germany will also adhere to these commitments. In particular, the rights and obligations arising from the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons of July 1, 1968, continue to apply to the united Germany. 2. The Government of Germany and the Government of the GDR made the following statement on August 30, 1990 in Vienna at the negotiations on conventional armed forces in Europe: "The German government undertakes to reduce the armed forces of the united Germany within 3-4 years to the number of 370,000 people (land forces, air force and naval forces). This reduction should begin with the entry into force of the first treaty on conventional armed forces in Europe. Within this cumulative upper limit, no more than 345,000 people will be included in the ground forces and air forces, which, in accordance with the agreed mandate, are the only subject of negotiations on conventional armed forces in Europe. The German Government sees in its commitment to reduce the land and air forces a significant German contribution to the reduction of conventional armed forces in Europe. It proceeds from the fact that in subsequent negotiations, other participants will also contribute to strengthening security and stability in Europe, including measures to limit the number of troops." The GDR Government fully aligned itself with this statement. 3. The Government of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, the USA, the USSR, and the French Republic take note of these statements by the Governments of the GDR and the FRG. Article 4 1. The Governments of the USSR, the GDR and the FRG declare that the USSR and the united Germany will settle by agreement the conditions and terms of the stay of Soviet troops in the territory of the present GDR and Berlin, as well as the implementation of the withdrawal of these troops, which will be completed by the end of 1994, in conjunction with the implementation of the obligations of the Governments of the GDR and the FRG, set out in paragraph 2 of Article 3 of this Agreement. 2. The Governments of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, the United States of America and the French Republic take note of this statement. Article 5 1. Until the completion of the withdrawal of Soviet troops from the territory of the present GDR and Berlin, in accordance with Article 4 of this Treaty, exclusively German territorial defense formations, not integrated into allied structures, to which German armed forces are attached to the rest of German territory, will be deployed in this territory as the armed forces of a united Germany. Subject to the settlement contained in paragraph 2 of this article, the troops of other States will not be stationed in this territory or carry out other military activities there during this period. 2. For the duration of the stay of Soviet troops in the territory of the present GDR and Berlin, the troops of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, the United States of America and the French Republic will, in accordance with the wishes of the German side, on the basis of an appropriate contractual settlement between the Government of the united Germany and the Governments of these States, continue to be stationed in Berlin. The number of personnel and the number of weapons of all non-German troops stationed in Berlin will not be greater than at the time of signing this Agreement. New categories of weapons will not be introduced there by the German armed forces. The Government of the united Germany will conclude agreements with the Governments of the States that have deployed troops in Berlin on fair terms, taking into account the relations existing with these States. 3. After the completion of the withdrawal of Soviet troops from the territory of the present GDR and Berlin, formations of the German armed forces may also be located in this part of Germany, attached to military allied structures in the same way as formations in the rest of German territory, but without nuclear weapons carriers. This does not apply to conventional weapons systems, which may have other abilities besides conventional ones, but which in this part of Germany are equipped for a conventional role and are intended only for such. Foreign troops and nuclear weapons or their carriers will not be stationed in this part of Germany and deployed there. Article 6 The right of the united Germany to participate in the unions, with all the rights and obligations arising from this, is not affected by this Treaty. Article 7 1. The United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, the United States, the USSR and the French Republic hereby terminate their rights and responsibilities with respect to Berlin and Germany as a whole. As a result, the relevant quadrilateral agreements, decisions and practices related to them are terminated and all relevant institutions of the four Powers are dissolved. 2. In accordance with this, the united Germany acquires full sovereignty over its internal and external affairs. Article 8 1. This Treaty is subject to ratification or acceptance as soon as possible. The ratification on the German side is carried out by the united Germany. This Treaty is thus valid for a united Germany. 