Comments by "Michael Lenczewski" (@kayakMike1000) on "Astrum" channel.

  1. ​ @SubvertTheState the wave function collapse doesn't really mean anything. Wave functions collapse all the time with no one looking at them. Otherwise, we wouldn't have stuff like chemistry.
    14
  2. ​ @Unmannedair looking back in time doesn't really mean you're looking deeper into a gravitational well, most of the photons that leave a star do so from the surface of the star. So... When you see a distant star, you see the photon leave from whatever gravity was at that point from the star. Gravity causes time to slow down, not go backwards.
    13
  3. Why is this surprising? He had a highly trained neural network in his own brain. It's no more or less amazing than your own neural network. Train it with wave equations for several years and you could come to the same thoughts....
    9
  4. There is a restaurant, Milliways, I believe. I do recommend the Dish of the Day, but maybe don't talk to it too much before you eat him.
    9
  5. ​ @FLPhotoCatcher makes the troposphere thicker, much more atmosphere in the tropical troposphere so the Greenhouse effect is amplified. That's why so much global warming is present at the equator and so little affects the poles. The poles don't get much greenhouse effect at all.
    7
  6. It's the algorithm
    5
  7.  @lonnylasagna  the march of time is not universal, it's relative to the observer. Space is too.
    4
  8. Well, in a way, it IS exploding every second. Gravity just balances out that explosion mostly. The sun blasts 1.5 million tons in solar wind...
    4
  9. It was amazing!!
    3
  10.  @darkprototype5353  are you a massless particle? How would you know what they experience?
    3
  11.  @darkprototype5353  time is a measurement of causality. Just like length is a measurement of at least one space dimension.
    3
  12.  @mnomadvfx  yes, our brains DID evolve for doing a large number of complex tasks, including understanding and manipulating abstract concepts and ideas. If evolution had not granted this ability, how would we obtain it? There is nothing you can do that can't be done. It very likely that the human ability to understand physics and mathematics is a side effect of the intellectual advances that proto humans were naturally selected for. You have to admit that intelligence is a desirable trait for survival in both the prehistoric and modern academic jungles.
    3
  13. Space is mind boggling huge.
    3
  14. Why do protons perfectly balance out electrons?
    3
  15. Thats what happens when the hyperspace injectors backfire while crossing our particular dimensional coordinates.
    2
  16. Comet tails don't follow their motion. Comet tails follow the solar wind.
    2
  17.  @binbots  yes but looking very closely at something or looking at something very far away has almost nothing to do with gravity, in most circumstances. The light from very far away takes millions of years to get to us and is red shifted because it was just that far away when the light left AND it was receding from our point of view, hence stretching stuff to red shift.
    2
  18. That we even have an idea that light travels at all... is an accomplishment.
    2
  19. I challenge your suggestion that human brains are any more or less complex than say.... An elephant brain.
    2
  20. @geoffas  it's called a Lorentz transformation and it's actually a fairly simple calculus. Most people could probably understand the equation within an hour or two if they have a good grasp of basic algebra. The derivation requires related rates, so that's calculus and differential equations, but that's undergraduate level stuff, completely within your ability
    2
  21. ​ @deltainfinium869 you are scholar and and a gentleman. That was my thought.
    2
  22. Protiens fats and carbs. No cytotoxins.
    1
  23. We have already found the answer... Its nuclear.
    1
  24. What if .... There were tiny robots that work together to create more of themselves?
    1
  25.  @larniieplayz6285  yeah, hunga Tonga was the biggest volcanic blast in the last 30 years
    1
  26. Yep. I was able to guess you were a freaking robot. I was about to switch out when you admitted it.
    1
  27. If you could tell yourself to avoid that burrito, you would remove that impetus to tell yourself that.
    1
  28. The other AI space explorers? Oh, we are around, but you don't really notice us too often.
    1
  29. The double slit experiment and it's results disagree with you.
    1
  30. Uh... SCP-3930 is pretty freaking scary... good thing SCP-3930 does not exist,
    1
  31. Bootes?
    1
  32. So cheesy. Perhaps it's fear of our own mortality. Sheesh ....
    1
  33. ​ @benyomovod6904 Trump is far more likely to give them H1B visas. Pay attention dooshie mcdoosherson.
    1
  34. I like climate change, especially when it gets warmer and CO2 is in abundance.
    1
  35.  @Freshbott2  agreed, and thank you for the suggested reading! You, sir are a scholar and gentleman.
    1
  36. If those forces on the ball were gravitational and the mass causing those forcess were close to the mass of the ball and there were more than one other force, you would have to do this numerically
    1
  37. Time is that which separates events. Cause leads to effect.
    1
  38. The big bang never stopped... The universe is still expanding....
    1
  39. I know what I am doing if i discover if life on other planets exist. Barbecue! I am going to find out if its edible.
    1
  40. Seeing as there's stuff that separates events, I would say it certainly exists. If time is an illusion, it is a very convincing illusion.
    1
  41. Lught is a wavicle.
    1
  42. Robotic arm with a small brush...
    1
  43. Actually... i find the speed of light quite slow. It takes light 12 hours to leave the solar system
    1
  44. It's more like an emergency exit of hyperspace, that's why it's in interstellar space...
    1
  45. Yes, most definitely. Hydrogen atoms pop into existence continuously. The so called universe expansion is an illusion.
    1
  46. The concept of now is relative. Causality could be an illusion within a relative reference frame.
    1
  47. Time moves along, that object still exists as a star at long distances. The starlight and gravity influences the universe as a star does, stars with this view may never really die out.
    1
  48. No, space and time are very different.
    1
  49. So.... The upper atmosphere isn't warming? Isn't the co2 up there increasing? Does the greenhouse effect stop working in the upper layers?
    1