Comments by "Arnold Hubbert" (@arnoldhubbert6779) on "History Tea Time with Lindsay Holiday" channel.

  1.  @lac8494  Your comment: "Read what Benjamin Franklin, your home boy said and then research what he said and then come back with an intelligent argument..." No problem. BF used the term "swarthy" when describing Italians, French, Spanish, Germans, and Swedes from the mid to late 1700's, right? So, are you telling me that all those Europeans from as recent as the mid to late 1700's WERE ALL NEGROES? My own heritage is Scandinavian and German that didn't immigrate to the US until the mid to late 1800's. Are you telling me that my own relatively recent ancestors were all black nergoes and then somehow became fair skinned, blond haired and blue eyed within the last 150 years or so (my family has those features)? OR, that somehow, my recent ancestors came in and completely removed ALL evidence of the European negro population, including digging up every grave, to remove all DNA evidence just in case future scientists might be able to use to prove their existence in, again, all within about 50-100 years time. The fact that you'd fall for such a ridiculous idea that is so easily disproven supports the idea of your suffering from an inferiority complex fueled delusion. BF's comment actually discredits your cute little theorys. Swarthy doesn't mean black negro. It's just the word Europeans used back then (AND TODAY), to describe white Europeans with a slightly darker appearance. We still use the term to describe southern Europeans or even just a European with dark hair.
    6
  2. So, you conclude that because there were literally a handful of black and mixed black/white individuals who achieved minor prominence in Europe (extremely minor. At least a couple mentioned were still technically slaves), that somehow blacks founded every civilization? The mere fact that those listed in the video are even noticed at all is because they're black and an extreme anomaly in European history. If blacks founded Europe, the white aristocrats would be the anomaly and we'd be watching a video about them. Stop suppressing your reason and common sense.
    5
  3. Exactly. Blacks were the original Europeans who invented and built everthing Europeans are given the credit for. They were the original nobility until white Europeans came and kicked them out of their castles and stole their identities and noble heritage and noble heraldry and coats of arms. UNTIL whites got enough power and then secretly, leaving absolutely no evidence, killed or captured ALL blacks and shipped them to the Americas, but destroying all the records and forcing all the people in Europe and America at the time to both deny it ever happened and to never write about it or pass down oral stories to their descendants, including as especially the blacks themselves. Then, the whites destroyed or altered all the images and records of native black europeans, except of course, any records or images of blacks who were slaves transported from slave territories. And, if that weren't enough, they even dug up ALL the black graves in Europe and destroyed all the evidence (or just transposted all the graves to the Americas) so that one day, no future scientist would be able to use DNA testing to prove they existed. Clever devils, those white people. Not so say, super hard working. That would have taken generations of hard work to do all that.
    5
  4. the moors didn't control europe. They invaded and occupied a part of Spain (never the entire country). They also didn't civilize anyone. That's an historical exaggeration promoted by inferiority complex fueled muslims. Oh, and they weren't black (negro). They were north african (berber, arab).
    5
  5.  @stacybell3706  If you're black and from the Caribbean, your ancestors were from Africa, not Europe.
    5
  6.  @lac8494  Btw, why can't you guys just be happy with the little tidbits like the examples provided by this video (even if they are a bit exaggerated) rather than going to an extreme and trying appropriate an entire heritage that doesn't belong to you?
    5
  7.  @lac8494  Everyone, even black historians, acknowledge that Cleopatra was Greek. Your claims of "whitewashing" is just another excuse for your attempt to, using your words, "re-write your own history," in a way that supports your fictional self-worth. There's not much I could comment that could help you. At some point, you're going to have to decide whether or not to do a serious self-introspection and decide if your "self-worth" is worth believing fabrications. It's a dead end and your artificial self-worth will fall hard one day. It's up to you.
    5
  8. How was any of this hidden? They were all extremely minor figures. Why would we all need to know about them? If they were hidden, how do you know about them, then?
    5
  9. https://youtu.be/PNltS01o5n4 "Are we Obsessed with African Ancestry within European Royalty? Though it's an interesting minor detail of history, It seems like so many blacks think they need to claim European heritage in order to have any pride whatsoever in their heritage. For example, finding out about a few Europeans who lived in old Japan as samurai doesn't do a think for me. It's a slightly interesting minor part of history but it doesn't give me any pride in being of the same race. They're not my ancestors or connected to me, personally, in any way. Instead of wasting so much time studying (and then fantasizing) about heritage that really isn't yours (European), why don't you put more effort into your own black African heritage. You'll get a lot more self worth out of it.
    5
  10. Blacks sure believe in a lot of absurd fantasies. You're so envious of Europeans that you're claiming to be Europeans and appropriating all of our heritage as your own. Every one of your claims is easily refuted but blacks usually igore all the evidence that refute your fantasies beause of your inferiority complex. You're so desperate to believe in fantasies that you ignore real and overwhelming evidence. A wise person once said, "Forget your feelings and stop being biased."
    4
  11. Why is there NO african or negro dna ever found in Europe then? Only Caucasian dna?
    4
  12. de•lu•sion•al /dəˈlo͞oZH(ə)nəl/ adjective characterized by or holding false beliefs or judgments about external reality that are held despite incontrovertible evidence to the contrary, typically as a symptom of a mental condition or an inferiority complex.
    4
  13. You mean you don't care if they're historically accurate or not? We're in trouble.
    4
  14.  @MizMorgue1  "You're one of those ppl" You mean someone who cares about truth? Yup, I'm one of those people. "because I believe the best actor or actress should get the job" Are you so naïve and that gullible to actually believe that they were only looking to hire the best actors, regardless of race and that there just weren't qualified Caucasian actors. They were looking for non white actors to support an agenda. If you believe otherwise you're apparently also suffering from delusional disorder. Nighty, night.
    4
  15. It's actually quite pathetic that so many negroes think they need to claim European heritage in order to have any pride whatsoever in their heritage. Instead of wasting so much time studying (and then fantasizing) about heritage that isn't yours (European), why don't you put more effort into your own black negro african heritage. You'll get a lot more self worth out of the truth.
    4
  16. Here's what a people with the world's biggest racial inferiority complex do. 1) They first envy your heritage. 2) Then they fantasize about having your heritage with you. 3) Then, they take your heritage and deny that it's even your heritage anymore. Over the last few decades, blacks have been doing this same thing with the following peoples: Egyptians, Japanese, Chinese, British, Anglo Saxons, Celts, Vikings, Russians, European nobility, all Europeans, Jews, all Israelites, native Americans. In fact, I think the only heritage they won't claim is AFRICAN.
    4
  17.  @lac8494  "Oh I can provide it alright, but I don't owe you an explanation." What a convenient escuse for someone with NO EXPLANATION. Now, I'm going to use your own words against you: "I challenged her (YOU) to bring the receipts because I know she (YOU) can't, that information just is not out there." How ironic.
    4
  18.  @stacybell3706  I appreciate your reply and acknowledge that, in many cases, black Americans do have additional ancestry. My comment was mostly in regard to your "black" noble ancestors. I don't have a problem if you're claiming black African noble ancestors, or even white European noble ancestors. But I do if you're claiming noble black European ancestors, which were not "whitewashed" to remove the evidence.
    4
  19.  @lac8494  You were just caught and exposed for racism (race IS bioligical) by claiming someone was genetically inferior, and now you're trying to backtrack it. Won't work. Everyone saw it.
    4
  20.  @lac8494  Actually, I HAVE asked a lot of people, like yourself, for proof. To this day, NO ONE has ever provided it. In fact, when I've held them to a specific claim (who, when, how, etc.), they usually "run away" and say stuff like, they don't owe me an explanation or something like that.
    4
  21. why then has there never been any black negro dna found in Europe anywhere. Why does all ancient dna match local white Europeans? why does african american dna match exactly the dna of west africans where history recorded your ancestors were enslaved?
    4
  22. Why is it, then, that NO dna evidence (or anything else) has ever been found in Europe? And all ancient dna ever found belongs to ancient and modern white Europeans. IF what you're saying had any truth, there would be dna found all over Europe, let alone NONE. Black people who believe this falsehood must have the world's biggest inferiority complex, for you to be so desperate and gullible. AND, THE FACT THAT IT'S WHITE EUROPEAN HERITAGE THAT YOU CLAIM, EXPOSES THE SOURCE OF YOUR ENVY AND COMPLEX. Btw, prediction. You won't respond to my comment. When confronted by any actual evidence that disproves your absurd claims, black people always just run away.
