Comments by "Evgeniya" (@evgeniya7853) on "Escalation management and Biden’s strategy for Ukraine" video.

  1. Requirements of the Russian Federation to the United States and NATO on security guarantees (December 2021) The demands were ignored. As a result, these demands will be fulfilled at the cost of millions of lives, the destruction of an entire state, riots and economic collapse in Europe Draft agreements between Russia, NATO and the United States on security guarantees. The main provisions of the first document: — exclude the further expansion of NATO and the accession of Ukraine to the alliance; — not to deploy additional military and weapons outside the countries where they were in May 1997 (before joining the alliance of Eastern European countries) – except in exceptional cases with the consent of Russia and NATO members; — to abandon any NATO military activity in Ukraine, Eastern Europe, Transcaucasia, and Central Asia; — do not deploy medium-range and shorter-range missiles where they can hit the territory of the other side; — not to conduct exercises and other actions with a strength of more than a brigade in the agreed border zone, regularly exchange information about military exercises; — to confirm that the parties do not consider each other as opponents, to consolidate the agreement to resolve all disputes peacefully and to refrain from the use of force; — to give an obligation not to create conditions that can be regarded as a threat by the other party; — Create hotlines for emergency contacts. The main provisions of the second document are: — not to deploy weapons and forces in areas where it will be perceived by the other side as a threat to national security; — refrain from flying heavy bombers in nuclear and non-nuclear equipment outside their skies, from where they can hit targets on the territory of the other side; — refrain from the presence of warships in areas outside national waters, from where they can hit targets on the territory of the other side; — not to deploy medium-range and shorter-range missiles abroad and in areas from where they can hit targets on the territory of the other side; — not to deploy nuclear weapons abroad and return those already deployed, as well as eliminate the infrastructure for the deployment of nuclear weapons outside its territory; — not to conduct military exercises with the development of scenarios for the use of nuclear weapons and not to prepare the military of non-nuclear countries to use nuclear weapons; — The United States undertakes to exclude further expansion of NATO to the east and to refuse admission to the alliance of post-Soviet countries; — The United States undertakes not to create military bases in post-Soviet countries, not to use their military infrastructure and not to develop military cooperation with them
    2
  2.  @nic.h  Is NATO based on defense? Tell this tale to THESE people List of countries INVADED, bombed/attacked by the United States (along with NATO countries) after World War II: Korea and China (1950-1953) Guatemala (1954) Indonesia (1958, 1966) Haiti (1959) Cuba (1959-1961) Guatemala (1960) Congo (1964) Laos (1959, 1964-1973) Vietnam (1961-1973) Cambodia (1969-1970) Guatemala (1960, 1967-1969) Grenada (1983) Lebanon (1958, 1983, 1984) Libya (1986, 2011) El Salvador (1980s) Nicaragua (1972, 1980s) Iran (1987) Honduras (1988) Panama (1989) Iraq (1991) Kuwait (1991) Somalia (1993) Bosnia (1994, 1995) Sudan (1998) Afghanistan (1998) Yugoslavia (1999) Yemen (2002) Iraq (1991-2003) Iraq (2003-2015) Afghanistan (2001-2015) Pakistan (2007-2015) Somalia (1992-1994, 2007, 2008, 2011) Yemen (2009, 2011) Libya (2011, 2015) Syria (2013 – present) Bombing YEMEN and LEBANON – right now + Supplying weapons to the Israeli army to exterminate the population of Gaza – right now
    2
  3.  @theredscourge  And from what fright should Russia plunge into a civil war? It's still a question of WHO exactly is experiencing the illusion of victory
    2
  4.  @zahimiibrahim3602  What does Putin and his government have to do with it? It will be useful for you to inquire about the origins and cause of the Ukrainian conflict. In general, it is always useful to study the topic before opening your mouth
    2
  5. 19. The conditions determining the possibility of the Russian Federation using nuclear weapons are: a) receipt of reliable information about the launch of ballistic missiles attacking the territories of the Russian Federation and (or) its allies; b) the use by the enemy of nuclear weapons or other types of weapons of mass destruction on the territories of the Russian Federation and (or) its allies; c) the enemy's impact on critically important state or military facilities of the Russian Federation, the disabling of which will lead to the disruption of the response of nuclear forces; d) aggression against the Russian Federation with the USE of CONVENTIONAL weapons, when the very existence of the State is threatened.
