Comments by "Evgeniya" (@evgeniya7853) on "Can Russia win in Ukraine with nuclear weapons?" video.

  1. Russia will win without nuclear weapons. Instead, it uses ALL existing mechanisms and instruments of International law, which exists and operates independently of the conviction of the Western "rulers of the world" in their own impunity, permissiveness and lawlessness. The United States and the European Union have forgotten about the existence of the rest of the world outside their "garden of Eden"... who will gladly participate in criminal trials against Western elites
    4
  2. Excerpt from the Nuclear Doctrine of the Russian Federation: 19. The conditions determining the possibility of the Russian Federation using nuclear weapons are: a) receipt of reliable information about the launch of ballistic missiles attacking the territories of the Russian Federation and (or) its allies; b) the use by the enemy of nuclear weapons or other types of weapons of mass destruction on the territories of the Russian Federation and (or) its allies; c) the enemy's impact on critically important state or military facilities of the Russian Federation, the disabling of which will lead to the disruption of the response of nuclear forces; d) aggression against the Russian Federation with the USE of CONVENTIONAL weapons, when the very existence of the State is threatened
    4
  3.  @peterpan7903  So what? Russia does currently own 25% of the former Ukrainian territory. It has FOREVER. Where is the contradiction with the "propaganda channels"?
    2
  4.  @thomaslunde5014  Right. There was no one to join. Most of the Republics of the USSR did not exist at all before 1917. They formed and acquired their modern form only WITHIN the Soviet Union. Before that, they were just TERRITORIES... if you don't know))) At the time of joining the USSR, the so-called "Ukraine" consisted of 5 regions - Kiev, Chernihiv, Poltava, Podolsk, Zhytomyr. EVERYTHING ELSE has never belonged to Ukraine
    2
  5.  @madisondines7441  In Doctrinal documents (long-term strategy of the state) The United States has ENEMIES in black and white - Russia and China. Against which it is permissible to use ANY means. In the Doctrinal documents of Russia there is no concept of "enemy" at all))) Just a note in the margins
    1
  6.  @madisondines7441  ❗Retaliation AGAINST WHOM? I hope these countries also have a "strategy of retaliation" List of countries INVADED, bombed/attacked by the United States (along with NATO countries) after World War II: Korea and China (1950-1953) Guatemala (1954) Indonesia (1958, 1966) Haiti (1959) Cuba (1959-1961) Guatemala (1960) Congo (1964) Laos (1959, 1964-1973) Vietnam (1961-1973) Cambodia (1969-1970) Guatemala (1960, 1967-1969) Grenada (1983) Lebanon (1958, 1983, 1984) Libya (1986, 2011) El Salvador (1980s) Nicaragua (1972, 1980s) Iran (1987) Honduras (1988) Panama (1989) Iraq (1991) Kuwait (1991) Somalia (1993) Bosnia (1994, 1995) Sudan (1998) Afghanistan (1998) Yugoslavia (1999) Yemen (2002) Iraq (1991-2003) Iraq (2003-2015) Afghanistan (2001-2015) Pakistan (2007-2015) Somalia (1992-1994, 2007, 2008, 2011) Yemen (2009, 2011) Libya (2011, 2015) Syria (2013 – present) Bombing YEMEN and LEBANON – right now + Supplying weapons to the Israeli army to exterminate the population of Gaza – right now
    1
  7.  @gazzarafalemozzy4766  You don't understand - "this is different"😂
    1
  8.  @madisondines7441  As a result, the Soviet Union ENDED the war in Japan. Millions of civilians in Hiroshima, Nagasaki and Tokyo (the usual bombing) died absolutely in vain, for nothing. Japan capitulated ONLY after the defeat of the Kwantung army by Soviet troops. THE MANCHURIAN OPERATION (August 9-20, 1945) Americans can only fight against civilians
    1
  9.  @kimmogensen4888  Come back to reality, gopher. Russia's nuclear weapons are intended exclusively for NATO))) If it is used, the problem of China will stop bothering you... forever
    1
  10.  @fyrchmyrddin1937  You're living an outdated paradigm, gopher. Nuclear bombs are the last century. Nuclear warheads have long been "living" on hypersonic carriers and drones with artificial intelligence))) The area affected by ONE Sarmat nuclear missile is the ENTIRE territory of France... or Germany, Spain, Italy...
