Comments by "HesteBremse" (@HesteBremse) on "carwow" channel.

  1. 124
  2. 74
  3. 72
  4. 45
  5. 40
  6. 33
  7. 27
  8. 23
  9. 20
  10. 19
  11. 19
  12. 16
  13. 15
  14. 15
  15. 14
  16. 13
  17. 12
  18. 11
  19. 11
  20. 8
  21. 7
  22. 7
  23. 7
  24. 7
  25. 7
  26. 6
  27. 6
  28. 6
  29. 5
  30. 5
  31. 5
  32. No, they do not look exactly the same – You might as well pick any two objects that serve the same purpose and say they look exactly the same. Car models are made to serve certain target group needs, therefore they are usually formed within the same dimensions and the production cost are managed in the way that the car can be offered within a certain price range. If you have little or no affiliations or emotions for the looks of example a car, you just pick the cheapest one, since it will properly get the job done anyways. On the other hand, if you are able to see the differences or have brand affiliation you most certainly will not pick just any of the offers. Scroll back in the video to the 4 cars in mention and take a second look – not one of them has the same headlight design, not one of them has the same C-Pillar design, not of them has the same shoulder line, not one of them has the same grill design, not one of them have the same side intake design – but yes they do all have four wheels, the engine sits in the front and therefore they all have a grill, they all have four doors because that is rather practical etc. etc. – What you state is simply wrong; "exactly" is far from "similar" or "alike" – They are all important cars for the manufacturers, they were all going through a design process by different design departments and individuals wanting to reach the same target group – Therefore none of them look completely different in the base dimensions and overall form – but it is also the reason they do not look exactly the same. Nearly Everybody has an opinion on design, but most do not have any clue about it at all – Design is not wildfire decoration exercise but a complex combination of many inputs and elements that intentionally have to serve a particular goal, within specifications, demands and needs, while at the same time create a difference to the competition.
    5
  33. 5
  34. 5
  35. 5
  36. 4
  37. 4
  38. 4
  39. 4
  40. 4
  41. 4
  42. 4
  43. 4
  44. 3
  45. 3
  46. 3
  47. 3
  48. 3
  49. 3
  50. 3
  51. 3
  52. 3
  53. 3
  54. 2
  55. 2
  56. 2
  57. 2
  58. 2
  59. 2
  60. 2
  61. 2
  62. 2
  63. 2
  64. 2
  65. 2
  66. 2
  67. 2
  68. 2
  69. 2
  70. 2
  71. 2
  72. 2
  73. 2
  74. 2
  75. 2
  76. 2
  77. 2
  78. 2
  79. 2
  80. 2
  81. 2
  82. 2
  83. 2
  84. 2
  85. 2
  86. 2
  87. 2
  88. 2
  89. 2
  90. 1
  91. It´s certainly not a very inspiring exterior - it´s rather Conservative. The F-Pace wins for dynamic looks in this class, and the MB is also better shaped than the Audi. There was a time when Audi launched cars like the TT, the Q7 and those where cars with a lot of distinct character for exterior design and also not to forget the the A5 and A7 Coupe with much elegance - ooh and the R8. But somehow the exteriors of Audi has become a rather rigid affair, very controlled and in my eyes looks like too many perfect lines on the drawing board and too little passion in the actual conversion into real 3D shapes. I´m not a MB fan but I must say that they have done far more to evolve their DNA progressively than Audi - MB have had many more style studies including more crazy stuff, thus have allowed various of their studios to go quite different directions - this has paid off a long way for exterior expression. And one must also acknowledge Volvo for their re entry after near collapse. In fact the sad thing is that the Audi Design team does come up with very dynamic concepts, but they all seam to get weathered so much down in the process that nothing much is left when the car finally leaves the production line - and it´s weird since the Audi Interiors are so spot on and up to date, but the exteriors becomes more and more rigid - they even are getting close to being a bit goofy - The front on this Q5 is close to that - that extremely huge metal frame looks light it almost could let the car tip over - not particular elegant.