2. Instruments of ratification or acceptance shall be deposited with the Government of the united Germany. It shall inform the Governments of the other Contracting Parties of the deposit of each instrument of ratification or acceptance. Article 9 This Treaty shall enter into force for the United Germany, the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, the United States, the USSR and the French Republic on the date of deposit by these States of the last instrument of ratification or acceptance. Article 10 The original of this Agreement, the texts of which in English, German, Russian and French are equally valid, shall be deposited with the Government of Germany, which will transmit certified copies to the Governments of the other Contracting Parties. In witness whereof the undersigned, duly authorized, have signed this Agreement. Done in Moscow on September 12, 1990 ❗К вопросу ОККУПАЦИИ
    1
  2703.  @jamesedwards6173  Russia can recall and take a closer look at this Treaty: Final Settlement AGREEMENT with respect to Germany Article 1 1. The united Germany will include the territories of the German Democratic Republic, the Federal Republic of Germany and the whole of Berlin. Its external borders will finally become the borders of the GDR and the FRG from the date of entry into force of this Treaty. The confirmation of the final character of the borders of a united Germany is an essential part of the peaceful order in Europe. 2. The United Germany and the Republic of Poland confirm the existing border between them in a treaty that is binding in accordance with international law. 3. The united Germany has no territorial claims against other States and will not make such claims in the future either. 4. The Governments of the GDR and the FRG will ensure that the Constitution of the united Germany does not contain any provisions contrary to these principles. Accordingly, this applies to the provisions set out in the preamble, in the second sentence of article 23 and in article 146 of the Basic Law of Germany. 5. The Governments of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, the United States of America, the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics and the French Republic officially take note of the relevant commitments and statements of the Governments of the GDR and the FRG and declare that with their implementation the final character of the borders of the united Germany will be confirmed. Article 2 The governments of the GDR and Germany confirm their statements that only peace will come from German soil. According to the Constitution of the united Germany, actions that can and aim to disrupt peace between peoples, especially preparations for an offensive war, are unconstitutional and punishable. The Governments of the GDR and Germany declare that a united Germany will never use the weapons it possesses, except in accordance with its constitution and the UN Charter. Article 3 1. The Governments of the GDR and the FRG confirm their renunciation of the production, possession and disposal of nuclear, biological and chemical weapons. They declare that a united Germany will also adhere to these commitments. In particular, the rights and obligations arising from the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons of July 1, 1968, continue to apply to the united Germany. 2. The Government of Germany and the Government of the GDR made the following statement on August 30, 1990 in Vienna at the negotiations on conventional armed forces in Europe: "The German government undertakes to reduce the armed forces of the united Germany within 3-4 years to the number of 370,000 people (land forces, air force and naval forces). This reduction should begin with the entry into force of the first treaty on conventional armed forces in Europe. Within this cumulative upper limit, no more than 345,000 people will be included in the ground forces and air forces, which, in accordance with the agreed mandate, are the only subject of negotiations on conventional armed forces in Europe. The German Government sees in its commitment to reduce the land and air forces a significant German contribution to the reduction of conventional armed forces in Europe. It proceeds from the fact that in subsequent negotiations, other participants will also contribute to strengthening security and stability in Europe, including measures to limit the number of troops." The GDR Government fully aligned itself with this statement. 3. The Government of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, the USA, the USSR, and the French Republic take note of these statements by the Governments of the GDR and the FRG. Article 4 1. The Governments of the USSR, the GDR and the FRG declare that the USSR and the united Germany will settle by agreement the conditions and terms of the stay of Soviet troops in the territory of the present GDR and Berlin, as well as the implementation of the withdrawal of these troops, which will be completed by the end of 1994, in conjunction with the implementation of the obligations of the Governments of the GDR and the FRG, set out in paragraph 2 of Article 3 of this Agreement. 