Comments by "Arnold Hubbert" (@arnoldhubbert6779) on "No Such Thing as Anglo-Saxons? The Attack on Our History & Heroes." video.
-
1
-
1
-
@charleshayes2528 I think you're missing the point. I don't anyone who claims at least a degree of anglo saxon heritage (and legacy) denies the truths you mentioned in regard to the racial history of Britain. However, what is happening is that there are political forces (all in an effort to gain power) who are doing all they can to erase any sense of identity that Western Europeans have, so that they'll be less resistant to the massive changes (non-Western, non-European, massive immigration, etc.) being forced on their country. If a people don't have any kind of an identity (including an ethnic one), for many of them, there's nothing left to defend so they're easily overrun and overpower. They don't even care about the future of their descendants or their country.
Btw, you're mistaken that "no one" is trying to deny that those people even existed. It only starts small, by denying they existed as a distinct group (which, they eventually did, even before the Norman invasion, but especially during the Norman invasion), but eventually evolves into claiming that they were only a small group of oppressors, and that modern English aren't descended from them, or even things like they were "black," etc. All of these things are also being pushed. Eventually, their history won't be taught or remembered at all, which is the same as denying their existence at all.
1
-
@charleshayes2528 The results of a resent study (conducted over several years) showed that the social results of ethnic diversity were all the opposite of what those promoted diversity claim. Rather than being a strength, it has proven to be the opposite. They found people are way less likely to be civic minded, way less unified, way less lawful, way less likely to be charitable, way less freedom but way more laws, way more crime, way more corruption, way more on welfare, way more environmental problems and neglect, etc. Why is that? Because there's very little community mindedness long sightedness and way more self-interest and shortsightedness, when people don't have a community identity. Iceland, for example (and although this is starting to change) largely see themselves as a large extended family. You behave differently towards your extended family than you do to a people with whom you have no association, not connection, no history, and instead see them as alien, and protentional threats (or even hate them, especially if the media is convincing you to).
NO ONE has a RIGHT to immigrate to another country, unless invited. However, a host country does have the right (even moral obligation) to both limit and even expel immigrants if they are seen as a threat to the wellbeing of it's citizens.
1