Comments by "Evgeniya" (@evgeniya7853) on "Russia's view on the ICC and war crimes" video.

  1. The United States has not just "not ratified," it has passed a special law on the Rome Statute called the "Law on the Protection of American Military Personnel," which states that no American citizen or ally can be arrested or detained by order of the ICC. The Law, among its provisions, contains the following. No agency or organization of the U.S. government, any state or local government may extradite any U.S. person to the International Criminal Court or support the transfer of any U.S. citizen or permanent resident to the ICC. No agency or organization of the U.S. Government or any state or local government, including any court, may provide support to the International Criminal Court. No agent of the International Criminal Court may conduct in the United States or in any territory under U.S. jurisdiction any investigative activity related to the preliminary investigation, investigation, prosecution or other proceedings before the International Criminal Court. ❗In 2006, ICC Prosecutor Fatou Bensouda opened a preliminary investigation into US actions in Afghanistan, trying to find understanding from the Obama administration, but met the same resistance from the Democratic Party as the Republican one. The investigation was postponed for 11 years. In 2017, after President Donald Trump took office, Bensouda officially appealed to the ICC judges with a request to authorize the launch of an investigation into war crimes committed by the US armed forces and the CIA. In 2018, the US authorities announced that they would arrest ICC judges and impose sanctions on all those involved in the investigation. The judges understood the signal – and in 2019, a decision followed: Bensouda was refused to initiate an investigation, and in its justification the court referred to the "complexity and variability of the political climate." In 2020, the "changeable climate" changed towards the decline of Trump – and Bensouda managed to appeal this decision. The investigation was authorized. The Trump administration, in turn, said that such actions by the ICC "threaten to undermine U.S. sovereignty." In September of the same year, the United States imposed personal sanctions against Bensouda and another high–ranking employee of the ICC Prosecutor's office, Fakiso Mochochoko… What clear-cut boys😂
    6
  2. 4
  3. 4
  4. 4
  5. 4
  6. The UN Charter, in Articles 106 and 107, gives the right to the winners of the Second World War - the USSR, the USA, Great Britain and China - to apply all measures against the countries that fought against them to prevent actions aimed at revising the results of the Second World War. In particular, it is possible to use military force against these countries. To do this, it is enough to notify the other three winning countries, but not to get their consent. Forceful coercion of countries that want to revise the Yalta-Potsdam system in Europe can also be carried out by Russia, which is the legal successor of the USSR. Russia can stop attempts to revive Nazism in Germany, Hungary, Romania, Austria, Bulgaria, Finland, Croatia, Slovenia, Czech Republic, Slovakia, Italy, Spain, Norway, Denmark, Holland, Japan. Articles 106 and 107 of the UN Charter also apply to all those countries that refuse to inherit from the USSR – Latvia, Estonia, Lithuania. Their attitude that there was a Soviet occupation and the treaties of Friendship and cooperation concluded by them with the Third Reich move these countries into the ranks of the Hitlerite coalition. The same position is taken by modern Ukraine, which accepts as its predecessor the military-political formations of the OUN-UPA, created by Ukrainian fascists. Proves that all these post-Soviet republics belong to the Hitlerite coalition. Hence the possibility of revising the territorial acquisitions of countries that position themselves as supporters of the Hitlerite coalition. Plus SPONSORS OF the Nazi regimes (USA and Britain)
    3
  7. The UN Charter, in Articles 106 and 107, gives the right to the winners of the Second World War - the USSR, the USA, Great Britain and China - to apply all measures against the countries that fought against them to prevent actions aimed at revising the results of the Second World War. In particular, it is possible to use military force against these countries. To do this, it is enough to notify the other three winning countries, but not to get their consent. Forceful coercion of countries that want to revise the Yalta-Potsdam system in Europe can also be carried out by Russia, which is the legal successor of the USSR. Russia can stop attempts to revive Nazism in Germany, Hungary, Romania, Austria, Bulgaria, Finland, Croatia, Slovenia, Czech