Comments by "Arnold Hubbert" (@arnoldhubbert6779) on "Why does SWEDEN NO LONGER WANT IMMIGRANTS? - VisualPolitik EN" video.

  1.  @niks1298  That is NOT true. In fact, it's been shown that the next generation is often ever worse and less assimilated that the first. It's partially due to the fact that they are unassimilatable. Their values and culture aren't just due to where they're from. It's their religion. And, those values are completely imcompatable with those of Sweden, and other European countries. These values have resulted in the conflict and poor economic conditions of the countries these people left, and will bring with them to where ever they go. These "war" refugees need to find refuge in other muslim coutries.
    201
  2. Amongst all the good comments, there's one I haven't found (and usually don't find), which is WHY did the Swedish government (and others) allow and promote such a horrendous policy (mass unrestricted immigration from a people whose culture and values are completely imcompatible with those of the natives). Why would they continue to support it when it was so obviously bad for the country but even the majority of the citizens opposed it (why would an elected politicial do anything that the majority of their voters oppose?). Often they're either given a pass that they were "well intended" or "had good hearts" but were just naive. This is NOT true (although, I'm sure there are a few naive citizens who may have felt this way, but not the government). It all has to do with POWER. Jascha Fischer (German politicial) said a few decades ago that the purpose of socialists (and others) in promoting the unrestricted mass immigration from the middle east, in particular, was to "dilute the native population." A people who have their own national, cultural, and ethnic identity are very difficult to control by globalists and leftists (of course, the other extreme, extreme nationalism, can have negative consequences too). Once you've broken them, they will no longer care about the future of their country and people, but all they will care about is their own immediate needs. So, they're easier to manipulate. This is the exact same thing that is happening in the USA right now.
    32
  3. Some EU politicians, who are behind this unrestricted mass immigration to Europe, have stated that their intent is to elimiate any "ethno-states," and that by doing so will remove the cause of future wars. This is not true. Ethnic differences do not automatically result in war, nor does their elimination prevent them. In the US civil war, one of the most brutal wars in history, was between two basically idential ethnicities, who, up until just a generation or two ealier, had immigrated from the same countries. Also, if it were so, why is it that only European countries are targeted for the elimination of ethno-states?
    4
  4. Many Swedes naively think that they can have unlimited immigration and their way of life WON'T CHANGE. This is NOT TRUE. What makes Sweden Sweden is not the land, resources, or even it's laws. It's the PEOPLE. If you change the people, Sweden will change, and likely not in a way that native Swedes, of all different political and cultural beliefs, want. Muslim culture and beliefs, for example, are, not just different, but are in oppostition to the majority of Swedish values, and they refuse to ever intergrate. What do you thin will be the result? When they are enough of the population, they will begin to make cultural and political demands that go counter to native values. It could also eventually lead to the "balkanizaton" of Sweden. It doesn't matter if the Swedish government tries to settle muslims all over the country. The process has already begun in other European countries. Recently, a large group of French military generals sent a commucation to the French government that civil war is inevitable unless something can be done to stop the increased balkanization of France due to the unrestricted muslim immigration. Think this through, people, before it's too late. If some people are legitimate war refugees (most aren't, by far), allow them temporary safety, but repatriate them to their native countries as soon as possible.
    4
  5.  @coyotedust  You are correct but I believe their intent is more than simply ending wars. If it was, they would do it in other continents as well. It's to control people through globalization.
    1
  6.  @LictordeThrax  I believe you're correct.
    1