    4
  23. Here's an example of overwhelming evidence. If negroes were truly the nobility of Europe, they would have to have been the original population of Europe too and that whtie Europeans came later (many blacks claim that white people took over all of Europe, starting in the late 1700's). If that were the case, there would be tens of thousands of negro burials in Europe (or at the very least, among the nobility). Is there? Even you have to admit there's never been a single example of negro dna ever found in europe (including not among any nobility). And all dna found, is all caucasian and related to modern white Europeans. All of it. Does these facts hurt your feelings and are you trying to figure out how to deny them? Remember, "Forget your feelings and stop being biased."
    3
  24. Btw, you're misinterpreting European histories, written by Europeans, with European terms, with your modern limited negro understanding. For example, "black" never meant negro when describing other Europeans, in historical European records. You guys are truly the world's biggest idiots.
    3
  25. Here's what a people with the world's biggest racial inferiority complex do. 1) They first envy your heritage. 2) Then they fantasize about having your heritage with you. 3) Then, they take your heritage and deny that it's even your heritage anymore. Over the last few decades, blacks have been doing this same thing with the following peoples: Egyptians, Japanese, Chinese, British, Anglo Saxons, Celts, Vikings, Russians, European nobility, all Europeans, Jews, all Israelites, native Americans. In fact, I think the only heritage they won't claim is AFRICAN.
    3
  26. A bit of an exaggeration. They only occupied parts of Spain (never entirely) and in fact, was mostly relegated to just the southern portion for most of that history. Also, they weren't black negro but were north African (berber, arab, etc.).
    3
  27. Btw, want proof? In modern Spain, especially along the south and west, much of the native population has some degree of north African dna (berber, arabic). However, there is virtually NO sub saharan black dna. So, obvious evidence of some of the Moors leaving a genetic legacy of their occupation. If negroes were even a part of that occupation, there would be measurable negro dna as well. There isn't.
    3
  28. AS A WHITE PERSON and reading about all these claims I've come to realize something... Doesn't that make us pretty amazing? That we were able to completely take over and replace and the negroes in Europe is a pretty impressive accomplishment. We've so thoroughly "colonized" negroes that we've made the entire world think that it was US who had accomplished all those things. Think about all we would have had to do. Even though we didn't know anything, somehow we were able to defeat all the negroes and take over their castles, palaces, homes, and cities, and move out of our caves. We dug up ALL the negro burials and replaced them with our own ancient ancestor's bodies (which we would have to have preserved for thousands of years since the burials scientists are digging up now and find they all have Caucasian DNA, are thousands of years old). Even though our ancestors weren't even aware of DNA yet. We learned so well when you all taught us how to build ships, castles, cities, and modern laws and forms of government, that we've been able to continue doing those things and spread the technology and knowledge all around the world and everyone thinks we invented those things. We concocted impressive genealogies for ourselves, going back hundreds, even well over a thousand years of ancestors, stole negro identities and names, and made them appear to have lived in Europe the whole time. Oh, we painted over every painting of all the negro nobility and made them look Caucasian so well that even modern experts can't tell. Then, on top of everything, we also gathered up every single negro, so that none were left, and shipped them to sub Saharan Africa and make them live like the world's most primitive culture and people, reduced to living in mud huts and even eating each other for food (and even got them to stop using the wheel until the 20th century), so we could trick everyone into thinking they hadn't originated in Europe and were so advanced. We even got negroes to forget their own glorious past and believe that they just were this primitive and backward people, so we could also enslave them later. Oh, we also made the negroes learn a who new non European language in Africa and removed any connection or words that might connect their language to the European language their ancestors had developed and spoke for thousands of years. We also tricked them into thinking that their European surnames, which they somehow kept, despite no longer speaking a European language, were just names they took from their Caucasian slave masters. Just wow! We Caucasians are an amazingly ambitious and hard working people to have accomplished all that, and within just a few hundred years. You have to admit.
    3
  29. If black people were everywhere why hasn't there ever been any negro dna found anywhere but africa? No negro dna has ever been found in Europe, only caucasian dna. Cleopatra wasn't even negro but Caucasian Greek. black people aren't being left out. You were never there.
    3
  30. Really? Could you share just a single example?
    3
  31. Why then is there no black negro dna found in Europe, neither anciently, or modern? Not a single example. Why is it that all dna samples ever found always exactly match that of modern Caucasian Europeans? I'll bet you won't answer.
    3
  32. Please proved an example of what they "renamed' black people (negroes) many times? In fact, provide a few, since you indicated "many" times.
    3
  33. Quite an absurd and baseless claim, that most noble houses in Europe were of Moorish decent. Outside of Spain, during the moorish occupation, name a single example (let alone "most"). I dare you. A SINGLE example. Also, the Moors weren't negroes: "Moors - Of mixed Arab, Spanish, and Amazigh (Berber) origins, the Moors created the Islamic Andalusian civilization and subsequently settled as refugees in the Maghreb (in the region of North Africa) between the 11th and 17th centuries."
    3
  34. Even though that's not true (and no evidence) why do you use the word "melanated" instead of black or negro? Is it because you know there's no evidence for negroes but by using an extremely general term (anyone with darker than pale skin), you think you're covered and in your mind you like to think that anyone with less then pale skin is somehow related to you? Is that it?
    3
  35. are you saying that if there were black aristocracy that it means that black slavery didn't exist? Or, that since black slavery existed, there really wasn't such a thing as black aristocracy?
    3
  36. why then has there never been any black negro dna found in Europe anywhere. Why does all ancient dna match local white Europeans? why does african american dna match exactly the dna of west africans where history recorded your ancestors were enslaved?
    3
  37. Actually, kind of misleading. The moors were barely hanging on in Spain for several hundred years before they were completely kicked out in 1492. Also, you are aware that most of the moors were negro, right? They were north african (berber, arab). There may have been a few negroes among them as slaves or mercenaries, however. Don't believe me? Look it up.
    3
  38. It's ironic that you're appropriating the heritage of your ancestor's enslavers, which is the most pathetic example of an inferiority complex I have ever heard.
    3
  39.  @dieu5041  There was never a single negro monarch in Europe (nor any negro populations). Even the moors weren't negro (though there were likely some negroes among them, either as slaves or as mercenaries).
    3
  40. You seem to care a lot about historical accuracy. The reason some black history is being banned is exactly because it ISN'T ACCURATE. No one is banning accurate black history, except those who are claiming and spreading ideas such as America was founded on anti black racism, or that blacks were the original Europeans, even the original European nobility, until the white people highjacked their castles and sent them all to the Carribean as slaves. Hopefully you're not allowing stuff like that to be taught.
    3
  41. actually even the oldest dna finds in Europe all show dna that matches the local white Europeans. Also, no negro dna has ever been found. although it is true that some of the ancestors of modern Europeans also came from the steppes, most of our ancestry of from the ancient original inhabitants. on the other hand. negro dna originated and remained in sub saharan africa until the trans atlantic slave trade. science doesn't lie.
    3
  42. AS A WHITE PERSON and reading about all these claims I've come to realize something... Doesn't that make us pretty amazing? That we were able to completely take over and replace and the negroes in Europe is a pretty impressive accomplishment. We've so thoroughly "colonized" negroes that we've made the entire world think that it was US who had accomplished all those things. Think about all we would have had to do. Even though we didn't know anything, somehow we were able to defeat all the negroes and take over their castles, palaces, homes, and cities, and move out of our caves. We dug up ALL the negro burials and replaced them with our own ancient ancestor's bodies (which we would have to have preserved for thousands of years since the burials scientists are digging up now and find they all have Caucasian DNA, are thousands of years old). Even though our ancestors weren't even aware of DNA yet. We learned so well when you all taught us how to build ships, castles, cities, and modern laws and forms of government, that we've been able to continue doing those things and spread the technology and knowledge all around the world and everyone thinks we invented those things. We concocted impressive genealogies for ourselves, going back hundreds, even well over a thousand years of ancestors, stole negro identities and names, and made them appear to have lived in Europe the whole time. Oh, we painted over every painting of all the negro nobility and made them look Caucasian so well that even modern experts can't tell. Then, on top of everything, we also gathered up every single negro, so that none were left, and shipped them to sub Saharan Africa and make them live like the world's most primitive culture and people, reduced to living in mud huts and even eating each other for food (and even got them to stop using the wheel until the 20th century), so we could trick everyone into thinking they hadn't originated in Europe and were so advanced. We even got negroes to forget their own glorious past and believe that they just were this primitive and backward people, so we could also enslave them later. Oh, we also made the negroes learn a who new non European language in Africa and removed any connection or words that might connect their language to the European language their ancestors had developed and spoke for thousands of years. We also tricked them into thinking that their European surnames, which they somehow kept, despite no longer speaking a European language, were just names they took from their Caucasian slave masters. Just wow! We Caucasians are an amazingly ambitious and hard working people to have accomplished all that, and within just a few hundred years. You have to admit.