    1
  92. 1
  93. 1
  94. 1
  95. 1
  96. 1
  97. 1
  98. 1
  99. 1
  100. 1
  101. 1
  102. 1
  103. 1
  104. 1
  105. 1
  106. 1
  107. 1
  108. 1
  109. 1
  110. 1
  111. 1
  112. 1
  113. 1
  114. 1
  115. 1
  116. 1
  117. 1
  118. 1
  119. 1
  120. 1
  121. 1
  122. It looks quite well – in fact, better than the other AUDI SUVs, sits s a bit lower, appears a bit wider and dives more towards the front and does not have any conservative stiffness about it. I am not a fan of the Front grill – that comes out a bit sporadic and appears weirdly plastical – hopefully one can also get the E-Tron in other colors because this Kitchen Blue does not do it much justice. The cabin is very much AUDI and who will complain about that (except perhaps Tesla). Overall I find the I-Pace is just as good an EV design as this, just a different language but equally well sorted. The Model-X still have some show-off capabilities, great range and is very spacious inside – but it is rather clumsy looking on the outside. The MB EQC lands in the middle of it all and I´m not an MB fan, but somehow I think the EQC will grow with time. The BMW i3 is still a remarkable and completely different take on an EV and it has the lowest and best recyclable material footprint of all of them, but I understand people who do not like the looks. I also wish to see the i8 in a full EV version. It will not be a long time before a lot more EV´s will be available on the market – now we just need an upgraded infrastructure to support these cars – How hard can that be I wonder? – we got electricity all over the place already. And I hope that all these automotive tech giants can come to down to a few charge solutions that can be used by all EV´s – do we really need to go through a +ten years period with all that cable BS that users have been offered for electronic devices all over again ??. Anyways the e-Tron looks great but the price tag is high indeed.
    1
  123. 1
  124. 1
  125. 1
  126. 1
  127. 1
  128. 1
  129. 1
  130. 1
  131. 1
  132. 1
  133. Not a bad word on tech and interior other than it appears to be sublime. I´m a BMW fan but for this segment I do prefer the exterior looks of Mercedes over both BMW and AUDI - in fact I do not like the looks of this Audi at all - it´s both pretentious with all its chrome and oversized grill and it is also rather a dull appearance at the same time, there is nearly nothing in shapes, creases or other exterior features that clearly defines this top Audi (The rear maybe) - the MB in comparison has some very defined graciousness and the BMW is not pretty but has more personality than this A8. And why the fake exhausts I really do not understand in this price class. Long time back big cars was much more common and the designs was far more interesting - The only one I have seen work with this lately is Mercedes and the Maybach divisions concepts - That is far more interesting approach to the top end of luxury limousines. To me is feels like the growing Chinese markets have had its markets driven influence on design decisions for this A8 - and that is to a European eye sadly not a good thing. But well it is apart from that oversized grill so anonymous that it will deliver important people of state and commerces to their destinations in the most appropriate and unexcited way - job done for that - yes absolutely. But let´s for moment assume that you have owned a top spec Panamera, but you now want to full monty of a luxury limo with a private driver in front part time - Is this A8 really gonna be the choice or will e.g a Bentley be much more likely?.
    1
  134. 1
  135. 1
  136. 1
  137. 1
  138. 1
  139. 1
  140. 1
  141. 1
  142. 1
  143. 1
  144. 1
  145. 1
  146. 1
  147. 1
  148. 1
  149. 1
  150. 1
  151. 1
  152. 1
  153. 1
  154. 1
  155. 1
  156. 1
  157. 1
  158. 1
  159. 1
  160. 1
  161. 1
  162. 1
  163. 1
  164. 1
  165. 1
  166. 1
  167. 1
  168. 1
  169. 1
  170. 1
  171. 1
  172. 1
  173. 1
  174. 1
  175. 1
  176. 1
  177. 1
  178. 1
  179. 1
  180. 1
  181. 1
  182. 1
  183. 1
  184. 1
  185. 1
  186. 1
  187. 1
  188. 1
  189. 1
  190. 1
  191. 1
  192. 1
  193. 1
  194. 1
  195. 1
  196. 1
  197. 1
  198. 1
  199. 1
  200. 1
  201. 1
  202. 1
  203. 1
  204. 1
  205. 1
  206. 1
  207. 1
  208. 1
  209. 1
  210. 1
  211. It has its own strong character for sure, but I would not call it pretty or elegant like an S-series, it does though have a modernistic next-gen soft human thematic. I get that they have worked hard on the aero and it may have influenced the final design a lot, but that A-pillar to hood height is massive, especially in 3/4 front view and I do not fancy that much, especially since there is no storage in the front. Difficult to judge but the sound in the Taycan (from Vids) sounds a lot more exciting vs very heavy in the EQS. The Interior is beautiful and I noticed that the Concept Car Image from the EQS has been removed for a start design surface - in any case, the usage of the passenger screens UX is apparently rather limited, but hey it can be upgraded later on. Overall I am sure that many Mercedes fans and also other customers from other brands will consider it, but before some solutions are found to lighter battery technology, the super luxury brands will continue to have immense weights which in some aspects is contradictory to the whole purpose of going electric. Remember that the BMW i3 on the release in 2016 had a weight of only 1,195 kg (2,635 lb) as well as a lot of recyclable materials – Just sad that the main BMW department was so reluctant to engage with the new electric department at the time, letting Tesla getting ahead by a lot. The best thing about the EQS is its range potential and comfort – but let's just say Germany got a very slow start into the E-mobility and might still be struggling for some years before their IT departments are fully up to speed – never the less the EQS feels like Mercedes mean it, and they'd better with all the concepts they have produced over the last 5-10 years.
