Comments by "Jacob\x27s *HEX* Ladder" (@jacobshexladder) on "Primal Space" channel.

  1. gowd sake is now sad. I know you're upset that you were lied too. So was I but it's the truth. IT STARTED WITH A LIE KIDDO. YOU DO REALIZE THE MEASUREMENTS NEVER CHANGED FROM THE ORIGINAL LIE. USE LOGIC BUDDY.
    3
  2. ArKritz84 is delusional.
    2
  3. Of course we didn't. Anyone that THINKS the moon is a PHYSICAL object is delusional.
    2
  4. gowd sake is delusional. Before you can have an OPINION about a LIGHT in the sky. 1. You must FIRST prove that light in the sky is an actual physical object. 2. You must prove the Sun is ACTUALLY bigger than the Moon. 3. You must prove the Sun is 93,000,000 miles further away than the Moon! Unfortunately for you, I'll be waiting patiently.
    2
  5. gowd sake is delusional. RADAR doesn't have the range because of the original power out put given by these devices. I get that you don't understand how RADAR works but that's even more reason for you to do a little research. Don't trust something that was based on a lie. I mean a radio wave traveling 238,900 miles and back?? You can't really be that naive?? Mind you a wave needs matter to actually WAVE. Vacuum = NO MATTER
    2
  6. gowd sake is desperate. The PAVE PAWS is orders of magnitude stronger than a HAM RADIO. People have claimed to use the HAM RADIO for the MOON BOUNCE. The PAVE PAWS (Precision Acquisition Vehicle Entry[a] Phased Array Warning System) is an elaborate Cold War early warning radar and computer system developed in 1980 to "detect and characterize a sea-launched ballistic missile attack against the United States. It is reported to have a range of about 3000nautical miles (3452 statute miles, 5550 km. The HAM RADIO only has a range of 100 miles. But using HF (high frequency) radio, you can reach the entire world...if the conditions are favorable. The range of HF transmissions is affected by the ionosphere, which is like the weather: it changes constantly, it's unpredictable, and you can't do anything about it. . The license privileges of amateur radio operators include the use of frequencies within this band for telecommunication, usually conducted locally within a range of about 100 miles (160 km) and USING HF radio of course you can reach longer distances but definitely not hundreds of thousands of miles away. So using RADAR to do a MOON BOUNCE IS IMPOSSIBLE. HAM RADIOS DON'T HAVE THE RANGE output to reach 238,900 miles and back.
    2
  7. gowd sake is delusional. The whole Moon Bounce started with people claiming to have used HAM RADIO. That alone proves they were lying. All the fake measurements originated from a lie. These are the measurements that you're still quoting today. It all started with a lie UNFORTUNATELY.
    2
  8. gowd sake is delusional. Hahaha the fact that this idiot thinks he can determine the geometry of the object he stands on by looking at lights in the sky ... Proves his stupidity. Everything that you think you know about the sky above is based on theology. The idea that any light in the sky is an actual physical object is based on hypothesis and theoretical science. Non of which can be proven. Theories do not = proof or facts
    2
  9. gowd sake is now sad. If you want to talk about lights in the sky and think they prove the Earth is a globe. Let's do it. Time lapse Star trail parallax is not observed = galactic theory debunked Polaris never moves = galactic theory and the theory that Earth supposedly moves in four different directions debunked Sun and Moon are EXACTLY THE SAME SIZE. When observed both make circular revolutions above observer. The only thing telling you that the Sun is further away than the Moon is theoretical science. How do you KNOW one is further away than the other? By observation alone and not theology both are = distance from observer. Not to mention EVERYONE on Earth only ever sees ONE FLAT side of the Moon. HOW does this = observation by every person on Earth make the Moon a ball?? It doesn't, only theology can hypothesize that. oh well ...
    2
  10. gowd sake I'm sorry but lights in the sky have no bearing whatsoever on the geometry of object you're standing on.
