Comments by "Michael Lenczewski" (@kayakMike1000) on "ReasonTV" channel.

  1. Ha ha ha 😂 so True!
    17
  2. I dare you to convince anyone that those photos were not part if the setup.
    15
  3. Freedom of speech. It's his right. It's inalienable, no permit required. If you don't like it, tough cookies.
    14
  4. It's because the problem isn't really a problem, nor is it under humanities control.
    10
  5. ​ @kapildhingra20  he never really had much credibility. Always struck me as the "I am so smart because I am an Atheist and people who believe in God are stupid" dooshbag.
    8
  6. It's a fate worse than death.
    7
  7. People in favor of the AGW hypothesis can only use anecdotal evidence because actual scientific evidence doesn't really exist.
    6
  8. Lizzad people live a long time.
    5
  9. I disagree. It seems to me that Billie was watching porn that she found arousing, not because her guy friends liked it.
    5
  10. My, my... Liz Wolfe is very lovely young lady. If my daughter turns out only half as well spoken as she, I will be a proud father.
    5
  11.  @pm71241  scientists that are saying anything to be concerned about are saying what they need to to win grant money from governments. There is no consensus, whatever warming we are seeing is likely due to solar forcing and NOAA and NASA adjusting data.
    5
  12. Bitcoin isn't perfect. For example, the ledger is public knowledge, so all money can be tracked anywhere. You're giving up all privacy, which is a major limitation on freedom.
    5
  13.  @pm71241  dude, it's not a conspiracy theory. I think it's funny when facts that are inconvenient, someone is going to claim conspiracy theory. Ironically, sometimes conspiracy theories are true. Lightbulbs burn out because the lightbulb companies conspired to make them this way. The USA went to war with Iraq based on a conspiracy lie about WMDs... And honestly what I am talking about is barely a conspiracy; it's scientific bias that is created by the system probably accidentally. Look, the pressure for scientists to get their papers published is immense. If you're a post doc at a university hoping for tenure, your job depends on getting published. Researching things that people disagree with is a perfect recipe to get your paper rejected. Also, research costs money, and scientists compete for government grant money. If you figure out how to claim that you're researching a serious existential threat, you're way more likely to win that grant. These are all FACTS. You can put them together into whatever theory you want, and make you own conclusions. When climate scientists start making accurate predictions, I will accept that they are right. They do not make accurate predictions... it's post 2020 and the great lakes have not dried out, nor has Manhattan been permanently flooded, the Maldives are doing fine. Ice in Greenland is melting from volcanic activity under the glacier and you just believe shit people tell you because you're a sheep person.
    4
  14.  @pm71241  it's ok. your time isn't valuable because you lost the argument. Strawmen and Ad Hominem are all you got. I am glad I am not you.
    4
  15. I challenge the idea that equality in the distribution of wealth is a remotely desirable goal. I am not the smartest guy in the room, but by no means am I stupid. There, I acknowledge a disparity in intelligence, some people just have more of it than me. I can still work as a senior firmware engineer, so there's a good chance I make more wealth than a garbage man, though I could probably do that job too.
    3
  16.  @pm71241  There was lots of concern of cold climate turn in the 70s because of a few years of tough winters with lots of snow. It may yet happen.
    3
  17.  @Peppersauce84  hmmm... That's a good way of looking at it. You are a scholar and a gentleman, Jason! I hope my description of the current state of research and academia is something we can address, there is a real problem with scientific incentives.
    3
  18.  @Globovoyeur  Michael Mann attempted to get a paper by Willie Soon blocked for publishing because of a copyright dispute. Climate scientists are known for not sharing their source data or describing methodology very well.
    3
  19. Pretty sure you can defeat any ancient fundamentalism with western 3rd grade common knowledge and common sense.
    3
  20. Sam Harris suffers from the Duning-Kruger effect. I wouldn't say he is a complete moron, maybe harris has somewhat average intelligence, but ego is off the scale.
    2
  21. Yup.
    2
  22. We waste around 40% of what we produce. We can just get more efficient at distributing food, we should be ok for a lot longer than not.
    2
  23.  @lukegibson9410  it's part of the woketard agenda.