    1
  212. 1
  213. 1
  214. 1
  215. 1
  216. 1
  217. 1
  218. 1
  219. 1
  220. 1
  221. 1
  222. 1
  223. 1
  224. 1
  225. 1
  226. 1
  227. 1
  228. 1
  229. A lot of comments about making a drag race – case is that the P100D will properly roast the Taycan at least in the first races. But make 10 or 20 drag races after each other and the Taycan might very well come out on top. At least that should be a consideration about that particular drag race. The Tesla S is still remarkable considering it's up to 7 seat capacity, quite long-range and fierce acceleration – also considering that Tesla did not have any automotive heritage to build on. The Taycan is thought differently and with the German Autobahn in mind – To Sell this car in Germany means that it must be able to cruise at fairly high speed for longer periods of time. Secondary the Porsche Taycan does not need to fulfil all the practicality for a large family and has different kinds of POS´s, handling, luxury, stability, quality, exclusivity and being able to accelerate fast over and over again – If it could not do that then many Porsche buyers would not even consider going EV or else they are properly already owning a top-spec Tesla. It is two very different takes on the EV, but I think that the Taycan will not be the largest competitor to the Tesla Model S – it will most likely come from another brand which e.g could be the upcoming Volvo EV and who knows – all the manufacturers have EVs brewing and this is only the very beginning of the EV era. That said, the Taycan will not be the only Porsche EV – they might even expand their range into new segments over time. Still, the challenge for the EV´s remains – battery capacity/range and charging options. The moment an EV can drive a 1000 Km on charge and arrive nearly anywhere with the option to recharge within a short time the landscape of EVs will look very different. Over just 4-5 years time the battery capacity in Formula E has nearly doubled – in 5 - 8 years times the options might look very different.
    1
  230. 1
  231. 1
  232. 1
  233. 1
  234. 1
  235. 1
  236. 1
  237. 1
  238. 1
  239. 1
  240. 1
  241. 1
  242. 1
  243. 1
  244. 1
  245. 1
  246. 1
  247. 1
  248. 1
  249. 1
  250. 1
  251. 1
  252. 1
  253. 1
  254. 1
  255. 1
  256. 1
  257. 1
  258. 1
  259. 1
  260. 1
  261. 1
  262. 1
  263. 1
  264. 1
  265. 1
  266. 1
  267. 1
  268. 1
  269. 1
  270. 1
  271. 1
  272. 1
  273. 1
  274. 1
  275. 1
  276. 1
  277. 1
  278. 1
  279. 1
  280. 1
  281. 1
  282. 1
  283. 1
  284. 1
  285. 1
  286. 1
  287. 1
  288. 1
  289. 1
  290. 1
  291. 1
  292. 1
  293. 1
  294. 1
  295. 1
  296. 1
  297. 1
  298. 1
  299. 1
  300. 1
  301. 1
  302. 1
  303. 1
  304. 1
  305. 1
  306. 1
  307. 1
  308. 1
  309. 1
  310. 1
  311. 1
  312. 1
  313. 1
  314. 1
  315. 1
  316. 1
  317. 1
  318. 1
  319. 1
  320. 1