Comments by "Jacob\x27s *HEX* Ladder" (@jacobshexladder) on "JRE Clips" channel.

  1. 245
  2. 86
  3. Zach Arbogast is now very sad. Everything that you think you know about the sky above is based on theology. The idea that any light in the sky is an actual physical object is based on hypothesis and theoretical science. Non of which can be proven. Theories do not = proof or facts The World Record For Long Distance Photography (a 275 mile observation from a 9,272 ft peak (Pic de Finestrelles) to a 12,730 ft peak (Pic Gaspard) over water that should be anywhere from 16,502 ft (3 miles) to 23,275 ft (4 1/2 miles) below horizon based on spherical geometry) has already proven the Earth to be flat. Amateur rockets with a ceiling of 393,700 ft has proven the Earth to be flat. Weather Ballons have a ceiling around 130,000 ft., they also prove the Earth to be FLAT. Commercial airlines fly at only 40,000 ft, they also show the Earth to be flat. Nothing compares to these 3 views all showing the Earth to be flatter than a pancake.  If you want to talk about lights in the sky and think they prove the Earth is a globe. Let's do it. Time lapse Star trail parallax is not observed = galactic theory debunked Polaris never moves = galactic theory and the theory that Earth supposedly moves in four different directions debunked Sun and Moon are EXACTLY THE SAME SIZE. When observed both make circular revolutions above observer. The only thing telling you that the Sun is further away than the Moon is theoretical science. How do you KNOW one is further away than the other? By observation alone and not theology both are = distance from observer. Not to mention EVERYONE on Earth only ever sees ONE FLAT side of the Moon. HOW does this = observation by every person on Earth make the Moon a ball?? It doesn't, only theology can hypothesize that. oh well ... NO CURVE = THEORETICAL RADIUS OF EARTH DEBUNKED = ORBITAL SCIENCE DEBUNKED = NO THEORETICAL MAGICAL LEVITATING SPINNING BALL = GLOBE MODEL/MAP DEBUNKED = SPACE DEBUNKED = FLAT EARTH
    42
  4. 38
  5. 33
  6. 27
  7. 23
  8. 22
  9. 21
  10. 17
  11. 16
  12. 15
  13. 15
  14. 15
  15. 15
  16. 15
  17. 14
  18. 12
  19. 12
  20. 11
  21. 11
  22. 10
  23. 10
  24. 9
  25. 9
  26. 8
  27. 8
  28. 8
  29. 8
  30. 8
  31. TTime685 has no MATH SKILLS. World Record For Long Distance Photography Pic de Finestrelles (Elevation 9,272 ft) TO Pic Gaspard (Elevation 12,730 ft) is a 443 km/275.267 mile difference between mountain peaks. Eye Height = 9,272 FT Target Distance = 275.267 Miles Target Hidden Height = 16,446.3562 FT 16,446.3562 FT - Pic Gaspard (Elevation 12,730 ft) = 3,716.3562 FT Pic Gaspard Peak should be 3,716.3562 FT BELOW HORIZON. You SEE THE ENTIRE MOUNTAIN ALONG WITH MANY OTHERS. THIS ALONE DEBUNKS YOUR MODEL!! THIS IS THE SECOND OBSERVATION that DEBUNKS AND DESTROYS YOUR SPINNING MODEL THEORY!! So ... lets POINT out ANOTHER OBSERVATION. YOU CAN SEE THE POINTED PEAK. THAT WOULD BE IMPOSSIBLE IF WE LIVED ON A BALL. THE MOUNTAINS SHOULD BE TILTED AWAY FROM YOU AND THE HORIZON SHOULDN'T BE RAISING THE FURTHER WE LOOK OUT. IT SHOULD BE CURVING DOWN AND AWAY FROM THE OBSERVER. THIS IS THE THIRD OBSERVATION THAT DESTROYS THE HELIOCENTRIC MODEL!!! (SIDE NOTE REFRACTION CAN NOT I REPEAT CAN NOT CAUSE A MOUNTAIN TO MAGICALLY LEVITATE anywhere between 16,446.3562 ft to 23,725.2110 ft UP INTO THE AIR) That's ANYWHERE BETWEEN 3.101 TO 4.501 MILES OF MAGICAL LEVITATION. AHAHAHA AHAHA THAT'S PRACTICALLY THE HEIGHT OF KILIMANJARO!!! THAT'S SOME MAGIC LEVITATION!! If the observer was at half the height of Pic de Finestrelles which is roughly 5,000 ft. Pic Gaspard would be 23,725.2110 ft BELOW HORIZON. SO AGAIN anywhere between 16,446.3562 FT to 23,725.2110 ft SHOULD BE HIDDEN FROM SIGHT. 16,446.3562 - 12,730 (Pic Gaspard elevation) = 3,716.3562 FT  23,725.2110 - 12,730 (Pic Gaspard elevation) = 10,995.211 FT THE TOP OF Pic Gaspard Peak should be ANYWHERE BETWEEN 3,716.3562 FT TO 10,995.211 FT BELOW HORIZON. THE ENTIRE MOUNTAIN SHOULD BE ANYWHERE BETWEEN 3.101 TO 4.501 MILES BELOW THE HORIZON!
    7
  32. deny73 is just dumb. GPS does NOT = SATELLITES in SPACE GPS = INTERNET SATELLITES in THEORETICAL SPACE DON'T EXIST and they are DEFINITELY NOT NEEDED!!! HERE'S WHY ... 1. What is something most people don’t know about undersea cables? Most people probably don’t know that 99 percent of all transoceanic data traffic goes through undersea cables, and that includes Internet usage, phone calls and text messages. This route is also faster than satellite transmissions, by up to eight-fold. 2. More than half of the world's population is still without Internet access!!! (PROOF SATELLITES DON'T EXIST) Project Loon is a network of BALLONS traveling on the edge of space, designed to extend Internet connectivity to people in rural and remote areas worldwide. FLIGHT We aim to launch and maintain a fleet of balloons to provide Internet coverage to users on the ground, with our Autolaunchers capable of safely and consistently launching a new balloon every 30 minutes. We have flown over 25 million km of test flights to date since the project began - with one of our record-breaking balloons surviving for 190 days aloft in the stratosphere. CONNECTION High speed internet is transmitted up to the nearest balloon from our telecommunications partner on the ground, relayed across the balloon network, and then back down to users on the ground. We have demonstrated data transmission between balloons over 100 km apart in the stratosphere and back down to people on the ground with connection speeds of up to 10 Mbps, directly to their LTE phones. 3. LORAN has ALWAYS BEEN IN USE. Started development in 1940!!! MINIMUM Range of up to 1,500 miles (2,400 km)!!!! eLoran is the longstanding and proven series of low-frequency, LOng-RAnge Navigation (LORAN) systems, one that takes full advantage of 21st-century technology. It meets the accuracy, availability, integrity and continuity performance requirements for maritime harbor entrance and approach maneuvers, aviation non-precision instrument approaches, land-mobile vehicle navigation and location-based services. It’s a precise source of time (phase) and frequency. Additionally, eLoran provides user bearing (azimuth) and has built-in integrity. In full disclosure, however, eLoran is only a 2D positioning solution unless integrated with a simple altimeter. eLoran is a low-frequency radionavigation system that operates in the frequency band of 90 to 110 kHz. eLoran is built on internationally standardized Loran-C, and provides a high-power PNT service for use by all modes of transport and in other applications. eLoran is an independent dissimilar complement to GNSS. It allows GNSS users to retain the safety, security and economic benefits of GNSS even when their satellite services are disrupted. eLoran uses pulsed signals at a center frequency of 100 kHz. The pulses are designed to allow receivers to distinguish between the groundwave and skywave components in the received composite signal. This way, the eLoran signals can be used over very long ranges without fading or uncertainty in the time-of-arrival (TOA) measurement related to skywaves. Although eLoran is based upon Loran-C, it has key differences: All transmissions are synchronized to UTC (like GPS)Time-of-transmission controlThe ability to use differential corrections (similar to DGPS)Receivers use “all-in-view” signalsIncludes one or more Loran data channels that provide: Low-rate data messaging, added integrity, differential corrections (dLoran and/or DGPS) and other communications including navigation messages. GPS has been called “a single point of failure” for much of the U.S. economy and critical infrastructure. Nine nations are operating Loran-C or eLoran stations, including Russia and China. It is our understanding that the Republic of Korea, India and the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia are pursuing the installation of eLoran technology or upgrading their Loran-C technology to eLoran.
