Comments by "Cole Behnke" (@colebehnke7767) on "Getting OWNED over Hitler's Socialism" video.

  1. Uh, when does he change the meaning of words after establishing what they mean?
    5
  2. So you didn’t watch the video…
    4
  3. So did every socialist dictator ever.
    3
  4.  @freemindrebel  Eh, he was a nazi, totally different ideology, both based off of socialism though.
    2
  5.  @freemindrebel  The third reich suspended private property. I’m less sure about the fascists, but they were trade unionists.
    2
  6.  @slaterslater5944  No clue who but the Nazi party owned them. Owning people is much more important.
    2
  7.  @slaterslater5944  and those individuals/entities where directly under Hitlers thumb, to the point where he probably replaced them with his own men at one point or another.
    2
  8.  @slaterslater5944  But Hitler ran multiple times without the industrialists, and it was only when he was out of money that he turned to them. When he did he toned down all his rhetoric, both his racism and his socialism. When he was brought to power he slowly ramped up his racism and his socialism again. So I find it much more believable that he lied to the industrialists to get their support and was actually a diehard socialist then the other way around.
    2
  9.  @slaterslater5944  https://youtu.be/eCYIBpDVtP0
    2
  10.  @brett22bt  True, I would still consider Fascism and Nazism to be far-right ideologies dispute their socialism.
    2
  11.  @brett22bt  So Stalin's purges also exempt him from being socialist? TIK also made a video explaining how corporations have a symbiotic relationship with socialists.
    2
  12.  @porteal8986  It was the one used at the time, so let’s judge them by their own definitions.
    1
  13. That’s why TIK is using the last agreed upon definition, before the socialists slaughtered it.
    1
  14.  @slaterslater5944  Well yeah, Hitler did not allow “owners” to have profits above a certain threshold, he controlled who exactly was employed and for how much they where paid, and his price commissars unforced strict price controls. Basically everything besides the general management of the company and predetermined profits was controlled by the Nazi party, and even that was suspect because he forced all workers into the DAF and gave them a lot of power over their employers.
    1
  15.  @slaterslater5944  Why in the world would Hitler do that? He believed in the stab in the back theory, and who stabbed Germany in the back? The rich industrialists and the aristocracy, so again why would he give them huge profits? The truth is he improved the working classes living conditions, gave them higher wages and cheaper goods, all off the backs of other countries. He gave the workers authority and votes in the business, and you don’t need collective bargaining or strikes if you own the business
    1
  16. What primary sources refute his clamps?
    1
  17. What are you talking about, Hitler was not fascist, he was a Nazi, completely different ideologies. Additionally why in the world would he give stuff to the rich industrialists, aren’t those the people who stabbed Germany in the back in said theory?
    1
  18.  @brett22bt  Every historian worth his name would tell you that fascism is a separate ideology form nazism, it’s only the average non-historian who would tell you otherwise.
    1
  19.  @brett22bt And fascism was a derivative of socialism, you can trace its inspirations back to Marxism. I’m beginning to think you don’t know any of the history, Just ask any historian.
    1
  20. Well what’s your IQ?
    1
  21. What are you talking about? How is this in any way relevant?
    1
  22.  @brett22bt  I mean Hitler downplayed his antisemitism for the corporate elites, so it’s not too hard to believe that he also downplayed his socialism to them as well. It looks like to me that Hitler did the reverse of what your saying, that he tricked the corporate elite into supporting the worker party.
    1
  23.  @brett22bt  but what were his nationalist goals?
    1
  24.  @brett22bt  So what were his goals? Why did he want to invade Russia, why exterminate the Jews? Why set up absolute control over the economy? The easy answer would be that he wanted to create a socialist utopia for the Germans, everything else lines up after that.
    1
  25. Far right, far left. It doesn’t matter, they were socialists.
    1
  26.  @myname7937 except in Nazi Germany. But I agree with you elsewhere.
    1
  27. This is hilarious. Want to try again?
    1
  28.  @slaterslater5944  well, suspending private property is sure a socialist policy.
    1