Comments by "John Pliskin" (@johnpliskin8759) on "Tim Pool Tells Twitter Exec They Have a Liberal Bias | JRE Twitter Special" video.

  1. so how do you explain liberals getting banned, are those accidents? even if this were true, twitter has no reason to even defend these accusations, if a baker can refuse service based on faith, twitter can refuse service based on politics, the double standard is so obvious here on the part of conservatives, come back when you count health care as a right then we can talk about a social media platform's obligation to the first amendment
    4
  2. tim has an agenda as well, don't be fooled
    3
  3. even if this were true, twitter has no reason to even defend these accusations, if a baker can refuse service based on faith, twitter can refuse service based on politics, the double standard is so obvious here on the part of conservatives, come back when you count health care as a right then we can talk about a social media platform's obligation to the first amendment
    3
  4. even if this were true, twitter has no reason to even defend these accusations, if a baker can refuse service based on faith, twitter can refuse service based on politics, the double standard is so obvious here on the part of conservatives, come back when you count health care as a right then we can talk about a social media platform's obligation to the first amendment
    3
  5. who do you think 'they' is?
    3
  6. even if this were true, twitter has no reason to even defend these accusations, if a baker can refuse service based on faith, twitter can refuse service based on politics, the double standard is so obvious here on the part of conservatives, come back when you count health care as a right then we can talk about a social media platform's obligation to the first amendment
    3
  7. even if this were true, twitter has no reason to even defend these accusations, if a baker can refuse service based on faith, twitter can refuse service based on politics, the double standard is so obvious here on the part of conservatives, come back when you count health care as a right then we can talk about a social media platform's obligation to the first amendment
    2
  8. even if this were true, twitter has no reason to even defend these accusations, if a baker can refuse service based on faith, twitter can refuse service based on politics, the double standard is so obvious here on the part of conservatives, come back when you count health care as a right then we can talk about a social media platform's obligation to the first amendment
    1
  9.  @DudeImWayBetter  even if this were true, twitter has no reason to even defend these accusations, if a baker can refuse service based on faith, twitter can refuse service based on politics, the double standard is so obvious here on the part of conservatives, come back when you count health care as a right then we can talk about a social media platform's obligation to the first amendment
    1
  10. i mean, so what?
    1
  11. question: why does it matter whether a company has a bias or not? chik-fil-a has a conservative christian bias, fox news has a conservative bias, cnn has a centrist capitalist bias, why can't twitter have a liberal bias? twitter is not a right you guys want twitter for all but health care and college only for the rich?
    1
  12. why? why does twitter have to be unbiased but chik-fil-a and the Christian baker are just exercising their freedom for having anti-gay bias? whiny bitches
    1
  13. i mean, i don't see protesters on the left telling people they will burn in hell for all eternity because they are attracted to a legally consenting adult that they think that person shouldn't be attracted to
    1