Comments by "Rose S" (@roses6564) on "Understanding men: rich, attractive, or loyal" video.

You're missing a crucial one: Intelligence. No, it is not the same as rich, since intelligence may or may not bring riches. It often brings some degree of financial stability but this hardly means "riches." Male intelligence is a value in itself which is extremely important to a small category of women at the right end of the Bell Curve - the higher IQ ones. An intelligent woman desperately needs an intelligent man - at least as intelligent as she is, ideally more. Otherwise, she is forever doomed to look down on that man, rich or not. When he talks, she can't help but secretly roll eyes (in her head, if she knows what's good for her) and this is fatal to any relationship. An intelligent woman will always prefer the man of equal or higher intelligence than her, even if he runs low on all other 3: lower income, ugly, disloyal. For a brainy woman it is horrifying to be around a man measurably less intelligent than her and by "measurable" I don't mean degrees and higher ed. A woman of higher IQ with a man of lower IQ spells disaster no matter what his other 3 traits are (rich, gorgeous, loyal). If he is dumber than her, it's relationship death. Believe.
6
@MartialMind Anyone who believes women value loyalty by itself is simply not very bright. Do they really need to specify? They do value loyalty - from men they are attracted to. They could not care less about loyalty from a man she's not attracted to.
5
Plenty women like this.
3
@jdsartre9520 As it should be.
2
BS. This is what you think with that male brain of yours completely incapable of relating. Women will certainly not "close their browser" to even an enemy's point of view. If anything, they will listen to what the "enemy" has to say so they can get into his mind and play him. You have zero understanding of the female mind.
2
@TrentReeves-c2k You didn't have better options. If any of you had, or any of you had fallen in love with someone else, you would have been toast. You fell back on settling for what was, and now you rationalize it as "for the best."
1
@chinchin3274 They're horrible.
1
@DustinD-h3i Ate.
1
@sammyz4eva Same.
1
@DustinD-h3i Another woman here.
1
He probably included intelligence under attractive, so I would have to take that back. What I don’t take back is the match made in Heaven. If the two connect and cherish each other, the transactionalism becomes secondary.
1
@IfSemper For sapio/demi women (aka women of caliber) a men's intelligence is basically EVERYTHING. It is incredibly attractive. They will put up with a lack of riches, physical ugliness AND disloyalty if he mesmerizes them with his brains. Alas, brains do not always bring money but an intelligent woman will not need him to maximize earnings beyond basics.
1
@IfSemper Intelligence is never EVERYTHING but it is SOMETHING without which everything else is doomed to fail, even kindness and hard work. It is crucial, especially in men, therefore extremely attractive in itself. Many women are attracted to highly intelligent, competent men, whether they are jerks or not.
1
@angamerc5373 Dude! She has a right to wait for a chance to find a man she’s actually attracted to and loves,. If that takes her to 30 without having found him, that’s still her right to settle then. She doesn’t owe nature or society the maximum number of babies by accepting an offer from the first dull-head that came her way at the age of 18. Jesus Christ.
1
@timypaul So...she stays with him bc God scares the living lights out of her? Not bc God made it in such ways that he inspires her and they simply love each other? If religious people stopped parroting nonsense, they could have a start to something sane.
1
@Alexxx492 On point.
1
@NonConformistPsyche They want loyalty from the men they are attracted to. If attraction is not in place first, you can shower them in loyalty, it's irrelevant.
1