2. The Governments of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, the United States of America and the French Republic take note of this statement. Article 5 1. Until the completion of the withdrawal of Soviet troops from the territory of the present GDR and Berlin, in accordance with Article 4 of this Treaty, exclusively German territorial defense formations, not integrated into allied structures, to which German armed forces are attached to the rest of German territory, will be deployed in this territory as the armed forces of a united Germany. Subject to the settlement contained in paragraph 2 of this article, the troops of other States will not be stationed in this territory or carry out other military activities there during this period. 2. For the duration of the stay of Soviet troops in the territory of the present GDR and Berlin, the troops of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, the United States of America and the French Republic will, in accordance with the wishes of the German side, on the basis of an appropriate contractual settlement between the Government of the united Germany and the Governments of these States, continue to be stationed in Berlin. The number of personnel and the number of weapons of all non-German troops stationed in Berlin will not be greater than at the time of signing this Agreement. New categories of weapons will not be introduced there by the German armed forces. The Government of the united Germany will conclude agreements with the Governments of the States that have deployed troops in Berlin on fair terms, taking into account the relations existing with these States. 3. After the completion of the withdrawal of Soviet troops from the territory of the present GDR and Berlin, formations of the German armed forces may also be located in this part of Germany, attached to military allied structures in the same way as formations in the rest of German territory, but without nuclear weapons carriers. This does not apply to conventional weapons systems, which may have other abilities besides conventional ones, but which in this part of Germany are equipped for a conventional role and are intended only for such. Foreign troops and nuclear weapons or their carriers will not be stationed in this part of Germany and deployed there. Article 6 The right of the united Germany to participate in the unions, with all the rights and obligations arising from this, is not affected by this Treaty. Article 7 1. The United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, the United States, the USSR and the French Republic hereby terminate their rights and responsibilities with respect to Berlin and Germany as a whole. As a result, the relevant quadrilateral agreements, decisions and practices related to them are terminated and all relevant institutions of the four Powers are dissolved. 2. In accordance with this, the united Germany acquires full sovereignty over its internal and external affairs. Article 8 1. This Treaty is subject to ratification or acceptance as soon as possible. The ratification on the German side is carried out by the united Germany. This Treaty is thus valid for a united Germany. 2. Instruments of ratification or acceptance shall be deposited with the Government of the united Germany. It shall inform the Governments of the other Contracting Parties of the deposit of each instrument of ratification or acceptance. Article 9 This Treaty shall enter into force for the United Germany, the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, the United States, the USSR and the French Republic on the date of deposit by these States of the last instrument of ratification or acceptance. Article 10 The original of this Agreement, the texts of which in English, German, Russian and French are equally valid, shall be deposited with the Government of Germany, which will transmit certified copies to the Governments of the other Contracting Parties. In witness whereof the undersigned, duly authorized, have signed this Agreement. Done in Moscow on September 12, 1990
    1
  2704. 1
  2705. 1
  2706.  @wolfgangemmerich7552  Russia should DENOUNCE this Agreement: Final Settlement AGREEMENT with respect to Germany Article 1 1. The united Germany will include the territories of the German Democratic Republic, the Federal Republic of Germany and the whole of Berlin. Its external borders will finally become the borders of the GDR and the FRG from the date of entry into force of this Treaty. The confirmation of the final character of the borders of a united Germany is an essential part of the peaceful order in Europe. 2. The United Germany and the Republic of Poland confirm the existing border between them in a treaty that is binding in accordance with international law. 3. The united Germany has no territorial claims against other States and will not make such claims in the future either. 4. The Governments of the GDR and the FRG will ensure that the Constitution of the united Germany does not contain any provisions contrary to these principles. Accordingly, this applies to the provisions set out in the preamble, in the second sentence of article 23 and in article 146 of the Basic Law of Germany. 