    1
  11.  @Calligraphybooster  "Our only answer to all this is to end it" "End it" in your own country, gopher. And the Russian people will decide for THEMSELVES what they will do or not do in their own country... You have clearly overestimated your right to decide something for others
    1
  12.  @Calligraphybooster  ❗ALL these people also have a great desire to "get it over with.".. that is, with the aggressor List of countries INVADED, bombed/attacked by the United States (along with NATO countries) after World War II: Korea and China (1950-1953) Guatemala (1954) Indonesia (1958, 1966) Haiti (1959) Cuba (1959-1961) Guatemala (1960) Congo (1964) Laos (1959, 1964-1973) Vietnam (1961-1973) Cambodia (1969-1970) Guatemala (1960, 1967-1969) Grenada (1983) Lebanon (1958, 1983, 1984) Libya (1986, 2011) El Salvador (1980s) Nicaragua (1972, 1980s) Iran (1987) Honduras (1988) Panama (1989) Iraq (1991) Kuwait (1991) Somalia (1993) Bosnia (1994, 1995) Sudan (1998) Afghanistan (1998) Yugoslavia (1999) Yemen (2002) Iraq (1991-2003) Iraq (2003-2015) Afghanistan (2001-2015) Pakistan (2007-2015) Somalia (1992-1994, 2007, 2008, 2011) Yemen (2009, 2011) Libya (2011, 2015) Syria (2013 – present) Bombing YEMEN and LEBANON – right now + Supplying weapons to the Israeli army to exterminate the population of Gaza – right now
    1
  13.  @Slavic_Goblin  The only endless round-the-clock screams about Russia's aggression come exclusively from Europe. She's like a half-witted spinster screaming at the whole world, "Take me! Well, take me!" And then suddenly, after the victory in Ukraine, Russia will forget about them, deprive them of its attention😂😂😂
    1
  14.  @NoIce33  Russia's strategic nuclear weapons are intended exclusively for NATO. Russia really hates it... And this is NOT Ukraine
    1
  15.  @reneblom2160  What's wrong with Russian television, gopher? Watch your own. Where Ursula Foderleyen will tell you that Russia uses chips from washing machines in hypersonic missiles😂
    1
  16.  @nathanhazlehurst484  So much the worse for you all, especially for Europe... Which has forever lost cheap Russian energy resources and the possibility of mutually beneficial cooperation
    1
  17.  @nommchompsky  Is this a session of complacency and self-suggestion? Nice try, but totally useless. You will have to come to terms with an unpleasant reality that goes against your dreams))) Don't be primitive
    1
  18.  @reneblom2160  And what's wrong with Solovyov? I guess liking you is the last thing any Russian presenter cares about
    1
  19.  @nommchompsky  Aren't you very comfortable in your echo chamber? while...
    1
  20.  @nommchompsky  You should know better. She's the one
    1
  21.  @nozhki-busha  And who told you that Russia needs you? An amazing conceit. Fascism is a manifestation of the true ESSENCE of Europe, which is the cradle of Nazism and fascism. Historically, Russia has ALWAYS been in opposition to Europe... fascism, that is
    1
  22.  @snyde02  Yes, innate oligophrenics are simply, by definition, unable to come up with anything more constructive and productive than being in a state of "cold war" with Russia... Well, okay... The BRICS countries will have plenty of laughs
    1
  23.  @perchristophersen8966  Why use bombs when a 30-point tsunami is much better suited?
    1
  24.  @stream2watch  When people with a single cerebral gyrus do not hear or understand in any other way, they have to show a club))) Have you heard what the President of the Russian Federation told you in his address to the people of Russia and the leaders of Western countries on February 24, 2022? Have you listened to anything at all that Russia has been trying to convey to you over the past 10 years? No?... That leaves ONLY the nuclear club... Because it's all completely hopeless
    1
  25.  @ivancho5854  Try not to fart while chanting the slogan
    1
  26.  @TadaGanIarracht  Correction: Putin will NOT provoke. Putin is guaranteed to RESPOND to the provocation
    1
  27.  @RandallBurt-u1w  The Minsk Agreements, the Istanbul Peace Treaty on the initiative of Russia... Who threw them in the trash?