    7
  33. 7
  34. 7
  35. 7
  36. 7
  37.  @AP-zt2ox  is confused. Hahaha the fact that this child thinks he can determine the geometry of the object he stands on by looking at lights in the sky ... Proves his stupidity. Everything that you think you know about the sky above is based on theology. The idea that any light in the sky is an actual physical object is based on hypothesis and theoretical science. Non of which can be proven. Theories do not = proof or facts The World Record For Long Distance Photography (a 275 mile observation from a 9,272 ft peak (Pic de Finestrelles) to a 12,730 ft peak (Pic Gaspard) over water that should be anywhere from 16,502 ft (3 miles) to 23,275 ft (4 1/2 miles) below horizon based on spherical geometry) has already proven the Earth to be flat. Amateur rockets with a ceiling of 393,700 ft has proven the Earth to be flat. Weather Ballons have a ceiling around 130,000 ft., they also prove the Earth to be FLAT. Commercial airlines fly at only 40,000 ft, they also show the Earth to be flat. Nothing compares to these 3 views all showing the Earth to be flatter than a pancake.  If you want to talk about lights in the sky and think they prove the Earth is a globe. Let's do it. Time lapse Star trail parallax is not observed = galactic theory debunked Polaris never moves = galactic theory and the theory that Earth supposedly moves in four different directions debunked Sun and Moon are EXACTLY THE SAME SIZE. When observed both make circular revolutions above observer. The only thing telling you that the Sun is further away than the Moon is theoretical science. How do you KNOW one is further away than the other? By observation alone and not theology both are = distance from observer. Not to mention EVERYONE on Earth only ever sees ONE FLAT side of the Moon. HOW does this = observation by every person on Earth make the Moon a ball?? It doesn't, only theology can hypothesize that. oh well ... NO CURVE = THEORETICAL RADIUS OF EARTH DEBUNKED = ORBITAL SCIENCE DEBUNKED = NO THEORETICAL MAGICAL LEVITATING SPINNING BALL = GLOBE MODEL/MAP DEBUNKED = SPACE DEBUNKED = FLAT EARTH
    7
  38. 7
  39. 6
  40. 6
  41. Kelley 081 is silly dumb. GPS does NOT = SATELLITES in SPACE GPS = INTERNET SATELLITES in THEORETICAL SPACE DON'T EXIST and they are DEFINITELY NOT NEEDED!!! HERE'S WHY ... 1. What is something most people don’t know about undersea cables? Most people probably don’t know that 99 percent of all transoceanic data traffic goes through undersea cables, and that includes Internet usage, phone calls and text messages. This route is also faster than satellite transmissions, by up to eight-fold. 2. More than half of the world's population is still without Internet access!!! (PROOF SATELLITES DON'T EXIST) Project Loon is a network of BALLONS traveling on the edge of space, designed to extend Internet connectivity to people in rural and remote areas worldwide. FLIGHT We aim to launch and maintain a fleet of balloons to provide Internet coverage to users on the ground, with our Autolaunchers capable of safely and consistently launching a new balloon every 30 minutes. We have flown over 25 million km of test flights to date since the project began - with one of our record-breaking balloons surviving for 190 days aloft in the stratosphere. CONNECTION High speed internet is transmitted up to the nearest balloon from our telecommunications partner on the ground, relayed across the balloon network, and then back down to users on the ground. We have demonstrated data transmission between balloons over 100 km apart in the stratosphere and back down to people on the ground with connection speeds of up to 10 Mbps, directly to their LTE phones. 3. LORAN has ALWAYS BEEN IN USE. Started development in 1940!!! MINIMUM Range of up to 1,500 miles (2,400 km)!!!! eLoran is the longstanding and proven series of low-frequency, LOng-RAnge Navigation (LORAN) systems, one that takes full advantage of 21st-century technology. It meets the accuracy, availability, integrity and continuity performance requirements for maritime harbor entrance and approach maneuvers, aviation non-precision instrument approaches, land-mobile vehicle navigation and location-based services. It’s a precise source of time (phase) and frequency. Additionally, eLoran provides user bearing (azimuth) and has built-in integrity. In full disclosure, however, eLoran is only a 2D positioning solution unless integrated with a simple altimeter. eLoran is a low-frequency radionavigation system that operates in the frequency band of 90 to 110 kHz. eLoran is built on internationally standardized Loran-C, and provides a high-power PNT service for use by all modes of transport and in other applications. eLoran is an independent dissimilar complement to GNSS. It allows GNSS users to retain the safety, security and economic benefits of GNSS even when their satellite services are disrupted. eLoran uses pulsed signals at a center frequency of 100 kHz. The pulses are designed to allow receivers to distinguish between the groundwave and skywave components in the received composite signal. This way, the eLoran signals can be used over very long ranges without fading or uncertainty in the time-of-arrival (TOA) measurement related to skywaves. Although eLoran is based upon Loran-C, it has key differences: All transmissions are synchronized to UTC (like GPS)Time-of-transmission controlThe ability to use differential corrections (similar to DGPS)Receivers use “all-in-view” signalsIncludes one or more Loran data channels that provide: Low-rate data messaging, added integrity, differential corrections (dLoran and/or DGPS) and other communications including navigation messages. GPS has been called “a single point of failure” for much of the U.S. economy and critical infrastructure. Nine nations are operating Loran-C or eLoran stations, including Russia and China. It is our understanding that the Republic of Korea, India and the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia are pursuing the installation of eLoran technology or upgrading their Loran-C technology to eLoran.
    6
  42. 6
  43. 6
  44. 6
  45. 6
  46. 6
  47. 6
  48. 6
  49. 6
  50. 6
  51. 6
  52. 6
  53. 6
  54. 5
  55. 5
  56. 5
  57. 5
  58. 5
  59. 5
  60. 5
  61. 5
  62. 5
  63. 5
  64. 5
  65. 5
  66. 5
  67. 5
  68. 5
  69. 4
  70. 4
  71. 4
  72. 4
  73. 4
  74. 4
  75. 4
  76. 4
  77. 4
  78. 4
  79. 4
  80. 4
  81. 4
  82. 4
  83. 4
  84. 4
  85. nardinit has no MATH SKILLS. BAHAHA YOU BUFFOON. World Record For Long Distance Photography Pic de Finestrelles (Elevation 9,272 ft) TO Pic Gaspard (Elevation 12,730 ft) is a 443 km/275.267 mile difference between mountain peaks. Eye Height = 9,272 FT Target Distance = 275.267 Miles Target Hidden Height = 16,446.3562 FT 16,446.3562 FT - Pic Gaspard (Elevation 12,730 ft) = 3,716.3562 FT Pic Gaspard Peak should be 3,716.3562 FT BELOW HORIZON. You SEE THE ENTIRE MOUNTAIN ALONG WITH MANY OTHERS. THIS ALONE DEBUNKS YOUR MODEL!! THIS IS THE SECOND OBSERVATION that DEBUNKS AND DESTROYS YOUR SPINNING MODEL THEORY!! So ... lets POINT out ANOTHER OBSERVATION. YOU CAN SEE THE POINTED PEAK. THAT WOULD BE IMPOSSIBLE IF WE LIVED ON A BALL. THE MOUNTAINS SHOULD BE TILTED AWAY FROM YOU AND THE HORIZON SHOULDN'T BE RAISING THE FURTHER WE LOOK OUT. IT SHOULD BE CURVING DOWN AND AWAY FROM THE OBSERVER. THIS IS THE THIRD OBSERVATION THAT DESTROYS THE HELIOCENTRIC MODEL!!! (SIDE NOTE REFRACTION CAN NOT I REPEAT CAN NOT CAUSE A MOUNTAIN TO MAGICALLY LEVITATE anywhere between 16,446.3562 ft to 23,725.2110 ft UP INTO THE AIR) That's ANYWHERE BETWEEN 3.101 TO 4.501 MILES OF MAGICAL LEVITATION. AHAHAHA AHAHA THAT'S PRACTICALLY THE HEIGHT OF KILIMANJARO!!! THAT'S SOME MAGIC LEVITATION!! If the observer was at half the height of Pic de Finestrelles which is roughly 5,000 ft. Pic Gaspard would be 23,725.2110 ft BELOW HORIZON. SO AGAIN anywhere between 16,446.3562 FT to 23,725.2110 ft SHOULD BE HIDDEN FROM SIGHT. 16,446.3562 - 12,730 (Pic Gaspard elevation) = 3,716.3562 FT  23,725.2110 - 12,730 (Pic Gaspard elevation) = 10,995.211 FT THE TOP OF Pic Gaspard Peak should be ANYWHERE BETWEEN 3,716.3562 FT TO 10,995.211 FT BELOW HORIZON. THE ENTIRE MOUNTAIN SHOULD BE ANYWHERE BETWEEN 3.101 TO 4.501 MILES BELOW THE HORIZON!
    4
  86. 4
  87. 4
  88. 4
  89. 4
  90. 4
  91. 4
  92. 4
  93. 4
  94. 4
  95. 4
  96. 4
  97. 4
  98. 4
  99. 4
  100. 4
  101. 4
  102. 4
  103. 4
  104. 4
  105. 4
  106. 4
  107. 4
  108. 4
  109. 3
  110. 3
  111. 3
  112. 3
  113. 3
  114. 3
  115. 3
  116. 3
  117. 3
  118. 3
  119. 3
  120. 3
  121. 3
  122. 3
  123. 3
  124. 3
  125. 3
  126. 3
  127. 3
  128. 3
  129. 3
  130. 3
  131. 3
  132. 3
  133. 3
  134. 3
  135. 3
  136. 3
  137. 3
  138. 3
  139. 3
  140. 3
  141. 3
  142. 3
  143. 3
  144. 3
  145. 3
  146. 3
  147. BWX World Record For Long Distance Photography Pic de Finestrelles (Elevation 9,272 ft) TO Pic Gaspard (Elevation 12,730 ft) is a 443 km/275.267 mile difference between mountain peaks. Eye Height = 9,272 FT Target Distance = 275.267 Miles Target Hidden Height = 16,446.3562 FT 16,446.3562 FT - Pic Gaspard (Elevation 12,730 ft) = 3,716.3562 FT Pic Gaspard Peak should be 3,716.3562 FT BELOW HORIZON. You SEE THE ENTIRE MOUNTAIN ALONG WITH MANY OTHERS. THIS ALONE DEBUNKS YOUR MODEL!! THIS IS THE SECOND OBSERVATION that DEBUNKS AND DESTROYS YOUR SPINNING MODEL THEORY!! So ... lets POINT out ANOTHER OBSERVATION. YOU CAN SEE THE POINTED PEAK. THAT WOULD BE IMPOSSIBLE IF WE LIVED ON A BALL. THE MOUNTAINS SHOULD BE TILTED AWAY FROM YOU AND THE HORIZON SHOULDN'T BE RAISING THE FURTHER WE LOOK OUT. IT SHOULD BE CURVING DOWN AND AWAY FROM THE OBSERVER. THIS IS THE THIRD OBSERVATION THAT DESTROYS THE HELIOCENTRIC MODEL!!! (SIDE NOTE REFRACTION CAN NOT I REPEAT CAN NOT CAUSE A MOUNTAIN TO MAGICALLY LEVITATE anywhere between 16,446.3562 ft to 23,725.2110 ft UP INTO THE AIR) That's ANYWHERE BETWEEN 3.101 TO 4.501 MILES OF MAGICAL LEVITATION. AHAHAHA AHAHA THAT'S PRACTICALLY THE HEIGHT OF KILIMANJARO!!! THAT'S SOME MAGIC LEVITATION!! If the observer was at half the height of Pic de Finestrelles which is roughly 5,000 ft. Pic Gaspard would be 23,725.2110 ft BELOW HORIZON. SO AGAIN anywhere between 16,446.3562 FT to 23,725.2110 ft SHOULD BE HIDDEN FROM SIGHT. 16,446.3562 - 12,730 (Pic Gaspard elevation) = 3,716.3562 FT  23,725.2110 - 12,730 (Pic Gaspard elevation) = 10,995.211 FT THE TOP OF Pic Gaspard Peak should be ANYWHERE BETWEEN 3,716.3562 FT TO 10,995.211 FT BELOW HORIZON. THE ENTIRE MOUNTAIN SHOULD BE ANYWHERE BETWEEN 3.101 TO 4.501 MILES BELOW THE HORIZON!
