Comments by "E Dennis" (@edennis8578) on "The True Cost Of The Royal Family On Diana's Life | In Diana's Memory | Real Royalty" video.

I have a hard time believing that the Queen was angry with Diana for upstaging her with a very modest hairdo. She was the Queen, for god's sake. And how was Diana supposed to know that the press would make such a big deal over a tiny detail like that? Unless I hear it from the mouth of another family member, I will continue to believe that upbraiding Diana over it was all Margaret's idea; Margaret is the only person who said anything to Diana about it. She was just the type of woman who would be offended by such a thing.
5
Right, if you're talking about Diana. She was not a commoner. Diana was Lady Diana Spencer before she even met Charles; her father was an earl, a title of noble rank. Her grandmothers were both ladies in waiting to Charles' grandmother.
2
That's a disgusting thing to say, and the thing you're implying is untrue. A lot of people knew Epstein as a top-notch wall street broker and investment counselor. Epstein started out as an assistant to a Wall Street trader. Within a year, he was one of Wall Street's top traders himself, and within four years he was made a partner in one of Wall Street's best firms. He started his own investment service that catered to billionaires exclusively. He made rich people much richer; that's why everyone wanted to know him. Epstein's sleazy side was a secret except to a very few people, for obvious reasons.
1
@stevenhowe6677 I'm horrified by how Charles and the rf picked on her for everything. What was she supposed to do, run around with a bag over her head so that she wouldn't offend them by being so beautiful? They should've been kissing the ground she walked on that she brought some good-looking genes into the family tree.
1