5. The Governments of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, the United States of America, the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics and the French Republic officially take note of the relevant commitments and statements of the Governments of the GDR and the FRG and declare that with their implementation the final character of the borders of the united Germany will be confirmed. Article 2 The governments of the GDR and Germany confirm their statements that only peace will come from German soil. According to the Constitution of the united Germany, actions that can and aim to disrupt peace between peoples, especially preparations for an offensive war, are unconstitutional and punishable. The Governments of the GDR and Germany declare that a united Germany will never use the weapons it possesses, except in accordance with its constitution and the UN Charter. Article 3 1. The Governments of the GDR and the FRG confirm their renunciation of the production, possession and disposal of nuclear, biological and chemical weapons. They declare that a united Germany will also adhere to these commitments. In particular, the rights and obligations arising from the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons of July 1, 1968, continue to apply to the united Germany. 2. The Government of Germany and the Government of the GDR made the following statement on August 30, 1990 in Vienna at the negotiations on conventional armed forces in Europe: "The German government undertakes to reduce the armed forces of the united Germany within 3-4 years to the number of 370,000 people (land forces, air force and naval forces). This reduction should begin with the entry into force of the first treaty on conventional armed forces in Europe. Within this cumulative upper limit, no more than 345,000 people will be included in the ground forces and air forces, which, in accordance with the agreed mandate, are the only subject of negotiations on conventional armed forces in Europe. The German Government sees in its commitment to reduce the land and air forces a significant German contribution to the reduction of conventional armed forces in Europe. It proceeds from the fact that in subsequent negotiations, other participants will also contribute to strengthening security and stability in Europe, including measures to limit the number of troops." The GDR Government fully aligned itself with this statement. 3. The Government of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, the USA, the USSR, and the French Republic take note of these statements by the Governments of the GDR and the FRG. Article 4 1. The Governments of the USSR, the GDR and the FRG declare that the USSR and the united Germany will settle by agreement the conditions and terms of the stay of Soviet troops in the territory of the present GDR and Berlin, as well as the implementation of the withdrawal of these troops, which will be completed by the end of 1994, in conjunction with the implementation of the obligations of the Governments of the GDR and the FRG, set out in paragraph 2 of Article 3 of this Agreement. 2. The Governments of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, the United States of America and the French Republic take note of this statement. Article 5 1. Until the completion of the withdrawal of Soviet troops from the territory of the present GDR and Berlin, in accordance with Article 4 of this Treaty, exclusively German territorial defense formations, not integrated into allied structures, to which German armed forces are attached to the rest of German territory, will be deployed in this territory as the armed forces of a united Germany. Subject to the settlement contained in paragraph 2 of this article, the troops of other States will not be stationed in this territory or carry out other military activities there during this period. 2. For the duration of the stay of Soviet troops in the territory of the present GDR and Berlin, the troops of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, the United States of America and the French Republic will, in accordance with the wishes of the German side, on the basis of an appropriate contractual settlement between the Government of the united Germany and the Governments of these States, continue to be stationed in Berlin. The number of personnel and the number of weapons of all non-German troops stationed in Berlin will not be greater than at the time of signing this Agreement. New categories of weapons will not be introduced there by the German armed forces. The Government of the united Germany will conclude agreements with the Governments of the States that have deployed troops in Berlin on fair terms, taking into account the relations existing with these States. 