    3
  148. 3
  149. 3
  150. 3
  151. 3
  152. 3
  153. 3
  154. 3
  155. 3
  156. 3
  157. 3
  158. 3
  159. D Shmoney is the dumbest of them all. BAHAHA. Everything that you think you know about the sky above is based on theology. The idea that any light in the sky is an actual physical object is based on hypothesis and theoretical science. Non of which can be proven. Theories do not = proof or facts The World Record For Long Distance Photography (a 275 mile observation from a 9,272 ft peak (Pic de Finestrelles) to a 12,730 ft peak (Pic Gaspard) over water that should be anywhere from 16,502 ft (3 miles) to 23,275 ft (4 1/2 miles) below horizon based on spherical geometry) has already proven the Earth to be flat. Amateur rockets with a ceiling of 393,700 ft has proven the Earth to be flat. Weather Ballons have a ceiling around 130,000 ft., they also prove the Earth to be FLAT. Commercial airlines fly at only 40,000 ft, they also show the Earth to be flat. Nothing compares to these 3 views all showing the Earth to be flatter than a pancake.  If you want to talk about lights in the sky and think they prove the Earth is a globe. Let's do it. Time lapse Star trail parallax is not observed = galactic theory debunked Polaris never moves = galactic theory and the theory that Earth supposedly moves in four different directions debunked Sun and Moon are EXACTLY THE SAME SIZE. When observed both make circular revolutions above observer. The only thing telling you that the Sun is further away than the Moon is theoretical science. How do you KNOW one is further away than the other? By observation alone and not theology both are = distance from observer. Not to mention EVERYONE on Earth only ever sees ONE FLAT side of the Moon. HOW does this = observation by every person on Earth make the Moon a ball?? It doesn't, only theology can hypothesize that. oh well ... NO CURVE = THEORETICAL RADIUS OF EARTH DEBUNKED = ORBITAL SCIENCE DEBUNKED = NO THEORETICAL MAGICAL LEVITATING SPINNING BALL = GLOBE MODEL/MAP DEBUNKED = SPACE DEBUNKED = FLAT EARTH
    3
  160. 3
  161. 3
  162. 3
  163. 3
  164. 3
  165. 3
  166. 3
  167. 3
  168. 3
  169. 3
  170. 3
  171. 3
  172. 3
  173. 3
  174. 3
  175. 3
  176. 3
  177. 3
  178. 3
  179. 3
  180. 3
  181. 3
  182.  @AP-zt2ox  has no math skills. World Record For Long Distance Photography Pic de Finestrelles (Elevation 9,272 ft) TO Pic Gaspard (Elevation 12,730 ft) is a 443 km/275.267 mile difference between mountain peaks. Eye Height = 9,272 FT Target Distance = 275.267 Miles Target Hidden Height = 16,446.35 FT 16,446.35 FT - Pic Gaspard (Elevation 12,730 ft) = 3,716.35 FT Pic Gaspard Peak should be 3,716.3562 FT BELOW HORIZON. You SEE THE ENTIRE MOUNTAIN ALONG WITH MANY OTHERS. THIS ALONE DEBUNKS YOUR MODEL!! THIS IS THE SECOND OBSERVATION that DEBUNKS AND DESTROYS YOUR SPINNING MODEL THEORY!! So ... lets POINT out ANOTHER OBSERVATION. YOU CAN SEE THE POINTED PEAK. THAT WOULD BE IMPOSSIBLE IF WE LIVED ON A BALL. THE MOUNTAINS SHOULD BE TILTED AWAY FROM YOU AND THE HORIZON SHOULDN'T BE RAISING THE FURTHER WE LOOK OUT. IT SHOULD BE CURVING DOWN AND AWAY FROM THE OBSERVER. THIS IS THE THIRD OBSERVATION THAT DESTROYS THE HELIOCENTRIC MODEL!!! TO BE ENTERED AND COUNTED AS AN OFFICIAL WORLD RECORD, REFRACTION AND MIRAGE COULD NOT BE THE CAUSE OF OBSERVATION. (SIDE NOTE REFRACTION CAN NOT I REPEAT CAN NOT CAUSE A MOUNTAIN TO MAGICALLY LEVITATE anywhere between 16,446.35 ft to 23,725.21 ft UP INTO THE AIR) That's ANYWHERE BETWEEN 3 TO 4 1/2 MILES OF MAGICAL LEVITATION. AHAHAHA AHAHA THAT'S PRACTICALLY THE HEIGHT OF KILIMANJARO!!! THAT'S SOME MAGIC LEVITATION!! If the observer was at half the height of Pic de Finestrelles which is roughly 5,000 ft. Pic Gaspard would be 23,725.21 ft BELOW HORIZON. SO AGAIN anywhere between 16,446.3562 FT to 23,725.2110 ft SHOULD BE HIDDEN FROM SIGHT. 16,446.3562 - 12,730 (Pic Gaspard elevation) = 3,716.35 FT 23,725.21 - 12,730 (Pic Gaspard elevation) = 10,995.21 FT THE TOP OF Pic Gaspard Peak should be ANYWHERE BETWEEN 3,716.35 FT TO 10,995.21 FT BELOW HORIZON. THE ENTIRE MOUNTAIN SHOULD BE ANYWHERE BETWEEN 3 TO 4 1/2 MILES BELOW THE HORIZON. NO CURVE = FLAT EARTH
    3
  183. 3
  184. 3
  185. 3
  186. 3
  187. 3
  188. 3
  189. 3
  190. 3
  191. 3
  192. 3
  193. 3
  194. 3
  195. 3
  196. 3
  197. 3
  198. 3
  199. 3
  200. 3
  201. Vincent Mcbride is far DUMBER that ANYONE. Hahaha the fact that this idiot thinks he can determine the geometry of the object he stands on by looking at lights in the sky ... Proves his stupidity. Everything that you think you know about the sky above is based on theology. The idea that any light in the sky is an actual physical object is based on hypothesis and theoretical science. Non of which can be proven. Theories do not = proof or facts The World Record For Long Distance Photography (a 275 mile observation from a 9,272 ft peak (Pic de Finestrelles) to a 12,730 ft peak (Pic Gaspard) over water that should be anywhere from 16,502 ft (3 miles) to 23,275 ft (4 1/2 miles) below horizon based on spherical geometry) has already proven the Earth to be flat. Amateur rockets with a ceiling of 393,700 ft has proven the Earth to be flat. Weather Ballons have a ceiling around 130,000 ft., they also prove the Earth to be FLAT. Commercial airlines fly at only 40,000 ft, they also show the Earth to be flat. Nothing compares to these 3 views all showing the Earth to be flatter than a pancake.  If you want to talk about lights in the sky and think they prove the Earth is a globe. Let's do it. Time lapse Star trail parallax is not observed = galactic theory debunked Polaris never moves = galactic theory and the theory that Earth supposedly moves in four different directions debunked Sun and Moon are EXACTLY THE SAME SIZE. When observed both make circular revolutions above observer. The only thing telling you that the Sun is further away than the Moon is theoretical science. How do you KNOW one is further away than the other? By observation alone and not theology both are = distance from observer. Not to mention EVERYONE on Earth only ever sees ONE FLAT side of the Moon. HOW does this = observation by every person on Earth make the Moon a ball?? It doesn't, only theology can hypothesize that. oh well ... NO CURVE = THEORETICAL RADIUS OF EARTH DEBUNKED = ORBITAL SCIENCE DEBUNKED = NO THEORETICAL MAGICAL LEVITATING SPINNING BALL = GLOBE MODEL/MAP DEBUNKED = SPACE DEBUNKED = FLAT EARTH
    3
  202. 3
  203. 3
  204. 3
  205. 3
  206. Alex Scott is now very sad. Everything that you think you know about the sky above is based on theology. The idea that any light in the sky is an actual physical object is based on hypothesis and theoretical science. Non of which can be proven. Theories do not = proof or facts The World Record For Long Distance Photography (a 275 mile observation from a 9,272 ft peak (Pic de Finestrelles) to a 12,730 ft peak (Pic Gaspard) over water that should be anywhere from 16,502 ft (3 miles) to 23,275 ft (4 1/2 miles) below horizon based on spherical geometry) has already proven the Earth to be flat. Amateur rockets with a ceiling of 393,700 ft has proven the Earth to be flat. Weather Ballons have a ceiling around 130,000 ft., they also prove the Earth to be FLAT. Commercial airlines fly at only 40,000 ft, they also show the Earth to be flat. Nothing compares to these 3 views all showing the Earth to be flatter than a pancake.  If you want to talk about lights in the sky and think they prove the Earth is a globe. Let's do it. Time lapse Star trail parallax is not observed = galactic theory debunked Polaris never moves = galactic theory and the theory that Earth supposedly moves in four different directions debunked Sun and Moon are EXACTLY THE SAME SIZE. When observed both make circular revolutions above observer. The only thing telling you that the Sun is further away than the Moon is theoretical science. How do you KNOW one is further away than the other? By observation alone and not theology both are = distance from observer. Not to mention EVERYONE on Earth only ever sees ONE FLAT side of the Moon. HOW does this = observation by every person on Earth make the Moon a ball?? It doesn't, only theology can hypothesize that. oh well ... NO CURVE = THEORETICAL RADIUS OF EARTH DEBUNKED = ORBITAL SCIENCE DEBUNKED = NO THEORETICAL MAGICAL LEVITATING SPINNING BALL = GLOBE MODEL/MAP DEBUNKED = SPACE DEBUNKED = FLAT EARTH
    3
  207. 3
  208. 3
  209. 3
  210. 3
  211. 3
  212. 3
  213. 3
  214. 3
  215. 3
  216. 3
  217. 3
  218. 3
  219. 3
  220. 2
  221. 2
  222. 2
  223. 2
  224. 2
  225. 2
  226. 2
  227. 2
  228. 2
  229. 2
  230. 2
  231. 2
  232. 2
  233. 2
  234. 2
  235. 2
  236. 2
  237. 2
  238. 2
  239. 2
  240. 2
  241. 2
  242. 2
  243. 2
  244. 2
  245. 2
  246. 2
  247. 2
  248. 2
  249. 2
  250. 2
  251. 2
  252. 2
  253. 2
  254. 2
  255. 2
  256. 2
  257. 2
  258. 2
  259. 2
  260. 2
  261. 2
  262. 2
  263. 2
  264. 2
  265. 2
  266. 2
  267. 2
  268. 2
  269. 2
  270. 2
  271. 2
  272. 2
  273. 2
  274. 2
  275. 2
  276. 2
  277. 2
  278. 2
  279. 2
  280. 2
  281. 2
  282. 2
  283. 2
  284. 2
  285. 2
  286. 2
  287. 2
  288. 2
  289. 2
  290. 2
  291. 2
  292. 2
  293. 2
  294. 2
  295. 2
  296. 2
  297. 2
  298. 2
  299. 2
  300. 2
  301. 2
  302. 2
  303. 2
  304. 2
  305. 2
  306. 2
  307. 2
  308. 2
  309. 2
  310. 2
  311. 2
  312. 2
  313. 2
  314. 2
  315. 2
  316. 2
  317. 2
  318. 2
  319. 2
  320. TakodaRA World Record For Long Distance Photography Pic de Finestrelles (Elevation 9,272 ft) TO Pic Gaspard (Elevation 12,730 ft) is a 443 km/275.267 mile difference between mountain peaks. Eye Height = 9,272 FT Target Distance = 275.267 Miles Target Hidden Height = 16,446.3562 FT 16,446.3562 FT - Pic Gaspard (Elevation 12,730 ft) = 3,716.3562 FT Pic Gaspard Peak should be 3,716.3562 FT BELOW HORIZON. You SEE THE ENTIRE MOUNTAIN ALONG WITH MANY OTHERS. THIS ALONE DEBUNKS YOUR MODEL!! THIS IS THE SECOND OBSERVATION that DEBUNKS AND DESTROYS YOUR SPINNING MODEL THEORY!! So ... lets POINT out ANOTHER OBSERVATION. YOU CAN SEE THE POINTED PEAK. THAT WOULD BE IMPOSSIBLE IF WE LIVED ON A BALL. THE MOUNTAINS SHOULD BE TILTED AWAY FROM YOU AND THE HORIZON SHOULDN'T BE RAISING THE FURTHER WE LOOK OUT. IT SHOULD BE CURVING DOWN AND AWAY FROM THE OBSERVER. THIS IS THE THIRD OBSERVATION THAT DESTROYS THE HELIOCENTRIC MODEL!!! (SIDE NOTE REFRACTION CAN NOT I REPEAT CAN NOT CAUSE A MOUNTAIN TO MAGICALLY LEVITATE anywhere between 16,446.3562 ft to 23,725.2110 ft UP INTO THE AIR) That's ANYWHERE BETWEEN 3.101 TO 4.501 MILES OF MAGICAL LEVITATION. AHAHAHA AHAHA THAT'S PRACTICALLY THE HEIGHT OF KILIMANJARO!!! THAT'S SOME MAGIC LEVITATION!! If the observer was at half the height of Pic de Finestrelles which is roughly 5,000 ft. Pic Gaspard would be 23,725.2110 ft BELOW HORIZON. SO AGAIN anywhere between 16,446.3562 FT to 23,725.2110 ft SHOULD BE HIDDEN FROM SIGHT. 16,446.3562 - 12,730 (Pic Gaspard elevation) = 3,716.3562 FT  23,725.2110 - 12,730 (Pic Gaspard elevation) = 10,995.211 FT THE TOP OF Pic Gaspard Peak should be ANYWHERE BETWEEN 3,716.3562 FT TO 10,995.211 FT BELOW HORIZON. THE ENTIRE MOUNTAIN SHOULD BE ANYWHERE BETWEEN 3.101 TO 4.501 MILES BELOW THE HORIZON!
