Comments by "Aaron Rosenberg" (@aaronrosenberg6633) on "Hunting for dinosaurs showed me our place in the universe | Kenneth Lacovara" video.

  1. Facundo Dilota All pertinent fields of science converge to prove you wrong. Telling me that "he knows it" is a toddler's tactic. Surely you can do better?
    2
  2. +Facundo Dilota Refutation?
    1
  3. Facundo Dilota "Surely i can, but english is not my language" I wasn't talking about your grammar. "..and i didn't had a formal english education." It doesn't matter. You seem to believe you have a formal science education. Tell us how you know that all fields of science converging on the fact of climate change are wrong. "Besides, is not me in the TED talks. He is the one to have to explain." That work has already been accomplished. He is re-stating the fact in the context of the dinosaurs being helpless, while we are not. "The end is near. You choose the cause." Listen to you trying to be prophetic. Are you getting Christian on me?
    1
  4. Facundo Dilota "He show himself as a great scientist, in his own field, and then, close the talks with this alarming message on something outside his knowlege or field." The fact of climate change is no longer outside anyone's knowledge. He is to be commended for using this opportunity to heighten awareness.
    1
  5. Facundo Dilota "There is no consensus about climate change and their causes, no matter what some people says." You're a science denier, then. Here is one link - http://www.ucsusa.org/global_warming/science_and_impacts/science/weight-of-the-evidence.html#.Vz3Q5JMrIo9 Some details may be "still in debate," but there is no denying that the problem is real. Do you also deny evolution? I have a weird feeling you do. "There are so many variables still in debate... i can not take nothing for sure." Bullshit. There's lots you can be sure of. Wenhong Li, an atmospheric scientist at Duke University: “Our understanding of the mechanisms that drive the climate system is far from perfect,” Li says. But she adds that the statistical evidence presented in her research is powerful and should not be ignored. She likens it to the statistical correlations between smoking and lung cancer, which were clear long before the mechanisms of carcinogenesis were clearly understood. “In both cases, the statistical data can give you important information that can help to avoid risk,” she says. Willful ignorance means you don't have worry, though, doesn't it? "That´s why i was expecting some king of explanation, and not only a declaration of principles." Read this: http://www.ucsusa.org/global_warming/science_and_impacts/science/climate-scientist-benjamin-santer.html#.Vz3SHpMrIo8 "Maybe is my fault, maybe i am not accepting the truth of the majority, but i still think that science is not democratic and has to be explained." The explanations are out there. While the hard science can be difficult for some to grasp, what is not difficult is to understand that multiple branches of science converge upon the same truth. "Thank you for the talk. This subject is over for me." You're running away from reality.
    1