Republic, Slovakia, Italy, Spain, Norway, Denmark, Holland, Japan. Articles 106 and 107 of the UN Charter also apply to all those countries that refuse to inherit from the USSR – Latvia, Estonia, Lithuania. Their attitude that there was a Soviet occupation and the treaties of Friendship and cooperation concluded by them with the Third Reich move these countries into the ranks of the Hitlerite coalition. The same position is taken by modern Ukraine, which accepts as its predecessor the military-political formations of the OUN-UPA, created by Ukrainian fascists. Proves that all these post-Soviet republics belong to the Hitlerite coalition. Hence the possibility of revising the territorial acquisitions of countries that position themselves as supporters of the Hitlerite coalition. Plus SPONSORS OF the Nazi regimes (USA and Britain)
    2
  8. 2
  9. 2
  10. 2
  11. 2
  12. 2
  13. 2
  14. 2
  15. 2
  16. 2
  17. 2
  18. 2
  19. 1
  20. 1
  21. 1
  22. 1
  23. 1
  24. 1
  25. 1
  26. 1
  27. 1
  28. 1
  29. 1
  30. 1
  31. 1
  32. 1
  33. 1
  34. 1
  35. 1
  36. 1
  37. 1
  38. 1
  39. 1
  40. 1
  41. 1
  42. 1
  43. 1
  44. 1
  45. 1
  46. 1
  47. 1
  48. 1
  49. 1
  50. 1
  51. 1
  52. 1
  53. 1
  54. 1
  55. 1
  56. 1
  57. 1
  58. 1
  59.  @nattygsbord  The only thing Russia wants is to ensure the SECURITY of the Russian state. The wishes of the former republics in the post-Soviet space do not matter at the level of geopolitics. Relations between the two countries are governed by international treaties that assume OBLIGATIONS on BOTH sides. Which impose certain restrictions on BOTH sides (Russia is also limited in its desires). Ukraine and Kazakhstan have agreed to a NEUTRAL, non-aligned status. If countries wish to reconsider their status and join a military alliance hostile to Russia, this is their right. Only in this case, all guarantees of Russia in relation to them are automatically canceled. Russia will act towards them in the same way as towards any NATO country. In the event of a war with NATO, strikes will be equally inflicted not only on Europe, but also on Latvia, Lithuania, Estonia, Ukraine and others who have repeated the path of Ukraine. Therefore, Ukraine, which has freed itself from all obligations towards Russia, looks ridiculous and ridiculous, accusing Russia of violating some obligations. Seriously? This is not how it works in international relations. Ukraine has allowed itself to turn into a NATO springboard against Russia, opening the way to the Russian border for American military infrastructure... Therefore, Ukraine will face the fate of a "used bridgehead" If this is so difficult to understand, put Mexico on the border with the state of Texas in place of Ukraine. Mexico is also free to do whatever it wants, isn't it? Including inviting the Russian armed forces to the border with the United States, equipping Russian nuclear bases there... lol...
    1
  60. 1
  61. 1
  62. 1
  63. 1
  64. 1
  65. 1
  66. 1
  67. 1
  68. 1
  69. 1
  70. 1
  71. 1
  72. 1
  73. 1
  74. 1
  75.  @nic.h  The UN Charter, in Articles 106 and 107, gives the right to the winners of the Second World War - the USSR, the USA, Great Britain and China - to apply all measures against the countries that fought against them to prevent actions aimed at revising the results of the Second World War. In particular, it is possible to use military force against these countries. To do this, it is enough to notify the other three winning countries, but not to get their consent. Forceful coercion of countries that want to revise the Yalta-Potsdam system in Europe can also be carried out by Russia, which is the legal successor of the USSR. Russia can stop attempts to revive Nazism in Germany, Hungary, Romania, Austria, Bulgaria, Finland, Croatia, Slovenia, Czech Republic, Slovakia, Italy, Spain, Norway, Denmark, Holland, Japan. Articles 106 and 107 of the UN Charter also apply to all those countries that refuse to inherit from the USSR – Latvia, Estonia, Lithuania. Their attitude that there was a Soviet occupation and the treaties of Friendship and cooperation concluded by them with the Third Reich move these countries into the ranks of the Hitlerite coalition. The same position is taken by modern Ukraine, which accepts as its predecessor the military-political formations of the OUN-UPA, created by Ukrainian fascists. Proves that all these post-Soviet republics belong to the Hitlerite coalition. Hence the possibility of revising the territorial acquisitions of countries that position themselves as supporters of the Hitlerite coalition. Plus SPONSORS OF the Nazi regimes (USA and Britain)
    1
  76. 1
  77. 1
  78. 1
  79. 1
  80. 1
  81. 1
  82. 1
  83. 1
  84. 1
  85. 1
  86. 1
  87. 1
  88. 1
  89. 1
  90. 1
  91. 1
  92. 1
  93. 1
  94. 1
  95. 1
  96. 1