Comments by "Rune of Svalbard" (@vladimirofsvalbard9477) on "Alliance for Responsible Citizenship" channel.

31 here with a 2 year old son; I fully agree. Raising a family is certainly hard, but on a different level it seems equally hard to give them the childhood that we had growing up. Families are drastically shrinking; friend groups are shrinking. It's all about life-stage and the largest demographic will soon be (middle aged, unmarried, no kids). In my opinion, we have to do something different going forward. The environment of the 90s and 2000s doesn't exist anymore. I've never found the money part to be hard, but the social/community part seems impossible anymore.
24
Well, it's because women (statistically) date men that can provide for them. Meaning they date (across and up) in regards to income. The average female income is higher than the average male income, which means that a large majority of women are dating pools of men that are the same or below their income levels. So naturally, the women get picky and can't find a viable partner based on those survival instincts.
6
@morgainenyc I think you should blame government intervention in creating massive bastions of big business and propaganda. Not an economic medium of exchange.
4
Well, you're falsely associating affluence with not wanting to support children. Women going into college are much less likely to have children before they've even started. It's because they are more likely to be on birth control AND they are going to avoid serious relationships during a considerable amount of their fertile years. Once a woman hits 25-28; her prospects of a successful marriage go down significantly. After 30, it's near impossible. Historically, this is why women were married off young. You may be an A+, but women only date their own age and higher on a societal scale. Meaning that their selection-pool of men is C+ at best by the time they're 25-28.
2
@AseRa444 Not taking on a mortgage worth of student loan debt for starters.
2
Well, it will eventually; whether people like it or not. Educating women basically starves their fertile years. In doing so, you create a population implosion. The education of women has created a phenomenon where the average woman is making more than the average man. So naturally, women will find it harder to date since they typically strive for partners that have higher incomes (survival instincts). As the dating pools implode, more men end up at the bottom and more women stack up alone in the middle. All the while there is a super-class of minority males mating with a super-minority of the females and subduing the men. This is mother-natures fail safe. Eventually, those women will die out and the low-status males will breed generations of lower class slaves. Leading to the inevitable outcome that a patriarchy will rule again. Who would have thought that (women not having kids after spending all their time in college and work) would not be sustainable? lol
1
@VincitOmniaVeritas7 Well, an inversion of the pyramid means that all social nets and investments will reverse. Either that or hyperinflation is inevitable.
1