3. After the completion of the withdrawal of Soviet troops from the territory of the present GDR and Berlin, formations of the German armed forces may also be located in this part of Germany, attached to military allied structures in the same way as formations in the rest of German territory, but without nuclear weapons carriers. This does not apply to conventional weapons systems, which may have other abilities besides conventional ones, but which in this part of Germany are equipped for a conventional role and are intended only for such. Foreign troops and nuclear weapons or their carriers will not be stationed in this part of Germany and deployed there. Article 6 The right of the united Germany to participate in the unions, with all the rights and obligations arising from this, is not affected by this Treaty. Article 7 1. The United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, the United States, the USSR and the French Republic hereby terminate their rights and responsibilities with respect to Berlin and Germany as a whole. As a result, the relevant quadrilateral agreements, decisions and practices related to them are terminated and all relevant institutions of the four Powers are dissolved. 2. In accordance with this, the united Germany acquires full sovereignty over its internal and external affairs. Article 8 1. This Treaty is subject to ratification or acceptance as soon as possible. The ratification on the German side is carried out by the united Germany. This Treaty is thus valid for a united Germany. 2. Instruments of ratification or acceptance shall be deposited with the Government of the united Germany. It shall inform the Governments of the other Contracting Parties of the deposit of each instrument of ratification or acceptance. Article 9 This Treaty shall enter into force for the United Germany, the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, the United States, the USSR and the French Republic on the date of deposit by these States of the last instrument of ratification or acceptance. Article 10 The original of this Agreement, the texts of which in English, German, Russian and French are equally valid, shall be deposited with the Government of Germany, which will transmit certified copies to the Governments of the other Contracting Parties. In witness whereof the undersigned, duly authorized, have signed this Agreement. Done in Moscow on September 12, 1990
    1
  2707. 1
  2708. 1
  2709. 1
  2710. 1
  2711. 1
  2712. 1
  2713. 1
  2714. 1
  2715.  @johan8969  The UN Charter, in Articles 106 and 107, gives the right to the winners of the Second World War - the USSR, the USA, Great Britain and China - to apply all measures against the countries that fought against them to prevent actions aimed at revising the results of the Second World War. In particular, it is possible to use military force against these countries. To do this, it is enough to notify the other three winning countries, but not to get their consent. Forceful coercion of countries that want to revise the Yalta-Potsdam system in Europe can also be carried out by Russia, which is the legal successor of the USSR. Russia can stop attempts to revive Nazism in Germany, Hungary, Romania, Austria, Bulgaria, Finland, Croatia, Slovenia, Czech Republic, Slovakia, Italy, Spain, Norway, Denmark, Holland, Japan. Articles 106 and 107 of the UN Charter also apply to all those countries that refuse to inherit from the USSR – Latvia, Estonia, Lithuania. Their attitude that there was a Soviet occupation and the treaties of Friendship and cooperation concluded by them with the Third Reich move these countries into the ranks of the Hitlerite coalition. The same position is taken by modern Ukraine, which accepts as its predecessor the military-political formations of the OUN-UPA, created by Ukrainian fascists. Proves that all these post-Soviet republics belong to the Hitlerite coalition. Hence the possibility of revising the territorial acquisitions of countries that position themselves as supporters of the Hitlerite coalition. Plus SPONSORS OF the Nazi regimes (USA and Britain)
    1
  2716. 1
  2717. 1
  2718. 1
  2719. 1
  2720. 1
  2721. 1
  2722. 1
  2723. 1
  2724. 1
  2725. 1
  2726. 1
  2727. 1
  2728. 1
  2729. 1
  2730. 1
  2731. 1
  2732. 1
  2733. 1
  2734. 1
  2735. 1
  2736. 1
  2737. 1
  2738. 1
  2739. 1
  2740. 1
  2741. 1
  2742. 1
  2743. 1
  2744. 1
  2745. 1
  2746. 1
  2747. 1
  2748. 1
  2749. 1
  2750.  @alwood1993  First of all, Russia never intended to attack a NATO country... or any country at all. However, in the case of aggression against Russia, one should not delude oneself - At "moment X" Russia will not care at all whether the aggressor country is a member of NATO or not. It's just that military bases on the territory of these countries will cease to exist... as are the countries themselves within their current borders... Secondly, the conflict in Ukraine has nothing to do with either the United States or Europe. This is a civil confrontation within Ukraine. However, if the United States and Europe decide to become active participants in SOMEONE ELSE's conflict... In the end, they should not complain about the CONSEQUENCES for themselves after the defeat in Ukraine... Thirdly, China, Iran, and North Korea have nothing to do with the conflict in Ukraine. However, they have every right to defend themselves against the aggression of the United States and NATO. To deal with the aggressor in a MIRROR WAY - to impose sanctions against the above, to arrange terrorist attacks on the territory of the above... Or TAKE REVENGE on the West on the territory of Ukraine... That is, to do in relation to the United States and Europe the same thing that the United States and Europe are doing in relation to them... The RESULT, in case you don't know, is that on January 31, 2024, the International Court of Justice refused to recognize Russia as an "aggressor state". The court also rejected Ukraine's claim under the ICFBT to hold Russia responsible for the crash of Boeing flight MH17. As a result of the proceedings, Ukraine was completely denied all claims for compensation or other forms of satisfaction