    3
  43. Imagine having an inferiority complex so huge that you would put so much effort into creating a fantasy with virtually no evidence, other than by quoting the fantasies of other equally gullible and desperate people with the same complex. One day you'll look back on all of this and be so embarrassed that you'll probably create another fantasy that you never were this delusional.
    2
  44.  @Abel-dg8qr  Um. Your comment was directed at the original comment denying the claim that there "were black people living in Europe since ancient times." So, what does any who might have ended up as slaves in American have to do with that? Whatever "receipts" you have, wouldn't prove anything regarding blacks in ancient Europe. Btw, I don't believe there's a record of any going to America because American hadn't been discovered yet! How would moors at the time of their finally being kicked out of Spain in 1492, decide to go to a place that hadn't been discovered yet (did some later go to America, from North Africa, possibly but that's not what I said in response to your question of where did the go after they were kicked out of Spain). I'd love to see what your so called receipts said.
    2
  45. I knew you wouldn't be able to answer that very basic question. Why? Because fantasies don't require evidence. The only requirement is a vivid imagination (usually coupled with an inferiority complex or, as in this case, white envy).
    2
  46. It's nice that they're letting inmates at the insane asylum have computer access now. It fills your day and gives you something to do and probably keeps you so busy, you're less likely to get into trouble.
    2
  47. Here's what a people with the world's biggest racial inferiority complex do. 1) They first envy your heritage. 2) Then they fantasize about having your heritage with you. 3) Then, they take your heritage and deny that it's even your heritage anymore. Over the last few decades, blacks have been doing this same thing with the following peoples: Egyptians, Japanese, Chinese, British, Anglo Saxons, Celts, Vikings, Russians, all Europeans, Jews, all Israelites, native Americans. In fact, I think the only heritage they won't claim is AFRICAN.
    2
  48. "we adapted and branched out into multiple ethnicities" THAT'S EXACTLY WHAT RACE IS AND AND HOW IT'S DEFINED. You only used the word "ethnicities" so you could express a biological reality without using the word "race." (to avoid using the word race, people have also started to incorrectly use words like "nationalities."). Race IS NOT a social construct invented in the 15th century. It's existed since the first group of humans isolated themselves for several generation, long enough for them to develop an amalgamation of their features. And, people have recognized distinct races since at least recorded history. Only racial superiority and inferiority are social constructs. People, like you, who make the claim that race is nothing more than a social construct, only do so because you THINK that's the way to end racism. But then, you all will continue to use racial terminology and distinctions, if you've found that by doing so, benefits you. I've literally heard black people say, "Race is a social construct invented by WHITE PEOPLE who are all evil from birth." You've done something very similar in a passive aggressive way. You claim race doesn't exist and then proceed to highlight all the racial benefits of being black. That, my uneducated friend, is what is known as hypocrisy.
    2
  49. Here's what a people with the world's biggest racial inferiority complex do. 1) They first envy your heritage. 2) Then they fantasize about having your heritage with you. 3) Then, they take your heritage and deny that it's even your heritage anymore. Over the last few decades, blacks have been doing this same thing with the following peoples: Egyptians, Japanese, Chinese, British, Anglo Saxons, Celts, Vikings, Russians, European nobility, all Europeans, Jews, all Israelites, native Americans. In fact, I think the only heritage they won't claim is AFRICAN.
    2
  50. Here's what a people with the world's biggest racial inferiority complex do. 1) They first envy your heritage. 2) Then they fantasize about having your heritage with you. 3) Then, they take your heritage and deny that it's even your heritage anymore. Over the last few decades, blacks have been doing this same thing with the following peoples: Egyptians, Japanese, Chinese, British, Anglo Saxons, Celts, Vikings, Russians, European nobility, all Europeans, Jews, all Israelites, native Americans. In fact, I think the only heritage they won't claim is AFRICAN.
    2
  51. Can you prove you're a "descendant of ROYAL & SWARTHY Europeans" or is it just a fantasy? Prediction, you won't be able to prove it so you'll either demand that I "disprove" it or just run away from the discussion.
    2
  52.  @yvngleanoa2137  I've done my genealogy extensively (btw, most white Americans have done so. We're quite aware of our heritage). I can trace my heritage back to well over a thousand years. My family has been to the churches and monasteries in the areas where my ancestors lived for hundreds of years, and have seen the actual genealogical records showing my ancestry (not from some limited US census). I've seen the castles where my ancestors lived that are still named for my family name. I've even seen a statue of one of these ancestors (she's Caucasian, btw). I have the records from these castles showing my descent from those that lived there (one, since 1288). I can also trace my dna to ancient dna found in Europe. Just because most black Americans don't even know the names of their great grandparents, they think no one else can either. You guys have no idea just how connected we European Americans are to our ancestors and heritage (which doesn't come close to how even more connected our European relatives are). "there’s thousands of black Americans that can prove they have black royalty in there blood" I've heard this claim made now, numerous times, but whenever I ask a negro to offer evidence, he just runs away without offering any. So, let's give you a try. What is the specific proof that you have black royal (or even just black European) blood? Btw, the proof can't be some random image of st Maurice, etc. I want to know YOUR actual connection (and, that they're actually negro).
    2
  53. During the Moorish period, sub saharan blacks were living in mud huts and eating each other for food. You weren't even using the wheel until the early 20th century.
    2
  54. No reply? I thought not.
    2
  55. https://youtu.be/PNltS01o5n4 "Are we Obsessed with African Ancestry within European Royalty? Though it's an interesting minor detail of history, It seems like so many blacks think they need to claim European heritage in order to have any pride whatsoever in their heritage. For example, finding out about a few Europeans who lived in old Japan as samurai doesn't do a think for me. It's a slightly interesting minor part of history but it doesn't give me any pride in being of the same race. They're not my ancestors or connected to me, personally, in any way. Instead of wasting so much time studying (and then fantasizing) about heritage that really isn't yours (European), why don't you put more effort into your own black African heritage. You'll get a lot more self worth out of it.
    2
  56. If you've taken a DNA test, surely you noticed all the sub saharan west african negro DNA, right? Also, since you're a believer in DNA test results, surely you're aware that there's never been found a single example of negro DNA in any part of European history. ALL the DNA found, is always Caucasian and always matches modern Europeans. You're the one hiding true history and replacing it with false black fantasies.
    2
  57. Where does it say that they were black negro?
    2
  58. Delusional fantasy by a people with an inferiority complex.
    2
  59. https://youtu.be/PNltS01o5n4 "Are we Obsessed with African Ancestry within European Royalty?
    2
  60.  @Hardline_Boss  I said, provide ONE example of a noble European house that is descended from Moors, as you claim. ONE.
    2
  61. IF a European was described as "swarthy" that doesn't make them of moorish descent (and certainly not of negro descent, since even the Moors weren't negro). We've ALWAYS known that there were Europeans of various shades of white, some paler, some less so, NONE OF WHOM WERE MOOR OR NEGRO, however... you just can't get around the fact that if you're limited to your own african negro heritage, you don't have much to brag about.
    2
  62.  @Hardline_Boss  You guys don't get it. YOU'RE the one with the burden of proof, not me. You're the one's making absurd, baseless, claims. I don't have to prove anything. YOU DO. Just because you read the word "swarthy" doesn't mean negro (or moor). Europeans have always used that word to describe any white European with slightly less than pale skin. We still use it the same way.
    2
  63.  @Hardline_Boss  I used the word NEGRO (I only mentioned "black" too because some people use that word to also refer to negroes). No anthropologist have EVER said that ANY bodies found were NEGROID. NONE. If you're referring to cheddar man (you mentioned earlier), no anthropologist ever said he was negroid. In fact, at most, he was of a likely of a slightly darker complexion, but they're not even sure of that. Negroes like yourself have exaggerated anything you've think you heard. That would like one day finding the remains of Donald Trump, and someone said me might have had a slightly darker complexion (orange) and future negroes claim the Trump was a negro. You guys are pretty desparate. Why not look to the source of your true heritage in Africa?
    2
  64.  @julesword4240  What ever gave you the idea she was "black?" Since you're making such a claim, let's see if you can back it up with facts? Please explain how Queen Charlotte is black? And, please don't run away and hide when someone confronts you with your claim.
    2
  65. The moors were isolated to Spain an d their rule didn't last. Also, the moors weren't negro, but north African which were related to Berbers. Though it's likely that they employed (or enslaved) some negroes.
