Comments by "Rose S" (@roses6564) on "Why beautiful women are nuts: a co-created problem" video.

  1. 11
  2. 9
  3. 5
  4. 4
  5. 1
  6. So now that we clarified that beautiful women are nuts...- horrible, no good, very bad (like Alexander's Day) -... let us all, ladies, gentleman and the alphabet people, watch our deeply rational fellow human, The Man (TM), favor the plain, if not homely Jane over the sexually insinuating crazy hottie. Um, pardon me? Oh, you say they already do! Aaaah. You mean like when they make the economic decision to marry that "aw'ight" incubator who will be a "good mother for my children and minimize my headaches" while I continue to fantasize over the nutty hottie since I was never really into my incubator to begin with?" ...You mean like that? Of course, a man gotta be rational. In other words: "Beautiful women are nuts but we still want them bad a**, more or less secretly, while we make the "meh" women we do marry feel like crap - forever undesirable - since we always fantasize over the nutty hottie we never got to have, as we continue to play the "good, committed" husband role. What nobody talks about is caste and overall caliber. All beautiful women have not been created equal. Beautiful combined with stupidity and low character/poor caliber (most beauties, statistically speaking) gets a drooling man exactly what he deserves. Therefore yo, muh dudes, muh bruhs: if y'all like hot, intelligent, kind, sweet, graceful, realistic, sane women who love you for dear life, like you're The One and Only ... do you not think you need to breed your unicorns so there's plenty of that to go around for each one of you, exemplary men? Aren't y'all the fathers of the gigantic female disappointments out there? You bred THAT! And we, women, might do the same with y'all: breed a glorious alphacorn for each one of us. No? Sure you don't want society to try its hand at eugenics? What now. Not egalitarian enough for your modern sensibilities? I guess not. [Walks away defeated - but she tried].
    1