    1
  2751. 1
  2752. 1
  2753. 1
  2754. 1
  2755. 1
  2756. 1
  2757.  @stream2watch  Russia should start working on the DENUNCIATION of this Treaty: Final Settlement AGREEMENT with respect to Germany Article 1 1. The united Germany will include the territories of the German Democratic Republic, the Federal Republic of Germany and the whole of Berlin. Its external borders will finally become the borders of the GDR and the FRG from the date of entry into force of this Treaty. The confirmation of the final character of the borders of a united Germany is an essential part of the peaceful order in Europe. 2. The United Germany and the Republic of Poland confirm the existing border between them in a treaty that is binding in accordance with international law. 3. The united Germany has no territorial claims against other States and will not make such claims in the future either. 4. The Governments of the GDR and the FRG will ensure that the Constitution of the united Germany does not contain any provisions contrary to these principles. Accordingly, this applies to the provisions set out in the preamble, in the second sentence of article 23 and in article 146 of the Basic Law of Germany. 5. The Governments of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, the United States of America, the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics and the French Republic officially take note of the relevant commitments and statements of the Governments of the GDR and the FRG and declare that with their implementation the final character of the borders of the united Germany will be confirmed. Article 2 The governments of the GDR and Germany confirm their statements that only peace will come from German soil. According to the Constitution of the united Germany, actions that can and aim to disrupt peace between peoples, especially preparations for an offensive war, are unconstitutional and punishable. The Governments of the GDR and Germany declare that a united Germany will never use the weapons it possesses, except in accordance with its constitution and the UN Charter. Article 3 1. The Governments of the GDR and the FRG confirm their renunciation of the production, possession and disposal of nuclear, biological and chemical weapons. They declare that a united Germany will also adhere to these commitments. In particular, the rights and obligations arising from the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons of July 1, 1968, continue to apply to the united Germany. 2. The Government of Germany and the Government of the GDR made the following statement on August 30, 1990 in Vienna at the negotiations on conventional armed forces in Europe: "The German government undertakes to reduce the armed forces of the united Germany within 3-4 years to the number of 370,000 people (land forces, air force and naval forces). This reduction should begin with the entry into force of the first treaty on conventional armed forces in Europe. Within this cumulative upper limit, no more than 345,000 people will be included in the ground forces and air forces, which, in accordance with the agreed mandate, are the only subject of negotiations on conventional armed forces in Europe. The German Government sees in its commitment to reduce the land and air forces a significant German contribution to the reduction of conventional armed forces in Europe. It proceeds from the fact that in subsequent negotiations, other participants will also contribute to strengthening security and stability in Europe, including measures to limit the number of troops." The GDR Government fully aligned itself with this statement. 3. The Government of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, the USA, the USSR, and the French Republic take note of these statements by the Governments of the GDR and the FRG. Article 4 1. The Governments of the USSR, the GDR and the FRG declare that the USSR and the united Germany will settle by agreement the conditions and terms of the stay of Soviet troops in the territory of the present GDR and Berlin, as well as the implementation of the withdrawal of these troops, which will be completed by the end of 1994, in conjunction with the implementation of the obligations of the Governments of the GDR and the FRG, set out in paragraph 2 of Article 3 of this Agreement. 