    1
  28.  @dzonikg  Yes. And today it's not Russia that has placed a military base and military "advisers" in Mexico on the border with Texas, is it?
    1
  29.  @RandallBurt-u1w  The people are behind Putin. All these constant attempts to put the real Russian people out of brackets look ridiculous and absurd
    1
  30.  @ivancho5854  Don't overlook the bickford cord in your own ass
    1
  31. Russia has been famous for the presence of fools since ancient times
    1
  32.  @Paul-wo3qh  The WHOLE of Ukraine is under the control of NATO, or rather, under the control of the United States. With the exception of the territories annexed to Russia. 70% of Ukrainian fertile lands are owned by American corporations Black Rock and Monsanto
    1
  33.  @bikechainmic  Intellectual primitivism makes you ridiculous and ridiculous
    1
  34. Try not to fart, pushing the narrative of the US State Department hard... It's ridiculous and ridiculous
    1
  35.  @thomaslunde5014  Is there something wrong with you, a descendant of Hitler's henchman? Are you sure your ancestors weren't concentration camp guards?
    1
  36.  @peterpan7903  What's your concern? Does it stop you from eating and defecating? Keep an eye on your own household while you have it
    1
  37.  @peterpan7903  You look ridiculous in your attempts to insult Russia. Get back in your short pants
    1
  38.  @zignar22  Are you talking about the Munich agreement (Germany, England, France)? The same one when the "sweet trinity" INVADED Czechoslovakia in 1938 and committed its partition? Poland (the Hitler-Pilsudski Pact, 1934) took over the Teszyn region, which belonged to Czechoslovakia))) However, ironically, a year later, Poland itself was divided... lol. It happens sometimes
    1
  39.  @Charity4Chokora  The Soviet Union won the victory over the Third Reich in World War II. Without the use of nuclear weapons
    1
  40.  @ChristyBermingham  Russia is also monitoring every move by the United States. From outer space
    1
  41.  @dpelpal  For some reason, the United States will not understand the obvious in any way - Russian nuclear missiles will fly first of all at THEM))) The US has played too much into proxy wars
    1
  42.  @michaelschultz5968  Japan surrendered ONLY after the defeat of 1,000,000 Kwantung army by Soviet troops - MANCHURIAN OPERATION (August 9-20, 1945). After the bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, no one was going to give up... Until the USSR entered the war with Japan))) Americans can only fight against civilians
    1
  43.  @ChristyBermingham  However, the strategy of nuclear deterrence works ONLY if adequate politicians are in power. The United States, not Russia, is constantly talking about a "limited nuclear war." Do you even listen to your own "leaders"? Or does your shit not smell? And does any absurdity said seem normal? So you pull the earplugs out and listen carefully. "Deterrence" does not mean that you can ignore other people's requests, fears and warnings. There is such a thing as a "limit", in which no "deterrence" will help))) It is NOT Russia that has deployed its military bases and its military "advisers" in Mexico, on the border with Texas... isn't it? I hope you don't need to explain the phrase "Why do we need a world in which there will be no Russia?" However, the morons in power in Europe and the United States will understand only AFTER...if they make it in time
    1
  44.  @brentverc  This means only one thing - Objects on the territory of NATO countries are becoming legitimate TARGETS for Russia. There are really no restrictions. Russia will finally start doing what should have been done a long time ago))) You did NOT HEAR, or rather did not want to hear, what the President of the Russian Federation told you in his address to the people of Russia and the leaders of Western countries on February 24, 2022
    1
  45.  @jiros00  This does not affect the quantity and QUALITY of Russian nuclear weapons in any way
    1
  46.  @JohnSchuetz-js7lk  You clearly don't understand the ESSENCE of the conflict in Ukraine. Go back to 2014
    1
  47.  @wormlandsbanen  Russia will win AT ANY cost. The United States and NATO will be defeated. Just get over it
    1
  48.  @Jueyes-vg2gb  You're living an outdated paradigm, gopher. Nuclear bombs are the last century. Nuclear warheads have long been "living" on hypersonic carriers and drones with artificial intelligence))) The area affected by ONE Sarmat nuclear missile is the ENTIRE territory of France... or Germany, Spain, Italy...