    2
  321. 2
  322. 2
  323. 2
  324. 2
  325. 2
  326. 2
  327. 2
  328. 2
  329. 2
  330. 2
  331. 2
  332. 2
  333. 2
  334. 2
  335. 2
  336. 2
  337. 2
  338. 2
  339. 2
  340. 2
  341. 2
  342. 2
  343. 2
  344. 2
  345. 2
  346. 2
  347. 2
  348. 2
  349. 2
  350. 2
  351. 2
  352. 2
  353. 2
  354. 2
  355. 2
  356. 2
  357. 2
  358. 2
  359. 2
  360. 2
  361. 2
  362. 2
  363. 2
  364. 2
  365. 2
  366. 2
  367. 2
  368. 2
  369. Neg Ative is now very very sad. Hahaha the fact that this idiot thinks he can determine the geometry of the object he stands on by looking at lights in the sky ... Proves his stupidity. Everything that you think you know about the sky above is based on theology. The idea that any light in the sky is an actual physical object is based on hypothesis and theoretical science. Non of which can be proven. Theories do not = proof or facts The World Record For Long Distance Photography (a 275 mile observation from a 9,272 ft peak (Pic de Finestrelles) to a 12,730 ft peak (Pic Gaspard) over water that should be anywhere from 16,502 ft (3 miles) to 23,275 ft (4 1/2 miles) below horizon based on spherical geometry) has already proven the Earth to be flat. Amateur rockets with a ceiling of 393,700 ft has proven the Earth to be flat. Weather Ballons have a ceiling around 130,000 ft., they also prove the Earth to be FLAT. Commercial airlines fly at only 40,000 ft, they also show the Earth to be flat. Nothing compares to these 3 views all showing the Earth to be flatter than a pancake.  If you want to talk about lights in the sky and think they prove the Earth is a globe. Let's do it. Time lapse Star trail parallax is not observed = galactic theory debunked Polaris never moves = galactic theory and the theory that Earth supposedly moves in four different directions debunked Sun and Moon are EXACTLY THE SAME SIZE. When observed both make circular revolutions above observer. The only thing telling you that the Sun is further away than the Moon is theoretical science. How do you KNOW one is further away than the other? By observation alone and not theology both are = distance from observer. Not to mention EVERYONE on Earth only ever sees ONE FLAT side of the Moon. HOW does this = observation by every person on Earth make the Moon a ball?? It doesn't, only theology can hypothesize that. oh well ... NO CURVE = THEORETICAL RADIUS OF EARTH DEBUNKED = ORBITAL SCIENCE DEBUNKED = NO THEORETICAL MAGICAL LEVITATING SPINNING BALL = GLOBE MODEL/MAP DEBUNKED = SPACE DEBUNKED = FLAT EARTH
    2
  370. 2
  371. 2
  372. 2
  373. 2
  374. 2
  375. 2
  376. 2
  377. 2
  378. 2
  379. 2
  380. 2
  381. 2
  382. 2
  383. 2
  384. 2
  385. 2
  386. 2
  387. 2
  388. 2
  389. 2
  390. 2
  391. 2
  392. 2
  393. 2
  394. 2
  395. 2
  396. 2
  397. 2
  398. 2
  399. 2
  400. 2
  401. 2
  402. 2
  403. 2
  404. 2
  405. 2
  406. 2
  407. 2
  408. 2
  409. 2
  410. 2
  411. 2
  412. 2
  413. 2
  414. 2
  415. 2
  416. 2
  417. 2
  418. 2
  419. 2
  420. 2
  421. 2
  422. 2
  423. 2
  424. 2
  425. 2
  426. 2
  427. 2
  428. 2
  429. 2
  430. 2
  431. 2
  432. 2
  433. 2
  434. 2
  435. 2
  436. 2
  437. 2
  438. 2
  439. 2
  440. 2
  441. 2
  442. 2
  443. 2
  444. 2
  445. 2
  446. 2
  447. 2
  448. 2
  449. 2
  450. 2
  451. deny73 is very very dumb. 4. An atmospheric satellite (United States usage, abbreviated atmosat) or pseudo-satellite (British usage) is an aircraft that operates in the atmosphere at high altitudes for extended periods of time, in order to provide services conventionally provided by an artificial satellite orbiting in space. Atmospheric satellites remain aloft through atmospheric lift, either aerostatic (e.g., balloons) or aerodynamic (e.g., airplanes). To date, all atmosats have been unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs). Operating altitudes are expected to be in the tropopause—at approximately 65,000 feet—where winds are generally less than 5 knots and clouds do not block sunlight.[2] It is desirable in the United States to operate above 60,000 feet, above which the Federal Aviation Administration does not regulate the airspace. To enable night time operation and ensure endurance through consecutive 24-hour day/night cycles, in daylight hours solar panels charge batteries[2] or fuel cells[4] which subsequently power the vehicle during hours of darkness. An atmospheric satellite may initially ascend at night under battery power, and reach altitude soon after dawn to allow solar panels to take advantage of a full day's sunlight. 5. Geostationary balloon satellites (GBS) are atmosphere analogues to satellites that float in the stratosphere (60,000 to 70,000 feet (18 to 21 km) above sea level) at a fixed point over the Earth's surface. At that altitude, air density is 1/10 of what it is at sea level. The average wind speed at these levels is less than that at the surface.[citation needed] A propulsion system would allow the balloon to move into and maintain its position. The GBS would be powered with solar panels en route to its location and then receive laser power from a cell tower it hovers over. A GBS could be used to provide broadband Internet access over a large area. Laser broadband would connect the GBS to the network, which could then provide a large area of coverage because of its wider line of sight over the curvature of the Earth and unimpeded Fresnel zone. BAHAHA KEEP RESPONDING YOUR STUPIDITY IS HILARIOUS!!
    2
  452. 2
  453. 2
  454. 2
  455. 2
  456. 2
  457. 2
  458. 2
  459. 2
  460. 2
  461. 2
  462. 2
  463.  @gumbi79  is confused. Hahaha the fact that this child thinks he can determine the geometry of the object he stands on by looking at lights in the sky ... Proves his stupidity. Everything that you think you know about the sky above is based on theology. The idea that any light in the sky is an actual physical object is based on hypothesis and theoretical science. Non of which can be proven. Theories do not = proof or facts The World Record For Long Distance Photography (a 275 mile observation from a 9,272 ft peak (Pic de Finestrelles) to a 12,730 ft peak (Pic Gaspard) over water that should be anywhere from 16,502 ft (3 miles) to 23,275 ft (4 1/2 miles) below horizon based on spherical geometry) has already proven the Earth to be flat. Amateur rockets with a ceiling of 393,700 ft has proven the Earth to be flat. Weather Ballons have a ceiling around 130,000 ft., they also prove the Earth to be FLAT. Commercial airlines fly at only 40,000 ft, they also show the Earth to be flat. Nothing compares to these 3 views all showing the Earth to be flatter than a pancake.  If you want to talk about lights in the sky and think they prove the Earth is a globe. Let's do it. Time lapse Star trail parallax is not observed = galactic theory debunked Polaris never moves = galactic theory and the theory that Earth supposedly moves in four different directions debunked Sun and Moon are EXACTLY THE SAME SIZE. When observed both make circular revolutions above observer. The only thing telling you that the Sun is further away than the Moon is theoretical science. How do you KNOW one is further away than the other? By observation alone and not theology both are = distance from observer. Not to mention EVERYONE on Earth only ever sees ONE FLAT side of the Moon. HOW does this = observation by every person on Earth make the Moon a ball?? It doesn't, only theology can hypothesize that. oh well ... NO CURVE = THEORETICAL RADIUS OF EARTH DEBUNKED = ORBITAL SCIENCE DEBUNKED = NO THEORETICAL MAGICAL LEVITATING SPINNING BALL = GLOBE MODEL/MAP DEBUNKED = SPACE DEBUNKED = FLAT EARTH
    2
  464. 2
  465. 2
  466. 2
  467. 2
  468. Kelley 081 is my favorite DUMBOO 4. An atmospheric satellite (United States usage, abbreviated atmosat) or pseudo-satellite (British usage) is an aircraft that operates in the atmosphere at high altitudes for extended periods of time, in order to provide services conventionally provided by an artificial satellite orbiting in space. Atmospheric satellites remain aloft through atmospheric lift, either aerostatic (e.g., balloons) or aerodynamic (e.g., airplanes). To date, all atmosats have been unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs). Operating altitudes are expected to be in the tropopause—at approximately 65,000 feet—where winds are generally less than 5 knots and clouds do not block sunlight.[2] It is desirable in the United States to operate above 60,000 feet, above which the Federal Aviation Administration does not regulate the airspace. To enable night time operation and ensure endurance through consecutive 24-hour day/night cycles, in daylight hours solar panels charge batteries[2] or fuel cells[4] which subsequently power the vehicle during hours of darkness. An atmospheric satellite may initially ascend at night under battery power, and reach altitude soon after dawn to allow solar panels to take advantage of a full day's sunlight. 5. Geostationary balloon satellites (GBS) are atmosphere analogues to satellites that float in the stratosphere (60,000 to 70,000 feet (18 to 21 km) above sea level) at a fixed point over the Earth's surface. At that altitude, air density is 1/10 of what it is at sea level. The average wind speed at these levels is less than that at the surface.[citation needed] A propulsion system would allow the balloon to move into and maintain its position. The GBS would be powered with solar panels en route to its location and then receive laser power from a cell tower it hovers over. A GBS could be used to provide broadband Internet access over a large area. Laser broadband would connect the GBS to the network, which could then provide a large area of coverage because of its wider line of sight over the curvature of the Earth and unimpeded Fresnel zone. BAHAHA KEEP RESPONDING YOUR STUPIDITY IS HILARIOUS!!