    2
  66. ​ @yvngleanoa2137  Bro, the Moors ruled a portion of Spain for about 781 years (btw, why bother to exaggerate to 900? I think it's so that eventually you'll be able to start exaggerate to a "thousand' years because a thousand sounds much more impressive). Also, the history is clear how their advanced was halted from going beyond Spain. What so called 'evidence" do you have (not fake evidence like depictions of st Maurice or of moorsheads on crests, etc. which have a completely different meaning), but actual documented evidence of actual Moors invading the rest of Europe? Also, the Moors weren't negro (sub saharan African). They were North West African. Also, the definition of Moor, "literally means": from Old French More, via Latin from Greek Mauros ‘inhabitant of Mauretania’. It has nothing to do with dark complexion. Also, the Moors were, "a member of a northwestern African Muslim people of mixed Berber and Arab descent." Btw, you're welcome to look up Berber yourself to see what their race is. You'll be disappointed, of course.
    2
  67. de•lu•sion•al /dəˈlo͞oZH(ə)nəl/ adjective characterized by or holding false beliefs or judgments about external reality that are held despite incontrovertible evidence to the contrary, typically as a symptom of a mental condition or an inferiority complex.
    2
  68. Please explain, then, how did the white Europeans completely take over and completely eradicate ALL evidence of all those black people, including and especially any dna evidence? And please be specific. Keep in mind, like many Europeans, I can trace my direct ancestors to European (German) nobility. One family was ennobled in 1288 and lasted until the 17th century. I've seen their castle and their sculptures and paintings, and they're all of white people. I also don't have any negro dna. I look forward to your detailed explanation.
    2
  69.  @jorad4887  If you're getting your information from a single documentary, it's doesn't sound like very reliable information. You must understand that with the proliferation of so many "documentaries" today, and with no real oversight regarding truth, especially those on the internet, the "facts" are often influenced by personal biases or, just as often, by simply repeating back other, just as unreliable and unvetted, sources. Kind of just like your original claim regarding the assumptions modern people make about the past. Fact is, the Norse were indeed actually taller than their European counterparts. We know this from both contemporary descriptions as well as archeological evidence. Some modern documentaries will twist or misconstrue evidence to make it seem as though they have the "truth' that no one else has, in order to feel superior (just like you did in your original text). They misunderstood the results of averages, which don't give an accurate picture of reality. For example, one extremely short individual can skew the results, even if he were an isolated outlier (which is exactly what happened with some "results" regarding the subject, that other respectable scientists have since debunked). Fact is, the Norse were actually almost as tall as modern Scandinavians which, by the standards of the day, were taller than the average European.
    2
  70. Here's what a people with the world's biggest racial inferiority complex do. 1) They first envy your heritage. 2) Then they fantasize about having your heritage with you. 3) Then, they take your heritage and deny that it's even your heritage anymore. Over the last few decades, blacks have been doing this same thing with the following peoples: Egyptians, Japanese, Chinese, British, Anglo Saxons, Celts, Vikings, Russians, European nobility, all Europeans, Jews, all Israelites, native Americans. In fact, I think the only heritage they won't claim is AFRICAN.
    2
  71. what proof do you have for such an extreme and absurd claim?
    2
  72. Though interesting, these few examples origins are still highly speculative and, despite their surroundings, would not have been considered aristocrats, especially by Eurpean standards. Bridgerton is still an extreme fiction. That doesn't mean they were "noble' of character, however, which should be more highly regarded.
    2
  73.  @samanthasmith61  It's unfortunate, and historically irresponsible, for rare and speculative examples, to be used as the foundation for modern interpretations of history, whether in movies, books, or even academia, whose proof is only that it's "based on a true story," which has come to mean nothing more than the existence of minor details.
    2
  74.  @samanthasmith61  ... coupled with the author's (movie maker's, etc.), wishful thinking.
    2
  75. AS A WHITE PERSON and reading about all these claims I've come to realize something... Doesn't that make us pretty amazing? That we were able to completely take over and replace and the negroes in Europe is a pretty impressive accomplishment. We've so thoroughly "colonized" negroes that we've made the entire world think that it was US who had accomplished all those things. Think about all we would have had to do. Even though we didn't know anything, somehow we were able to defeat all the negroes and take over their castles, palaces, homes, and cities, and move out of our caves. We dug up ALL the negro burials and replaced them with our own ancient ancestor's bodies (which we would have to have preserved for thousands of years since the burials scientists are digging up now and find they all have Caucasian DNA, are thousands of years old). Even though our ancestors weren't even aware of DNA yet. We learned so well when you all taught us how to build ships, castles, cities, and modern laws and forms of government, that we've been able to continue doing those things and spread the technology and knowledge all around the world and everyone thinks we invented those things. We concocted impressive genealogies for ourselves, going back hundreds, even well over a thousand years of ancestors, stole negro identities and names, and made them appear to have lived in Europe the whole time. Oh, we painted over every painting of all the negro nobility and made them look Caucasian so well that even modern experts can't tell. Then, on top of everything, we also gathered up every single negro, so that none were left, and shipped them to sub Saharan Africa and make them live like the world's most primitive culture and people, reduced to living in mud huts and even eating each other for food (and even got them to stop using the wheel until the 20th century), so we could trick everyone into thinking they hadn't originated in Europe and were so advanced. We even got negroes to forget their own glorious past and believe that they just were this primitive and backward people, so we could also enslave them later. Oh, we also made the negroes learn a who new non European language in Africa and removed any connection or words that might connect their language to the European language their ancestors had developed and spoke for thousands of years. We also tricked them into thinking that their European surnames, which they somehow kept, despite no longer speaking a European language, were just names they took from their Caucasian slave masters. Just wow! We Caucasians are an amazingly ambitious and hard working people to have accomplished all that, and within just a few hundred years. You have to admit.
    2
  76. native to africa. you can tell just by observing. the afro hair, dark skin, dark eyes and hair, broad noses, etc. all evolved in a hot climate exactly like sub saharan africa. dna prove this as well.
    2
  77. Spain and Portugal were NOT founded by africans. Where did you get that delusional idea? They had already existed long before the moors (who were not negro) invaded and eventually expelled.
    2
  78. What fully black child? Swarthy never meant negro, btw. It just referred to a Caucasian with dark hair and olive skin (like southern Europeans, or even some british people).
    2
  79.  @benyahudadavidl  Then why has NO negro dna ever been found in Europe (or everywhere else)? Why is all the DNA found in Europe (including that of the nobles), always Caucasian and matches modern Europeans. Shalom.
    2
  80.  @lac8494  Not the best evidence, but if it's all you got...?
    2
  81.  @lac8494  Even you would have to acknowledge that the claims you're making are not accepted as even remotely possible by the vast majority of people, including historians. "now we're asking for receipts PROOF!!!" Again, YOU'RE the one making absurd claims that are at extreme odds with accepted historical facts. THE BURDEN OF PROOF IS ON YOU. "What is absurd is that people would actually claim someone else's history and pass it off as their own." Do you not see the irony. YOU'RE the one claiming someone else's history as your own. And if your source is "the internet," one of the most dubious sources of truth there is, NO WONDER you're getting it all wrong. "We're rewriting our story so get the hell out of the way." EXACTLY. That's exactly what you're doing. You're inventing your own history and do not want anyone, especially the people whose history you're distorting and appropriating, to get in the way by countering it with truth and overwhelming evidence to the contrary. You're hoping you can use your "race card" and "white guilt" to get white people to just let you get away with your inferiority complex fueled attempt to re-write history. Btw, as as side, do you actually think Cleopatra was was a black negro?
    2
  82.  @lac8494  What princess?
    2
  83.  @jtoussaint2011  "black is a derogatory" But didn't you use the same term in your earlier comment ("black nobility")? What word, then, do we use for sub Saharan black negroes? You guys keep changing your label so often, it's impossible to keep up. Your claims are kind of difficult to follow. So, you're saying the enslavement of black negroes (let me know what word to use) didn't exist because black negroes were the leaders of Europe and they wouldn't enslave their own people? And that later, the European nobility changed from black negro to white through evolution? Btw, it's a "secret" mainly because IT ISN'T TRUE (and there's NO evidence to support it, even stretched evidence). Only absurd fantasies.
    2
  84.  @jtoussaint2011  Btw, since I descend from German nobility who were ennobled in 1288 and lasted until the 17th century, when did my negro German ancestors change from negro to Caucasian? And, why don't I have any negro dna? Oh, and why do depictions of those same ancestors (sculptures and paintings) depict white people?
    2
  85. Do you have a single documented case of an African negro in Europe who went there on their own without being brought there? Even the Moors, who were the majority not black, included blacks but usually only as hired mercenaries or slaves.
    2
  86. why then has there never been any black negro dna found in Europe anywhere. Why does all ancient dna match local white Europeans? why does african american dna match exactly the dna of west africans where history recorded your ancestors were enslaved?