2. The Governments of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, the United States of America and the French Republic take note of this statement. Article 5 1. Until the completion of the withdrawal of Soviet troops from the territory of the present GDR and Berlin, in accordance with Article 4 of this Treaty, exclusively German territorial defense formations, not integrated into allied structures, to which German armed forces are attached to the rest of German territory, will be deployed in this territory as the armed forces of a united Germany. Subject to the settlement contained in paragraph 2 of this article, the troops of other States will not be stationed in this territory or carry out other military activities there during this period. 2. For the duration of the stay of Soviet troops in the territory of the present GDR and Berlin, the troops of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, the United States of America and the French Republic will, in accordance with the wishes of the German side, on the basis of an appropriate contractual settlement between the Government of the united Germany and the Governments of these States, continue to be stationed in Berlin. The number of personnel and the number of weapons of all non-German troops stationed in Berlin will not be greater than at the time of signing this Agreement. New categories of weapons will not be introduced there by the German armed forces. The Government of the united Germany will conclude agreements with the Governments of the States that have deployed troops in Berlin on fair terms, taking into account the relations existing with these States. 3. After the completion of the withdrawal of Soviet troops from the territory of the present GDR and Berlin, formations of the German armed forces may also be located in this part of Germany, attached to military allied structures in the same way as formations in the rest of German territory, but without nuclear weapons carriers. This does not apply to conventional weapons systems, which may have other abilities besides conventional ones, but which in this part of Germany are equipped for a conventional role and are intended only for such. Foreign troops and nuclear weapons or their carriers will not be stationed in this part of Germany and deployed there. Article 6 The right of the united Germany to participate in the unions, with all the rights and obligations arising from this, is not affected by this Treaty. Article 7 1. The United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, the United States, the USSR and the French Republic hereby terminate their rights and responsibilities with respect to Berlin and Germany as a whole. As a result, the relevant quadrilateral agreements, decisions and practices related to them are terminated and all relevant institutions of the four Powers are dissolved. 2. In accordance with this, the united Germany acquires full sovereignty over its internal and external affairs. Article 8 1. This Treaty is subject to ratification or acceptance as soon as possible. The ratification on the German side is carried out by the united Germany. This Treaty is thus valid for a united Germany. 2. Instruments of ratification or acceptance shall be deposited with the Government of the united Germany. It shall inform the Governments of the other Contracting Parties of the deposit of each instrument of ratification or acceptance. Article 9 This Treaty shall enter into force for the United Germany, the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, the United States, the USSR and the French Republic on the date of deposit by these States of the last instrument of ratification or acceptance. Article 10 The original of this Agreement, the texts of which in English, German, Russian and French are equally valid, shall be deposited with the Government of Germany, which will transmit certified copies to the Governments of the other Contracting Parties. In witness whereof the undersigned, duly authorized, have signed this Agreement. Done in Moscow on September 12, 1990
    1
  2758. 1
  2759. 1
  2760. 1
  2761. 1
  2762. 1
  2763. 1
  2764.  @ristoikonen6957  The UN Charter, in Articles 106 and 107, gives the right to the winners of the Second World War - the USSR, the USA, Great Britain and China - to apply all measures against the countries that fought against them to prevent actions aimed at revising the results of the Second World War. In particular, it is possible to use military force against these countries. To do this, it is enough to notify the other three winning countries, but not to get their consent. Forceful coercion of countries that want to revise the Yalta-Potsdam system in Europe can also be carried out by Russia, which is the legal successor of the USSR. Russia can stop attempts to revive Nazism in Germany, Hungary, Romania, Austria, Bulgaria, Finland, Croatia, Slovenia, Czech Republic, Slovakia, Italy, Spain, Norway, Denmark, Holland, Japan. Articles 106 and 107 of the UN Charter also apply to all those countries that refuse to inherit from the USSR – Latvia, Estonia, Lithuania. Their attitude that there was a Soviet occupation and the treaties of Friendship and cooperation concluded by them with the Third Reich move these countries into the ranks of the Hitlerite coalition. The same position is taken by modern Ukraine, which accepts as its predecessor the military-political formations of the OUN-UPA, created by Ukrainian fascists. Proves that all these post-Soviet republics belong to the Hitlerite coalition. Hence the possibility of revising the territorial acquisitions of countries that position themselves as supporters of the Hitlerite coalition. Plus SPONSORS OF the Nazi regimes (USA and Britain) Just information for general development