    2
  6. Since December 2021, Russia has received data on NATO's plans to deploy 4 military brigades on the territory of Ukraine (2 land, 1 sea, 1 air). Moreover, an air brigade with the ability to carry nuclear warheads. By the end of the year, they would have provoked a conflict and launched full-scale military operations against Russia using nuclear weapons. The key role in this was assigned to the current American-controlled ruling elite in Ukraine and the nationalists. A plan of attack was being prepared with the destruction of the population on the territory of the Donetsk and Lugansk People's Republics. A day before the start of the war, fateful decisions were made to destroy the Russian-speaking population in Donbass. About a week before the start of the Russian special operation, the People's militia of the DPR intercepted a map of the offensive on Donbass from the AFU. It was clearly laid out when long-range artillery strikes would be carried out, when MLRS, when aviation, then strikes by the operational tactical group (OTG), respectively "North", "South" and "East". OTG Vostok was supposed to operate at the intersection of Donetsk and Lugansk. They had three days to go to the border, and the OTG "SOUTH" would act together with the "Aidar", who, according to the plan, were supposed to act as a barrier detachment. In the north, where Lugansk, the AFU were supposed to operate under the cover of the "Right Sector", they were supposed to meet in the Komsomolsk area south of Donetsk and cut off the LDPR from the border with Russia. It was planned to start a "full sweep" within two days. Moreover, Donetsk, Lugansk and several other cities were simply surrounded and blocked, that is, a complete blockade of settlements was envisaged, before a "complete sweep". This plan was developed jointly with NATO curators, since the Americans had previously transferred about 5,000 of their soldiers to Poland, plus there was also the Polish army – according to the plan, they were supposed to block the Kaliningrad grouping of Russia, so that if anything it could not advance to the attacked territory of southeastern Ukraine. The second group is a thousand soldiers of the Stryker brigade (armored vehicles) in Romania. This group blocked Transnistria so that the peacekeepers stationed there could not advance through the South to Odessa. It was all a single set of actions that were supposed to begin on the night of February 24-25. However, suddenly, for them, the units of the LPR and DPR began to actively operate one day earlier with the support of the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation
    2
  7.  @alwood1993  There is no need to try to "pull an owl on the globe" - To try to attract China, Iran and North Korea to the conflict in Ukraine. There is a "small" nuance here. The United States and NATO are waging a CONCRETE war with Russia at the hands of Ukrainians... which doesn't change the point. Russia is fighting a war FOR ITSELF. I do not understand the West's surprise at the actions of the entire non-Western world in relation to this conflict. Did you really think that you could unleash aggression of this magnitude with complete impunity?.. and get no RESPONSE? Seriously? Does the whole non-Western world understand perfectly well that the war is not only against Russia, but also against them?
    2
  8. "They can't win, but they can't stop either." On the basis of what is such a strange conclusion made? I do not notice any "military rails" in the Russian economy
    1
  9.  @chrisstrawn4108  And what was wrong with the post-war Soviet economy? The launch of the first artificial Earth satellite? The first man in space (Gagarin)? The first human spacewalk (Titov)? The world's first orbital station "Salyut-1" The creation of the first nuclear reactor? Creating the first laser? The world's first nuclear icebreaker? The world's first flight of the Tu-144 supersonic passenger aircraft? The world's first kidney transplant?