    2
  87.  @HappyHopefullTree  What you really want to ignore are facts and the truth about your origins and the origins and achievements of Europeans, which you so desperately want to appropriate. You want to run away to your little "safe space" where you can continue to believe your fantasies without anyone preventing you from doing so by providing facts, truth, and common sense.
    2
  88.  @yvngleanoa2137  Which part was factually and historically incorrect? The part of negro monarchs or that the Moors were mostly North African and rarely were negroes among them? I've studied each subject extensively (in college as well) and all (not most, but all) actually scholars agree with those two statements of truth. You're getting the truth mixed up with black fantasy. Remember, black fantasy = false.
    2
  89.  @GailBecker-MSED-CM-Author  It sounds like you are probably doing a good job. It was my understanding that those things being removed were teaching CRT and/or 1619 project information. Have I been misinformed? I have also understood that American black history has always been taught (and continues to be). What isn't being taught, that should be? Btw, those extreme examples I mentioned ARE being taught in some schools (mostly in some colleges) by actual college professors with actual degrees.
    2
  90. You guys are so embarrassed by the truth of your ancestors being african slaves that you'll make up a fake history, with absolutely no evidence, in order to overcome your inferiority complex. So pathetic.
    1
  91. Here's what a people with the world's biggest racial inferiority complex do. 1) They first envy your heritage. 2) Then they fantasize about having your heritage with you. 3) Then, they take your heritage and deny that it's even your heritage anymore. Over the last few decades, blacks have been doing this same thing with the following peoples: Egyptians, Japanese, Chinese, British, Anglo Saxons, Celts, Vikings, Russians, European nobility, all Europeans, Jews, all Israelites, native Americans. In fact, I think the only heritage they won't claim is AFRICAN.
    1
  92. de•lu•sion•al /dəˈlo͞oZH(ə)nəl/ adjective characterized by or holding false beliefs or judgments about external reality that are held despite incontrovertible evidence to the contrary, typically as a symptom of a mental condition or an inferiority complex.
    1
  93.  @sublimnl1  Here's what a people with the world's biggest racial inferiority complex do. 1) They first envy your heritage. 2) Then they fantasize about having your heritage with you. 3) Then, they take your heritage and deny that it's even your heritage anymore. Over the last few decades, blacks have been doing this same thing with the following peoples: Egyptians, Japanese, Chinese, British, Anglo Saxons, Celts, Vikings, Russians, European nobility, all Europeans, Jews, all Israelites, native Americans. In fact, I think the only heritage they won't claim is AFRICAN.
    1
  94.  @benyahudadavidl  You got one thing right, though. We're not supposed to tell and I could get in big trouble for this but the truth is white people (especially blond Nordic people***) come from another planet. Our ancestors came to earth, actually, only about 1000 years ago. They decided to settle in Europe because it was by far the most advanced civilization at the time. But, in order to pull it off, they had to eliminate the native negro population and then just replace them by appropriating their identities (after tricking the negro Europeans into teaching them all they knew, first). However, our ancestors thought that in the future, their descendants might be able to use the descendants of those negroes as slaves, so instead of just killing them outright, most of them were just transported to sub saharan africa, where they were made to forget their history, technology, their language, even their names, so they'd think they were just a primitive native african people. Our plan worked perfectly until recently when black people started to put 2 and 2 together and figure things out. Well, we had a good run but our people are starting to talk about returning to the home world. We hid our spaceships in oceans and lakes (why do you think white people love to have their vacation homes near bodies of water?) and are getting them ready for our return. * All white people are descended from our alien ancestors but darker Europeans mixed with indigenous earthlings which is why they're darker now. However, blond Nordic people (Scandinavians, etc.) are pure descendants of these alien ancestors. It's not been easy to keep our ancestry pure, but there have been a lot of attempts over the centuries (the nazis, American eugenics, just to name a few).
    1
  95.  @benyahudadavidl  Btw, if you guys are going to convince the rest of the world of the truth you just discovered about white people, you're going to have to reconcile this one glaring piece of history. "wherever modernity is found throughout history" If there was any truth to that claim, wouldn't sub saharan africa and it's people be the world's most advanced and civilized place on earth? Instead, they are literally the world's most primitive, backward, and uncivilized place and people on earth. Before the arrival of the Europeans, you all were living in mud huts and eating each other for food and didn't even start using the wheel until the 20th century. So, you're going to need a way to either hide that part or just explain how the Nordic aliens were so effective in making your ancestors forget all their previous advancements, that your ancestors reverted all the way back to the stone age.
    1
  96. Then why has NO negro dna ever been found in Europe (or everywhere else)? Why is all the DNA found in Europe (including that of the nobles), always Caucasian and matches modern Europeans. Does believing a fantasy help you with your self-esteem? We all know how much blacks are ashamed of your sub saharan negro african heritage but do you really think that reasonable people are going to be so gullible to fall for your absurd fantasies? Some black people will, of course, but I mean "reasonable" people.
    1
  97.  @Abel-dg8qr  They went back to north Africa. This is well documented.
    1
  98. The moors weren't negro (though there were some negroes among them, either as slaves or mercenaries), and didn't rule Europe, but a part of Spain.
    1
  99.  @odetteloney9088  de•lu•sion•al /dəˈlo͞oZH(ə)nəl/ adjective characterized by or holding false beliefs or judgments about external reality that are held despite incontrovertible evidence to the contrary, typically as a symptom of a mental condition or an inferiority complex.
    1
  100. There were actually closer to 4 million but what's your point?
    1
  101.  @royalistparty8380  Your information is incredibly false. According to the 1860 census, around 226,000 free Black people lived in the Northern states before the Civil War, and about the same number living in the South. By contrast, there were over 4 million black slaves. Also, even the free blacks were once slaves or descendants of slaves (usually no further back than their parents). There were also no white slaves. There were some indentured servants but that's a huge difference since once you paid your debt, you were no longer indentured. Slaves were born and died slaves (and their children) as a result of their race.
    1
  102. "Swarthy, Ruddy, brunette and olive" were all just European terms used to describe some white Europeans. Those words were not used to describe black negroes. If the word black was ever also used, it was in reference to hair color. This is very easily proven. That black negroes would have such a huge racial inferiority complex as to believe in the most easily refuted delusional fantasies, should be an source of extreme embarrassment to those of the black community.
    1
  103. "Dark skinned people dominated Europe since its first inhabitants so they were the majority of the population up until the 1800's." de•lu•sion•al /dəˈlo͞oZH(ə)nəl/ adjective characterized by or holding false beliefs or judgments about external reality that are held despite incontrovertible evidence to the contrary, typically as a symptom of a mental condition or an inferiority complex.
    1
  104.  @Dingledanus  "Mudhuts are fried brick or clay brick . They are better then woodshacks" Have you ever seen pictures of European architechture, from the medieval period and even hundreds of years earlier? Europeans were living in palaces, castles, and citiies that aren't much less advanced than we have today. Where as negroes were living in mud huts (at best) until relatively recently. "Africans had iron and stone buildings before Europeans " What an absurd claim coming from the world's most primitive (and still the world's more primitive) people. You all were living in the stone age when discovered by Europeans. You all weren't even using the wheel until the 20th century. THE 20TH CENTURY!!! How pathetic is that. Also, regarding African cannibalism. Perhaps your'e just unaware of your own history. Prepare for a shock: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cannibalism_in_Africa Btw, most of these accounts are from sub saharan west africa (Nigeria and the congo) which are regions where most african american's ancestry comes from. These are YOUR direct ancestors. Btw, I'm fairly certain you won't reply to me after reading this because you'll be so shocked by your own heritage that you'll likely deal with it by being in denial.
    1
  105.  @benyahudadavidl  You're saying Godrey Higgins, etc. were negroes or that they wrote about negroes? I don't have time to read that book so just provide me with what you claim it says. That book references a common source for a lot of the worlds' religions but I don't see anywhere it says that Europeans were negroes.
    1
  106. The movie was highly inaccurate, though.
    1
  107.  @mikaladavis4102  I very much agree with you on that point!
    1
  108.  @mikaladavis4102  Absolutely. The producers think that's what people want to see but it's not true. It doesn't add to, like they claim, but distracts from the plot.
    1
  109. @PerryLornythorinque It's ok to learn about history in greater detail, however, it still needs to be accurate. And, people can learn about whatever history they want to on their own, but "black" history isn't been kept "hidden." The handful of individuals on this video, for the most part, aren't that remarkable. Would we even care to know about them if they were white? Likely not. Btw, even these examples are linked to slavery, one way or the other.
