Comments by "Kate Ashby" (@kateashby3066) on "(FULL) Suitcase Murder Trial Status Hearing: FL v Sarah Boone" video.

  1. Yeah because didn’t you hear… it wasn’t intentional!! 😂. Homegirl has never heard of involuntary manslaughter, apparently 😂
    13
  2. NPD, she suffers from narcissistic personality disorder. Actually WE suffer from it 😭
    10
  3. Not even close to criminally insane. She’s just your run of the mill narcissist. Very much like Darryl Brookes actually.
    9
  4. That’s not how the American Justice system works. At all.
    6
  5. It will. What WONT happen is this looney getting a bind and getting out 😂
    5
  6. This is a new judge so right off the bat you have no clue what you are saying. Secondly, he doesn’t have a choice. Show me in the constitution where it addresses this issue. It doesn’t. THAT is the problem. He can’t force her to take an incompetent lawyer (her opinion not mine) and he also can’t force her to rep herself. Learn the law then come back with your smart ideas 😂. This judge is (actually) SMART. He’s protecting the future verdict and making it impossible for her to successfully appeal and go free. Then again maybe the JUDGES on this case are all wrong and some internet rando is right 😂
    4
  7. This is a very naive comment. Show us in the constitution where it says we have to have the lawyer appointed to us? That’s the problem, it doesn’t. And she knows it. If the judge tells her to suck it up- she loses her trial and appeals and WINS because the judge broke the law. Is THAT what you want? There’s a reason why he’s treading carefully and giving her lots of chances. Actually this is a new judge so this is his first time dealing with this. But it’s been put in the record by the last judge and this guy knows exactly what’s happening. Have some faith.
    3
  8.  @critterscute3642 🤦🏻‍♀️ victims aren’t mentioned in the constitution. Go read it.
    2
  9.  @BrandiBee. incorrect. The constitution has authority. The judge has TEMPORARY authority and if he uses that incorrectly then it ruins everything. Y’all need to wise up.
    2
  10.  @faticus5369 according to who? you? Or the CONSTITUTION? 😂
    1
  11.  @happychaps507 that’s not accurate. A bunch of her first lawyers pulled out for reasons not having to do with her.
    1
  12. You have no clue what you’re talking about. First, a chunk of her lawyers quit for ethical reasons having nothing to do with her. Second, this is a brand new judge, third, if he goes your genius route, she wins in appeal because her rights were violated. Suck it up.
    1