    1
  10.  @johntomasini3916  What is the basis for such a strange conclusion, gopher? Everything is fine with the Russian production of weapons, missiles and projectiles. Including the Angara-5 heavy-class space launch vehicles, created exclusively from domestic components
    1
  11.  @Epaminondas371  Don't fart with importance... a fan of historical soap bubbles😂
    1
  12.  @Epaminondas371  You can't even bring back your own astronauts who are stuck on the space station right now... Without Russia's participation
    1
  13.  @marrs1013  The Budapest Memorandum CEASED to exist after the US INTERVENED in Ukraine's internal politics. A coup d'etat organized by third countries deprives the country of political sovereignty, turning it into a "marin state". It's time to stop doing semantic balancing acts, poking everyone's nose into a decomposed corpse and convincing the whole world that shit smells like roses - There has been no sovereign Ukraine since 2014. Russia has not concluded any agreements with the puppet regimes of the United States THAT'S IT, THE CAT IS DEAD
    1
  14.  @BC-tp8ep  Besides Putin, there are 143,000,000 people living in Russia... Just a reminder
    1
  15.  @theredscourge  Don't get your hopes up, gopher. Russia has seen worse times, and Russia is no stranger to trials. Compared to the 1990s, life in Russia is now a full bowl... The fifth economy in the world is very far from collapse. After all, everything is known in comparison. Also, the public that rocked power in 1917 is far in the past. Nowadays, completely different people and a more civic-oriented society RULE in Russia. Especially after all the garbage has merged into Europe. How many of them escaped there? No one in Russia is interested. Their place was taken by other, patriotic people from Donbass. The balance has been restored. The question is, WHAT is the consumer society ready for in well-fed Europe and the USA? Are Western citizens ready for conditional "empty shelves in the store"? Eh?
    1
  16.  @nic.h  The United States is NATO. NATO is the US troops (no matter which country of origin they are in) on the territory of Eurasia. In fact, NATO is the same as the Warsaw Pact military bloc. The only difference is in the TASTES and personal preferences of the alliance members. The DOLLAR turned out to be preferable. Don't even try to lie to yourself. The United States is leaving - NATO is automatically self-destructing. And together with the European Union... In their current form and condition
    1
  17.  @nic.h  Do you really not appreciate your own intelligence that much? Well, at least in private, you don't have to deceive yourself
    1
  18.  @AkselGAL  Azerbaijan "captured" Nagorno-Karabakh because Pashinyan signed an agreement with Aliyev that Armenia recognizes Azerbaijan's sovereignty over Nagorno-Karabakh))) Russia is simply tired of the hopeless stupidity of the Armenian authorities to interfere. This is the result of the policy of "sitting on two chairs". This will be the case with all the other post-Soviet republics that covetously look to the West - the destruction of their state. Some people just need to learn their lesson
    1
  19.  @marrs1013  Russia does NOT have to use nuclear weapons to inflict painful blows on NATO and the United States... There are many other interesting options... Moreover, there are many people in the world who want to participate))) It's not that nuclear weapons weren't eventually used... Any Doctrine is a program of action, not a framed herbarium))) Do you have problems perceiving reality that is not mixed with Hollywood comics?
    1
  20.  @marrs1013  We can also laugh and make fun of the American Nuclear Doctrine... moreover, there really is something to work on😂
    1
  21. Exactly. They have not been able to force Ukraine to comply with the Minsk Agreements ratified by the UN and recognized by the international community
    1
  22.  @ninjafruitchilled  And why should Russia collapse?
    1
  23.  @ТрънчоДиваков  You must have a fear of your own collapse. This is more relevant today
    1
  24.  @billyponsonby  This is not Russia, but the whole world will plunge into chaos. I am moved to tears by the United States, which firmly believes that the "Atlantic puddle" guarantees their safety
    1
  25.  @dylanc9174  Aren't you laughing at the nonsense you've written?🤡
    1
  26.  @MrKakibuy  Why does Russia need US control? Control your own reproductive organs
    1
  27.  @ozzylad2497  So what's the problem, gopher? As soon as mobilization begins in the USA and Europe, you will run to the front ahead of everyone))) By the way, why aren't you still in the Ukrainian trenches? We have heard that there are problems with recruitment in Ukraine
    1
  28.  @benholroyd5221  Aren't you laughing at the nonsense you've written?🤡
    1
  29.  @tech477  Exactly how many wars has Russia lost in the last 1,000 years?
    1
  30.  @MrCABman1972  Russia will decide what is best for it without you
    1
  31.  @OliverBootle1  On the basis of what did you decide that Russia (the fifth economy in the world according to World Bank research) should collapse?
    1
  32.  @r2hildur  On the basis of what did you decide that Russia (the fifth economy in the world according to World Bank research) should collapse?