    1
  110. @PerryLornythorinque Your English is far better than my French (I actually do speak a little and I happen to be talking to my daughter while typing this whose actually lives in France right now and speaks fluently). I never said this video wasn't necessarily inaccurate (although, the title is a little misleading, because most of those individuals really wouldn't be considered aristocrats (even if a few of them assocaited with aristocrats). Some of them weren't remakable at all, only unique, given their enslaved background and their unique circumstances. However, I will agree that what a few of them achieved, though not necessarily historically remarkable, it was remarkable, given their backgroud, that they accomplished what they did. However, a common perspective from some segments of American society, distorts and exaggerates these examples. For example, there was a recent film made all about Dido Belle, but rather than representing the truth about her very unremarkable accomplishments or historical impact, instead made her out to be the most talented, skilled, accommplished, of supreme noble character, but oppressed, while at the same time made most of the white people out to be incompetent, naive, oppressive, bafoons. In reality, she was nothing more than a mixed race servant, but who was also cared for more so than most african slaves at the time so associated with her white cousin to a degree while they were young. Doesn't sound like a great movie but have been more historically accurate. My original point was that many black Americans are obsessed with finding validation and self-worth by associating black people with European history, especially if they're somehow able to find a connection with the nobility. Due to being surrounded by European history for generations, they've come to believe that the only way to achieve the greatest self-worth is within the context of European history and identity. However, historical accuracy isn't as important as how it makes you feel so often these connections or their accomplishments are often highly exaggerated.
    1
  111. @PerryLornythorinque In fact, it's been taken to such an extreme that it is now to the point of absurd delusional fantasy. If you read the many of the comments below, you'll notice that many black people aren't even satisfied with these handfull of individuals, but are actually making the claims that ALL the European nobility weren't white at all but were actually black and in fact, black negroes were the original European people until white people came out of their caves in the late 1700's, and then black people taught white people civilization and how to build castles, cities, and ships, etc. then the white people took over their identities (including their noble titles and moved into their castles) and shipped all the black people to Africa and America, made them slaves and made them forget who they were. Many black Americans suffer from these delusions as a result of a huge inferiority complex.
    1
  112. even though each of their actual heritage can be traced to their African origin?
    1
  113.  @nebulanesian369  I get my knowledge of history from numerous sources. Records that correlate with and support each other from numerous divergent sources (in other words, a historical account written by one group correlates with the historical record recorded by another group in another area, both act like supportive witnesses for each other and that what they've recorded is largely true), supporting scientific and anthropological and archeological evidence which also support each other as well as the historical record (for example, every dna test ever conducted of every Norse/Viking burial all show white European dna that perfectly matches that of their modern descendants in Scandinavia (and in a few cases, other Northern European people), my own family's records and documentation, which can be traced all the way back several generations in Europe and include genealogical records (going back hundreds, even well over a thousand years), journals, portraiture (I have paintings and statuary of my direct ancestors that I've seen), even oral histories that have been passed down to myself, that are more than a couple hundred years old. for starters. Btw, my own dna matches dna taken from Viking/Norse burials from over a thousand years ago. On the other hand, if you''re black, every black (american) dna test ALWAYS, shows your dna originated in west Africa, EXACTLY FROM WHERE THE HISTORICAL RECORD SHOWS YOUR ANCESTEORS WERE ENSLAVED (even down to the very west african tribes). See, that's how an understanding of true history works, one thing corroborating another. Where do you get your "knowledge" of history, besides from your own fantasies? From a few videos on the internet made by a few Afrocentrists, who have NO connection to Europe, past or modern, and whose comprehension of European history (and terminology, including an understanding of the word "swarthy") is influenced by the world's biggest inferiority complex and resulting bias? If you were an honest searcher for true history, just go ask a European what the definition is of the word "swarthy." He'll laugh at you if you claim it means black negro.
    1
  114. Btw, I can see why so many of you delusional afrocentrists think you can just claim European heritage, just based on your original statement. You referenced "primary source material" and I'm sure you assume that white Europeans just have never read those things and that our knowledge is just limited to what we learned in elementary school. The fact that you're that delusional corroborates your absurd claims. I've personally, as have probably the majority of Europeans, read vast amounts of "primary source" material. We have entire courses of study in universities that use source material in their entirety, from every area and period of European history. Do you honestly think we're not aware of our own history? Europeans (in Europe or America), despite some exceptions, are EXTREMELY aware of our history and heritage. In many cases, we've maintained a connection to even our distant ancestors for hundreds of years. Even many of us Americans have been to the actual houses (and castles) in Europe where our families lived for hundreds of years. One house my family lived in, just before immigrating to America, our family lived in for several hundred years and is still called by my family name as their house. By contrast, you probably can't go very far back in your own genealogy (not your fault, if you're a descendant of slaves, which erased most of your heritage). And now, you've read a few things in a few books, taken way out of context, and combined with a personal bias, and now YOU have the gall to accuse Europeans for not being aware of our own history and that YOU, with absolutely NO connection, are now the expert in OUR history? You guys are truly the world's most delusional people.
    1
  115.  @nebulanesian369  I've studied extensively on my own, reputable sources from actual educated non-biased people. By contrast, you get your information from other equally delusional people suffering from the same inferiority complex you're suffering from, as well as from you own delusional fantasies.
    1
  116.  @Dingledanus  actually, I get my education from a variety of sources, including first hand and from my own family. You guys are so naive and assume that white people just get all their informaton and education from the public school system. You have no idea just how conntected we are to our own family histories, which we can trace back hundreds or even over a thousand years. We don't get it out of school books. We get it out of the actual parish records, from the towns and cities our people came from, whic records are themselves, fairly ancient. Most african americans can't trace their own ancestry beyond the1870 census, at best. (most don't even know your great grandparents).
    1
  117. Queen Charlotte's MOTHER was African? Really? Proof please? This is an example of how extreme speculation or outright falsehoods get spread. Someone like you makes an absurd claim. Other gullible people with then use your false statement as support for what they believe, and all of a sudden, we have fake history. Well done.
    1
  118. Here's what a people with the world's biggest racial inferiority complex do. 1) They first envy your heritage. 2) Then they fantasize about having your heritage with you. 3) Then, they take your heritage and deny that it's even your heritage anymore. Over the last few decades, blacks have been doing this same thing with the following peoples: Egyptians, Japanese, Chinese, British, Anglo Saxons, Celts, Vikings, Russians, all Europeans, Jews, all Israelites, native Americans. In fact, I think the only heritage they won't claim is AFRICAN.
    1
  119. Besides all the untruths you just claimed, here's one of the more obvious. "black Moors would conquer Rome and rule most of Europe for more then eight hundred years". Besides the fact that the Moors weren't actually black negro (though they likely did include some blacks in their ranks), where do you get the idea that the Moors ruled most of Europe for 800 years? They didn't ever rule most of Spain for 800 years. The fact that you would distort a very easily proven history, is an example of the extremes you'll go to to make other false claims.
    1
  120. "Caucasians are the newest race on this planet" So, you're saying the Caucasians are the most evolved of all the races? Don't you all also claim that the black race was the original race? Does that mean the black race is the least evolved? You do realize that this is exactly what white supremacists claims, right?
    1
  121. You are truly delusional. Black negro history in Europe hasn't been hidden. There's nothing there to hide. The fact that you actually are so delusional to believe that "Oliver Cromwell in the mid 1600s murdered and deported thousands and possibly millions of Euro blacks most of whom were absorbed into the fabric of the New World alongside West African slaves" shows how truly separated from reality you are. Your negro ancestors WERE ALL FROM AFRICA. If you've taken a dna test, your negro dna will exactly match those regions from where negroes were enslaved and brought to the Americas. IF you have any European dna, it's only because you have mixed ancestry. IF you have dna that matches anything in Europe, it's from any white European ancestry you may have. IT'S NOT from your negro dna.
    1
  122. The oft cited Ben Frankly quote is a perfect example of just how delusional you are and how much you misinterpret the meanings of words. He used tawny to describe some Europeans in mid 1700's. Tawny doesn't mean black negro. If it did, I, who am of Scandinavian and German heritage, and who lived in those regions during that period, would show negro dna. I do not. Not a drop. Which means, his use of the word tawny DOES NOT mean black negro, but simply just another shade of white European.
    1
  123. It's actually quite pathetic that so many negroes think they need to claim European heritage in order to have any pride whatsoever in their heritage. Instead of wasting so much time studying (and then fantasizing) about heritage that isn't yours (European), why don't you put more effort into your own black negro african heritage. You'll get a lot more self worth out of the truth.
