Comments by "John G Williams" (@johnwilliams8818) on "Institute of Human Anatomy"
channel.
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
jimharrington6300 OK, Dr. Bob. There is way too much to unpack there.
So I'll start with your first mistake. Correlation doesn't imply causation. "If" there are limited data points to correlate to reach a logical causation, this concept is overused, dated, and, IMO, used as an excuse to be logically lazy.
There is this little thing that most humans lack "genetically" and that is called "common sense.".
A person who has never felt a snowflake lacks the sensory input to "know" what the snowflake feels like; they do not have any emotional or physical experience. So if you are a heterosexual male, you do not know what it feels like to be a homosexual male. No more than a biological male knows what it's like to be a biological female, you do not have all the necessary preprogrammed core instincts that are by nature distinct and functionally different in each sex. Of which there are "only" two.
IE, there is a great deal more to the idea that "Men are from Mars and Women are from Venus" than just a funny book title. The differences begin with "core" primal instincts. The fallacy of assumption occurs when individuals forget that human beings are mammals and have the same natural instincts that all life has. Instincts are not learned; "skills" are, and they are not the same thing.
As far as your "assumption" that I am somehow "Left Winged"? Or that I subscribe to any of that utter nonsense?
Means that you must be one of those closed minded individuals that are behind the "machince" which allowed these breakdowns in logic to occur in the first place.
1