Comments by "E Dennis" (@edennis8578) on "BREAKING NEWS: Alec Baldwin Charges Dropped After Fatal ‘Rust’ Shooting, Lawyers Say" video.

  1. So? Rust was a movie set. The laws regulating gun safety on movie sets are different from gun safety generally. Actors have NEVER been prosecuted in these cases, ever, because the legal burden is on the armorer, the gun safety expert on the set.
    4
  2. I said at the beginning, laws regulating gun safety on movie sets are different from gun safety generally. Actors have NEVER been prosecuted in these cases, ever, because the legal burden is on the armorer, the gun safety expert on the set. Whatever you think of Baldwin, he never should have been charged in the first place.
    3
  3. ​​ @jerryinsc  They dropped the charges because legally they didn't have a case. Laws regulating gun safety on movie sets are different from gun safety generally. Actors have NEVER been prosecuted in these cases, ever, because the legal burden is on the armorer, the gun safety expert on the set.
    2
  4. I said at the beginning, laws regulating gun safety on movie sets are different from gun safety generally. Actors have NEVER been prosecuted in these cases, ever, because the legal burden is on the armorer, the gun safety expert on the set.
    2
  5. It was a movie set. The laws regulating gun safety on movie sets are different from gun safety generally. Actors have NEVER been prosecuted in these cases, ever, because the legal burden is on the armorer, the gun safety expert on the set.
    1
  6. The New Mexico authorities were wrong to charge him in the first place, because laws regulating gun safety on film sets are different from gun safety generally. Actors have NEVER been prosecuted in these cases, ever, because the legal burden is on the armorer, the gun safety expert on the set. It was cut and dried; Baldwin, whatever you think of him, was not legally at fault. I also want to remind you that part of the lawsuit settlement with the husband was that he got a producer job on the movie! Wrap your mind around that one.
    1
  7. His peers, real peers in the film industry, would exonerate him because he isn't legally liable. Laws regulating gun safety on movie sets are different from gun safety generally. Actors have NEVER been prosecuted in these cases, ever, because the legal burden is on the armorer, the gun safety expert on the set.
    1
  8. The example of an unfair justice system is that he was charged at all. Laws regulating gun safety on film sets are different from gun safety generally. Actors have NEVER been prosecuted in these cases, ever, because the legal burden is on the armorer, the gun safety expert on the set. No matter what you think about Baldwin, legally he was not at fault.
    1
  9. Laws regulating gun safety on movie sets are different from gun safety generally. Actors have NEVER been prosecuted in these cases, ever, because the legal burden is on the armorer, the gun safety expert on the set. The New Mexico legal system never should have charged him in the first place. I think Baldwin is a terrible human being, but legally it wasn't on him.
    1
  10. I said at the beginning, laws regulating gun safety on movie sets are different from gun safety generally. Actors have NEVER been prosecuted in these cases, ever, because the legal burden is on the armorer, the gun safety expert on the set. Something else to think about: part of the lawsuit settlement with the husband was that he got a job as producer on the movie. Now that's twisted. He doesn't exactly strike me as all broken up when he wants to be a producer on the movie where his wife was killed.
    1