    1
  124. CB ENT Arnold Hubbert and I said the fact the Noble houses were Swarthy and melinatted is what made them Moors ...you can't get around Europes Dark nobility
    1
  125.  @yvngleanoa2137  Where in the world are you getting the idea they spread out to France and other kingdoms? They never went beyond Spain, though they tried, but were defeated before their attempt to enter France. They didn't even rule over all of Spain, and most of their rule was over a minority of Spain. Also, where did you get the number 900 years? It was 781 years. Also, "melanated" is a virtually useless word, because it's so subjective. It could literally mean anyone with a complexion darker than the palest of Nordic Europeans, which includes a lot of Caucasian people, including southern Europeans. Moors were, according to every historian, north African berber and arabic and weren't negro. Also, here's the official definition of of the word, Moor: Moor (n.) "North African, Berber, one of the race dwelling in Barbary," from Old French More, from Medieval Latin Morus, from Latin Maurus "inhabitant of Mauretania" (Roman northwest Africa, a region now corresponding to northern Algeria and Morocco)." Pick up book, bro.
    1
  126.  @yvngleanoa2137  Are you serious? The Huguenots weren't negroes. Where in the world are you getting that absurd idea? Have you been watching black supremacist videos again? The Huguenots were a group of French Protestants who fled France and Wallonia (southern Belgium) in the 16th–18th centuries due to religious persecution: Who were they? They were primarily middle class and skilled artisans who followed the teachings of theologian John Calvin. They mostly settled in other parts of Europe and their descendants are well known. They're all Caucasian Europeans. None of them have even a drop of negro dna. And, before you get any other absurd ideas, NO MODERN (OR ANCIENT) EUROPEANS HAVE ANY NEGRO DNA.
    1
  127.  @yvngleanoa2137  de·lu·sion·al /dəˈlo͞oZH(ə)nəl/ adjective characterized by or holding false beliefs or judgments about external reality that are held despite incontrovertible evidence to the contrary, typically as a symptom of a mental condition.
    1
  128.  @kefabenysraal7687  Exactly. Blacks were the original Europeans who invented and built everything Europeans are given the credit for. They were the original nobility until white Europeans came and kicked them out of their castles and stole their identities and noble heritage and noble heraldry and coats of arms. UNTIL whites got enough power and then secretly, leaving absolutely no evidence, killed or captured ALL blacks and secretly shipped them to the Americas, but destroying all the records and forcing all the people in Europe and America at the time to both deny it ever happened and to never write about it or pass down oral stories to their descendants, including as especially the blacks themselves. Then, the whites destroyed or altered all the images and records of native black europeans, except of course, any records or images of blacks who were slaves transported from slave territories. And, if that weren't enough, they even dug up ALL the black graves in Europe and destroyed all the evidence (or just transposted all the graves to the Americas) so that one day, no future scientist would be able to use DNA testing to prove they existed. Clever devils, those white people. And, super hard working. That would have taken generations of hard work to do all that.
    1
  129.  @heyalfietheconnoisseur  He didn't say black. He say "swarthy." White italians, French, and even some British are considered swarthy. You guys really are delusional.
    1
  130.  @heyalfietheconnoisseur  Are you really so delusional that you would believe something so easily disproven, that all continental Europeans were black negroes as recent as the mid 1700's? And then what happened? A whole bunch of white people came in and killed or captured all the blacks and completely erased any proof of their existence, including digging up all their graves and destroying any dna evidence.
    1
  131.  @kefabenysraal7687  So, how were they able to do it all? Did they really dig up ALL the black graves in Europe?
    1
  132.  @heyalfietheconnoisseur  Don't you know the different between what a European means by "black or tawny" versus "swarthy?" Swarthy just means either less than very fair, or olive toned skin. It can also just mean dark hair and eyes. Southern Europeans and even some living in northern countries, are considerd swarthy by Europeans, both today, and back in the 1700's. Do you honestly think that all the Germans and Swedes were black negroes as recent as the mid 1700's? What happend to them all?
    1
  133.  @eddedcuba3408  In your video 23:20, This is a perfect example of how black afrocentrists have it ALL WRONG. "...a tall, thin, black man, like a spaniard or Jew." The accompianing portrait is not fake. It shows at tall, thin, "black man" according to how Eurpeans refer to other Europeans with dark or black hair. Spaniards and Jews were known (and still so) to be darker than most Europeans, especially having dark or black hair. Afrocentrists are so delulsional that you naiviely think than all references to "black" in old European records refer to negroes. Black Irish weren't negro Irish. They were irish with black hair.
    1
  134. So, you conclude that because there were literally a handful of black and mixed black/white individuals who achieved minor prominence in Europe (extremely minor. At least a couple mentioned were still technically slaves), that somehow blacks were most of the nobility? The mere fact that those listed in the video are even noticed at all is because they're black and an extreme anomaly in European history. If blacks founded Europe, the white aristocrats would be the anomaly and we'd be watching a video about them. See if your common sense can overpower your inferiority complex for just a minute.
    1
  135. Actually, Vikings were taller than average for their day.
    1
  136.  @jorad4887  So, it sounds like all your "evidence" is just circumstantial and anecdotal, which is very unreliable "evidence." I have circumstantial and anecdotal evidence too, which proves just the opposite, but I would never use it to prove anything to anyone (btw, I'm a Scandinavian American, whose family also comes from a Scandinavian community, who also has relatives in Scandinavia. And, even though my daughter is almost 6 foot and my son is 6'5", I would never use that as evidence for anything). Besides contemporary descriptions of the Norse and Vikings by outsiders, who described them as significantly taller than other people, including other Europeans. Scandinavians today, are also among the world's tallest people. Harold Hardrada, a Viking, was over 7 feet tall. However, the best and most reliable, evidence is the study of Norse burials, which show the Vikings to be almost as tall, on average, as modern Scandinavians and are shown to have been, on average, taller than other contemporary Europeans. However, if you've ever studied height averages, you'd understand that averages can be misleading because you can have a lot of tall people, but then a few really short people can skew your averages. Any way, if you really want to know the truth, instead of just listening to a few of your friends and calling more informed people a 'liar," you'll need to pick up a book and read it.
    1
  137.  @jorad4887  Btw, I assume you just made a typo except with your other faulty "facts" maybe it was intentional and you're just horribly uniformed. The Viking age wasn't any where near 800 BC. It was between 740 to 1066 AD. So, you're only about a thousand years off. Btw, you'll notice I didn't call you a liar. I assume you either just made a typo or are just incredibly uniformed.
    1
  138. Delusional fantasy held by someone with a huge inferiority complex.
    1
  139.  @olmecgods7  What does any of that even mean? I can't tell what you're even trying to say. Are you saying that because the achievements of black people are hidden in America, that therefore, blacks negroes were the original inhabitants of Europe? That's your "evidence?" No wonder you all are so delusional.
    1
  140. It's not true that "most royal houses" carry his genes. He does have a few descendants who have survived and who are mostly in a few british minor nobility.
    1
  141.  @lac8494  Umm. How do you know that your ancestors were black negro nobles from Scotland? They either weren't your ancestors or they weren't black negro. You're fabricating something.
    1
  142.  @lac8494  "I want the source of who she bought her freedom from, Name of owner, Ship she came on, relationship to slave owner, and receipts, thank you." It's ironic how you demand such detailed proof regarding something which goes against your desired belief, but when you make the most absurd unfounded extreme claims (i.e. all the black negro nobility in Europe, and that it was so common as to be considered normal), you don't have to be held to the same standard of proof. So, be consistent. What's your proof in the same detail you require of others (btw, you won't be able to provide it, because it's not true).
    1
  143.  @lac8494  Through geneolocial records, which my family and people have meticulously kept for hundreds of years, I can trace my family on both sides for hundreds and even a few thousand years in several cases. Btw, I'm not denying you can too. I'm just saying that IF you can trace your ancestry to a noble Scottish ancestor (who I'm certain weren't black negro), I doubt you have any evidence to back up your claim (saying, "they were definitely black" isn't proof)? Also, you likely can't trace any of your black negro ancestry very far and, if you somehow can, it'll lead straight back to Africa.
    1
  144.  @lac8494  What evidence do I have to provide? YOU'RE the one making absurd claims, which go contrary to accepted history. The burden of proof is on YOU. But, I'll be shocked if you ever even attempt to provide it because we both know it won't be evidence of what you claim (that you're descended from BLACK NEGRO Scotish nobles). What I've found is that those who make the most absurd claims regarding their heritage or of black negroes in European history, when ever you call them on it, instead of offering any proof, they tend to try to shift the burden of proof on anyone but themselves (as though their absurd claims are self-evident. They're only "self-evident" to desparate people withan inferiority complex), and then pretend to be offended and accuse anyone questioning them, as racist. You seem to be fitting the mold pretty good. Sorry if I've come accross as critical. That just been my experience.
