Comments by "Michael Lenczewski" (@kayakMike1000) on "ThePrint" channel.

  1. 4
  2. 3
  3. 2
  4. 1
  5. 1
  6. 1
  7. 1
  8. 1
  9. 1
  10. 1
  11. 1
  12. 1
  13.  @NewPipeFTW  you could just link the article. Besides, I AM a qualified researcher. I get paid to do research and development. Sea water is not blood. Your blood doesn't have a huge reserve of calcium carbonate rubble swirling around it... This would tend to buffer any change in pH. This is why the ocean remains ALKALINE at 8.1 pH despite being at the bottom of a my mostly nitrogen atmosphere. So this acidosis idea is completely stupid. At worst, ocean becomes slightly LESS alkaline, but never becomes acidic. Next this ocean acidification has a few serious problems... The carbon dioxide concentration increases in the water, a tiny portion of this becomes carbonic acid and reduces the pH of the ocean. But now, that CO2 is not in the air to actually CAUSE the temperature to increase. Furthermore, warmer temperatures of the Earth's surface means that the oceans will be warmer and able to dissolve less CO2, the ocean tends to become an emitter of CO2. If you look at the CO2 graph, you'll see it's got a cyclical component to it... There is much CO2 dissolved in seawater from geothermal vents, some geologists have hypothesized that some of the recent CO2 increases could be from undersea geothermal vents and ocean out gassing. What observations were made to support their conclusions? There is no data, just people saying some dumb shit and you claiming it's from a qualified source. This is not science. You need to discuss your hypothesis, a method for testing your hypothesis, data from your experiment, and see if your hypothesis is valid.
    1
  14. 1