    1
  33.  @Anton1SPb  Не лишайте людей их священной мантры😂
    1
  34.  @OliverBootle1  Do you want to repeat it for an encore? However, the Soviet Union has become a thing of the past and has become history. The realities of the USSR have nothing to do with today's realities in Russia. The history is cyclical and diverse. It is characterized by ALTERNATION. I don't want to disappoint, but now it's time for someone else to FALL apart. And this is not Russia... and not even Ukraine. You can pray 24/7, but the historical process doesn't give a damn about your preferences
    1
  35.  @OliverBootle1  It's time for you to stop looking for yesterday😂
    1
  36.  @MrCABman1972  No one in Russia is interested in your opinion. That's when they ask - then you'll open your mouth
    1
  37.  @Epaminondas371  The role of Western technologies is greatly exaggerated. Yes, it is annoying and inconvenient, but not critical. Russia will cope with this. It will launch additional production facilities, which will only contribute to further economic development
    1
  38.  @kevinkanter2537  How much do you want to destroy Russia, right? want to jump right out of my skin. Try not to fart and shit your pants from the strain. THE Lord HAS already ASSIGNED EVERYONE HIS PLACE. So spluttering is completely useless
    1
  39.  @ozzylad2497  Are you in trouble, gopher? The psychiatrist is down the hall👎
    1
  40.  @MrCABman1972  Are you sure you didn't fart by repeating long-rotten narratives? Maybe it's time to change this jammed record? THE WORLD IS CHANGING and moving forward... Apparently, this world has already overtaken you for a long time...
    1
  41.  @MrCABman1972  Are you not amused by the hopeless stupidity that you promote?
    1
  42.  @OliverBootle1  Everything is fine with the Russian economy... In any case, it's NO WORSE than the economy of the United States or Europe... are you sure that everything is fine with the economy of your own country? If you don't lie to yourself? Maybe you're looking at the wrong place so intently?
    1
  43. And what else should Russia do in RESPONSE to the supply of long-range weapons? Isn't it something SYMMETRICAL?
    1
  44.  @khulgarulfsson8067  Aren't you laughing at the nonsense you've written?🤡
    1
  45.  @theredscourge  "Historically, the suffering of everyone else is usually a byproduct of Russia's attempts to achieve what they want." Tell THESE people that their suffering is ridiculous List of countries INVADED, bombed/attacked by the United States (along with NATO countries) after World War II: Korea and China (1950-1953) Guatemala (1954) Indonesia (1958, 1966) Haiti (1959) Cuba (1959-1961) Guatemala (1960) Congo (1964) Laos (1959, 1964-1973) Vietnam (1961-1973) Cambodia (1969-1970) Guatemala (1960, 1967-1969) Grenada (1983) Lebanon (1958, 1983, 1984) Libya (1986, 2011) El Salvador (1980s) Nicaragua (1972, 1980s) Iran (1987) Honduras (1988) Panama (1989) Iraq (1991) Kuwait (1991) Somalia (1993) Bosnia (1994, 1995) Sudan (1998) Afghanistan (1998) Yugoslavia (1999) Yemen (2002) Iraq (1991-2003) Iraq (2003-2015) Afghanistan (2001-2015) Pakistan (2007-2015) Somalia (1992-1994, 2007, 2008, 2011) Yemen (2009, 2011) Libya (2011, 2015) Syria (2013 – present) Bombing YEMEN and LEBANON – right now + Supplying weapons to the Israeli army to exterminate the population of Gaza – right now
    1
  46.  @sbirchsbirch6232  Don't fuss so much, or you'll fart loudly, and you'll get an embarrassment🤡
    1
  47.  @guydreamr  🤡👈
    1
  48.  @owen-trombone  How do you know about Russia's resources?
