Comments by "Chris Nilsson" (@GenerationX1984) on "The Fact That We Even NEED a "March for Science" is Embarrassing" video.

  1. Most people won't go to a shopaholic for financial advise, a computer geek for car mechanic advice (unless he's a computer geek and a mechanic jack-of-all-trades), or a person with no social skills for relationship advise. However, people listen to political talk show hosts for advice on scientific things like climate change instead of listening to somebody who has a science background or even worked with scientists. Agreed. Things tend to go downhill when they become too political. Politics tends to poison what it touches.
    5
  2. The nerds are too soft on the idiots. It's OK to insult, ridicule, demean, and bully the anti-science crowd. The fear of humiliation will eventually shut them all up and THEN we won't need a march for science because the anti-science crowd will be bullied into silence and submission. We need more sarcasm toward climate change deniers because most deniers don't even have a background in science. No credentials or experience usually means no need to pretend to be an expert. Because if Rush Limbaugh is an expert on climate change then Paris Hilton is a nuclear engineer and Ben Stein is a comedian.
    1
  3. My home state of Idaho is a joke too. They just took all mention of climate change from the science standards. Red states tend to censor science these days and it's alarming how people either agree with it or don't care that scientific data is being censored which is a violation of free speech and freedom of thought.
    1
  4. Not religious, but still tied to his heritage and culture.
    1