    2
  469. 2
  470. 2
  471. 2
  472. 2
  473. 2
  474. 2
  475. 2
  476. 2
  477. 2
  478. 2
  479. 2
  480. 2
  481. 2
  482. 2
  483. 2
  484. 2
  485. 2
  486. 2
  487. 2
  488. 2
  489. 2
  490. 2
  491. 2
  492. 2
  493. 2
  494. 2
  495. 2
  496. 2
  497. 2
  498. 2
  499. 2
  500. 2
  501. 2
  502.  @Chiefmucka  is confused World Record For Long Distance Photography Pic de Finestrelles (Elevation 9,272 ft) TO Pic Gaspard (Elevation 12,730 ft) is a 443 km/275.267 mile difference between mountain peaks. Eye Height = 9,272 FT Target Distance = 275.267 Miles Target Hidden Height = 16,446.35 FT 16,446.35 FT - Pic Gaspard (Elevation 12,730 ft) = 3,716.35 FT Pic Gaspard Peak should be 3,716.3562 FT BELOW HORIZON. You SEE THE ENTIRE MOUNTAIN ALONG WITH MANY OTHERS. THIS ALONE DEBUNKS YOUR MODEL!! THIS IS THE SECOND OBSERVATION that DEBUNKS AND DESTROYS YOUR SPINNING MODEL THEORY!! So ... lets POINT out ANOTHER OBSERVATION. YOU CAN SEE THE POINTED PEAK. THAT WOULD BE IMPOSSIBLE IF WE LIVED ON A BALL. THE MOUNTAINS SHOULD BE TILTED AWAY FROM YOU AND THE HORIZON SHOULDN'T BE RAISING THE FURTHER WE LOOK OUT. IT SHOULD BE CURVING DOWN AND AWAY FROM THE OBSERVER. THIS IS THE THIRD OBSERVATION THAT DESTROYS THE HELIOCENTRIC MODEL!!! TO BE ENTERED AND COUNTED AS AN OFFICIAL WORLD RECORD, REFRACTION AND MIRAGE COULD NOT BE THE CAUSE OF OBSERVATION. (SIDE NOTE REFRACTION CAN NOT I REPEAT CAN NOT CAUSE A MOUNTAIN TO MAGICALLY LEVITATE anywhere between 16,446.35 ft to 23,725.21 ft UP INTO THE AIR) That's ANYWHERE BETWEEN 3 TO 4 1/2 MILES OF MAGICAL LEVITATION. AHAHAHA AHAHA THAT'S PRACTICALLY THE HEIGHT OF KILIMANJARO!!! THAT'S SOME MAGIC LEVITATION!! If the observer was at half the height of Pic de Finestrelles which is roughly 5,000 ft. Pic Gaspard would be 23,725.21 ft BELOW HORIZON. SO AGAIN anywhere between 16,446.3562 FT to 23,725.2110 ft SHOULD BE HIDDEN FROM SIGHT. 16,446.3562 - 12,730 (Pic Gaspard elevation) = 3,716.35 FT 23,725.21 - 12,730 (Pic Gaspard elevation) = 10,995.21 FT THE TOP OF Pic Gaspard Peak should be ANYWHERE BETWEEN 3,716.35 FT TO 10,995.21 FT BELOW HORIZON. THE ENTIRE MOUNTAIN SHOULD BE ANYWHERE BETWEEN 3 TO 4 1/2 MILES BELOW THE HORIZON. NO CURVE = FLAT EARTH
    2
  503. 2
  504. 2
  505. 2
  506. 2
  507. 2
  508. 2
  509. 2
  510. 2
  511. 2
  512. 2
  513. 2
  514. 2
  515. 2
  516. 2
  517. 2
  518. 2
  519. 2
  520. 2
  521. 2
  522. 2
  523. 2
  524. 2
  525. 2
  526. 2
  527. 2
  528. 2
  529. 2
  530. 2
  531. 2
  532. 2
  533. 2
  534. 2
  535. 2
  536. 2
  537. 2
  538. 2
  539. 2
  540. 2
  541. 2
  542. 2
  543. 2
  544. 2
  545. 2
  546. 2
  547. 2
  548. 2
  549. 2
  550. 2
  551. 2
  552. 2
  553. 2
  554. 2
  555. 2
  556. 2
  557. 2
  558. 2
  559. 2
  560. 2
  561. 2
  562. 2
  563. 2
  564. 2
  565. 2
  566. 2
  567. 2
  568. 2
  569. 2
  570. 2
  571. 2
  572. 2
  573. 2
  574. 2
  575. 2
  576. 2
  577. 2
  578. 2
  579. 2
  580. 2
  581. 2
  582. 2
  583. 2
  584. 2
  585. 2
  586. 2
  587.  @chris8967  is my personal DUMBO Hahaha the fact that this idiot thinks she can determine the geometry of the object she stands on by looking at lights in the sky ... Proves her stupidity. Everything that you think you know about the sky above is based on theology. The idea that any light in the sky is an actual physical object is based on hypothesis and theoretical science. Non of which can be proven. Theories do not = proof or facts The World Record For Long Distance Photography (a 275 mile observation from a 9,272 ft peak (Pic de Finestrelles) to a 12,730 ft peak (Pic Gaspard) over water that should be anywhere from 16,502 ft (3 miles) to 23,275 ft (4 1/2 miles) below horizon based on spherical geometry) has already proven the Earth to be flat. Amateur rockets with a ceiling of 393,700 ft has proven the Earth to be flat. Weather Ballons have a ceiling around 130,000 ft., they also prove the Earth to be FLAT. Commercial airlines fly at only 40,000 ft, they also show the Earth to be flat. Nothing compares to these 3 views all showing the Earth to be flatter than a pancake.  If you want to talk about lights in the sky and think they prove the Earth is a globe. Let's do it. Time lapse Star trail parallax is not observed = galactic theory debunked Polaris never moves = galactic theory and the theory that Earth supposedly moves in four different directions debunked Sun and Moon are EXACTLY THE SAME SIZE. When observed both make circular revolutions above observer. The only thing telling you that the Sun is further away than the Moon is theoretical science. How do you KNOW one is further away than the other? By observation alone and not theology both are = distance from observer. Not to mention EVERYONE on Earth only ever sees ONE FLAT side of the Moon. HOW does this = observation by every person on Earth make the Moon a ball?? It doesn't, only theology can hypothesize that. oh well ... NO CURVE = THEORETICAL RADIUS OF EARTH DEBUNKED = ORBITAL SCIENCE DEBUNKED = NO THEORETICAL MAGICAL LEVITATING SPINNING BALL = GLOBE MODEL/MAP DEBUNKED = SPACE DEBUNKED = FLAT EARTH
    2
  588. 2
  589. 2
  590. 2
  591. 2
  592. 2
  593. 2
  594. 2
  595. 2
  596. 2
  597. 2
  598. 2
  599. 2
  600. 2
  601. 2
  602.  @AP-zt2ox  hates being my personal DUMBO. GPS does NOT = SATELLITES in SPACE GPS = INTERNET SATELLITES in THEORETICAL SPACE DON'T EXIST and they are DEFINITELY NOT NEEDED!!! HERE'S WHY ... 1. What is something most people don’t know about undersea cables? Most people probably don’t know that 99 percent of all transoceanic data traffic goes through undersea cables, and that includes Internet usage, phone calls and text messages. This route is also faster than satellite transmissions, by up to eight-fold. 2. More than half of the world's population is still without Internet access!!! (PROOF SATELLITES DON'T EXIST) Project Loon is a network of BALLONS traveling on the edge of space, designed to extend Internet connectivity to people in rural and remote areas worldwide. FLIGHT We aim to launch and maintain a fleet of balloons to provide Internet coverage to users on the ground, with our Autolaunchers capable of safely and consistently launching a new balloon every 30 minutes. We have flown over 25 million km of test flights to date since the project began - with one of our record-breaking balloons surviving for 190 days aloft in the stratosphere. CONNECTION High speed internet is transmitted up to the nearest balloon from our telecommunications partner on the ground, relayed across the balloon network, and then back down to users on the ground. We have demonstrated data transmission between balloons over 100 km apart in the stratosphere and back down to people on the ground with connection speeds of up to 10 Mbps, directly to their LTE phones. 3. LORAN has ALWAYS BEEN IN USE. Started development in 1940!!! MINIMUM Range of up to 1,500 miles (2,400 km)!!!! eLoran is the longstanding and proven series of low-frequency, LOng-RAnge Navigation (LORAN) systems, one that takes full advantage of 21st-century technology. It meets the accuracy, availability, integrity and continuity performance requirements for maritime harbor entrance and approach maneuvers, aviation non-precision instrument approaches, land-mobile vehicle navigation and location-based services. It’s a precise source of time (phase) and frequency. Additionally, eLoran provides user bearing (azimuth) and has built-in integrity. In full disclosure, however, eLoran is only a 2D positioning solution unless integrated with a simple altimeter. eLoran is a low-frequency radionavigation system that operates in the frequency band of 90 to 110 kHz. eLoran is built on internationally standardized Loran-C, and provides a high-power PNT service for use by all modes of transport and in other applications. eLoran is an independent dissimilar complement to GNSS. It allows GNSS users to retain the safety, security and economic benefits of GNSS even when their satellite services are disrupted. eLoran uses pulsed signals at a center frequency of 100 kHz. The pulses are designed to allow receivers to distinguish between the groundwave and skywave components in the received composite signal. This way, the eLoran signals can be used over very long ranges without fading or uncertainty in the time-of-arrival (TOA) measurement related to skywaves. Although eLoran is based upon Loran-C, it has key differences: All transmissions are synchronized to UTC (like GPS)Time-of-transmission controlThe ability to use differential corrections (similar to DGPS)Receivers use “all-in-view” signalsIncludes one or more Loran data channels that provide: Low-rate data messaging, added integrity, differential corrections (dLoran and/or DGPS) and other communications including navigation messages. GPS has been called “a single point of failure” for much of the U.S. economy and critical infrastructure. Nine nations are operating Loran-C or eLoran stations, including Russia and China. It is our understanding that the Republic of Korea, India and the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia are pursuing the installation of eLoran technology or upgrading their Loran-C technology to eLoran.