    1
  49.  @SSS-pn9ex  The only DUMB one I'm watching is YOU🤡👈
    1
  50.  @m00t  Or maybe you just need to find your lost brains? They told you that you are "hopelessly stupid, like this table"
    1
  51.  @sjs9698  "Russia has already gone as far as it could" Seriously? List of countries INVADED, bombed/attacked by the United States (along with NATO countries) after World War II: Korea and China (1950-1953) Guatemala (1954) Indonesia (1958, 1966) Haiti (1959) Cuba (1959-1961) Guatemala (1960) Congo (1964) Laos (1959, 1964-1973) Vietnam (1961-1973) Cambodia (1969-1970) Guatemala (1960, 1967-1969) Grenada (1983) Lebanon (1958, 1983, 1984) Libya (1986, 2011) El Salvador (1980s) Nicaragua (1972, 1980s) Iran (1987) Honduras (1988) Panama (1989) Iraq (1991) Kuwait (1991) Somalia (1993) Bosnia (1994, 1995) Sudan (1998) Afghanistan (1998) Yugoslavia (1999) Yemen (2002) Iraq (1991-2003) Iraq (2003-2015) Afghanistan (2001-2015) Pakistan (2007-2015) Somalia (1992-1994, 2007, 2008, 2011) Yemen (2009, 2011) Libya (2011, 2015) Syria (2013 – present) Bombing YEMEN and LEBANON – right now + Supplying weapons to the Israeli army to exterminate the population of Gaza – right now
    1
  52.  @sjs9698  In 2008, Georgia invaded Abkhazia and North Ossetia. The UN Security Council resolution recognized Georgia's aggression against these two republics (and not Russia's "aggression" at all, if you don't know). Sometimes it is useful to look at the UN website before opening your mouth
    1
  53. The United States has clearly confused Russia with someone else... And they lead Russia from a parallel world😂 So far, the REAL Russia is solving problems on earth and moving towards achieving its goals... It's time for the Pentagon and Washington to change the program in the computer. The simulator is clearly outdated😂
    1
  54.  @Curt_Sampson  At the time of the Istanbul Peace Treaty (April 2022) Donetsk, Luhansk, Zaporizhia, and Kherson regions were still part of Ukraine... Except for Crimea, whose citizens (90% of ethnic Russians) voted to join Russia. However, Ukraine unilaterally terminated the agreements reached and chose to continue the fighting. The desire to get EVERYTHING will lead to the loss of everything. GREED and stupidity destroy states. Ukraine is to blame for the loss of territories and the death of more than 1,000,000 soldiers. As long as there are weapons, people will die. As soon as the weapons run out, people will stop dying. Russia has clearly said from the very beginning - the DEMILITARIZATION of Ukraine. What is not clear to mentally retarded individuals in what has been said?
    1
  55.  @CesarFerraro2  What a long footcloth. And can I ask what all this has to do with the crimes of the Kiev regime against the civilian population of Donbass - bombing, shelling and restriction of the rights of ethnic Russians in this region? Ukraine should have simply implemented the Minsk Agreements, ratified by the UN and recognized by the international community
    1
  56.  @davidballantyne4492  Aren't you laughing at the nonsense you've written?
    1
  57. The United States has clearly confused Russia with someone else... And they lead Russia from a parallel world. So far, the REAL Russia is solving problems on earth and moving towards achieving its goals. It's time for the Pentagon and Washington to change the program in the computer. The simulator is clearly outdated
    1
  58. What Ukrainian spirit, gopher? 70% of the population of Ukraine are ethnic Russians. Most of whom VOTED for joining Russia. Some voted TWICE - for a better understanding of those suffering from slow thinking. Those suffering from slow thinking in the West still did not understand. At the moment, almost 10,000,000 former "Ukrainians" are Russian citizens + about 6,000,000 Ukrainians live in Russia as refugees. Initially, Russia did not need Western Ukraine. Let them protest with themselves there
    1
  59.  @blacklion8208  Aren't you laughing at the nonsense you've written?🤡
    1
  60.  @KSCPMark6742  It works BOTH ways, gopher... It's a TWO-way street
    1
  61. The supply of weapons and the provision of military assistance to one of the warring parties AFTER the outbreak of hostilities automatically transfers the "assistant" to the category of an active PARTICIPANT in the conflict. NATO missiles on Russian territory legitimize Russian missiles on NATO territory. This is a "two-way street". Russia will also conduct the war as it sees fit
    1