    2
  24. The warming is actually within a zone of human bias. The problem is... The hypothesis that CO2 and methane are driving a catastrophic increase in temperature is seriously flawed. We have modeled the atmosphere in giant supercomputers and the results were too warm in the wrong places. The equator should be warming much faster than polar regions, yet the polar regions are apparently warming ten times faster than anywhere else. Furthermore GHG increases in the upper atmosphere aren't warming. The models predicted the upper atmosphere to warm up, but this has not been observed.
    2
  25. ​ @Goblinforge  well, freedom of speech, but there is nuance. Goebbels may have attempted to incite violence.
    2
  26.  @Globovoyeur  Most published stuff is a bunch of malarkey. Just read the damn papers, most of them are complete bullshit. ClimateGate was actually a thing. If you fudge some numbers with a bit of bias and forget some other data and compare a few apples to oranges, you can get "science" to say anything. Just take a look at Tony Heller's channel, he pulls apart the climate science quite well. Pretty great engineer.
    2
  27.  @Globovoyeur  science proceeds with a particular method, last I checked no apple arts were involved. I think the peer review mechanism is currently broken, we have a reproducibility crisis in some fields, fee scientists dare challenge the opinions of the seniors b/c they want tenure. I have seen the wack bullshit in academia, it's cutthroat. Now go along and play, child, the grownups know that scientists are people and can be bought for the right price. The powers that be want climate lockdowns...
    2
  28.  @dannygreen7473  indeed. You are a scholar and a gentleman, good sir. Glad to hear informed people, though few and far between, are out there!
    2
  29. I am kinda skeptical of schemer because well... i really want aliens ro be a thing.
    2
  30. Unlikely. Decentralized global software network is vulnerable to nuclear bombs, solar flares. It's pretty easy to figure out who's mining Bitcoin by looking at power usage and infrared. That tech already exists to bust grow operations, so Bitcoin can and will be regulated by government.
    2
  31. Tattoos are away to stake a claim on yourself? What? Why would you feel that you need to claim yourself?
    2
  32. isn't the IPCC the one that published bullshit ClimateGate info?
    2
  33.  Frank Smith  it was cherry picked data used to illustrate a false narrative at the cost of intellectual honesty. Evidence suggests that Dr. Mann is a dishonest quack scientist and not to be trusted.
    2
  34. Penn changed.
    2
  35. Democratization if tattooing? What? It has never been an unavailable service, except during the lockdowns? Maybe a bit taboo, but sheesh... Don't fuck with me Ethos? What? You children cry like babies at the smallest insult, you are extremely easy to fuck with. Gen X hurts your fffeeeeellllings just by existing. Get bent, child.
    1
  36. Bees and insects are likely struggling because humans are using too much insecticide and growing monocultures.
    1
  37. Yup, it's been solved. Fungicides kill beneficial microbes that make the bees larva grow up weakly and sick, even if they survive...
    1
  38. The first people to suggest population control are the last to volunteer for it.
    1
  39. Thats still kinda gross.
    1
  40. So ... How do you KNOW ufos aren't blurry. If UFOs are using some crazy space warp stuff, that could make 'em blurry.
    1
  41. You cannot sell a product for more tyan people are willing to pay.
    1
  42. It's a brain scramble, neuron firing patterns are just crazy. It's a huge reset button for your neural network.
    1
  43. I think he fired so many useless people from government jobs, so many people were then without much money. Scarcity of the money...
    1
  44. Any speech is hate speech.
    1
  45. When was Sam Harris allowed to convict Trump of corruption with out a judge and jury? He stated Trump as guilty factually before bearing the burden of proof of corruption. Its really un-American to assume guilt before innocence. There's so much evidence of Biden corruption, but until biden has his day in court, we assume innocence. How Biden is avoiding court is still a mystery to me.
    1
  46. Urban heat island effect is well known, but not caused by anthropogenic CO2.
    1
  47. No. Woke isn't dead at all. Hell the KKK and Nazis still exist. Woke will still exist for a long time
    1
  48. The left is programmed to disagree with whatever ideas the right has, no matter how irrational.
    1
  49. Well... Some toxins are far more potent than others, but they're all still poisons...
    1
  50.  @Kazekoge101  no I did not
    1