Comments by "Arnold Hubbert" (@arnoldhubbert6779) on "MasterofRoflness" channel.

Don't hold your laugh next time. They need to hear just how absurd their claims are.
9
@knstp04391 Delusional people will never be aware of their own inferiority complex. Are you that insecure in your own heritage that you have to claim anyone else's. If your enslaved black African ancestors, who struggled just to somehow survive and have a family and pass down their legacy, if they knew that one day, their own descendants would one day deny their own African heritage and instead try to claim the heritage of the very people who enslaved them, they would roll over in their graves.
6
Here's what a people with the world's biggest racial inferiority complex do. 1) They first envy your heritage. 2) Then they fantasize about having your heritage with you. 3) Then, they take your heritage and deny that it's even your heritage anymore. Over the last few decades, blacks have been doing this same thing with the following peoples: Egyptians, Greeks, Romans, Japanese, Chinese, British, Anglo Saxons, Celts, Vikings, Russians, European nobility, all Europeans, Jews, all Israelites, native Americans. In fact, I think the only heritage they won't claim is AFRICAN.
4
@Yaiqab_Banyamyan_Yasharahla Then why has there never been any negro dna found in Scandinavia (or any where in Europe) from any period? It's all been Caucasian dna.
2
It's not true that the first humans in northern Europe had dark skin. There's actually no evidence to support it and no examples have ever been found.
2
If Europeans were black 5000 years ago, why is it that all burials and finds that date prior, are all Caucasian? And, no black/negro dna has ever been found? Why is that? Even Cheddarman, that you all like to claime, wasn't black but caucasian.
2
cheddar man wasn't black, and he definitely wasn't negro. One theory is that he may have had darker skin, but this isn't even confirmed.
2
It has a purpose. To destroy your national ethnic identity so you'll be easier to control and willing to give up your national soveriegnity. These black supremacists aren't in on it, though. They're just useful idiots.
1
@Yaiqab_Banyamyan_Yasharahla Why do YOU think you even know the meaning of the word? Why do you think that YOU as a negro, with no connection to Europe, have a better understanding of the word, than actual European people whose word it is? Your arrogance is only suppased by your stupidity.
1
He probably deserved the more like a bronze or silver star, but the Medal of Honor was awarded to him due to his race. By normal Medal of Honor standards, fighting off a force of 12 men, killing four, even while wounded, normally wouldn't warrant a Medal of Honor for a white soldier (more like a bronze or silver star). By contrast, Alvin York (initially awarded only the Distinguished Service Cross till upgraded) played a key role in a key battle, personally killing between 25-35 soldiers, destroying 35 machine gun nests, capturing 132 soldiers, and saving at least dozens of lives. Or, Audie Murphy, "ordered his men to retreat to positions in the woods, remaining alone at his post, shooting his M1 carbine and directing artillery fire via his field radio while the Germans aimed fire directly at his position. Murphy mounted the abandoned, burning tank destroyer and began firing its .50 caliber machine gun at the advancing Germans, killing a squad crawling through a ditch towards him.[83] For an hour, Murphy stood on the flaming tank destroyer returning German fire from foot soldiers and advancing tanks, killing or wounding 50 Germans (though officially credited with killing 240 soldiers during the war). He sustained a leg wound during his stand, and stopped only after he ran out of ammunition. Murphy rejoined his men, disregarding his own injury, and led them back to repel the Germans. He insisted on remaining with his men while his wounds were treated." He was still certainly heroic, though.
1
@ianbirchfield5124 Good job with your response. Even though he sounds pretty "harmless" and just naive and gullible, but that's how it starts. I laughed when I first heard of these absurd and baseless claims but they're not so pervasive that they're entering some mainstream entities, academia, film, museums, etc. I read that many scholars are afraid to counter these fantasies because they're worried about being called racist and cancelled (at least one, I know of, has already been). If it's not stopped, it could eventually be impossible to stop later. Btw, I actually used to feel bad for them too for the same reasons you mentioned, including the descendants of African slaves who had their heritage taken from them forcibly through being uprooted as they were. However, I don't feel the same sympathy I once did since their inferiority complex fueled delusions may end up overwriting true history.
