Comments by "Cole Behnke" (@colebehnke7767) on "Hitler WASN’T funded into power by the capitalists" video.

  1. So you didn’t watch the video?
    8
  2. So you have any evidence? Quotes? Documentation?
    8
  3. Dam, it’s almost like you didn’t watch the video…
    8
  4. So what’s wrong in the video?
    7
  5. What’s fascist about it? It literally is against fascism.
    7
  6.  @FaustLimbusCompany  the reason we make this argument is because most of Hitler’s bad ideas come directly from socialism. Dehumanizing a segment of the population is wrong, no mater if it is a class or race.
    7
  7.  @timfrye3586 dam, maybe you should actually watch to see how he actually proves you wrong…
    7
  8. So the Soviet Union wasn’t socialist?
    6
  9. How so?
    6
  10. So was the Soviet Union…
    6
  11.  @timfrye3586 dam, so you are so afraid of having your beliefs challenged… It’s funny, most people who disagree with TIK don’t even watch his videos, and so are completely incapable of challenging him. So why is the title wrong? The recycling bin says it’s a recycling bin, and you come along and say it accurately a trash bin because recycling bins are fake. Dam you could prove your point by checking.
    6
  12. And the company owner had to set the hours and wages that the nazi party demanded… And what could the company owners actually do with their profits?
    6
  13.  @TheHandsomeman no, there is no evidence of a painting existing. And claims without evidence can be dismissed without evidence.
    6
  14.  @SkeeterHowitzer so you didn’t actually watch the video where those arguments are addressed?
    5
  15. Dam, it’s almost like the contents of that video were addressed in this one…
    5
  16. So you didn’t actually watch the video?
    5
  17. Well what’s wrong?
    5
  18.  @rohanthandi4903 what makes someone a fake historian?
    5
  19. Did you actually watch the video?
    5
  20. Did you watch the video?
    5
  21. How is someone who hates socialism and equates Nazism so socialism a Nazi?
    5
  22. What datapoint? Your very words say that there is no data. Like we should be able to see these wealthy businessmen withdrawing a large amount of money and the Nazis receiving a large amount of money, or at least some other major discrepancy.
    5
  23. Uh, the historical definition of socialism is the social ownership of the means of the production, government ownership is a form of social ownership. The real kicker is he started socializing the economy the moment he took power.
    5
  24. How so?
    4
  25. Capitalists also funded communism, so I don’t know what to tell you.
    4
  26. So you don't watch the video?
    4
  27. So after they took power? What would you do if you were a capitalist in a country who just elected a socialist party?
    4
  28. ​ @nickscurvy8635 so you didn't watch the video?
    4
  29.  @lambnathan97  what in the world are you on about? You claim that the video is poorly researched, and you back up that claim it’s anecdotal evidence. Please try again.
    4
  30.  @memeoverlord-pz5ns so when evidence comes out later that disproves it…
    4
  31. What about the petition form hundreds of other capitalists to prevent Hitler from taking power?
    4
  32. So the Soviet Union wasn’t socialist monarchists? Of course they are at odds with Marxists. They redefined socialism to themselves after the Nazis fell. How can you be capitalist when you suspend private property rights first thing?
    4
  33.  @milasto2 it’s really funny, because people brought up those sources and where shot down…
    4
  34.  @TheHandsomeman Hitler didn’t have a painting of Ford, life size or not.
    4
  35. Uh, how?
    4
  36. So you didn't watch the video?
    3
  37. ​ @Mortablunt wow you should watch the video, and the rest in the series.
    3
  38.  @SkeeterHowitzer  Your excuse is terrible, a door with women written on it was made to exclude men, but no where does this title exclude you. maybe you should watch the video. You know, the one that uses the source you brought up to show you the opposite conclusion.
    3
  39. ⁠ @lambnathan97  What’s your credentials to argue that it was a false premise? Like where are you getting this information from that historians are not in a loose consensus on the fact that the Nazis weren’t funded to power by capitalists? Because from an outside perspective like my own, nether of you provide evidence for your claims here.
