Comments by "LancesArmorStriking" (@LancesArmorStriking) on "Business Insider"
channel.
-
9
-
7
-
By official metrics? Certainly not. The US, in international corruption-level studies, usually ranks in the high teens. Out of ~200 countries, not bad!
..Until you consider that lobbying is not counted as corruption, which it should, only because it's considered legal in the country in which it's practiced. At that point, measuring by sheer volume (close to 3.5 billion)- the US should rank at the very bottom.
The most marked difference between the US and developing countries is that corruption is hidden much better here- you don't have flight agents asking for a $300 "transactional fee" like I did a few years ago in St. Petersburg, in addition to the standard costs for rescheduling a flight. There is no pocketing in the U.S..
However, (relevantly) Congress' tax plans, national underdevelopment in both physical and digital infrastructure (my internet was more reliable in Poland), and a generally poor social service net all point to corruption at higher levels, with far-reaching impacts. Quality of life here is very high (that will happen when you have 250+ years of uninterrupted industrialization, safe from foreign powers), but corruption is actually higher than most people think.
Sorry for the text block.
7
-
@Shadow__133
It's just that America has so thoroughly Americnaized Japan that, to its people, Japan is exotic enough to be interesting but Western enough to be approachable.
Western people tend to like exotic things if they are "surface level": tangible things, like music, food, crafted goods, vacation spots, etc.
They tend not to actually like eastern culture, though: intangible things, like values, worldview, societal organization, even politics, they view as either backwards or a threat.
They only like foreign culture if they can keep it on a shelf.
6
-
6
-
5
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@witchdr.phantom7089
Sorry, I went off a little there.
I agree, and creativity isn't bound by political affiliation... to an extent. While he may not be completely right, he has a point.
Conservativism, by its very nature, discourages creativity. Unless it is accepted within a society's existing framework, holding certain things sacred and 'conserving values' holds them hostage, leaving then unable to change.
Creativity, on the other hand, encourages the 'perversion' of existing ideas, be they political or not.
This is especially true in comedy, where older conservatives don't want to be like 'those filthy Democrats,' seeing insults and teasing as beneath them, and modern Conservatives seemingly unable to string together a joke that doesn't use a racial slur.
It's just two sides of human nature, and one happens not to like new ideas. So while you're right that Conservatives can be creative, it doesn't make the playing field even, so to speak.
1
-
ThatOne Not sure about Brazil (have you seen the favelas?) but as for China and Russia, well..
China has been, for the last 2,000 years, an agriculturally-focused society (yes, there were emperors, but their authority was directly tied to the success of harvest). It's not hard to find food in China, whenever you end up. You'd have to try not to find a farmer's market. Russia, on the other hand, does in fact have hungry. Especially in Dagestan.
I'd also like to mention (even though I despise whataboutism) that the U.S. has people go hungry too. Not saying "take that," just that corruption doesn't always mean stealing food. It's usually just nepotism and skimming off the top. The Soviet days of "collecting" are long over. We're just about the same as everyone else.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1