Comments by "LancesArmorStriking" (@LancesArmorStriking) on "Dr. Jeffrey Sachs: What MSM WON'T TELL YOU About Ukraine-Russia, Nord Stream" video.

Not quite. There's still tens of thousands of men who've been discharged missing a limb. So unless they all lost their third legs, Ukraine will live on, albeit in a very poor demographic situation.
10
 @michaelkatz275 Doesn't mean he shares Solovyov's views. Jesus are you incapable of thinking without emotion? Stop making connections where none exist.
2
@michaelkatz275 Okay, but how does this "raise questions" about HIS OWN viewpoints? Does being associated with someone change the nature of the facts upon which your opinion is based? Frankly, does it even change the correctness of their interpretation of the facts, or the conclusion they draw? You're making a lot of assumptions about Jeffrey's viewpoints based on a few interviews conducted with a man who doesn't even speak English.
2
@michaelkatz275 Okay, you've asserted that they do (call into question the validity of his viewpoints), but you still haven't answered my question of HOW. Where do you make the connection that merely "associating" with Solovyov (if you consider appearing for an interview to be associating with him, personally or professionally) ddnigrates the correctness of his viewpoints? As an example: Sachs asserts that, during his time as economic advisor to Boris Yeltsin, the "shock therapy" doctrine that was advocated for Poland was simply not allowed to be carried out in Russia. Every single request he put in to DC for funding Poland's government, he received. When he did the same thing in Moscow, he almost always got rejected. From this, he concluded that there was an inconsistent approach to the funding aspect of shock therapy, and that the US fumbled its opportunity to transition Russia to a capitalist economy, ruining it for a decade. Solovyov would agree with this sentiment, based around the same facts: the amount of funding Russia received was indeed less than Poland— with a population 4x as large. The amount given to the respective economies was clearly unequal, when the advice given by the shock therapists was to give Russia at least as much aid as Poland, proportional to its economy and population. The US government did not even heed the advice of its own economists working with the Russians. Sachs and Solovyov are drawing similar conclusions based on the same set of facts. So I'm struggling to understand how the conclusion is somehow less true just because Solovyov believes it? How is it less true because he believes it? I'd like to know.
1
@michaelkatz275 Still waiting on that reply buddy. How does believing the same thing as someone bad make that belief incorrect?
1
@michaelkatz275 That isn't answering my question. I think you just don't want to admit that your original comment was wrong. That Sachs happens to share an opinion with Solovyov doesn't make that opinion (or the facts it is based upon) incorrect.
1