    2
  603.  @AP-zt2ox  feels very dumb now. 4. An atmospheric satellite (United States usage, abbreviated atmosat) or pseudo-satellite (British usage) is an aircraft that operates in the atmosphere at high altitudes for extended periods of time, in order to provide services conventionally provided by an artificial satellite orbiting in space. Atmospheric satellites remain aloft through atmospheric lift, either aerostatic (e.g., balloons) or aerodynamic (e.g., airplanes). To date, all atmosats have been unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs). Operating altitudes are expected to be in the tropopause—at approximately 65,000 feet—where winds are generally less than 5 knots and clouds do not block sunlight.[2] It is desirable in the United States to operate above 60,000 feet, above which the Federal Aviation Administration does not regulate the airspace. To enable night time operation and ensure endurance through consecutive 24-hour day/night cycles, in daylight hours solar panels charge batteries[2] or fuel cells[4] which subsequently power the vehicle during hours of darkness. An atmospheric satellite may initially ascend at night under battery power, and reach altitude soon after dawn to allow solar panels to take advantage of a full day's sunlight. 5. Geostationary balloon satellites (GBS) are atmosphere analogues to satellites that float in the stratosphere (60,000 to 70,000 feet (18 to 21 km) above sea level) at a fixed point over the Earth's surface. At that altitude, air density is 1/10 of what it is at sea level. The average wind speed at these levels is less than that at the surface.[citation needed] A propulsion system would allow the balloon to move into and maintain its position. The GBS would be powered with solar panels en route to its location and then receive laser power from a cell tower it hovers over. A GBS could be used to provide broadband Internet access over a large area. Laser broadband would connect the GBS to the network, which could then provide a large area of coverage because of its wider line of sight over the curvature of the Earth and unimpeded Fresnel zone. BAHAHA KEEP RESPONDING YOUR STUPIDITY IS HILARIOUS!!
    2
  604. 2
  605. 2
  606. 2
  607. 2
  608. 2
  609. 2
  610. 2
  611. 2
  612. 2
  613. 2
  614. 2
  615. 2
  616. 2
  617. 2
  618.  @AP-zt2ox  loves being wrong 😂 Hahaha the fact that this dodo thinks she can determine the geometry of the object she stands on by looking at lights in the sky ... Proves her stupidity. Everything that you think you know about the sky above is based on theology. The idea that any light in the sky is an actual physical object is based on hypothesis and theoretical science. Non of which can be proven. Theories do not = proof or facts The World Record For Long Distance Photography (a 275 mile observation from a 9,272 ft peak (Pic de Finestrelles) to a 12,730 ft peak (Pic Gaspard) over water that should be anywhere from 16,502 ft (3 miles) to 23,275 ft (4 1/2 miles) below horizon based on spherical geometry) has already proven the Earth to be flat. Amateur rockets with a ceiling of 393,700 ft has proven the Earth to be flat. Weather Ballons have a ceiling around 130,000 ft., they also prove the Earth to be FLAT. Commercial airlines fly at only 40,000 ft, they also show the Earth to be flat. Nothing compares to these 3 views all showing the Earth to be flatter than a pancake.  If you want to talk about lights in the sky and think they prove the Earth is a globe. Let's do it. Time lapse Star trail parallax is not observed = galactic theory debunked Polaris never moves = galactic theory and the theory that Earth supposedly moves in four different directions debunked Sun and Moon are EXACTLY THE SAME SIZE. When observed both make circular revolutions above observer. The only thing telling you that the Sun is further away than the Moon is theoretical science. How do you KNOW one is further away than the other? By observation alone and not theology both are = distance from observer. Not to mention EVERYONE on Earth only ever sees ONE FLAT side of the Moon. HOW does this = observation by every person on Earth make the Moon a ball?? It doesn't, only theology can hypothesize that. oh well ... NO CURVE = THEORETICAL RADIUS OF EARTH DEBUNKED = ORBITAL SCIENCE DEBUNKED = NO THEORETICAL MAGICAL LEVITATING SPINNING BALL = GLOBE MODEL/MAP DEBUNKED = SPACE DEBUNKED = FLAT EARTH
    2
  619. 2
  620. 2
  621. 2
  622. 2
  623. 2
  624. 2
  625. 2
  626. 2
  627. 2
  628. 2
  629. 2
  630. 2
  631. 2
  632. 2
  633. 2
  634. 2
  635. 2
  636. 2
  637. 2
  638. 2
  639. 2
  640. 2
  641. 2
  642. 2
  643. 2
  644. 2
  645. 2
  646. 2
  647. 2
  648. 2
  649. 2
  650. 2
  651. 2
  652. 2
  653. 2
  654. 2
  655. 2
  656. 2
  657. 2
  658. 2
  659. 2
  660. 2
  661. 2
  662. 2
  663. 2
  664. 2
  665. 2
  666. 2
  667. 2
  668.  @Stonktradomus  is confused. Hahaha the fact that this child thinks he can determine the geometry of the object he stands on by looking at lights in the sky ... Proves his stupidity. Everything that you think you know about the sky above is based on theology. The idea that any light in the sky is an actual physical object is based on hypothesis and theoretical science. Non of which can be proven. Theories do not = proof or facts The World Record For Long Distance Photography (a 275 mile observation from a 9,272 ft peak (Pic de Finestrelles) to a 12,730 ft peak (Pic Gaspard) over water that should be anywhere from 16,502 ft (3 miles) to 23,275 ft (4 1/2 miles) below horizon based on spherical geometry) has already proven the Earth to be flat. Amateur rockets with a ceiling of 393,700 ft has proven the Earth to be flat. Weather Ballons have a ceiling around 130,000 ft., they also prove the Earth to be FLAT. Commercial airlines fly at only 40,000 ft, they also show the Earth to be flat. Nothing compares to these 3 views all showing the Earth to be flatter than a pancake.  If you want to talk about lights in the sky and think they prove the Earth is a globe. Let's do it. Time lapse Star trail parallax is not observed = galactic theory debunked Polaris never moves = galactic theory and the theory that Earth supposedly moves in four different directions debunked Sun and Moon are EXACTLY THE SAME SIZE. When observed both make circular revolutions above observer. The only thing telling you that the Sun is further away than the Moon is theoretical science. How do you KNOW one is further away than the other? By observation alone and not theology both are = distance from observer. Not to mention EVERYONE on Earth only ever sees ONE FLAT side of the Moon. HOW does this = observation by every person on Earth make the Moon a ball?? It doesn't, only theology can hypothesize that. oh well ... NO CURVE = THEORETICAL RADIUS OF EARTH DEBUNKED = ORBITAL SCIENCE DEBUNKED = NO THEORETICAL MAGICAL LEVITATING SPINNING BALL = GLOBE MODEL/MAP DEBUNKED = SPACE DEBUNKED = FLAT EARTH
    2
  669. 2
  670. 2
  671. 2
  672. 2
  673. 2
  674. 2
  675. 2
  676. 2
  677. 2
  678. 2
  679. 2
  680. 2
  681. 2
  682. 2
  683. 2
  684. 2
  685. 2
  686. 2
  687. 2
  688. 2
  689. 2
  690. 2
  691. 2
  692. 2
  693. 2
  694. 2
  695. 2
  696. 2
  697. 2
  698. Firewall 4LIFE has no common sense. World Record For Long Distance Photography Pic de Finestrelles (Elevation 9,272 ft) TO Pic Gaspard (Elevation 12,730 ft) is a 443 km/275.267 mile difference between mountain peaks. Eye Height = 9,272 FT Target Distance = 275.267 Miles Target Hidden Height = 16,446.3562 FT 16,446.3562 FT - Pic Gaspard (Elevation 12,730 ft) = 3,716.3562 FT Pic Gaspard Peak should be 3,716.3562 FT BELOW HORIZON. You SEE THE ENTIRE MOUNTAIN ALONG WITH MANY OTHERS. THIS ALONE DEBUNKS YOUR MODEL!! THIS IS THE SECOND OBSERVATION that DEBUNKS AND DESTROYS YOUR SPINNING MODEL THEORY!! So ... lets POINT out ANOTHER OBSERVATION. YOU CAN SEE THE POINTED PEAK. THAT WOULD BE IMPOSSIBLE IF WE LIVED ON A BALL. THE MOUNTAINS SHOULD BE TILTED AWAY FROM YOU AND THE HORIZON SHOULDN'T BE RAISING THE FURTHER WE LOOK OUT. IT SHOULD BE CURVING DOWN AND AWAY FROM THE OBSERVER. THIS IS THE THIRD OBSERVATION THAT DESTROYS THE HELIOCENTRIC MODEL!!! (SIDE NOTE REFRACTION CAN NOT I REPEAT CAN NOT CAUSE A MOUNTAIN TO MAGICALLY LEVITATE anywhere between 16,446.3562 ft to 23,725.2110 ft UP INTO THE AIR) That's ANYWHERE BETWEEN 3.101 TO 4.501 MILES OF MAGICAL LEVITATION. AHAHAHA AHAHA THAT'S PRACTICALLY THE HEIGHT OF KILIMANJARO!!! THAT'S SOME MAGIC LEVITATION!! If the observer was at half the height of Pic de Finestrelles which is roughly 5,000 ft. Pic Gaspard would be 23,725.2110 ft BELOW HORIZON. SO AGAIN anywhere between 16,446.3562 FT to 23,725.2110 ft SHOULD BE HIDDEN FROM SIGHT. 16,446.3562 - 12,730 (Pic Gaspard elevation) = 3,716.3562 FT  23,725.2110 - 12,730 (Pic Gaspard elevation) = 10,995.211 FT THE TOP OF Pic Gaspard Peak should be ANYWHERE BETWEEN 3,716.3562 FT TO 10,995.211 FT BELOW HORIZON. THE ENTIRE MOUNTAIN SHOULD BE ANYWHERE BETWEEN 3.101 TO 4.501 MILES BELOW THE HORIZON!