  62.  @alwood1993  First of all, Russia never intended to attack a NATO country... or any country at all. However, in the case of aggression against Russia, one should not delude oneself - At "moment X" Russia will not care at all whether the aggressor country is a member of NATO or not. It's just that military bases on the territory of these countries will cease to exist... as are the countries themselves within their current borders... Secondly, the conflict in Ukraine has nothing to do with either the United States or Europe. This is a civil confrontation within Ukraine. However, if the United States and Europe decide to become active participants in SOMEONE ELSE's conflict... In the end, they should not complain about the CONSEQUENCES for themselves after the defeat in Ukraine... Thirdly, China, Iran, and North Korea have nothing to do with the conflict in Ukraine. However, they have every right to defend themselves against the aggression of the United States and NATO. To deal with the aggressor in a MIRROR WAY - to impose sanctions against the above, to arrange terrorist attacks on the territory of the above... Or TAKE REVENGE on the West on the territory of Ukraine... That is, to do in relation to the United States and Europe the same thing that the United States and Europe are doing in relation to them... The RESULT, in case you don't know, is that on January 31, 2024, the International Court of Justice refused to recognize Russia as an "aggressor state". The court also rejected Ukraine's claim under the ICFBT to hold Russia responsible for the crash of Boeing flight MH17. As a result of the proceedings, Ukraine was completely denied all claims for compensation or other forms of satisfaction
    1
  63. Is there a problem with Russia and China? May I ask WHERE China has invaded? Maybe the only people the world needs to solve the problem with are YOU? List of countries INVADED, bombed/attacked by the United States (along with NATO countries) after World War II: Korea and China (1950-1953) Guatemala (1954) Indonesia (1958, 1966) Haiti (1959) Cuba (1959-1961) Guatemala (1960) Congo (1964) Laos (1959, 1964-1973) Vietnam (1961-1973) Cambodia (1969-1970) Guatemala (1960, 1967-1969) Grenada (1983) Lebanon (1958, 1983, 1984) Libya (1986, 2011) El Salvador (1980s) Nicaragua (1972, 1980s) Iran (1987) Honduras (1988) Panama (1989) Iraq (1991) Kuwait (1991) Somalia (1993) Bosnia (1994, 1995) Sudan (1998) Afghanistan (1998) Yugoslavia (1999) Yemen (2002) Iraq (1991-2003) Iraq (2003-2015) Afghanistan (2001-2015) Pakistan (2007-2015) Somalia (1992-1994, 2007, 2008, 2011) Yemen (2009, 2011) Libya (2011, 2015) Syria (2013 – present) Bombing YEMEN and LEBANON – right now + Supplying weapons to the Israeli army to exterminate the population of Gaza – right now
    1
  64.  @Dave5843-d9m  Are you sure you didn't fart by repeating a rotten narrative?
    1
  65.  @sqweege6432  You don't have to try to be an ass - you are already one
    1
  66.  @BTinSF  You need to review the footage of the 1945 Victory Day Parade on Red Square in Moscow... To know what to prepare for
    1
  67.  @jerrymiller9039  And what was the "first invasion of Ukraine?" Do you mean the unconstitutional coup in Kiev, organized and financed by the United States?
    1
  68.  @williamblaker2628  Did you also make a fuss when NATO bombed Yugoslavia with depleted uranium missiles?
    1
  69.  @sjs9698  Russia will decide without you what to do and where to go
    1
  70.  @williamblaker2628  NATO bombed Yugoslavia with bombs and missiles with depleted uranium. From March 24 to June 10, 1999, more than 40,000 different depleted uranium munitions were fired. Huge territories of Serbia are still infected. There is a high level of cancer in the region. This is the available information
    1
  71.  @williamblaker2628  Your verbiage does not change the fact of the CRIME committed by the United States and NATO against the civilian population of Yugoslavia (especially Serbia). War crimes do not have a statute of limitations, do you know? Together with the tribunals for crimes committed by the Kiev regime against the civilian population of Donbass... Investigations and sentencing of crimes committed by NATO and the United States against Serbia will also resume ❗All information IS AVAILABLE despite Western censorship
    1
  72.  @BPo75  Do you really consider yourself a smart person? 🤡 I won't even read on
    1
  73.  @williamblaker2628  Not wanting to know does not absolve you from responsibility. US aviation + NATO aviation together bombed the civilian infrastructure of Yugoslavia with depleted uranium ammunition and inscriptions "Happy Easter". NOTHING WILL CHANGE THAT. Hypocritical creatures 👈are an abomination in the face of God
    1
  74.  @BPo75  What a fluffy bunny and a sweetheart. So smug, clean, spotless and not dirty... in his own narcissistic view. Hypocritical creatures 👈are an abomination in the face of God. Apparently, it is necessary to remind - the Lord does the dirty work with the hands of people. They are the ones who are truly PURE
    1