    1
  145.  @lac8494  Your last comment, "Ok, It's obvious you're an idiot, who is upset about his ws being challenged. Have you done any research for yourself or are you just a mindless sheep? I'm going with the latter, I am not saying that slavery didn't exist, what I am saying is that not all black people were slaves neither did they all come from the same place in 1619. Your assumptions are getting on my nerves, did I say my main source was the internet? You have not heard of Government records? you know Births, deaths, Marriages, migration records, war records, Burke's peerage. No sounds too much like hard work to you. Read what Benjamin Franklin, your home boy said and then research what he said and then come back with an intelligent argument, until then have a nice day and keep dreaming about slavery cos you might just get your wish, if you have "white guilt" that on you. I have no inferiority complex, in fact you're beneath me." ALL I SAID WAS THAT YOU DIDN'T DESCEND FROM A BLACK NEGRO SCOTTISH NOBLE, BECAUSE THERE ISN'T SUCH A THING. THAT'S IT. AND, YOU STILL HAVEN'T OFFERED ANY EVIDENCE.
    1
  146.  @lac8494  Your last comment, "Btw, as as side, do you actually think Cleopatra was was a black negro? If I say I'm an American what colour would you assume I was??? The pharaohs were Nubian's so I'm not sure why it is assumed she was white and ruled over a Nation of black Egyptians. another clumsy attempt to white wash history" ACTUALLY, IF YOU ACTUALLY STUDIED HISTORY YOU'D KNOW THAT CLEOPATRA NOT ONLY WASN'T BLACK, SHE WASN'T EVEN ETHNICALLY EGYPTIAN. YOU ARE AWARE SHE WAS GREEK, RIGHT? They actually have contemporary likenesses of her that show her to have been European. Here, I'll help you out a little: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cleopatra So, if you're so completely wrong about Cleopatra, there's a strong likelihood that you may just just as wrong about a lot of your claims.
    1
  147.  @lac8494  The fact that you don't understand the definition of the European word "swarthy" and that you're using your misunderstood and misconstrued defintion as "evidence" for your absurd claims, should be an embarrassment to afrocentrists everywhere. You're way out of your league here. You propbably ought to quit while you're behind.
    1
  148.  @lac8494  Well, can't argue with your agreeing with me. Thanks. It was nice to end on a good note.
    1
  149.  @lac8494  "It's to be expected from someone who lacks intelligence or class. showing your true genetic makeup" Don't you realize what a racist statement that is? To criticize someone and then claim that it's because of their "genetic makeup," isn't any less racist than a nazi or the most virulent white supremacist. You're exposing your true colors. Blatant racism is usually a symptom of an extreme inferiority complex. I don't think that because of your race or "genetic makeup." I think that because of your character and behavior (see the difference?).
    1
  150.  @lac8494  Nazis and white supremacists claim others are genetically inferiory too. You did exactly the same thing and we all saw it.
    1
  151.  @lac8494  Often, racists will try to misdirect by blaiming or accusing others, rather than accept their own fault. You're a textbook case. Btw, though not necessasrily racist, like your previous comment, imagine if a white person said this, "Fair skin is priceless and I love every ounce of it, it's literally priceless." Btw, I don't care if you like your melanin or not. Just the hypocrisy.
    1
  152.  @lac8494  That's great. Where does your racist attitude come from?
    1
  153.  @lac8494  Why don't you acknowldge your own racist comments, first? Some blacks are so used to throwing around accusations of racism, that they don't acknowldge (or even recognize) their own. I know why. You assume ALL yt people are already racist, which you consider the most evil thing in the world (on par with murder), SO you're justified in being racist back to them (whether they were racist at all in the first place or not). You'll often even fake outrage over the most minor of things, because it gives you a sense of power over other people.
    1
  154.  @lac8494  Never said all your ancestors were all just slaves. All I ever did was to deny your claim (and demand proof which you never can't and never did) of black negro Scottish noble ancestors and then called you out on your own racist attitude (with your own words). If you can't handle it perhaps you need to find a "safer" space to experess your claims, like a site occupied with no one but your fellow Afrocentrists. Just a suggestion.
    1
  155.  @lac8494  ...and then, your "proof" that they were black negroes. Or, if they're famous enough, you wouldn't have to provide any evidence. We could look them up together.
    1
  156.  @lac8494  there was no black negro princes mentioned. Who do you mean? Also, I was asking for proof of what YOU claim that you have a black negro scotish noble ancestor.
    1
  157.  @lac8494  Again. I ask for a specific example, over and over again, from the one's who declare it to be so. And, yet again, they avoid giving me a direct and specific answer. Who is the black negro princess? And, who is your black negro Scottish noble ancestor? Why are you so afraid to give a specific answer?
    1
  158.  @lac8494  "Go and research for yourself, if you had done that in the first place you wouldn't have responded in ignorance." I have. Can't find any proof for what you claim, which is why I asked YOU, THE ONE WITH THE BURDEN OF PROOF, to even just give me a specific example of what you claim***. And, yet again, like most Afrocentrists, you hide behind generalizations or try to shift the burden of proof on to anyone but yourself. So typical. So, white people (I assume you mean all Indo-European types) didn't exist until a few hundred years ago? I give up. You figured us out and I'll finally just admit the truth. The truth is we came from outerspace on space ships, in 1805. We used our advanced technology to subdue the native earthlings (which were all black negroes), destroyed every bit of black negro history, moved into their villages and castles, took over their names and invented fake geneologies, changed all the art that depicted blacks negroes and replaced them with art depicting ourselves, and transported them all to sub saharan Africa. ***IN CASE YOU FORGET, HERE ARE MY QUESTIONS (FOR WHICH YOU WILL FOREVER AVOID ANSWERING): Who is the black negro princess? And, who is your black negro Scottish noble ancestor? I predict you'll never provide a real answer (because you can't).
    1
  159.  @stacybell3706  So, related but not descended. That's certainly possible. Thanks.
    1
  160. Are you "ready" to defend your absurd fantasies? I doubt it but let's see. Why has there never been found any negro DNA in Europe from any time period but all the DNA of thousands of examples is always Caucasian and matches modern Europeans? And, why does the dna of black Americans always match that of sub saharan west african negroes? Let's see how ready you are to defend your fantasies.
    1
  161. for what delusional reason this time?
    1
  162. de•lu•sion•al /dəˈlo͞oZH(ə)nəl/ adjective characterized by or holding false beliefs or judgments about external reality that are held despite incontrovertible evidence to the contrary, typically as a symptom of a mental condition or an inferiority complex.
    1
  163. True. In fact, many free blacks also owned black slaves themselves. The very first slave owner in the US was himself, black.
    1
  164.  @yvngleanoa2137  still waiting for your reply. why is it that when ever someone is given the chance to defend their absurd fantasies (fake black history), you always just run away? I think we both know the answer to that, don't we? You don't have an answer or proof. It's easier to just run away and continue to believe in your fantasies rather than have them called into question by actual historical facts. The sooner you stop living your fantasies, the sooner you'll get over your inferiority complex.
    1
  165. de•lu•sion•al /dəˈlo͞oZH(ə)nəl/ adjective characterized by or holding false beliefs or judgments about external reality that are held despite incontrovertible evidence to the contrary, typically as a symptom of a mental condition or an inferiority complex.
    1
  166. Why did blacks build such a civilization in Europe but in their own continent of Africa, didn't really build or do much of anything? Also, if blacks were as prominent as you claim, why then is there 0 evidence? Where are all the black negro graves? Did all the white people dig them up (all of them) and destroy the evidence? Did they removed ALL DNA evidence (even though they didn't know what DNA was)? Did they "whitewash" ALL the paintings? Did they change ALL the records and remove mention of negroes and replaced with descriptions of white people (and re-wrote them to make them appear ancient on acient records and paper, etc.). Wow! White people are amazing for having accomplished such an impossible thing.
    1
  167. A delusional fantasy by one of the world's biggest racial inferiority complexes. Your claim is easy disproven.
    1
  168. Here's what a people with the world's biggest racial inferiority complex do. 1) They first envy your heritage. 2) Then they fantasize about having your heritage with you. 3) Then, they take your heritage and deny that it's even your heritage anymore. Over the last few decades, blacks have been doing this same thing with the following peoples: Egyptians, Japanese, Chinese, British, Anglo Saxons, Celts, Vikings, Russians, European nobility, all Europeans, Jews, all Israelites, native Americans. In fact, I think the only heritage they won't claim is AFRICAN.
    1
  169. Not black and not "all over Europe."
    1
  170. Excepet that the Moors weren't black african negro. "Moors - Of mixed Arab, Spanish, and Amazigh (Berber) origins, the Moors created the Islamic Andalusian civilization and subsequently settled as refugees in the Maghreb (in the region of North Africa) between the 11th and 17th centuries."
    1