Comments by "Michael Lenczewski" (@kayakMike1000) on "Jordan B Peterson" channel.

  1. Well done. You are a scholar and a gentleman. You are more moral than most.
    13
  2. I ❤️ Thomas Sowell!
    9
  3. You, good sir, are a scholar and a gentleman. I am twice your age and think the same as you. Wish I would have had a Dr. Peterson 22 years ago!
    7
  4. Humm. Seems like I wasn't meant for the factory.
    4
  5. ​ @ColtrazPlays  these ideas of maximizing the terms of trade made no sense. Get more for what you buy, and that's the whole game? What game is he playing? How about we maximize that by just taking everything and leaving Canada a solitary farthing. Why? Because we have a military and Canada doesn't
    4
  6. Illegal? What laws are being broken? Unkind? Really, he is just looking to get reciprocal tarrifs.
    3
  7. You are worth quite a lot. We think you would make great Americans. We see you as peers, as brothers. We would certainly value you more than the chuckleheads in your parliament...
    3
  8. I dunno man, pretty sure CO2 MIGHT be a good thing. Think about this idea, life is carbon based, and life in the biosphere has a certain carbon budget that cycles through many different forms. More carbon in the carbon cycle makes a bigger budget for life in general. And warmth, well, life likes it warm. The warmer wet places on earth have huge amounts of biodiversity
    3
  9. Though I agree with you, the cabal of elites that "protected democracy" is real... i still think Jordan Peterson actually IS the red pill for many people.
    2
  10. You know... Chomsky really had a really awful position opinion on people infected by covid or maybe it was people who weren't comfortable with the mRNA vaccine technology... Something about imprisoning these people and then letting them starve. Chomsky may be a genius, but wow, his opinion on that really made me want to vomit.
    2
  11. Nuclear fusion reactor at over unity in my garage.
    2
  12. Canada used to be free, what happened?
    2
  13. ​ @thecommonword6996  people with bad ideas usually do. They seem like good ideas untill you say then out loud...
    2
  14. ​ @leapinglizardking  well, sure you can have lots of evidence in favor of a particular hypothesis, but it really depends on the method in which the data was collected. For example, if you gather temperature data from weather stations from large asphalt airports, you might run a little hot. Sadly, methods on data or evidence gathering are not always shared openly or transparently, manipulated data finds its way into the so-called evidence. Climategate was an example of generating so called "evidence" with the hockey stick graphs, there was blatant bias to discount any hypothesis other than GHG.
    2
  15.  @pablorages1241  could just be trying to be careful. There could be a lot of work to do that you can't do while chained up in the gulag... or get drone striked.
    2
  16.  @jakethesnakestoner  honestly, i think the climate alarmism might be a pathogenic idea, nearly polar opposite from your idea. I think that might be WHY Peterson was originally questioning the biological analogy. He wanted to prevent opposing ideas from calling eachothers ideas parasitic rather than debate the merits. Though we may disagree, i hope we might find common ground that gigatons of co2 in the atmosphere isn't a great idea and we could build LFTR reactors with not so much R and D.
    2
  17. Yellow cake is a fairly typical uranium oxide that is solid and pounded into a fine powder. It looks pretty much like betty crockor yellow cake mix...
    1
  18. Um... The state of western civilization seems like the rat utopia experiments in the 1960's....
    1
  19. Climate alarmism is quite a significant idea pathogen.
    1
  20. The yellow cake is turned into uranium hexaflouride, which is a remarkably heavy gas. Thats what is centrifuged to enrich the uranium to have a high percentage of U239.
    1
  21. The internet's Dad.
    1
  22. Are we all screaming... If you're not with us you're against us!
    1
  23. Who cares if these two are a man and a woman. It's completely orthogonal to the conversation.
    1
  24. ​ @garysarela4431  sure, there's grant money that funds scientists. Turns out there are political movements that want to control the energy sector, so they hired a bunch of scientists to say we're doomed.
    1
  25. ​ @alexjackson9997  what are they denying? Peterson explains his idea, asks questions and the climate scientist comments and corrects him.
    1
  26. ​ @alexjackson9997  you're not paying attention. No one is arguing that humans aren't changing the climate; this much should be obvious. They are pretty much asking the questions, is it really THAT bad? Can we do anything about this?
    1
  27. There is evidence of all those things... there were many bellwethers in the election that went to Trump. Most of the rulings against Trump were dismissed on procedural grounds. Then there was the interference from big tech... And the recent Time magazine article about a secret cabal of elites... it seems more plausible that Trump really did win.
    1
  28. Get to work, child.
    1
  29. ​ @n0odles86  my house is fairly organized, but my mind is still a mess.
    1
  30. You criticized Michael Mann and got labeled a denier. I wonder how many hockey sticks Michael Mann has gotten in the mail.
    1
  31. No. Pretty sure we have outlawed lobotomies and electroshock treatments. They're bad science.
    1
  32. Quit worrying so much.
    1
  33. I wonder what he thinks of Chomsky
    1
  34. ​ @leapinglizardking  tropical troposphere has air that is too cold. Models were running too hot. The Arctic is heating faster than the equator, this doesn't fit any of the models. Leading climate scientists made several bad predictions that never came true. Now there's just so many different predictions, one is likely to be correct, and then they say we knew it all along. Dr. John Christy measured the change in temperature to be between 1.0 to 1.5 degrees Celsius since the begining of the industrial revolution. He made the claim at a Congressional hearing that this is within normal fluctuations. You're not finding contrarian articles very often because climate scientists who say these things usually loose their job. They are hired to find a catastrophe with grant money.
    1
  35. ​ @ajayrife  there are several mentions about highly debated ideas, like cloud modeling as a positive or negative feedback.
    1
  36. ​ @leapinglizardking  watch a few videos on the Climate Discussion Network.
    1
  37. Political correctness is progress to 1984's newspeak.
    1
  38. Depression is an insidious downward spiral, I would NOT wish it on my worst enemy. I had some minor chronic depression, some seasonal affective disorder, so I have an idea of where your at, but I never suffered greatly. I know for me trying to get out of it felt like I was swimming up stream, it can be tiring. Just pick one thing you can do that you know helps... Make a nutritious salad, go get some exercise, try some vitamin D or fish oil supplements whatever you can manage. You can talk about it, you acknowledge the malady and your finding things that cheer you up and you have gratitude. You're going to be ok, sooner or later. You have all the skills to beat depression, as far as I can see.
    1
  39. I have heard the models are not okay. They predict too much warming and most of them fully malfunction at higher levels of the troposphere. There are models that predict stratospheric cooling, which is what's observed.
    1