    2
  11. gowd sake Those are called lights in the sky. When you can actually prove they're physical objects I'll entertain your silly theory. I'll be waiting anxiously for you to prove that!! Ahahahahaha
    2
  12. gowd sake Sorry dumb dumb but light travels as a wave just like radio waves. Haha unfortunately for you there's no matter in a vacuum for waves to travel.
    2
  13. gowd sake is delusional. I mean a radio wave traveling 238,900 miles and back?? You can't really be that naive?? Mind you a wave needs matter to actually WAVE. Vacuum = NO MATTER
    2
  14. gowd sake forgot his proof. Before you can have an OPINION about a LIGHT in the sky. 1. You must FIRST prove that light in the sky is an actual physical object. 2. You must prove the Sun is ACTUALLY bigger than the Moon. 3. You must prove the Sun is 93,000,000 miles further away than the Moon!
    2
  15. gowd sake is delusional. Hahaha the fact that this idiot thinks he can determine the geometry of the object he stands on by looking at lights in the sky ... Proves his stupidity.
    2
  16. gowd sake Thinks there's a debate. BAHAHA You newbie! World Record Long Distance Photography (a 275 mile observation from a 9,272 ft peak (Pic de Finestrelles) to a 12,730 ft peak (Pic Gaspard) over water that should be anywhere from 16,502 ft (3.12 miles) to 23,275 ft (4.40 miles) below horizon based on spherical GEOMETRY) has already proven the Earth to be flat. That is a distance that is the equivalent stretch between Los Angeles to Las Vegas. ... BAHaha
    2
  17. gowd sake is now sad. The World Record For Long Distance Photography has already proven the Earth to be flatter than a pancake = THEORETICAL RADIUS OF EARTH DEBUNKED = SPACE DEBUNKED The RADIUS OF EARTH is needed for orbit and SPACE TRAVEL. BAHAHA OH WELL SUCKS FOR YOU
    2
  18. ArKritz84 is obviously sad because he's obsessed with massive BALLS and magical POLES.
    2
  19. ArKritz84 has no MATH SKILLS. For The World Record For Long Distance Photography all you need is two simpleton equations everyone acquired in high school. For DISTANCE TO HORIZON all you need is ... 1. HEIGHT OF OBSERVER = 1.760 MILES 2. RADIUS = 3,959.00 MILES ______ 1. DISTANCE  TO  HORIZON  = square root ((height of observer) squared) + 2R(height of observer) = square root ((1.760mi squared) + (2 * 3959.0mi * 1.760mi)) = 117.930380 MILES!!!! That puts the MOUNTAIN around 160 miles past the visible HORIZON and 3 to 4 MILES BELOW THE HORIZON ... that is if we lived on a MAGICAL THEORETICAL LEVITATING SPINNING BALL with a radius of ONLY 3,959 MILES.
    2
  20. ArKritz84 is now sad. ... and LET'S NOT FORGET the 2nd simpleton equation. so ... bahahahaha and TO DETERMINE TARGET HIDDEN HEIGHT all you need is ... 1. TARGET DISTANCE = 275 MILES 2. DISTANCE TO HORIZON = 117.93040 MILES 3. RADIUS = 3,959.00 MILES ______ 2. TARGET  HIDDEN  HEIGHT = (square root((target distance - distance to horizon)squared + R squared)) - R (square root((275mi - 117.93040mi)squared + 3959mi squared)) - 3959mi = 3.1145670 MILES _______ 3.114570 MILES!!!! = 16,444.930 FEET BELOW THE HORIZON!!!  BAHAHA HAHA TARGET HIDDEN HEIGHT =  16,444.930 ft Thanks again for proving that simple high school geometry is too difficult for you. HAHAHA
    2
  21. ArKritz84 wishes she had math skills. If you THINK my math is wrong. Please provide the simple high school spherical geometry calculations and than we'll compare. Unfortunately for all of you my calculations have already been confirmed by physical and applied science along with all of mainstream science. If you can't provide the calculations to justify opening your mouth than shut up. Opinions do not = proof Remember KIDDO OPINIONS DO NOT MAGICALLY LEVITATE AN ILLUSION OF A MOUNTAIN MILES UP INTO AIR AND AROUND A BALL SILLY GIRL.
    2