    1
  49.  @susrev88  It all works BOTH ways. The United States has apparently forgotten about this
    1
  50.  @zignar22  Don't burst with importance and inflated overestimation. Any help is always what it is - no less and NO MORE. On the scale of the war on the territory of the Soviet Union, by definition, NO assistance could have a decisive effect on the outcome of the war. It was a local "plugging of holes". Just look at the battle maps simultaneously throughout the entire territory of the Soviet Union. All of the above taken together is for one Kursk battle. And the war went on for 4 years. Yes, lend-lease has really helped in certain locations on the ground. It would have been much worse without him. However, the main DECISIVE factor of victory in this regard was the Soviet military-industrial complex, launched at full power. When the WHOLE country was at the machine 24/7. In addition, lend-lease started working after 1942, when the war had already turned from a series of defeats in the first months of the war in 1941 to victory in the battle of Moscow. At this MOST difficult time for the country, there was no help yet. But the country stood up. And the assault on Berlin was carried out exclusively with Soviet-made weapons and military equipment. So the US has over-praised itself to the point of utter absurdity. It is necessary to look at the world realistically, to be able to compare quantity and scale))) By the way, if we compare, Ukraine has currently received a total of much MORE Western weapons and equipment than the USSR under lend-lease… Although the scale of the war in Ukraine is not even close to comparable with the Second World War… So what? We see the result… A clear proof that no help affects the outcome of the war. So the American balloon needs to deflate a little and come to terms with the fact that the United States is not the dominant navel of the earth. And commentators like you need to learn how to work with a calculator: calculate the number–scale algorithm
    1
  51.  @Charity4Chokora  Yes, I don't see your answers. This is strange. Because even if a comment is deleted from the channel, it is saved in my mail (notification function). Because my email has nothing to do with Google services
    1
  52.  @cyberfunk3793  "it sounds from the mouth of a man whose country has been attacking civilians in Ukraine for more than 2 years..." For some reason it seemed to me that the fighting was taking place at the FRONT. I did not notice the civilians in the trenches and fortified areas opposite. The Ukrainian army and mercenaries from all over the world are firing from there... Perhaps I misunderstand the definition of "civilians"... it sounds pathetic and ridiculous against the background of such a CONTEXT. We can talk about the attacks. Would you like to discuss this topic with THESE people? List of countries INVADED, bombed/attacked by the United States (along with NATO countries) after World War II: Korea and China (1950-1953) Guatemala (1954) Indonesia (1958, 1966) Haiti (1959) Cuba (1959-1961) Guatemala (1960) Congo (1964) Laos (1959, 1964-1973) Vietnam (1961-1973) Cambodia (1969-1970) Guatemala (1960, 1967-1969) Grenada (1983) Lebanon (1958, 1983, 1984) Libya (1986, 2011) El Salvador (1980s) Nicaragua (1972, 1980s) Iran (1987) Honduras (1988) Panama (1989) Iraq (1991) Kuwait (1991) Somalia (1993) Bosnia (1994, 1995) Sudan (1998) Afghanistan (1998) Yugoslavia (1999) Yemen (2002) Iraq (1991-2003) Iraq (2003-2015) Afghanistan (2001-2015) Pakistan (2007-2015) Somalia (1992-1994, 2007, 2008, 2011) Yemen (2009, 2011) Libya (2011, 2015) Syria (2013 – present) Bombing YEMEN and LEBANON – right now + Supplying weapons to the Israeli army to exterminate the population of Gaza – right now ❗Go and dare to open your mouth in any of these countries... THEY HAVEN'T FORGOTTEN... don't get your hopes up and don't get your hopes up. The Japanese actually also REMEMBER who bombed them
    1
  53.  @cyberfunk3793  🤡👈
    1