    2
  699. 2
  700. 2
  701. 2
  702. 2
  703. 2
  704. 2
  705. 2
  706. 2
  707. 2
  708. 2
  709. 2
  710. Firewall 4LIFE World Record For Long Distance Photography Pic de Finestrelles (Elevation 9,272 ft) TO Pic Gaspard (Elevation 12,730 ft) is a 443 km/275.267 mile difference between mountain peaks. Eye Height = 9,272 FT Target Distance = 275.267 Miles Target Hidden Height = 16,446.3562 FT 16,446.3562 FT - Pic Gaspard (Elevation 12,730 ft) = 3,716.3562 FT Pic Gaspard Peak should be 3,716.3562 FT BELOW HORIZON. You SEE THE ENTIRE MOUNTAIN ALONG WITH MANY OTHERS. THIS ALONE DEBUNKS YOUR MODEL!! THIS IS THE SECOND OBSERVATION that DEBUNKS AND DESTROYS YOUR SPINNING MODEL THEORY!! So ... lets POINT out ANOTHER OBSERVATION. YOU CAN SEE THE POINTED PEAK. THAT WOULD BE IMPOSSIBLE IF WE LIVED ON A BALL. THE MOUNTAINS SHOULD BE TILTED AWAY FROM YOU AND THE HORIZON SHOULDN'T BE RAISING THE FURTHER WE LOOK OUT. IT SHOULD BE CURVING DOWN AND AWAY FROM THE OBSERVER. THIS IS THE THIRD OBSERVATION THAT DESTROYS THE HELIOCENTRIC MODEL!!! (SIDE NOTE REFRACTION CAN NOT I REPEAT CAN NOT CAUSE A MOUNTAIN TO MAGICALLY LEVITATE anywhere between 16,446.3562 ft to 23,725.2110 ft UP INTO THE AIR) That's ANYWHERE BETWEEN 3.101 TO 4.501 MILES OF MAGICAL LEVITATION. AHAHAHA AHAHA THAT'S PRACTICALLY THE HEIGHT OF KILIMANJARO!!! THAT'S SOME MAGIC LEVITATION!! If the observer was at half the height of Pic de Finestrelles which is roughly 5,000 ft. Pic Gaspard would be 23,725.2110 ft BELOW HORIZON. SO AGAIN anywhere between 16,446.3562 FT to 23,725.2110 ft SHOULD BE HIDDEN FROM SIGHT. 16,446.3562 - 12,730 (Pic Gaspard elevation) = 3,716.3562 FT  23,725.2110 - 12,730 (Pic Gaspard elevation) = 10,995.211 FT THE TOP OF Pic Gaspard Peak should be ANYWHERE BETWEEN 3,716.3562 FT TO 10,995.211 FT BELOW HORIZON. THE ENTIRE MOUNTAIN SHOULD BE ANYWHERE BETWEEN 3.101 TO 4.501 MILES BELOW THE HORIZON!
    2
  711. 2
  712. 2
  713. 2
  714. 2
  715. 2
  716. 2
  717. 2
  718. 2
  719. 2
  720. 2
  721. 2
  722. 2
  723. 2
  724. 2
  725. 2
  726. 2
  727. 2
  728. 2
  729. 2
  730. 2
  731. 2
  732. 2
  733. 2
  734. 2
  735. 2
  736. 2
  737. 2
  738. 2
  739. 2
  740. aaronmeeks is now very very sad. World Record For Long Distance Photography Pic de Finestrelles (Elevation 9,272 ft) TO Pic Gaspard (Elevation 12,730 ft) is a 443 km/275.267 mile difference between mountain peaks. Eye Height = 9,272 FT Target Distance = 275.267 Miles Target Hidden Height = 16,446.3562 FT 16,446.3562 FT - Pic Gaspard (Elevation 12,730 ft) = 3,716.3562 FT Pic Gaspard Peak should be 3,716.3562 FT BELOW HORIZON. You SEE THE ENTIRE MOUNTAIN ALONG WITH MANY OTHERS. THIS ALONE DEBUNKS YOUR MODEL!! THIS IS THE SECOND OBSERVATION that DEBUNKS AND DESTROYS YOUR SPINNING MODEL THEORY!! So ... lets POINT out ANOTHER OBSERVATION. YOU CAN SEE THE POINTED PEAK. THAT WOULD BE IMPOSSIBLE IF WE LIVED ON A BALL. THE MOUNTAINS SHOULD BE TILTED AWAY FROM YOU AND THE HORIZON SHOULDN'T BE RAISING THE FURTHER WE LOOK OUT. IT SHOULD BE CURVING DOWN AND AWAY FROM THE OBSERVER. THIS IS THE THIRD OBSERVATION THAT DESTROYS THE HELIOCENTRIC MODEL!!! (SIDE NOTE REFRACTION CAN NOT I REPEAT CAN NOT CAUSE A MOUNTAIN TO MAGICALLY LEVITATE anywhere between 16,446.3562 ft to 23,725.2110 ft UP INTO THE AIR) That's ANYWHERE BETWEEN 3.101 TO 4.501 MILES OF MAGICAL LEVITATION. AHAHAHA AHAHA THAT'S PRACTICALLY THE HEIGHT OF KILIMANJARO!!! THAT'S SOME MAGIC LEVITATION!! If the observer was at half the height of Pic de Finestrelles which is roughly 5,000 ft. Pic Gaspard would be 23,725.2110 ft BELOW HORIZON. SO AGAIN anywhere between 16,446.3562 FT to 23,725.2110 ft SHOULD BE HIDDEN FROM SIGHT. 16,446.3562 - 12,730 (Pic Gaspard elevation) = 3,716.3562 FT  23,725.2110 - 12,730 (Pic Gaspard elevation) = 10,995.211 FT THE TOP OF Pic Gaspard Peak should be ANYWHERE BETWEEN 3,716.3562 FT TO 10,995.211 FT BELOW HORIZON. THE ENTIRE MOUNTAIN SHOULD BE ANYWHERE BETWEEN 3.101 TO 4.501 MILES BELOW THE HORIZON!
    2
  741. 2
  742. 2
  743. 2
  744. 2
  745. 2
  746. 2
  747. 2
  748. 2
  749. 2
  750. 2
  751. 2
  752. 2
  753. 2
  754. 2
  755. 2
  756. 2
  757. 2
  758. 2
  759. 2
  760. 2
  761. 2
  762. 2
  763. 2
  764. 2
  765. 1
  766. 1
  767. 1
  768. 1
  769. 1
  770. 1
  771. 1
  772. 1
  773. 1
  774. 1
  775. 1
  776. 1
  777. 1
  778. 1
  779. 1
  780. 1
  781. 1
  782. 1
  783. 1
  784. 1
  785. 1
  786. 1
  787. 1
  788. 1
  789. 1
  790. 1
  791. 1
  792. 1
  793. 1
  794. 1
  795. 1
  796. 1
  797. 1
  798. 1
  799. 1
  800. 1
  801. 1
  802. 1
  803. 1
  804. 1
  805. 1
  806. 1
  807. 1
  808. 1
  809. 1
  810. 1
  811. 1
  812. 1
  813. 1
  814. 1
  815. 1
  816. 1
  817. 1
  818. 1
  819. 1
  820. 1
  821. 1
  822. 1
  823. 1
  824. 1
  825. 1
  826. 1
  827. 1
  828. 1
  829. 1
  830. 1
  831. 1
  832. 1
  833. 1
  834. 1
  835. 1
  836. 1
  837. 1
  838. 1
  839. 1
  840. 1
  841. 1
  842. 1
  843. 1
  844. 1
  845. 1
  846. 1
  847. 1
  848. 1
  849. 1
  850. 1
  851. 1
  852. 1
  853. 1
  854. 1
  855. 1
  856. 1
  857. 1
  858. 1
  859. 1
  860. 1
  861. 1
  862. 1
  863. 1
  864. 1
  865. 1
  866. 1
  867. 1
  868. 1
  869. 1
  870. 1
  871. 1
  872. 1
  873. 1
  874. 1
  875. 1
  876. 1
  877. 1
  878. 1
  879. 1
  880.  @chris8967  has no math skills World Record For Long Distance Photography Pic de Finestrelles (Elevation 9,272 ft) TO Pic Gaspard (Elevation 12,730 ft) is a 443 km/275.267 mile difference between mountain peaks. Eye Height = 9,272 FT Target Distance = 275.267 Miles Target Hidden Height = 16,446.3562 FT 16,446.3562 FT - Pic Gaspard (Elevation 12,730 ft) = 3,716.3562 FT Pic Gaspard Peak should be 3,716.3562 FT BELOW HORIZON. You SEE THE ENTIRE MOUNTAIN ALONG WITH MANY OTHERS. THIS ALONE DEBUNKS YOUR MODEL!! THIS IS THE SECOND OBSERVATION that DEBUNKS AND DESTROYS YOUR SPINNING MODEL THEORY!! So ... lets POINT out ANOTHER OBSERVATION. YOU CAN SEE THE POINTED PEAK. THAT WOULD BE IMPOSSIBLE IF WE LIVED ON A BALL. THE MOUNTAINS SHOULD BE TILTED AWAY FROM YOU AND THE HORIZON SHOULDN'T BE RAISING THE FURTHER WE LOOK OUT. IT SHOULD BE CURVING DOWN AND AWAY FROM THE OBSERVER. THIS IS THE THIRD OBSERVATION THAT DESTROYS THE HELIOCENTRIC MODEL!!! (SIDE NOTE REFRACTION CAN NOT I REPEAT CAN NOT CAUSE A MOUNTAIN TO MAGICALLY LEVITATE anywhere between 16,446.3562 ft to 23,725.2110 ft UP INTO THE AIR) That's ANYWHERE BETWEEN 3.101 TO 4.501 MILES OF MAGICAL LEVITATION. AHAHAHA AHAHA THAT'S PRACTICALLY THE HEIGHT OF KILIMANJARO!!! THAT'S SOME MAGIC LEVITATION!! If the observer was at half the height of Pic de Finestrelles which is roughly 5,000 ft. Pic Gaspard would be 23,725.2110 ft BELOW HORIZON. SO AGAIN anywhere between 16,446.3562 FT to 23,725.2110 ft SHOULD BE HIDDEN FROM SIGHT. 16,446.3562 - 12,730 (Pic Gaspard elevation) = 3,716.3562 FT 23,725.2110 - 12,730 (Pic Gaspard elevation) = 10,995.211 FT THE TOP OF Pic Gaspard Peak should be ANYWHERE BETWEEN 3,716.3562 FT TO 10,995.211 FT BELOW HORIZON. THE ENTIRE MOUNTAIN SHOULD BE ANYWHERE BETWEEN 3.101 TO 4.501 MILES BELOW THE HORIZON!
