Comments by "Cole Behnke" (@colebehnke7767) on "So, Hitler was a Communist in early 1919" video.
-
10
-
7
-
6
-
Yeah, tell me you haven’t watched the video without telling me you haven’t watched the video. Though to be honest a lot of that isn’t covered in this one, but has been refuted in his other videos.
Hitler did seek economic leveling, but deciding to fight all your neighbors tends to put a stopper on that. He was a race based socialist, class wasn’t an issue for him. And one of the first things he did when coming to power was suspend private property.
He was supported by rich industrialists, after he came to power, if they didn’t support him, they would’ve been replaced. As did happen on numerous occasions. Before he came to power rich industrialists didn’t support him in any meaningful way.
If destroying trade unions and forcing workers to a national one made one not socialist, then what of the Soviet Union that did the exact same thing?
Can you provide evidence for the claim that they used socialism in the name just to attract workers? Cus that would be like a Christian nationalist party claiming to be the National Muslim party.
Strasser and his side of the party had the same exact views on race and nationalism as Hitler, so by saying he was Socialist is admitting that race based socialism is a legitimate form of socialism. Where Hitler and Strasser disagreed was on whether there should be a peaceful revolution (Hitler’s stance) or a violent revolution (Strasser’s stance).
How is his definition, “the science of dealing with the common weal.” contradictory to the definition of socialism?
5
-
5
-
5
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1