    3
  40.  @lambnathan97  so can you point at a historian that disagrees with TIK? Like if it’s so easy then go ahead. So far you have been making unsubstantiated claims that also have no baring on the actual argument of the video. Like is why he likes to make 5 hour videos that you don’t watch, because if he doesn’t then you idiots will nitpick one irrelevant fact that he didn’t feel was worth showing the evidence for. Like how does the fact that historians disagree with him have anything to do with the arguments presented?
    3
  41. ​ @lolloblue9646 so did you watch the video?
    3
  42. I think you should watch the video.
    3
  43. That’s seems very biased, of course Marxists would say the Nazis weren’t socialists.
    3
  44. Ok and?
    3
  45. Social Darwinism is anything that says humans are subject to Darwinism, including Darwinism of collectives. This is what Hitler believed, that Germans were more evolved, and so more capable of being workers.
    3
  46. How so? What evidence do you have?
    3
  47.  @RedFlagSaid so every socialist state to have ever exist was actually capitalist? What a way to make an argument that Nazis Germany was a socialist state.
    3
  48. Germany was already industrialized. Like really what in the world are you talking about?
    3
  49. What in the world are you talking about?
    2
  50. What are you on about? What’s illogical and non historical about it?
    2
  51. ​ @Will46666  so why would he call himself nationalist then?
    2
  52. Just like how any socialist movement is useful to certain property owners.
    2
  53. ​ @commonwombat-h6r so say you were a capitalist in a newly formed socialist state, what would you pay to survive and keep your property?
    2
  54. What in the world are you talking about.
    2
  55.  @LyndonLaRoucheArchive what spin does TIK have?
    2
  56.  @LyndonLaRoucheArchive so the Soviet Union was monarchist now?
    2
  57.  @ammass321 so where do they state these goals?
    2
  58. So did the socialist revolution take place?
    2
  59.  @SkeeterHowitzer uh, you should watch the video. TIK talks about your so called good sources and addresses them in the video. Like seriously TIK is a historian, and a historians job is to look at all the sources and consider their biases.
    2
  60.  @SkeeterHowitzer conceal the truth? You wouldn’t even watch the video! You’re the only one who’s concealing truth, from yourself!
    2
  61.  @SkeeterHowitzer the Bank of England? Who also supported the Soviets? How does that show that the Nazis weren’t socialist?
    2
  62.  @SkeeterHowitzer so let be get this straight, the Bank of England supported the Nazis, and they also supported the Soviets. So sure the Nazis were supported by capitalists, but so were the Soviets. Were the Soviets a capitalist plot too? The entire point of the video is to show how the Nazis were supported by capitalists into power in the same way that other socialist countries war supported by capitalists into power, thus any argument that the Nazis were not socialist because they were supported by capitalists fall flat. You would know this if you actually watched the video.
    2
  63.  @SkeeterHowitzer  why should I read any of your source when you wouldn’t even watch the video you are commenting under, witch addresses your sources. The Nazis weren’t funded into power by capitalists in any way that makes them socialist.
    2
  64.  @memeoverlord-pz5ns have you watched the video?
    2
  65. So why would Jews support someone who is profusely anti-Jewish
    2
  66. ​ @ariesiv2790 what are you talking about?
    2
  67. There was a similar petition of several hundred capitalists who were against such a thing…
    2
  68. @barsukascoolI’m pretty sure it was talked about in the video, that you didn’t watch.
    2
  69. How so?
    2
  70.  @Progress_or_Barbarism yeah, members of the ruling party, care to explain how they were different?
    2
  71.  @sharky7002 what are you talking about? He is abundantly clear that socialism isn’t fascism but that fascism is socialism.
    2
  72. I mean, that is the historical consensus.
    2
  73.  @russchadwell why would he say anything like that when he was socialist himself?
    2
  74.  @russchadwell sure because he was a Socialist not a Marxist.
    2
  75.  @russchadwell yeah, he was a national socialist, of course he hated other branches of socialism.
    2
  76. So you didn't watch the video?
    1
  77. Dam, so after he got into power?
    1
  78. Wow you should watch the video.
    1