    1
  881. 1
  882. 1
  883. 1
  884. 1
  885.  @chris8967  = my personal DUMBO Hahaha the fact that this idiot thinks dhe can determine the geometry of the object she stands on by looking at lights in the sky ... Proves her stupidity. Everything that you think you know about the sky above is based on theology. The idea that any light in the sky is an actual physical object is based on hypothesis and theoretical science. Non of which can be proven. Theories do not = proof or facts The World Record For Long Distance Photography (a 275 mile observation from a 9,272 ft peak (Pic de Finestrelles) to a 12,730 ft peak (Pic Gaspard) over water that should be anywhere from 16,502 ft (3 miles) to 23,275 ft (4 1/2 miles) below horizon based on spherical geometry) has already proven the Earth to be flat. Amateur rockets with a ceiling of 393,700 ft has proven the Earth to be flat. Weather Ballons have a ceiling around 130,000 ft., they also prove the Earth to be FLAT. Commercial airlines fly at only 40,000 ft, they also show the Earth to be flat. Nothing compares to these 3 views all showing the Earth to be flatter than a pancake.  If you want to talk about lights in the sky and think they prove the Earth is a globe. Let's do it. Time lapse Star trail parallax is not observed = galactic theory debunked Polaris never moves = galactic theory and the theory that Earth supposedly moves in four different directions debunked Sun and Moon are EXACTLY THE SAME SIZE. When observed both make circular revolutions above observer. The only thing telling you that the Sun is further away than the Moon is theoretical science. How do you KNOW one is further away than the other? By observation alone and not theology both are = distance from observer. Not to mention EVERYONE on Earth only ever sees ONE FLAT side of the Moon. HOW does this = observation by every person on Earth make the Moon a ball?? It doesn't, only theology can hypothesize that. oh well ... NO CURVE = THEORETICAL RADIUS OF EARTH DEBUNKED = ORBITAL SCIENCE DEBUNKED = NO THEORETICAL MAGICAL LEVITATING SPINNING BALL = GLOBE MODEL/MAP DEBUNKED = SPACE DEBUNKED = FLAT EARTH
    1
  886. 1
  887. 1
  888. 1
  889. 1
  890. 1
  891. 1
  892. 1
  893. 1
  894.  @1747carling  Hahaha the fact that this DODO thinks he can determine the geometry of the object he stands on by looking at lights in the sky ... Proves his IGNORANCE. Everything that you think you know about the sky above is based on theology. The idea that any light in the sky is an actual physical object is based on hypothesis and theoretical science. Non of which can be proven. Theories do not = proof or facts The World Record For Long Distance Photography (a 275 mile observation from a 9,272 ft peak (Pic de Finestrelles) to a 12,730 ft peak (Pic Gaspard) over water that should be anywhere from 16,502 ft (3 miles) to 23,275 ft (4 1/2 miles) below horizon based on spherical geometry) has already proven the Earth to be flat. Amateur rockets with a ceiling of 393,700 ft has proven the Earth to be flat. Weather Ballons have a ceiling around 130,000 ft., they also prove the Earth to be FLAT. Commercial airlines fly at only 40,000 ft, they also show the Earth to be flat. Nothing compares to these 3 views all showing the Earth to be flatter than a pancake.  If you want to talk about lights in the sky and think they prove the Earth is a globe. Let's do it. Time lapse Star trail parallax is not observed = galactic theory debunked Polaris never moves = galactic theory and the theory that Earth supposedly moves in four different directions debunked Sun and Moon are EXACTLY THE SAME SIZE. When observed both make circular revolutions above observer. The only thing telling you that the Sun is further away than the Moon is theoretical science. How do you KNOW one is further away than the other? By observation alone and not theology both are = distance from observer. Not to mention EVERYONE on Earth only ever sees ONE FLAT side of the Moon. HOW does this = observation by every person on Earth make the Moon a ball?? It doesn't, only theology can hypothesize that. oh well ... NO CURVE = THEORETICAL RADIUS OF EARTH DEBUNKED = ORBITAL SCIENCE DEBUNKED = NO THEORETICAL MAGICAL LEVITATING SPINNING BALL = GLOBE MODEL/MAP DEBUNKED = SPACE DEBUNKED = FLAT EARTH
    1
  895. 1
  896. 1
  897. 1
  898.  @1747carling  GPS does NOT = SATELLITES in SPACE GPS = INTERNET SATELLITES in THEORETICAL SPACE DON'T EXIST and they are DEFINITELY NOT NEEDED!!! HERE'S WHY ... 1. What is something most people don’t know about undersea cables? Most people probably don’t know that 99 percent of all transoceanic data traffic goes through undersea cables, and that includes Internet usage, phone calls and text messages. This route is also faster than satellite transmissions, by up to eight-fold. 2. More than half of the world's population is still without Internet access!!! (PROOF SATELLITES DON'T EXIST) Project Loon is a network of BALLONS traveling on the edge of space, designed to extend Internet connectivity to people in rural and remote areas worldwide. FLIGHT We aim to launch and maintain a fleet of balloons to provide Internet coverage to users on the ground, with our Autolaunchers capable of safely and consistently launching a new balloon every 30 minutes. We have flown over 25 million km of test flights to date since the project began - with one of our record-breaking balloons surviving for 190 days aloft in the stratosphere. CONNECTION High speed internet is transmitted up to the nearest balloon from our telecommunications partner on the ground, relayed across the balloon network, and then back down to users on the ground. We have demonstrated data transmission between balloons over 100 km apart in the stratosphere and back down to people on the ground with connection speeds of up to 10 Mbps, directly to their LTE phones. 3. LORAN has ALWAYS BEEN IN USE. Started development in 1940!!! MINIMUM Range of up to 1,500 miles (2,400 km)!!!! eLoran is the longstanding and proven series of low-frequency, LOng-RAnge Navigation (LORAN) systems, one that takes full advantage of 21st-century technology. It meets the accuracy, availability, integrity and continuity performance requirements for maritime harbor entrance and approach maneuvers, aviation non-precision instrument approaches, land-mobile vehicle navigation and location-based services. It’s a precise source of time (phase) and frequency. Additionally, eLoran provides user bearing (azimuth) and has built-in integrity. In full disclosure, however, eLoran is only a 2D positioning solution unless integrated with a simple altimeter. eLoran is a low-frequency radionavigation system that operates in the frequency band of 90 to 110 kHz. eLoran is built on internationally standardized Loran-C, and provides a high-power PNT service for use by all modes of transport and in other applications. eLoran is an independent dissimilar complement to GNSS. It allows GNSS users to retain the safety, security and economic benefits of GNSS even when their satellite services are disrupted. eLoran uses pulsed signals at a center frequency of 100 kHz. The pulses are designed to allow receivers to distinguish between the groundwave and skywave components in the received composite signal. This way, the eLoran signals can be used over very long ranges without fading or uncertainty in the time-of-arrival (TOA) measurement related to skywaves. Although eLoran is based upon Loran-C, it has key differences: All transmissions are synchronized to UTC (like GPS)Time-of-transmission controlThe ability to use differential corrections (similar to DGPS)Receivers use “all-in-view” signalsIncludes one or more Loran data channels that provide: Low-rate data messaging, added integrity, differential corrections (dLoran and/or DGPS) and other communications including navigation messages. GPS has been called “a single point of failure” for much of the U.S. economy and critical infrastructure. Nine nations are operating Loran-C or eLoran stations, including Russia and China. It is our understanding that the Republic of Korea, India and the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia are pursuing the installation of eLoran technology or upgrading their Loran-C technology to eLoran.
    1
  899.  @1747carling  tracked a balloon in the sky. 4. An atmospheric satellite (United States usage, abbreviated atmosat) or pseudo-satellite (British usage) is an aircraft that operates in the atmosphere at high altitudes for extended periods of time, in order to provide services conventionally provided by an artificial satellite orbiting in space. Atmospheric satellites remain aloft through atmospheric lift, either aerostatic (e.g., balloons) or aerodynamic (e.g., airplanes). To date, all atmosats have been unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs). Operating altitudes are expected to be in the tropopause—at approximately 65,000 feet—where winds are generally less than 5 knots and clouds do not block sunlight.[2] It is desirable in the United States to operate above 60,000 feet, above which the Federal Aviation Administration does not regulate the airspace. To enable night time operation and ensure endurance through consecutive 24-hour day/night cycles, in daylight hours solar panels charge batteries[2] or fuel cells[4] which subsequently power the vehicle during hours of darkness. An atmospheric satellite may initially ascend at night under battery power, and reach altitude soon after dawn to allow solar panels to take advantage of a full day's sunlight. 5. Geostationary balloon satellites (GBS) are atmosphere analogues to satellites that float in the stratosphere (60,000 to 70,000 feet (18 to 21 km) above sea level) at a fixed point over the Earth's surface. At that altitude, air density is 1/10 of what it is at sea level. The average wind speed at these levels is less than that at the surface.[citation needed] A propulsion system would allow the balloon to move into and maintain its position. The GBS would be powered with solar panels en route to its location and then receive laser power from a cell tower it hovers over. A GBS could be used to provide broadband Internet access over a large area. Laser broadband would connect the GBS to the network, which could then provide a large area of coverage because of its wider line of sight over the curvature of the Earth and unimpeded Fresnel zone. BAHAHA KEEP RESPONDING YOUR STUPIDITY IS HILARIOUS!!
    1
  900. 1
  901. 1
  902. 1
  903. 1
  904. 1
  905. 1
  906. 1
  907. 1
  908. 1
  909. 1
  910. 1
  911. 1
  912. 1
  913. 1
  914. 1
  915. 1
  916. 1
  917. 1
  918. 1
  919. 1
  920. 1
  921. 1
  922. 1
  923. 1
  924. 1
  925. 1
  926. 1
  927. 1
  928. 1
  929. 1
  930. 1
  931. 1
  932. 1