1
@ianbirchfield5124 I'll also mention that it's fairly clear, at least in part, his motives for wanting to believe Europeans were black. If he's such a fan of LOTR's and wished it had black characters, he's obviously has Europe fetish and envy. This is not uncommon among non-European POC. They're surrounded by Europeans, our history, our myths and stories, our beauty standards, etc. It's only natural than many would begin to gravitate towards those things, at first, just fantasizing, wanting to believe they're somehow a part of it, appropriate it, then eventually, that white people are the interlopers who stole their heritage from them. And, their delusions know no bounds. I even know of some black folks who, as a result of European beauty standards, make the claim that black people were the first to have blue eyes and blond hair and that the Europeans stole those features from them (no matter what you believe regarding human evolution, and the "out of Africa" theory, their logic is absurd).
1
That's because their "despise" for us is simply veiled envy.
1
@nnhoffingg It's not funny, though. There are those who are using the black inferiority complex and their claiming to be the original Vikings and inhabitants of Europe so that native Europeans (including Swedes) will be less resistant to mass immigration. As funny as their claims are, it's ultimate purpose is to destroy you.
1
@davidtaylor142 There are those who are using the black inferiority complex and their claiming to be the original Vikings and inhabitants of Europe so that native Europeans (including Swedes) will be less resistant to mass immigration, with the false believe that Sweden (and Europe have always been diverse enough to include negroes. As ridiculous as their claims are, it's ultimate purpose is to destroy Scandinavian and European identity so they''ll be more pliable and submissive. It's already happened.
1
@robertortiz-wilson1588 How do you define a "literal nazi"?
1
You're half right. The first Swedes were not black. All remains tested in Scandinavia, including thousands of years ago, are all Caucasian. None of them have any negro dna.
1
@bigcoop3717 He never said they were black. Though he really wasn't an "eyewitness" and much and was just conjecture based on very limited knowledge and assumptions (he based all Germans on just one group he encountered from western Germany), he said they, along with much of the rest of Europe, were "swarthy," which did not mean negro then, and doesn't mean negro now. He then went on to describe other races, including negroes, using differernt terminology ("All Africa is black or tawny. Asia chiefly tawny"). Swarthy, a European term, refers to Europeans who resemble southern Europeans (Spanish, Italian, etc.) and even other Europeans with dark hair and "dark" features ("dark" Europeans aren't negro. They just have dark hair and eyes and olive skin). Btw, you are aware that there's a lot more to the difference between a negro and a Caucasian than just complexion, right? Also, NO negro dna has ever been found in Europe. If the Swedes, etc. were negro, there would absolutely have to be DNA evidence. ALL DNA found in Europe, including Scandinavia, is all Caucasian and matches modern white Europeans and Scandinavians. The oldest finds in Scandinavia are 11,000 years old, were Caucasian, and modern white Scandinavians are their descendants, proven by DNA. You guys are deluisonal.
1
@bigcoop3717 Btw, this is an example of how delusional black people are. My own ancestors lived in both Scandinavia and Germany in 1751 (and much earlier and later). If they were negro, wouldn't I be negro? I'm Nordic with blond hair, blue eyes, and a very fair complexion. And, I don't have any negro dna. Can you see how your desire to believe something (that blacks lived in Europe), has overpowered your intellect and ability to reason? Your inferiority complex is so huge, that you'll fall for anything, no matter how absurd, if it makes you feel better about yourself.
1
The oldest remains found in Scandinavia are 11,000 years old. Not only are they Caucasian, but modern white Scandinavians are descended from them (proven by DNA). Ancient and modern Scandinavians were and are white. No negro DNA has ever been found.
1
@wstoker84 That "Vikings were never a race of people" is this new little statement the uneducated like to throw around, somehow thinking it'll trump any traditional view of Nordic history. Vikings were a very specific groups of SCANDINAVIAN raiders and colonizers during a specific period in history (about 750 to 1066). Anglo Saxons weren't Vikings (even if they came from the same region, because they colonized England in the 400's). Modern Somali pirates aren't Vikings. Black Beard the pirate wasn't a Viking. Even my own Scandinavian ancestors who raided and defeated native inhabitants and colonized America weren't Vikings.
1
@wstoker84 sorry to have come across so crass. Only meant to point out that the not just anyone could be a Viking. Btw, my example of my own Scandinavian ancestors defeating the natives in America is true. My Scandinavian ancestors, in the late 19th century, settled and colonized a particular county in the US and had to fight a war against the native tribes to do so (it's called the "Blackhawk Indian War"). It's still a Scandinavian community to this day, and continue to celebrate it's Scandinavian origins and traditions, even a parade with "Vikings" (as well as the victory over the natives, although that last part is played down a bit, due to modern sensibilities).
1
@wstoker84 Not that war. There's another one of the same name that took place in Utah that ended in 1872.
1
@wstoker84 Utah
1
@wstoker84 Utah
1