    1
  2765. 1
  2766. 1
  2767. 1
  2768. 1
  2769. 1
  2770. 1
  2771. 1
  2772. 1
  2773. 1
  2774. 1
  2775. 1
  2776. 1
  2777. 1
  2778. 1
  2779. 1
  2780. 1
  2781. 1
  2782. 1
  2783. 1
  2784. 1
  2785. 1
  2786. 1
  2787. 1
  2788. 1
  2789. 1
  2790. 1
  2791. 1
  2792. 1
  2793. 1
  2794. 1
  2795. 1
  2796. 1
  2797. 1
  2798. 1
  2799. 1
  2800. 1
  2801. 1
  2802. 1
  2803. 1
  2804. 1
  2805. 1
  2806. 1
  2807. 1
  2808. 1
  2809. 1
  2810. 1
  2811. 1
  2812. 1
  2813. 1
  2814. 1
  2815. 1
  2816. 1
  2817. 1
  2818. 1
  2819. 1
  2820. 1
  2821. 1
  2822. 1
  2823. 1
  2824. 1
  2825. 1
  2826. 1
  2827. 1
  2828. 1
  2829. 1
  2830. 1
  2831. 1
  2832. 1
  2833. 1
  2834. 1
  2835. 1
  2836. 1
  2837. 1
  2838. 1
  2839. 1
  2840. 1
  2841. 1
  2842. 1
  2843. 1
  2844. 1
  2845. 1
  2846. 1
  2847. 1
  2848. 1
  2849. 1
  2850. 1
  2851. 1
  2852. 1
  2853. 1
  2854. 1
  2855. 1
  2856. 1
  2857. 1
  2858. 1
  2859. 1
  2860. 1
  2861. 1
  2862. 1
  2863. 1
  2864. 1
  2865. 1
  2866. 1
  2867. 1
  2868. 1
  2869. 1
  2870. 1
  2871. 1
  2872. 1
  2873. 1
  2874.  @zignar22  Don't burst with importance and inflated overestimation. Any help is always what it is - no less and NO MORE. On the scale of the war on the territory of the Soviet Union, by definition, NO assistance could have a decisive effect on the outcome of the war. It was a local "plugging of holes". Just look at the battle maps simultaneously throughout the entire territory of the Soviet Union. All of the above taken together is for one Kursk battle. And the war went on for 4 years. Yes, lend-lease has really helped in certain locations on the ground. It would have been much worse without him. However, the main DECISIVE factor of victory in this regard was the Soviet military-industrial complex, launched at full power. When the WHOLE country was at the machine 24/7. In addition, lend-lease started working after 1942, when the war had already turned from a series of defeats in the first months of the war in 1941 to victory in the battle of Moscow. At this MOST difficult time for the country, there was no help yet. But the country stood up. And the assault on Berlin was carried out exclusively with Soviet-made weapons and military equipment. So the US has over-praised itself to the point of utter absurdity. It is necessary to look at the world realistically, to be able to compare quantity and scale))) By the way, if we compare, Ukraine has currently received a total of much MORE Western weapons and equipment than the USSR under lend-lease… Although the scale of the war in Ukraine is not even close to comparable with the Second World War… So what? We see the result… A clear proof that no help affects the outcome of the war. So the American balloon needs to deflate a little and come to terms with the fact that the United States is not the dominant navel of the earth. And commentators like you need to learn how to work with a calculator: calculate the number–scale algorithm
    1
  2875. 1
  2876.  @cyberfunk3793  "it sounds from the mouth of a man whose country has been attacking civilians in Ukraine for more than 2 years..." For some reason it seemed to me that the fighting was taking place at the FRONT. I did not notice the civilians in the trenches and fortified areas opposite. The Ukrainian army and mercenaries from all over the world are firing from there... Perhaps I misunderstand the definition of "civilians"... it sounds pathetic and ridiculous against the background of such a CONTEXT. We can talk about the attacks. Would you like to discuss this topic with THESE people? List of countries INVADED, bombed/attacked by the United States (along with NATO countries) after World War II: Korea and China (1950-1953) Guatemala (1954) Indonesia (1958, 1966) Haiti (1959) Cuba (1959-1961) Guatemala (1960) Congo (1964) Laos (1959, 1964-1973) Vietnam (1961-1973) Cambodia (1969-1970) Guatemala (1960, 1967-1969) Grenada (1983) Lebanon (1958, 1983, 1984) Libya (1986, 2011) El Salvador (1980s) Nicaragua (1972, 1980s) Iran (1987) Honduras (1988) Panama (1989) Iraq (1991) Kuwait (1991) Somalia (1993) Bosnia (1994, 1995) Sudan (1998) Afghanistan (1998) Yugoslavia (1999) Yemen (2002) Iraq (1991-2003) Iraq (2003-2015) Afghanistan (2001-2015) Pakistan (2007-2015) Somalia (1992-1994, 2007, 2008, 2011) Yemen (2009, 2011) Libya (2011, 2015) Syria (2013 – present) Bombing YEMEN and LEBANON – right now + Supplying weapons to the Israeli army to exterminate the population of Gaza – right now ❗Go and dare to open your mouth in any of these countries... THEY HAVEN'T FORGOTTEN... don't get your hopes up and don't get your hopes up. The Japanese actually also REMEMBER who bombed them
    1
  2877. 1
  2878. 1
  2879. 1
  2880. 1
  2881. 1
  2882. 1
  2883. 1
  2884. 1
  2885. 1