Comments by "James Reefe" (@jpr1370) on "CBS Colorado" channel.

  1. The arguments of the judge in the original ruling are nonsense. Basically she said - the 14th amendment excludes insurrectionists from serving in offices - but permits it in the office of VP and POTUS. That is some feeble minded thinking. Why would there be a 14th amendment - that permits insurrectionist to be VP and POTUS. Clearly nonsense. You wouldn't need an amendment for that.
    1
  2. Look at the converse of the argument - are you telling me - the 14th amendment excludes insurrectionist in federal office - but allow insurrectionists as VP and POTUS? Why would you permit insurrectionists as VP and POTUS.. More narrowly - will you permit VP to be insurrectionist? Y or N? If VP then POTUS.
    1