Comments by "AFGuidesHD" (@AFGuidesHD) on "Times Radio" channel.

  1. Neither were the riots we've had every other year. Only the government and Labour's response was 'sympathies' and 'hope for justice and change'. But when it's Brits that riot; it's 'full force of the law', 'army of police' and 'thugs'. Why the double standards ?
    66
  2. "It brings back the concerns of interference" I mean yeah, if Russia just lobbed a few missiles into Poland it would be absolutely illegal. But for some reason it's totally legal for western "totally not imperialist" powers to just lob bombs into Iraq, Syria, Yemen etc. ? It even turns out that those navy SEALS went missing on a mission to intercept trade between Iran and Yemmen like can you actually imagine the outrage if Russia intercepted trade between Ukraine and the US ?
    42
  3.  @michaelrowsell1160  the obvious and simple logic is "its only ok when the US does it"
    14
  4. More trusted sources like Al Beeb ? Don't think so.
    5
  5. The Times spelling is untenable.
    4
  6. It's worked for the last 50 years, why stop now ?
    3
  7. Exactly. Blatant crass hypocrisy from plutocrats episode 5 billion
    3
  8.  @scottkrater2131  Sure but we know full well they'd be calling the perpetrators "terrorists" and not "totally understandable, fair and square"
    2
  9. Would Times Radio also agree "Afghanistan has every right to attack America" ?
    1
  10. Appeasement is when not starting nuclear war.
    1
  11. Perhaps the Russians should rebrand their war of aggression as a "war on terror" ?
    1
  12.  @chrisdodson8118  and who says it does ?
    1
  13. Yeah as much as it may seem daft for Russians to call this a terrorist attack, lets not damn well forget the Americans would also call an attack on American civilians by, say, Iraq or Afghanistan as an "act of terrorism".
    1