Comments by "Rose S" (@roses6564) on "The $50,000 beer: why very attractive women aren't on dating apps" video.

This is true. On the other hand, how many couples who go for that goal end up in loving relationships for the long term? 50% divorce rate, another 20-30% of expired intact marriages where the sex is anything but emotional. A few manage a great relationship long term but those are rare.
14
Qualifier needed. It's cheaper only if the relationship is more than just mere material transaction for her. Otherwise, the woman pays for that "cheapness" out the wazoo.
13
If it walks like a duck and quacks like a duck.... Just look at he. There are still women who were NOT easy when they were young and hot. Shockingly.
9
Why is the goal of "getting laid" being mixed with the goal of "dating" which for anyone sane assumes finding a meaningful relationship? You know... that person you will also like to travel with, cook with, converse with, plan some stuff with, have children with, get genuine affection from, etc. Unless you're hunting for "Pretty Woman," there are virtually zero chances for any of these things to happen with an escort. Very attractive women escorts are not on dating apps because they have nothing to do with dating for a long-term goal. If the goal is strictly getting laid (aka casual sex), paying a working girl is 100% the way to go. In fact, anyone who considers dating as a way to a lay and nothing else should be thrown in jail or the loony asylum. At least that's what would happen in an ideal, sane society. Granted, we don't live in one, just a world full of meatsuits with car keys - but still worth noting. Now here's to a perfectly ridiculous video, Dr. Taraban. A fan in general, but this one is your worst yet for failing to specify the goal. So you're saying a lay is better done with pay than with play. You don't say.
7
Bad stuff this one.
3
Turns out these dudes don't really want "emotional connection." Pshaw. That's girl stuff. What gets me is when they finally decide to marry and they do it like purely pragmatic animals. They marry a role, then expect it to "function" and be "loyal" by the contract. Then they wonder "why is this wife broken, she doesn't function, why doesn't she love me?!" Um yeah.
3
This was one of his worst.
3
No, he's not.
3
You don't have to do anything for sex. Just for yourself. All you need to do is not be a hopeless animal, and more like a human who might enjoy spending some time in the company of another fellow human for reasons other than sex, until you get to know each other better. This would apply at 90 too, not just at 60. If you can't find anything interesting about those women other than the promise of access to a hole, maybe you shouldn't be with them in the first place. There's unbelievable rudeness and entitlement in the attitude "I don't really enjoy your company, I just want access to a hole." Not a feminist, just a realist. It's rude and stupid.
2
It isn't cheaper for a woman to be in a relationship if she doesn't love him. She will pay many times over for that "cheapness."
2
Better yet: be the real deal (a lady). Instead of "lady-like." But that one you can't control 'cause you are or you aren't.
2
It's amazing how these lunatics talk about the necessity for women to put out from the first date and BoDYcoUNt in the same breath. Then you hear about the infallible male logic. :)
2
@wisp7753 All the more. This means dating / courtship, must be approached very carefully and artfully if anything long term is even remotely under discussion. If not, skip the gray zone and clarify that the goal is just a lay and nothing else, in which case a working girl is the answer. The prb is when men act like the sketchy "female dogs" that they are and go about dating giving the impression that a long-term thing might be a possibility - maybe, somehow, someway, some day, if she behaves and "qualifies," who knows where this might lead - but in reality they just want a quick smash then release. This is lowly - period. Casual sex is prole behavior. People, men and women, will you quit screwing others on your first date?! Y'all are icky. I couldn't believe it when Taraban insinuated third date is too late and that you "wasted the man's time and resources" if you didn't put out from the first date. You have got to be kidding me. Poor dahlings. Imagine having to go out for a coffee and have a conversation with another fellow human without sexual reward that same day! Atrocious! This has noting to do with playing "hard to get" or "lady-like." A lady is the real thing without "playing" anything. Not "lady-like." It's simply disgusting and irreverent to sleep with a stranger - and I am not even religious and couldn't care less about human-made "morality." I make my own, but sleeping with strangers is not part of it. If the lay is such an emergency, go see a working girl.These "lady-likes" provide excellent specialized services, bless their heart and other organs. The culture should crucify any man or woman who expects sex (or uses sex as bait) early in the courtship, just like they used to. In fact, there should be sexual behavior castes out there, with the Promiscuous designated as Untouchables. Sex should be off the table any time before a solid pair-bond is formed, which means long-term glue, official commitment or not. Those who believe in marriage may say "nothing before marriage" but I'm not one of those - even if I managed to end up in one, but that's a different story. Either way, a society where casual sex is required from the first date is a seriously sick society.
1
Not aware of any but I've been thinking of starting a blog for way too long now. But not for "women." For high IQ women. A completely different world with completely different challenges - and the harshest too.
1
Good one. At this rate, why not? I mean what's the escort other than a human masturbation device?
1
True dat.
1
@Armywolves In an open society (with social mobility), it would not be rational for most women to give up on hook-up/casual/early sex? Why? Because the pleasure offer is often the only currency lower caste women have. They all want to compete for the high SMV guys (the proverbial "prince") and the hot ones o modest origins are determined to win as high of a prize as they can. Women's social climbing has always happened through marriage. There's no way under the sun that an attractive low caste woman would vote for a culture of chastity if she can snatch that high SMV dude from his high caste female counterpart, just by offering her hotness. The chaste woman of 6 in looks, with higher IQ and character, from a family of caliber, will automatically lose in competition with a low-ilk 9. In consequence, don't expect all those "Pretty Women" (or quasi) to want to give up casual sex any time soon since many are very attractive (tight, lean peasant body genetics) even if shallow and dumb AF. In youth, the high SMV guys don't care that much about such deficiencies. Enter the Halo effect: if she is hot, she must also be smart, nice, and some other stuff. They wife her and in time she shows her true colors because how else. Remove social mobility first and bring back the caste system if you want the hook-up culture to go away.
1
Older women 50+ have lower BC on average than younger women.
1
It all depends on what the goal is. He doesn't clarify.
1
@CoolKidOx Maybe he's running out of topics...
1
Good. Because then him and her don't match. Move on. The right guy for her will wait.
1
@johns6331 Stats talk.
1
@Mockduck2020 Bc every person is self-interested first?
1
This time cannot come soon enough. A world of high SMV men each married to a bunch of mutually supportive women would be an absolute dream for the female of the species once the practice is culturally legitimized and institutionalized. Jealousy would make no sense and the "queens" would have a blast having top notch genetics for their kids and a a solid support network. A lot better than being married to the passive, emotionally inept, disconnected, poor communicator bores so many are forced to marry for lack of better options. Of course, the bores would be left without partners in a world like this but who says the species needs those genes passed down?
1
Can't do that when you know it's for pay. Yes, I'll pay someone to make me feel desirable and wanted. Then all I have to do is believe my own wallet magic. Really?
1
Not anymore.
1